Hello! I ask everyone reading this to express their opinion or at least read it. A person is "good" when his environment is of the opposite type of people, because "out of the thorns come roses, out of the roses thorns". When we suffer, we think, when we are faced with trials, we become more tolerant of the "good" way and we receive lessons, when we receive evil, we become inclined to give good, etc. Man is "bad" when his environment is NOT his. presupposed to chances on which to build morality and "human traits". There is no realized opportunity to make sense of all the "values" and to know how to be "good". Everything depends on the environment we are in! Some are lucky to be unhappy, others are not. But are they guilty? For a person to be good, the people around him must be bad and vice versa. If we all found boundaries, then there would simply be no good people! The seven deadly sins are greed, laziness, lust, anger, envy, greed, and pride. We do not realize but more or less allow them systematically. Everything we don't have gives us things that few have. But should we all be "losers" in the eyes of others? If you are white, you are black on Earth, if you are black here you are white? !! There are many people who think they are good, but they are not. The human mind has no limits and possibilities and there may be people who do not think evil of someone, but they also commit daily small sins. Everything given on Earth can produce sin depending on its use. Everything we are given is evil. Beauty leads to vanity, luxury to greed, arrogance, pride and even sometimes to others. The chance for power collects the most "points". In order to have good, there must be evil. But the good must be punished with misfortune and vice versa. Why should we be good? What is the logic? How many thoughts are there in this life? But why is all this necessary? What is the purpose of "almighty God"? !!
1 howsmycocknow answered
"What is the logic of being here?" - no logic! Roughly speaking, we are here because 9 months before our birthday, our parents indulged in their animal passions and hardly thought about "logic" at that moment. You read a lot of philosophies, but it's not bad to move on to something more modern than the Old Testament of the Bible. Catch read at least the New, besides there are Kant, Rousseau, Dante, Hesse, Dostoevsky ... choose some there. I will still comment on two of the things you found @ Everything depends on the environment we are in! Some are lucky to be unhappy, others are not. But are they guilty? Nothing touches the environment we are in, because everyone is a cosmos in itself. Read The Little Prince. There is no such thing as "luck". Man forges his own destiny. The question of guilt doesn't matter, when we cannot change the circumstances and it is not a crime within the meaning of the Law. Man is to blame or innocent, who, as you can see - no one is to blame for ourselves, the people who are here and now, our happiness and unhappiness. @ A person is "bad" when his environment has NOT presupposed him to chances to build morality and "human traits". I don't think so. The environment and genes only partially shape us, from ourselves, if you will - from our soul, from our inner mind will depend on what we will be. Man, even in the Bible, is endowed with FREE WILL, don't forget. The concept of "morality" is subjective and is determined by our culture. In some Muslim countries, you will be stoned to death because you looked at and "seduced" a boy or went out without a veil. You will definitely be "immoral" in the relevant context, but in the developed world it would not be immoral, but normal. On the other hand, "good" and "bad" are common human understandings, and definitely everyone will define the stoning of an innocent girl as "bad" and the perpetrators as "bad." But here you will not meet many fans of philosophy, catch and spend your vacation reading real philosophers