Who Is Wrong And Who Is Right?

   Why should we always judge the other woman? Yes, she is involved in something very low, such as infidelity, but she is not obliged to keep the relationship, but her husband. This is an act of a coward, and once you let it happen, she will not stop cheating. To me, this woman is too complex to still be with her husband. To judge both, because it would be very funny to judge only the woman, but not the man who is really the man next to her.

   It smells of a poorly concocted oriental plot with the insertion of modern technology. Something like a donkey and Hubble.

   You're the mistress, aren't you? You cannot condemn anyone for slander in this way. Don't bother and back off, obviously neither of them is right with your head.

   Because my ex did the same tricks, infidelities, hooting, etc. with a clear conscience I can say - the woman is guilty of enduring all this, that he also deals with his lovers !! ?? Abe beats her jester for exposing herself to other women. Her husband makes her a fool, shit everywhere, she will wipe him, why ??? It is stupid and pointless.

   Number 3 no, I'm not the mistress, everyone knows me and they know each other from the same place we are. I found out about the incident from the mistress herself, she and I are colleagues. I noticed that something was bothering her and I talked to her and she told me, I advised her not to film, not to care what someone's wife thinks, and most importantly to open her eyes and realize that the man himself he is not a man but a complex and costs nothing. She told me she didn't care, but why her mother had to get involved was her problem. As for the defamation case, I don't know how far it has come, I will follow what is happening and I will write again.

   Defamation occurs when there is publicity. If the wife has published the insults in question in the State Gazette, then the mistress may feel "slandered." No normal court will go to deal with neighborhood quarrels over the phone. Alpha, w. 30 years

   It is not known who is more guilty than whom. The wife seems to be more impressed by the fact that people know about her husband's antics than by the antics themselves. She began to insult her mistress unnecessarily, and in the end her husband swore allegiance, not the ones he slept with. If we talk about guilt, the mistress is not very innocent, but the bound is the one who cheated and hurt you with his lies. In general, she could have divorced happily long ago and lived her life peacefully with a man who would be faithful to her. She could have acted differently, without making dramas and introducing everyone to her personal problems. She is somewhat to blame for tolerating this behavior and allowing it. His mistress is shameless. He is both guilty and realizes that his wife's reaction is normal, and he decides to sue her for defamation. Why would he sue her? Because he thinks that the wife has no evidence of infidelity. So, she's guilty and she knows it, but since there's no evidence, she can come out innocent and make some money. If we have to think about it, her mistress may have a completely different version of the marriage of those two from the real one. Still, he is guilty of dealing with a committed man and behaving like holy water without drinking when his wife finds out about the infidelity. The husband is a little hat on a stick. He takes care of the family's expenses, satisfies their material needs and decides that by the time his duties are over and he can live. Good, but he could have divorced happily and blown it where his eyes could see without hurting anyone. Plus he was already caught in infidelity, he could at least try to be more discreet. Not that infidelity apologizes like that, but it's only logical to be careful, when you break your promises. Otherwise, if the man was standing on his family's ass and didn't have numerous outings, this story wouldn't exist at all. He may be provoked by something, but I doubt it, because there were ways to deal with the problems in his marriage instead of cheating. The other thing was, if he had been smart enough to cover his tracks, no one would have known about his antics at all, and things would be different now. Maybe he's the lead in this story, and most of his fault is entirely his. if he had been smart enough to cover his tracks, no one would have known about his antics at all, and things would be different now. Maybe he's the lead in this story, and most of his fault is entirely his. if he had been smart enough to cover his tracks, no one would have known about his antics at all, and things would be different now. Maybe he's the lead in this story, and most of his fault is entirely his.

   It is written "my acquaintances", the plural is what "her" ???

   A typical example of a miserable wife completely dependent on her husband financially and enduring all his asses and adventures. Does it matter who is wrong and who is right?

   this is one of the cases where there are no rights, everyone is mascara :-)) Let's see the facts: The man is a scumbag who fucks whatever he likes, the woman pretends to be blind and distracted, ie there is no self-esteem, and the mistress is she caught up with a married man and became involved in a foreign family, although she understood well what it cost to break up her own. I can't sympathize with any of them, and this with the court is funny :-)