What To Do In This Case

   He has no right to deny you access, you are suing ...

   Amy doesn't matter why she doesn't give it to you. If he threatened / harassed / harassed her, it is normal. There is nothing you can do. The court must determine the regime of personal contacts. Until then, you may not see it. Talk to a lawyer.

   In my opinion, a lawyer is needed to acquaint you with your rights and the possibilities for proceedings that you have. Or, directly, file a complaint with the police that it prevents you from seeing the child. But I guess that's only possible if your son has acknowledged paternity. Good luck

   First in the protection of the child (mental abuse of a child), then the police (complaint of child abduction), If there is no result, the prosecutor's office (filing a complaint) and the initiation of a lawsuit. Rub the nose of the forgotten muffin. These are women, a scourge for men!

   I see, do we? - Madam, your son is already a grown man, and a father. He must decide this issue himself. INDEPENDENTLY! Stop being his gadget.

   So, consult a lawyer and dig into the laws. Unfortunately, I am not very competent on the subject, but my relatives had a very similar problem recently and did so. The mother did not allow the father and his parents to see the children. It turned out that there is a law that states that the mother has no right to "hide" the child from them. There is no marriage in their situation and no custody cases have been filed. In reality, it cannot deprive you of the right to see the child because you are his relatives. You are not a criminal, you are not dangerous, I do not believe that there are circumstances that endanger the health of the child when he is with you. Even if custody cases are pending and the child stays with her, there will still be a scheme in which the father will be able to take the child with him. Then she will have to give it to you on schedule and otherwise, you have rights and you can use them. Investigate the situation itself and talk to competent people, you certainly have the right to see the child and you can look for him.

   №6, did you know that both the child's grandparents have the right to see their grandchildren. They can also sue if they are not allowed contact with their grandchildren. Quite rightly, the author writes in the plural, because the victims of the arbitrariness of the self-forgotten muffin are more than one.

   First, it is right to make it clear in the title what it is about. Second, why on an anonymous site? If it was: How not to visit the child - it is understandable. From the comments so far only number 8 has any real idea. Indeed, grandparents may want to be assigned a visitation regime. But they don't have to get it! My experience is from 20 years ago, but it is unlikely to be much different now. Then and now I see the huge mistake I made. I gave money and I really wanted to see the child! I was suing for parental rights - no chance. I went on TV, there was a show and nothing. For more than a year I went with witnesses to a visit which was denied to me and every two or three times a complaint to the prosecutor's office! Nothing! Then they set up a State Agency for Child Protection and there was nothing they could do. Very "successful" A move on their part was the child's mood against me, just "brainwashing", since even now, when he is an adult, when he sees me, he turns to the other side - it means "very good strategy"! And my "struggle" ended unexpectedly for me - it just stopped my interest or whatever it was and all of a sudden. At least the "pain" stopped. Then I had another child, now there are three without what I do not see. Why "pour" into a bottomless pit? !! By no means do I want to convey that I recommend for the mother to be inactive. But it is very possible that the result is similar. These miscellaneous: Strategies for the child. I don't trust them to have any thoughts about children at all! And I will be very happy not to be right! if even now, when she is an adult, when she sees me, she turns to the other side - it means "a very good strategy"! And my "struggle" ended unexpectedly for me - it just stopped my interest or whatever it was and all of a sudden. At least the "pain" stopped. Then I had another child, now there are three without what I do not see.

Why "pour" into a bottomless pit? !! By no means do I want to convey that I recommend for the mother to be inactive. But it is very possible that the result is similar. These miscellaneous: Strategies for the child. I don't trust them to have any thoughts about children at all! And I will be very happy not to be right! if even now, when she is an adult, when she sees me, she turns to the other side - it means "a very good strategy"! And my "struggle" ended unexpectedly for me - it just stopped my interest or whatever it was and all of a sudden. At least the "pain" stopped. Then I had another child, now there are three without what I do not see. Why "pour" into a bottomless pit? !! By no means do I want to convey that I recommend for the mother to be inactive. But it is very possible that the result is similar. These miscellaneous: Strategies for the child. I don't trust them to have any thoughts about children at all! And I will be very happy not to be right! now there are three without what I don't see. Why "pour" into a bottomless pit? !! By no means do I want to convey that I recommend for the mother to be inactive. But it is very possible that the result is similar. These miscellaneous: Strategies for the child. I don't trust them to have any thoughts about children at all! And I will be very happy not to be right! now there are three without what I don't see. Why "pour" into a bottomless pit? !! By no means do I want to convey that I recommend for the mother to be inactive. But it is very possible that the result is similar. These miscellaneous: Strategies for the child. I don't trust them to have any thoughts about children at all! And I will be very happy not to be right!