To Men About A Possible Divorce

   Well, author, there are prenuptial agreements - consult a lawyer that a friend so cheated on his ex-wife after the divorce.

   Your life will be spent guarding property, my man. This woman, 100 children and family are nothing to you. The important thing is not to pass. Funny!

   No wedding. People live en masse on a family basis without getting married, precisely because relationships often break down in the modern world. And with a woman like the one you described - God forbid. You can certainly set things up the way you want at a wedding, but it's not worth the time and effort. On the other hand, the problem is that once you recognize the child, she can insist on maintenance and pour your money like that. The very fact that she became pregnant in the era of mass contraception speaks for itself. The decision is difficult, perhaps the safest way is to make it a condition that you will recognize it only if she signs an agreement that either gives you parental rights in the event of separation or sets a reasonable maintenance limit so that it is enough for the child, but not to allow the savagery to wave his flag at your expense. The wedding is generally not recommended, but you can try it if this is the only way to sign something in black and white. A paternity test will not be superfluous, by the way. And above all, be sure that if the child is yours, you are ready to take real responsibility, not just beat the numbers.

   3, in case of possible separation, the presence or non-marriage does not change things especially. They are being sued again for guardianship, they are being sued again for common property, for maintenance, etc. If they both give money for a property and have written it to both of them, what does it matter if they are married? Everyone thinks that if you are not married, you are mega free and you can leave when you feel like it, but in reality, after a certain moment, it is no different from divorce.

   Man, this topic is not for share.net, but for a lawyer. Given your financial capabilities, I wonder how you even ask here.

   You had a good time with the cocoon, now you're roaring. Are you sure it's yours? Why are you looking for such women, and then you are afraid to have a family with them. There can be only half acquired after marriage ...

   Unfortunately, you can be blackmailed without getting married. If the woman does not have property, she can throw you out of your own apartment and use it until the child turns 18. You will not have access to it, and she will be able to take her tramplers there. So pass it all on to your parents if you're the only son, or to your company if you're the sole owner. If you don't have a company, do it for example in Malta and so on.

   Number 4, the author explained the situation. The properties are purely his, the woman has not given anything, and it seems that she herself has no income except from himself. Or other coins possibly.

   Interesting as you are such an accountant, firstly, how did you catch up with the suspicious woman, in your words, and secondly, how did you not use a condom? Or did you like the pennies? No matter how you twist for the child, YOU will pay alimony.

   Well, other times don't put it on cocoons that only look at luxury and money. One cannot always predict, but in your case it was extremely clear and no one is to blame. You're not lied to, or nothing, you're just screwed and you're screaming because you've been crushed. It's a little hard for me to sympathize with you.

   up to 4 - you speak unprepared. To the author - you have two options - you also say that if you are going to get married you want a prenuptial agreement because you don't trust her. Now everyone will croak, but I speak from personal experience. You will explain to her that this is the test of whether she loves you - if she sticks to you, she will sign it without looking at what is inside, if she pulls away, then it is an account. If you are well aware that he is looking for the benefit, just do not sign. Looking at your level, you will not earn much anyway, sorry for the child ...

   №1 answered correctly, everything else is ala-bala! There is no point in philosophizing, there are laws that recognize only written documents. What is yours before marriage, no one can take it from you, but it is best not to marry suspicious, and often women become unrecognizable after they tie up. A matter of luck boy!

   4, will be sued for common property, if any. As far as I understand here everything is the author. A marriage contract is called, author, if you are so anxious to marry her. Here you read, you want a mode of separation: https://pravatami.bg/884 For me this is not a good idea, you say that the woman does not inspire confidence that she is a cocoon hanging in beauty salons and does not love you . Then why are you getting married? Leave the property, you can take care of your work, but why should you marry a woman you do not love and respect, as it is written? To be at work? Because she wants so much? It is clear why he wants it to bind you even better. It is pointless, live, look after your child and time will show how things will develop.

   pravatami.bg Logo Home / Citizens / Actual cohabitation - the legal side Actual cohabitation - the legal side Author: Vasilena Hristova 03/08/2018 02/08/2018 I have been living with my friend Georgi for 10 years. We share an apartment, we share all the expenses, and the most important thing is that we have a 6-year-old child (which Georgi has recognized). However, we are not married. I often hear the expressions "de facto cohabitation" and "family life" and I want to know what they mean and what rights they give me. What is actual cohabitation? De facto cohabitation, also known as family life, is a situation in which a couple shares a home, finances, property, etc., but is not married. I'm obviously in actual cohabitation, but what does this mean from a legal point of view? Marriage gives rise to a number of rights and obligations for me and my new husband. However, these consequences do not occur in actual cohabitation. By not marrying, Georgi and I do not assume all the obligations and risks that this union implies. Therefore, we will not take advantage of the benefits and protections that marriage provides. Here are some of the main differences between actual cohabitation and marriage: If we live on a family basis, we can end the cohabitation at any time. If we have a marriage - we have to divorce. In case of de facto cohabitation, the parent who takes care of the children is not entitled to claim the use of the family home if it is owned by the other parent or a third party. This possibility exists in case of divorce. In actual cohabitation, it is impossible to seek maintenance from the ex. If I am divorced, I can claim alimony from my ex-spouse. In a marriage, there is a presumption that the father of a child born during the marriage is the mother's husband. In actual cohabitation there is no such presumption and the father must recognize the child (how this happens I can find out here). If we are married we can adopt a child, but if we live on a family basis we cannot. Actual cohabitation is uncertain. Easy termination is both an advantage (for example, if Georgi cheats on me, I can pack up the next day, move out and no longer communicate with him) and a disadvantage. There is no document to prove that my boyfriend and I live in actual cohabitation. If we have to prove this (for example, if we separate, we cannot agree with whom to keep the child and resort to court), we will have to rely on relatives and friends who can testify to the existence of cohabitation. Conclusion: Such a gold digger is just a coexistence

   From number 4 I have not read the specific topic, I spoke in general about what was said from number 3. Simply because many people think that by not getting married and saving a lot of problems. And this is a big misconception.

   Alimony is paid for the child with or without marriage, absolutely always when the parental rights are with one parent. She can always sue you and take child support. The advice to sign a document that she would transfer the parental songs to his unborn Petko is very stupid in case of divorce. No woman will sign such a thing!

   Number 4/15, you speak without knowing. According to Bulgarian law, cohabitation or, as it is popularly known, "on a family basis" provides almost no legal protection. Simply put, a man can kick her out of his home whenever he wants, and she will be entitled to claim child support only, which is a ridiculous amount.

   17, did you even understand what I said?

   This freak is dubious - be sure to tie your pants with a prenuptial agreement. You have no idea what change awaits you when the demo version of your relationship is over! You will be chewed, spit out and thrown away. Don't be naive and frivolous.

   The cocoon did not get pregnant by accident, and the goal is more than clear. The author's sexual preferences are a separate topic, but in the end there is no man who does not want to sleep with a hot babe.

   Author, I am a woman and I am also pregnant, but I do not insist on a wedding and I do not even want one at all - first, a pregnant woman is protected from flu, which can cause abortion, and second, wedding money can go to the future child. With you, I understood in two words what the case was. Does the woman have experience to become a mother? The only advice: do not marry. Premarital contracts have the option of one day invalidating them, etc.

   Author, you are not married yet, you are asking for a divorce. In that case, do not agree to marriage at all. I do not want to comment on you, I wonder at the mind of your pregnant girlfriend - how is it possible for a woman to be humiliated and ask for marriage ?! Horror! Too bad for a child with such parents.

   Author, not only do not get married, but even do a DNA test. If she only has you as a supplier, then most likely there are other treadmills. Obviously you don't trust her (nowadays he is who she already is) and she doesn't save at all. And yes, consult a lawyer. I used to have a girlfriend who, after we had sex for a whole week, told us to take off the condom. However, she previously sent me for a blood test for hepatitis, AIDS, etc. She did the same. At first I was offended that she didn't trust me like that, but then I realized that it was for the common good. Trust is built, you don't find it ready.

   Number 17, you're not quite right. In our block there is a family with three children, all under 7 years old, the mother and father are not married and live in an apartment named after the grandfather (paternal line). They soon parted company with the police and social services. They also interrogated us neighbors. The mother now has a restraining order against the father, but the court has ruled that the family home should be used by the mother and children until they reach the age of 18. children's. And, again, the apartment is not even owned by the father. Except for the apartment, the father was sentenced to support BGN 200 per child per month. The mother herself also shared that everyone had explained to her that without marriage she has no rights, especially since the man has no property and no employment contract. Fortunately, she was afraid to act and get rid of this man who was abusing her before our eyes. Now she gets maternity, alimony, electricity assistance and has a roof for at least another 10 years. And most of all, calm. So it's right that all these "men" who are wondering how to escape responsibility know that mothers have rights.

   24, leave him, let him think that he can kick his wife when he cries. Don't spoil his pink dreams.

   20, very clear and not bad, neither to like them nor to sleep with them. But then not to roar and run away from responsibility. It's a pity. A man has to stand behind his actions.

   If you are here in the west and get married, this will be the biggest mistake you can make. No one here marries, but lives on a family basis. Neither a prenuptial agreement nor anything can save you. If you separate you only pay child support and that is, paid. Here the women jump from branch to branch and live on the support of the children, and if you are married you can hit alimony for the woman and pay for life, just because you melted the pepper for 5 minutes. The deal is good but only for the woman ....

   Author, do you know what a woman goes through to give birth to a child? When you are so worried, transfer your property to your company.

   24, having started to give an example, why don't you describe it completely? There is no judge who can give someone else's property to anyone. If the apartment belongs to the man's grandfather, there is no way without his consent to give the apartment to someone else. Either it was sold to them during their cohabitation, or the grandfather agreed to use it. Even if it is her husband's, if they are not married, the children can stay in the apartment, but not their mother. As the example is given, the grandfather can get his apartment back at any time. There's something you don't know.

   1Lawyer 2Contract 3 even without marriage 25% of the proven monthly income support and housing until the age of 18. With brag is the same only that everything acquired after it is owned by both and in case of divorce is divided and the home remains with the one with parental rights. According to what you have written, they are a lamb, so set things in a contract, see a stable lawyer, so that everything is calm on your tab. Watch your child, and if she really loves you and has not decided to blackmail you, there will be for her. GOOD LUCK

   37, according to which paragraph, if they are not married, the apartment will be for both of them? In the absence of marriage, the man recognizes only the children, the woman has no rights over his property, and in this case the apartment does not belong to the man. Don't make up your own laws. Look at the alimony, I agree, who recognizes children, should also take care of them, but not the woman who gave birth to them.

   Do you deal with female cocoons, do you have unprotected sex with them, and then, oh, now? Hey, it's called whatever called, that's what called. The woman is unemployed, but once she goes to salons and gets hot, you don't have a problem. It may be the absolute sediment, but the important thing is that it is beautiful and decorated. You have unprotected sex, then what happened? This is nonsense, and absolutely yours. Everyone is itching.

   up to 35 - as you can see - we all know what a woman is ready to go through to catch a man - even if she has a child :) As for the home - there are more details - even if the mother is sentenced to 18 years of age, she owes rent to herself there. Also - if the property belongs to another person, things are not so guaranteed, this person is entitled to transactions with this home. Finally, which abused woman gives birth to three children to one man? The neighbor in front of us breaks down to call the police for domestic violence, she read in bgmama that this way she can evict him from the apartment ...

   41, and the other question is, this man, not wanting to be "caught", why does he have sex without a condom? But it is very easy for women to be to blame for you. It is true that the sexual culture in Bulgaria is below any level. Sex is still a taboo subject and it is believed that it is almost conceived innocently. It is also believed that a man can blow it anywhere. Do not use protective equipment when HE does not want children. It is believed that just because HE does not get pregnant and does not wear out the baby, he is released from any responsibility. And finally, a surprise !!!! It's not like that. And who is to blame? Naturally, the woman is a mercantile, a user, a gold digger, a whore, etc. In this case, the words are very appropriate: butt head rubs!

   Otherwise, I'm somewhat sorry for the author, because anyone can happen to come across an inappropriate partner. However, unfortunately, more like him need to be "burned" to remind men that the time of irresponsible sexual behavior has passed. And that the laws are written in such a way that a woman can force you to recognize your child if she proves that it is yours (and this is proven with a DNA test very easily). And don't be in a hurry to blame the laws or the women. They are right. The truth is that by NOT wanting a child, YOU are wary of such a possible development of things. You cannot guarantee what your sexual partner wants and whether he is on your wave. That is why YOU are careful. And the author, apart from consulting a lawyer, I can not give other advice. But his words are very ugly: "I will provide for her only while she is married to me and as I see fit,

   I am 42-41: As the author describes the situation, a condom would not be an obstacle for a woman who has followed in the footsteps of money. I've lived long enough to hear women advise their girlfriends about drilling condoms, hiding about pregnancy until the abortion period is over, and what not. As for responsibility, it's a convenient word for you, but read the law like the devil's gospel. For me, the responsibility is shared, which means that both are obliged to take action, and if they have previously talked and were aware that one - as if who does not want a child, period. The woman has the right to talk about taking responsibility only if they agreed to have a child and after pregnancy the man gave back - then I agree that responsibility should be taken. Otherwise, for me this marriage is doomed, a pity for the child ... In case of divorce, at most they should award him alimony and that is, if they did not acquire property during the marriage. I don't know where these ideas come from, that the rich are idiots and anyone can milk them, if they were, they wouldn't be rich - they know how to keep their own. As for the amount and, there is case law, such percentages, which are mentioned here, are not included, only the percentage of the minimum subsistence is fixed, because it is related to the minimum wage.

   In case of de facto cohabitation and subsequent separation, the parents do not have the right to claim a family home, on which they do not own at least partially. In the case of a marriage, even if the home is owned by a relative, the court may order that this home be given to the parent with the rights over the children, until the latter reaches the age of 18. In the Family Code, a family home is described as: “the home that is inhabited by both spouses and their minor children.” If you are not a spouse, no one has any rights over any home. That is - in the absence of marriage, if the name of one parent, as a co-owner, does not exist, then this parent is not entitled to any claims to the home. And here are some of the problems with divorce: Many people have the misconception that the mother automatically gets the rights over the children. This is simply not the case. It is quite possible that the FATHER is the one who receives the rights, as well as the right over the family home. The other misconception is that the parent who has the rights has those rights forever and cannot lose them. This is also a misconception. Not only is it possible to easily lose your job, but when that happens, all kinds of family homes and so on leave. Even if parental rights are restored, it is no longer possible to give family housing. Alimony is not always paid. The parent who has no rights over the child is obliged to pay maintenance in the amount of not less than 1/4 of the minimum wage, even if there is no income. Unfortunately, the problem comes if the parent has no income as well as property. The parent in question lives with his parents or friends, does not receive a salary, does not own any property, his bank accounts are empty and he uses his mom's account, you accumulate some debts that will not be paid for years. Maintenance "solves problems". The obligatory maintenance today is 1/4 of BGN 610, or BGN 152 per month. This money would be enough for the child's food, but if the parent does not want to live, it is as if it was 1820. Especially if the standard was high. There are cases in which a mother pays with BGN 250 alimony, but with BGN 450 bills and that is, before food was bought for her and her children, and 3 months ago she traveled by taxi every day, she had a babysitter while she was Biliana has expensive business dinners with her husband and has started a career in a top company in Sofia, and due to the divorce she can't work and look after the children, now she has to say goodbye to all this. Thebes is a very severe shock. I mean, don't see the divorce, as something hardly super nice and that the mother always "wins". It is very often a rotten human tragedy.

   Why should you get married? Nowadays it is full of couples who live together and have children for years. Why should you get married? Well, the child is yours, but you can admit it and not get married. I want to ask you something else - do you see her as your wife or the mother of your child? It does not work and as I see it has no desire to work. What will he do? Do you see her as a housewife - she will clean, cook, look after the children? Or does she want to drive her like she does now - will she go to salons and you will pay her expenses? Talk to lawyers. With very good lawyers and find out what it really means for you to get married! See also what documents to what extent they will protect you in case of divorce. If you get married, this will be a great security for HER - if you separate in time, she will tear your skin, she will take the child, and you will be obliged to pay her alimony. Don't get married if you're not sure that this is the man for you, because it can be very expensive for you! While you are together take care of her and the child. But in case of divorce, it can happen: that she takes a large part of your property, that you are obliged to pay her alimony, that she takes the child, that she blackmails you with him and that she continues to look for sponsors.

   44, we are obviously reading different stories. Where did you read that the woman manipulated him, suspected a perforated condom, etc.? The author writes, I quote: "I got pregnant by a woman". From then on, it becomes clear that this is obviously not the best partner you would choose as the mother of your children, but .... :( I have also heard stories about dishonest and manipulative men who allegedly "keep" their girlfriends , and they deliberately drop a little in them to tie them with a child, because the girl does not want at the moment. So there are dishonest people of both sexes. The question here is different. (as the author), you protect yourself, you do not rely on the neighbor, your wart, your mother, your cousin and the favorable weather conditions :)