Except for the $200 legal bill. What only gestures of great charity...
A single mother does not call herself a mother, damage a child does not know her father. It's a mother who raises her own child.
Well, in your case, you're absolutely right. You're the father of the child, you take care of maintenance and you buy him clothes, which is commendable. Can't you ask the mother to give it to you for a little more days instead of filing a lawsuit? What's she against?
There are cases other than yours, though. For example, I am divorced, the child's father is inadequate, harasses us, but otherwise he pushes to take the child, then returns her to a terrible emotional state. He doesn't want to pay alimony, I sued him, and now he says I robbed him. So in my case, yes, we have a sperm donor in this case, which is a father of documents, but it's not like that, so I'm a single mother. He's wearing a f-ing. does not buy, does not send gifts for birthdays and Christmas. The kid tells me how he sent me money and didn't give it to her. And I have to explain how the court ruled that, and I use that two hundred leva to buy her food and toys, and he tells me he hates me. The child, another father unfortunately will not have, she and a father will not, because this is not a father, he refuses to heal also and does not give a what he does to her. In the future, if I have another man, it will serve as a model of family behavior for the child. That is, she will witness what the relationship should be in a family that will serve her in the future. But a stepfather, I don't think anyone could fit in. Unfortunately, things don't work that way.
And you have nothing to worry about, no matter what your ex-wife says, your child has a father, and that's you.
Well, it's clear, and they know it, but in front of their new dummies they pretend to be saints, and most of them are even susceptible to humiliation by their new ones, because they know very well that the chance to find a man is 1:100, and if they find them hard for sex and manipulate them all the way, because he knows that they are already beaten cards and have no alternative ,will tolerate
That's what friends who've been dating virgins like that have been shared with me.
In my case, my ex-husband is not particularly interested in our child, nor does he pay alimony, nor does he see her regularly. In your case, if your ex-wife is a woman on the spot and loves her child herself, she'il make sure the judgment doesn't apply and will allow you to see your child whenever you want, because you're really a father and you deserve this.
I totally agree! I am myself the child of divorced parents and I can confirm that what we today call a "single mother" is a very incorrect definition.
Why would you? Well, because "single mother" means that a woman takes care of her child herself and supports and raises it herself.
Well, in my case, it wasn't like that. My father paid regular maintenance to my mother, my grandmother took care of me, and my mother spent a lot of time looking for the man who was better than my father.
Well, I do not believe that such a "single mother" has the right to complain about the adversity of life, provided that she chose such a life and was not alone, received enough help from the father and other family members.
Author, don't worry! Your child will appreciate your efforts and will not "replace" you with another father.
You will always be the father of your child, and no one can move you out of this position. But don't you want the man who will one day enter your wife's life, and from there your child, to treat this child with care and attention? He will never replace you, but he can be a positive presence in your child's life. The same goes for the woman who might one day be there for you. I don't have children yet, but if I happen to get back together with a man who already has a child, I'm going to make sure that this child feels good, that it's safe, it doesn't feel like a hindrance to me. I'm not going to try to replace his mother, but I'm going to make sure she knows that her child is in good hands when she's with me. I know it will always be a priority for their parents and any relationship of competition or opposition is inadmissible to me. Think more about the kids. No one knows one day what position he's going to find himself in.
Are the women of your child going to look for a father? And being a single mother is a mother who doesn't live with the father. And if your wife finds a new man, he'il be the stepfather of your child. And if he's a nice guy, he'il take care of your child, and he'il love him. And if you don't fit, don't get divorced. And then you're going to have a new father. Well, it's normal.
There are women who find a new man, and he becomes the father of their child. I and I'm not the only one living. My child has two dads, one biological, the other brought in, and they both look after him, and they both love him. And the biological dad is not as haha as you, but he accepts quite normally the new person in the child's life, he is even happy because the child gets more attention, one dad gives him one thing, the other, with one playing the piano, with the other playing football. When you love your child, you don't get jealous of them. There are many women with a successful second marriage.
And you sit with your ex-wife at a table, and instead of filling the throats of some lawyers, agree on a free regime to do what's best for your child. Unfortunately, most people don't have enough thoughts about it, they think they're going to win a lot, and things are clear. The child should be at the root, get love and security and not crucify him with and tell who is worse or better.
I grew up without love, fell victim to my father's second wife. Humiliation, insults, physical altercations. My mother died.
For the sake of going, no one made the right decision for me. My father was between the hammer and the anvil. Today, from the position of an adult, I believe that this is not the case. A child is not equivalent to an adult. Physical, mental and emotional trauma has carried them all my life. I was a gentle, beautiful, trouble-loving child with huge sad eyes. And this woman was messing with me, and my father "poor victim" was silent. 8 years old. I was prescribed sleeping pills so I could sleep because I had constant nightmares. Ad! All this as a result of the behavior of adults, regardless of the stems of the circumstances. As long as you think of yourself, you lead. who will prevail and build a psyche.
I'm going to get you out of here right now. moms ;)
But they're actually right that you're not a representative sample. There are men who do not look at their children, there are those who look at others as their own. I wish your problem could be solved, :)
I just didn't tell you what's wrong with other people's lives? Yes, you're afraid your wife will bring a man to your child. But if you were with him, you wouldn't have to worry about stitching him up with a new mother, would you? Enough of this hypocrisy. It's not enough that she's a single mother, because SAM, she's practically raising your child, and you're de facto single, and now you're spitting and spiteful. Well, you're wrong.
From the Author to number 1: from everything I wrote, did you read about the money?
N.3. if the father of your child-husband is inadequate, why did you marry him? When you decided to get married, where your mind was then. If you have a future husband, how do you think he's going to be a model of family treatment for your child? I doubt you'il be able to judge your second husband, and any man. Too bad about you.
From author to number 3: well, I don't know why he's against it and he's not giving it to me outside the court order. He used to give it to me outside the regime and I've been up to 12 days a month (which again was not enough for me), but it's still much more than 4 days. The mother has been in a relationship with a man for some time, and she hasn't given it to me for four days, and I think he's affecting her...
From the Author to number 7: you are right, but in my case it happens that before my ex-wife commits I take the child quite often at least 10 days a month, even up to 12 I have reached, but since he is with this man, the court decision is strictly respected on her part and does not give a word to say to take him more than the funny and pathetic 4 days in question 4 days a month. I guess that's what she's doing under the influence of her new man, but I'm not sure yet what he's aiming for.
I love to ashladis lonely cheats!
They're dedicated and very dedicated!
I hope more men are like you. My father paid my alimony and bought me things, but my mother sometimes didn't let me in for so many days just for revenge for catching a mistress for whom he left my mother (after 2 years he was no longer with the mistress). You don't need a case like this to off your ex the most. If she's a good guy, she'il let him go for more time. My mother went abroad for the summer to work and I was able to go to my dad's all summer. First she would send me to the village with my grandmother [her mother], but even she was sick of these tricks and she would take me back to town with my dad. My mother from abroad had nothing to do. And this "single mother" once heard it from my mother telling me to ask at school if there was any scholarship or something like that and I before I asked (there was no such thing natural) and I said "What does this single mother mean. I know my father and he gives me money. And she wasn't trying to make me a "stepfather" boyfriend, so he could run 200km/h if he told him something like that. I've had one mother and a father all my life. No one else has ever tried to act like a parent to me. I didn't love or hate their boyfriend.
Number 7 wrote it to you very well, top commentary for me.
I would never try to replace his father, only I would be a good brother or a kid for him and there. I would give him a good role model, upbringing, I wouldn't even want to hear him call me Dad, I wouldn't let him because the father is one, the one that lone cheats call "donor", is I wasn't the donor, so accordingly I don't want to have anything to do with the word father for this child, I want to be his friend and that is. So you worry in vain, calm the ball down.
From author to number 5: if she were a woman on the spot, she would have agreed to an agreement, which I offered her at least 50 times, and I had no maintenance benefits, that is. we would have agreed as much as she wanted, because I would give everything for my child, but she chose to sue because she knows i'il get the funny four days a month from the court. After the court decision, she started giving it to me outside the regime, and I never stopped helping her by buying a lot of things for the child. She's been in a relationship with another man for a few months now, and since then the court decision has been strictly followed and doesn't give me a minute more than those four days, which I think does it under the influence of her new man, otherwise I have no explanation as to why she gave it to me and 10 days a month.
Look, you may be a great father, but most men in your position aren't. And yes, a woman is a single mother, why she raises her own child. Yes, according to documents, the child has a father, but what do we do when this father does not care about his child at all and does the impossible not to pay alimony, and for things like dating, he does not want to think. No, he's got a new life, and he doesn't know or care what's going on with his child. Well, in that case, isn't it normal for a woman to be a single parent? And look for a man who, though not biologically, is the father of her child? Did you know there are kids who don't even know their real father? For them, it's a name on their birth certificate. So don't judge by itself. Most divorced men aren't like you.
Number 4, which one is a bit of a card? What century do you live in, and what kind of nonsense are you talking about? A bit of a card is a "family" where people are together for benefits. Do you know why most Bulgarians don't get divorced? Because they're financially dependent!
Being happy with a woman/man with a child is equal to being happy with a man/woman without a child. Judging by your reasoning, whatever you might want, you won't be happy.
Remember that an independent emotional and financial woman is always in demand, no matter how many children she has!
From author to number 3:no, if I have a wife by my side I will never teach the child or tell him that it is the mother or that there are 2 two mothers, and the woman next to me will be a kaa or Aunt Mimi (for example), because what happens if the mother also breaks up with her second husband, because history knows a lot of such cases What's he going to tell the kid that this second guy is no longer his father? What if he finds another one later, is he going to tell the kid he's got a third father again? This is extremely confusing and traumatic for children.
These things, how well she gave it to you and how she cut things down, you could have written them from the beginning. Look how many people have read it already, they could have told you something more decent. Your ex seems to be just trying to play an interesting, great mom in front of her new boyfriend. Show him how well his kid's looking at him, and he's probably telling him you're some kind of fool. Tell me how old the child is and which of the two you split up and did you have a third person to break up. And in court, they've said that mothers are great people, and they're princesses and don't give anything to talk about. So i don't think you're going to get anything with the court. In time, if he's still with the new guy, he'il probably want more time for them both, and he'il be sick of just looking after his kid, and he'il probably give it to you more time. Either they're going to split up or they're going to have their own kid, and you're still going to have more time. Just so you know, the court is the last place to fix problems in this country. And if you're judging her, say you want to increase the maintenance (you give him more) and it might work out, but she's talking to a lawyer.
Number 15, you're super bad. Did it ever occur to you that a person can get mentally ill at any age and after a number of years, especially if he starts and gets abused with medication and stimulants? Basically, I'm not Grandma Vanga, and I couldn't prophesy him. Do you happen to think that when I married him, he was obsessed?
The answer to your question how I'm sure my second choice, if I have one, would be appropriate - I can't be sure. If he turns out to be unlucky, he'il see the door on the other side. There's no way anyone can be sure, there's no guarantee. Maybe only those as sinless as you with prophetic abilities. And let's hope your wife or you don't one day unlock an obsession and see what it is, big shot. You're perfect, omniscient and insured, so it's okay :D In your next comments, I hope you put in a little more thought. You're bouncing like a pinched lady because you're getting to know things that have nothing to do with you, the thinly-veiled one. Joker.
Every divorced woman is primarily wanted for sex, because I've been divorced for five years now, and no man offered me a normal human relationship. I got used to the thought of raising my own children, albeit as a single mother.
I don't see these successful second marriages of divorced mothers with children.
From the Author to all who continue to use the term "single mother" for a divorced woman with a child. Ladies, we live in the 21st century, the information is extremely easy to find. A single mother is NOT a woman who is divorced with a child, but a mother whose father of the child is UNKNOWN.
From the Author to 25: my child is almost 4 years old and we separated on her initiative. She just told me she couldn't live with me without much explanation. The very fact that she moved out so quickly despite my calls to talk and smooth out the problems where she thinks there are, for me means a quick and ill-considered decision, which I am 99% sure will regret someday.
A single mother is the woman who looks after the child without a father. You can give money, buy things, but you're not there for him every hour, every day. You don't put food on the table. You don't pick it up and pick it up from school, kindergarten. You're just some extra presence in this case. The main role is the mother. You don't help him with homework, you don't put him to sleep every day, you don't comfort him by crying or someone insults him. Your help is purely financial. The woman takes full care of the child. You're just the ex-man who, from rain to wind, gives money and some material stuff that doesn't really warm a child. Children can do without toys, but without two parents can not. There's no way to fill the gap and the lack of attention with some money and toys. Your ex-wife knows that the child will need some permanent male presence. That as he grows up, he'il need someone who won't see once a month and give him a bag of gifts.
Your ex is completely free to find a new man. Yes, he won't be the father of your child, but he can be a super good person and take great care of him. You gave up on this woman, and she's free to do whatever she wants. Otherwise, he wouldn't have been getting divorced.
From author to number 30: I apologize, but more stupidity I had not read. Are you sure you've read what I wrote in the confession? How come i see my child from rain, to see him for four days a month, because that's how the mother decided, but before she found a man she gave it to me 10-12 days a month. Did you not read that when the child was sick personally, I took him to doctors and medicine, and bought him clothes and shoes and toys. What do you mean, I gave money from time to time? How did you decide I wasn't feeding him, that I was taking care of my child once in a month and once a month? I'm amazed at the conclusions you've drawn.
Author from 30
The care you take cannot be equal to the one the mother does daily and hourly. I don't know why you're pointing out things that are absolutely normal for any parent like care, resources and attention.
It's her right to meet another man and create something with him.
Author, I'm not number 30, but try to look at things objectively.
It may not be your fault, but you don't really live with the child - you see it from time to time and give him money from time to time. She lives with her mother, who raises him alone, and under the circumstances She is a single mother.
If you can win in court and they award you the rights to raise the child and it moves permanently with you, then you will be a single father, even though the child will have a mother who will eventually also see him from time to time and pay maintenance.
Author, you don't be impressed by the number 30. This is the typical "single" mother or average woman - she broadly wipes the facts, draws some conclusions of hers that have no real justification. You're starting to wonder if you live in the same world.
She used to have a crush on bad guys (because they're more interesting) and one of them made a kid. Yes, but it quickly became clear that bad guys are rarely good fathers and husbands. And they often go looking for other such muffins the moment they start pushing them with the need to look after their family.
What's up with our single mothers? Somehow they try to survive and everyday life and the sharply increased responsibility crushes and blows them away. And they start desperately looking for such a "super good guy" (by the way, to translate what that means - "a super-patient person who is OK with my frequent outbursts of hysteria and whining. And last but not least - to "help with the family budget" - that is, to support us because "we no longer live"). As it becomes clear, such men are no longer left, and these mothers will remain "lonely", in the pure sense of the word.
34 out of 30
I don't know, i'm not married yet, and I don't have a child. I'm 22.
The author points to as his merits things that are absolutely normal to do as a parent.
N. 34 you gloat, it certainly doesn't give you male charisma to know. Small and mean man... to know that life is a boomerang. Tomorrow you'il be a single father, and then what song are you going to sing in five voices?
From Author to number 32 and 33. If you have read the confession carefully you will see that I DO NOT dispute in any way the mother to seek and find a partner in her life. The only thing I'm arguing is that this man can't and can't be the father of my child. I will repeat myself before she meets this man she gave me her child 10-12 days a month, and after they got together she started giving me the child only as much as the court had set me up, which is clearly under his influence. Again, I adore my child, and there is no way he can be the father of my child and have more rights than me. Please read carefully.
From The Author to all who continue to claim that a mother with a child is a "single mother." Please familiarize yourself with the family code. A single mother is only this mother, of whom the child's father is UNKNOWN.
From Author to number 33. I do not give money from time to time, as manipulatively claimed, but monthly at 200LV at least another 200BGN for clothes shoes, etc. In fact, I buy a lot more clothes for my child than the mother.
According to the law, I copy the definition
"Single parent" is a person who, by reason of widowhood, divorce or unmarried marriage, raises children of her own up to the age of 18.
So a divorced mother is considered lonely.
The other thing I have to tell you is that no matter how pink you describe yourself, you have a fear or a swell of lobster, how can I call it that you are not given more than what you are entitled to by law. And in reality, the laws are not invented by stupid people and are judged according to the needs of the children, not according to the needs of their parents. This child, because of your decision to do it and then divorce, of course, and because of his mother's decisions, is forced to live with a new man as a member of his family. I mean, if you had tolerated your wife, or if you had chosen the right mother for your child, now she would not have been divorced and your child would not have been forced to live away from her father and with another man in the family. He's looking for the guilt in himself!
The child must learn to live with the new man, get used to it together, as well as the man himself to get used to the child, because if he gets used to the child not being around the mother, then I will accept your child as an obstacle in his relationship with her and will adjust negatively against the child. Of course he will never become the father of your child, but this man will put his efforts and money into his upbringing, so you should not be so negative against him, but befriend him for the good of your child. It is quite likely that this person's efforts will range from positive to negative based on your attitude to himself and all of this will negatively affect your child. So think about not yourself, but about the child!
I understand that you think you don't need him (the other one) to put funds and effort into your child, but if your child is separated and kicked out by him, you will not be more comfortable trusting, and the child will have to spend time with his mother and the man next to her. Think, for example, after a while, he explains to your child that he can not go to the sea with them to an expensive destination because his father only pays 200 BGN maintenance. A friend of mine used to tell me how they told him "if you lived with your father, you wouldn't go to a school camp," that by giving him money for the camp.
As for your thoughts on your child's mother, I also think you're going in the wrong direction. You think the woman you chose as your child's mother is easily manipulative, and you couldn't manipulate her "play your whistle" yourself, and you divorced her. What does that say about you?
My advice is not so selfishly only their own needs, but put more intelligence into your actions and words for the benefit of the child, you take care of your child to some degree ok, but also his mother and her husband take care of your child show their respect so that they and this person respect your child.
P.P. to clarify what I mean by caring to some degree, I mean, a 200BGN pension nowadays is not much money, and in reality with this money you can not pay all the expenses of one child, so it is under 7BGN per day, one sandwich outside is 5BGN, if you take some juice and today's dose of money is out, well, electricity for heating his room, well new sheets, duvets, etc. Suppose his mother put in 200lv, try living with 400 levs. By law, what the court sentences you to give is little more than the cost of half of your child's SURVIVAL. Unemployed fathers sentence them to 152 bgn per month. That is, this is the minimum amount for your child to survive or half of the food he needs, electricity, water, cheap clothes, and you decide whether you want your child to survive or to live a normal life and give according to your opinion. If it's like you're giving $400, then you're providing half the average life span of your child, unlike most divorced fathers, bravo!
Author, your fear of having a child love another man is understandable in a way. But there's nothing you can do about it. He is a human being and they have the right to emotions and their own opinion. If a man behaves well with him, the mother, why shouldn't the child love him and disrespect him? Is there something wrong with that? Let the child make his own choices.
There's only one self-pointing in your comments.
Author to number 40. In the style of writing, I see you're a woman, and so, ma'am. At least three times you mentioned that I hadn't divorced and that I wanted to manipulate my wife and why I divorced and immediately answered you, I never wanted to get divorced, and the initiative was my wife's, who was influencing her mother.
You're advising me to respect the ex's new man? If you read well you would have read that before he met him I saw my child up to 12 days a month, and after meeting him the days abruptly became 4. You're advising me to respect a complete stranger and someone else's for my child and me, a man who prevents my child and me from seeing each other? That's not going to happen. You mention how much is the cost of a child? Yes, there are many! But when this child is 12 days a month in my home, respectively the food I buy, the electricity I pay, the chershafi i pay, the heating of his room and everything I pay. In addition to paying everything, I pay 200lv maintenance 200lv at least for clothes and whatever. Most clothes I buy them, and the mother occasionally takes him a T-shirt or one pants for a total maximum of 50 lv, is who takes more care and who has more expenses, me or her?
I also notice that you claim that the laws were written by many smart people who knew what was good for the child? Yes, but no! In half of Europe, Shared Parenting is already accepted, where children spend 50 to 50 of their time with each of the parents, and this is proven to be the best for them after a healthy laugh, where they are all the time with both parents.
A single man who accepts such cohabitation suffers from severe complexes.
Fields.
He's an author, you never realized that this isn't a competition with your ex who's going to spend more money on the kid and who's going to take him to a cooler place. I don't think you understand that in wanting to rub your ex's nose, you confuse and hurt the child. Did either of you think about it? Or it's more important to you that you're a "super" dad because you spent Eddie on your clothes. What about the child's emotions and feelings? Have you thought about them? As long as you're competing with his mother, you're actually missing out on the most important thing, and one day you're going to wonder if you've got a confused, depressed teenager. Well, how not? Once your love is measured at $200 and whatever else you bought.
The author to number 44, not my love is not measured by money, but with the desire to be every single spare minute with my child, to care for him, to support him, to be by his side in the difficult moments, etc. but an unknown man interferes with the father-son relationship.
Number 40 struck me with his arrogant and absurd opinion, expressed with typical female malice and selfishness.
First, the definition of a single parent you've cited is taken from the welfare law. It is only in that law that it is listed as such in order to define to some extent the measures implementing that same law. That's it, that's it. Realistically, there's no way that a child is created by only one parent, it takes two. The child has a clearly recorded mother and father on his birth certificate. It's clear that the mother can't be unknown, but the father can. This happens when there is no civil marriage and no one has identified themselves as the father of the child. Only in this case can we talk about a single parent. When we were married, a child was born, and there were two parents. Even if they eventually split up, they remain parents. Even after a breakup, the child lives with one parent, the other pays alimony, just because he is a parent, too.
It's a strange logic to say "if you had tolerated the mother or found the right mother." First people change, change their views, goals, aspirations, needs, attitudes towards the other (I deliberately do not interfere with cheating) and often it comes down to cases where the two simply do not want to live together. For the greater good, they split up. But the child can't be separated, it's both of them. About the second, it's here I already laughed with a voice. Can you tell me how to choose the right mother or the right father? Do they have any hallmarks they're looking for? This is where I miss the logic...
It's okay to have a woman living with someone else who's taking care of the child. Children should be raised with love and attention. And they get it from both their parents. If there are others willing to help, even better. But the other is not the parent of the child, he already has parents and he should be aware of it. He can live with the mother, satisfy some needs, but the need of the child from his parents can not satisfy. You're saying the child's going to be an obstacle in the new relationship. Well, actually, yes, it's a hindrance, because it has to have a relationship with both real parents. The new person in the relationship has to comply with this fact. If he's reunited with a woman who already has a child from another, he should be aware that this child is not just hers. It also has another parent who loves him and should take the same care for him as the mother.
From many women who have become myself, I have heard the phrase "how do you look at a child with alimony?" A rhetorical question, the answer is - not at all. Once the mother is left alone, she should include her entire income in the upbringing, and the maintenance only supports her. Of course he can't watch it with alimony. And when the child is with his father, he also takes care, takes expenses... things are not measured only in money.
It is very common for the mother to start manipulating the child's father, limiting it to the sightings in order to get more maintenance. Or under pressure from his new man, who is trying to distance the child from his father to reduce his contacts with the mother. That's exactly the case. It's a manifestation of ego. But if he has agreed to live with a woman who already has a child, he should comply with that fact. If he wants to help raise the child, it's perfect, but it's not right to distance him from his second parent.
47, left her, has been touring her subjects for a few days, citing laws and behaving utterly arrogantly. Apparently, they're either not shaking any time soon, or it's going into the critical.
Your ex-wife's new partner is probably jealous of your wife, so he's tried to limit your contacts. In time, I guess he'il calm down by making sure you're just holding on to your child. Do you know this man? It's good to somehow meet and talk directly to him that you miss the child very much and want to take it like you used to. A little more diplomacy and patience manifested. I'm NOT saying you're wrong, but in this case it doesn't matter who's right, who's crooked. The important thing is to keep in touch with your son. On a personal level, it's good for you to think of a new soul mate. That way the child will have two families, and your ex-wife's new one will be relieved that you're not trying to get her back through the child.
Author to number 49. Being jealous is not my problem, much less the child's. This man, if he's jealous at all, has to get used to the idea that his wife is the mother of my child. I also don't know him personally, and I don't feel the urge to meet him, and he doesn't feel one. Otherwise I do not suffer from women's attention, there are a lot of women around me, but at this stage I want to indulge my child and it is not up to me. The point is, a man is interfering with a father-son relationship.
Author/ Author,
A single mother is this woman who does not marry (civil and religious (optionally) marriage and lives on a family basis with her boyfriend, became pregnant by him during their actual cohabitation and gave him a child /children who is recognized/recognized by him; there are also cases where the friend of the single mother refuses to recognize the child/children.
The single mother is this woman who lived for a certain time on a family basis with her boyfriend and who eventually leaves her, abandons and refuses to care for their common child ( who is recognised or the biological father refuses to recognise that child)
Women who are married ( civil and religious ( optionally) with their half-men are protected by the State ( because the woman in marriage is a wife and her husband is a husband) and are NOT single women, their men are legal husbands, their children are NOT recognized, but legally born children in marriage.
I'm number 33. I think you're quite affectionate and inclined to see enemies even when they're gone. I don't understand what I'm trying to manipulate - I'm telling you about an outsider who's not familiar with things and judging only by what you write here, what the situation looks objectively like, and that's it.
I tried to put myself in your shoes. I'm married myself, but we don't have kids yet, so I don't know what it's like to be a parent. If I get into your situation, I'il probably set myself up against my ex-husband, too, and it'il be unbearable if his new wife prevents me from seeing my child. I can understand your anger, but I don't understand what it helps you with in the case of pointing it at random people on the net who don't want you at all, just because their opinions don't overlap with yours.
1 sofiaspicex answered