Victor was frightened at first, but then remembered his father's words: "it's a snoothes!" - and immediately remembered his physical condition in real life - and decided to stay in a coma.
And in the film somehow state what will happen to the characters if in reality turn off the devices of life support?
Against the background of recommendations from the series "year-old domestic fiction" remembered the film of the early 90's: "The Broker" (of course, after Stalker and Solaris). The graphics, as in the same: "Stalker," "Solaris," there is no! But I got something hooked that I still remember. Although, if you reconsider now, there will be nothing. probably...)
The graphics, as in the same: "Stalker," "Solaris," there are no!
The graphics, as in the same: "Stalker," "Solaris," there is no!
A couple of years ago I was reviewing - it went well, atmospherically, scary. The only negative is the tightening, straight physically felt as the authors "drive the meter", in many episodes unnecessarily, imho.
Also started to look, because of local "recommendations." The first shots with a pile of graphics and dull "familiar" from the "Invasion" diminished the desire to look further, but overpowered ... Pampushny (Phantom), as to me, gave up a lot after the "Balkan frontier." But still, somewhere in the middle, it became interesting: what will happen next? Also, I pleasantly surprised Bikovich (Astronomer) after his "majors" ... In the process of viewing, suddenly "discovered" the German voiceover, and here with it suddenly the film added life!) It seems that the actors played in German, and Russian - it's dubbing, and spoiled everything (sorry, there are no Russian subtitles, so probably, in German looked). I couldn't understand where my native language was - lips seemed to fall everywhere... Still, you can knock, but never caught up with the ending - they in the past were (frames in the apartment, with telecom)??
On Alex's recommendation, I saw "Whom" yesterday. I think it's a great movie. I didn't see any supernatural scripted blunders. Well, yes, heading into the crazy idea of a better world in a coma is a strange thing, so he's crazy. The sound is really. And in the end, the snub for the continuation
and now just exactly what kind of movie)10 years ago on YouTube appeared this video)with it the screenwriters all and licked) even the ending of a coma) and about the creation of worlds ) stealing other people's ideas is not the first time our filmmakers
I liked it, with pleasure looked. )I think the review of Bad Comedian shall come later.
Can the sound be ruined in a trans-coding? Did anyone watch the movies?
The sound is really terrible - it's very hard to make out what they say. On the account of the review - raise questions of the claim to the script and ending without specifying what exactly in your opinion is wrong. The script is a snowstorm. Okay, why? Violation of the laws of a made-up world - what exactly is it about?
Yes! He flies to the same basket where the 'Draft' has been sent for a long time.
Yes! Flying in the same basket, where the 'Draft' has long been sent. like most Of Lukyanenko, however, yes,
Yes! He flies to the same basket where the 'Draft' has been sent for a long time.
By the way, it would be very cool to somehow make an opportunity in the comments to clean up under spoilers and kats text, really useful things, would be grateful.
Hell, we were going to do it a long time ago, for sure!
In advance, ihour grasias!
I have already seen the figure from the second frame: 😄
Uh... The first thought on reading the plot: substituate someone to our filmmakers "Ubik"! It's a pity.
Ubiq must film at least Nolan or Villeneuve.
They'll spoil it naturally.
There is a suspicion that if the screening will be a minimum of Villeneuve, he will have a maximum of something like "Blade Runner 2049", it's like Michal Mikhalych - "The general view has mastered, now the details do not have to be missed."
Villeneuve did not write a script for him. We'll wait for the Dune, see what happens.
I e.a. it's not about the director. OK 😄We'll wait, of course. It's very interesting what's going to happen. As one user wrote in the comments: "The very belonging to the genre arouses interest and respect." Logic, in principle, is - if the genre is interesting, the novelties in it will also arouse interest. But respect - strictly in fact, strictly on the fact.
We'll wait for the dunes, of course. Insha'allah. And then suddenly there was another fear - suddenly with the new "Duna" will screw up and will be about it later, comparing and remembering, to say bombastic Western film critics: "... While even the Russians in their "Coma" it was implemented much better, brighter and more expressive" 😄
We'll wait for the dunes, of course.
Holy holy. In general, it is funny, of course. Instead of perverting with boiling semolina, models of spaceships from papier-mache and rubber aliens, all will draw on the computer, the creators - limitless possibilities, embody any plans. And indeed, the visual series is now almost all learned to do well. From mathematically reliable black holes to the flowery subconscious of a schizophrenic. But there are no good fantastic films. Creators, where are you? Even medal-hit veterans, like Comrade Scott, when they start shaking their old right and left, would be better not to start. I don't know. Maybe it's just old-fashioned, and everything really goes as it should. No more NF, we need philosophical parables about pregnant androids. Or maybe, right now, right here, somewhere in Russia, someone, young and talented, with the money received from the Ministry of Culture, makes a normal adaptation of "Moonlight", which will break all the charts and will be the first Russian film, which brought a billion dollars at the box office and on the site imdb firmly established in the top five films of all time? What if?
Everything sticks in the writers, imho, or rather, in their absence. There are, and even wonderful, almost ready-made scripts, the picture to do learned, would be money, producers/directors experience gaining slowly, even actors and their game can be endured, but as soon as it comes to the plot / dialogues - put out the light.
Ubiq must film at least Nolan or Villeneuve. Here in this particular case it is in "how it can be still." Just to see how much I'm with this "mean" offer.
Ubiq must film at least Nolan or Villeneuve.
"Moon Rainbow"Mda. Try to reread.
Inhabited island and Draft have a liton - a lot helped?
It's a while? I read it not so long ago, about five years ago. I don't see any difficulties with the adaptation of the film adaptation. Moreover, he gave just as an example of a work from which it is quite possible to make a good film. We do not take into account the craft with Gostyukhin and Livanov.
I just want to make a book that's pretty mediocre. As for the film adaptation, what do you mean: shoot only on the first part, or on all at once? If by all, up to "Lokona" then "good movie" ... Hmm... Hardly. And if only on the first, it is unfinished somehow.
works from which it is quite possible to make a good film.
The original idea of Pavlov is unknown to me, but as a dilogy it is quite a finished work. And The Curls are a separate song, and from many points of view.
And what's all about this Duna? Absolutely primitive and rambling fiction for first-graders...
Ubik should film at least Nolan or Villeneuve. remakes
Ubiq must film at least Nolan or Villeneuve.
It's all about the right pitch. "Game of Thrones" in an alien entourage...
I didn't find Alex's 2012 "Heavenly Court" on the list with Habensky and Porechenkov , so it's time to recommend it to watch 😄. Imho is one of the most worthy comedies of recent times in general, and on the "heavenly" theme in particular.
"Heavenly Court" Good film, however, is not remembered as a comedy.
By the way, yes. It's a nice little thing. It is a rare case when Porechenkov did not irritate. Habensky is good. Dmitry Maryanov, now, alas, the deceased, is not very large, but a memorable role of costume for walking on Earth. There is in the form of a film and a miniseries - two seasons of 4 series (the second came out two years after the first, learned about it recently, in passing). The first channel is not only a slag produced once, oddly enough.
The film did not watch, but the description is very similar to "I stay" with Krasko 😄
"Links with propagandists from the liberal lobby, who oversee the whole culture" - the authors of epigraphs under substances? 😄
I read reviews of films that I know (after Bublik) for the sake of epigraphs that I won't watch
And it seemed to me that this is such a graceful euphemism for reptiles.
authors of epigraphs under substances?
"Previously, the most terrible and favorite profanity in Russia was "fascists", now they were added enemies of fascists - "democrats" and "liberals" 😄
"Previously, in Russia, the most terrible and favorite profanity was "fascists", now they were added enemies of fascists - "democrats" and "liberals" 😄Fascist liberals who created Western democracies.
"Previously, in Russia, the most terrible and favorite profanity was "fascists", now they were added enemies of fascists - "democrats" and "liberals" 😄
That's it, all in a heap roll - and conservatives, and liberals, and right and wrong, and elephants with donkeys, and sworn plutocrats-imperialists and their blood enemies - fiery socialists and revolutionaries.
Alex, I'm still very advise ingesantiating to the Platform to watch. The atmosphere resembles Cube, but the plot and meaning is much deeper.
Alex, I'm still very advise ingesantiating to the Platform to watch. The atmosphere resembles Cube 😄, but the plot and meaning is much deeper. 😲
Alex, I'm still very advise ingesantiating to the Platform to watch. The atmosphere resembles Cube, but the plot and meaning is much deeper.
It's a normal movie. Expecting the worst. And by the way, the sound in the multichannel was fine. Perhaps the problem is if the stereo and you can not adjust the level of the central channel separately.
It's a normal movie. I was expecting the worst. What if, when you expect the worst, just don't look? After all, the probability that the worst will come true, as a rule, much higher than 50% 😄
It's a normal movie. Expecting the worst.
What if, when you expect the worst, just don't look? So the choice among the novelties of movie fiction is relatively small, and "for fishless and fisherman - fish" 😄
What if, when you expect the worst, just don't look?
By the middle of the film, he was so sweetly dozed under him. In the end I experienced a slight Spanish shame. Remembered "Alien" and "The Computer" - also with a swing at fictionA for example looked yesterday "Akimbo Guns" - did not expect anything good, and liked it.
"Computer" IMHO, another example, when for some reason even in the elementary "take a good book - and just take off" again could not ...
An interesting career trajectory at Lavronenko - from the Cannes branch to Sarik.
Fell from the branch, but did not break - at the bottom, at the bottom, was Sarick - that's right in the center of the heap Lavronenko and pleased.
Enjoyed it, really! Depressing one thing, filming and clothes in the style of the apocalypse! What about the "coma" post-apocalypse? In my opinion, everyone was poisoned by the "frenzied max"! There's kind of a place though there are a lot of questions! And so, it's not even embarrassing!
As almost always with the Russians, a sense of unprofessionalism, some club amateurism. But nothing, you can look. It's not bad for the rest of us.
Suddenly on ... attacks hefty .... He was rescued by three people, one of whom had to sacrifice himself during the escape. The main character is led to a secret base, which leads the portal, which they call "the nora." Rescued architect girl with a nickname ... At the base is a few dozen people, led by a man named ... Morpheus, with two tablets 😄Need to look, visual/special effects on the teaser liked, it is a pity that unlike them the film itself, apparently weak, it is many blame. They want to do a remake in the U.S..
Suddenly on ... attacks hefty .... He was rescued by three people, one of whom had to sacrifice himself during the escape. The main character is led to a secret base, which leads the portal, which they call "the nora." Rescued architect girl with a nickname ... At the base is a few dozen people, led by a man named ...
Like in the U.S. want to do a remake. It's original. And who spreads such a snout? Promoters of the film?
They want to do a remake in the U.S..
And who spreads such a snout? Promoters of the film? That's a good question, I don't remember, maybe they did. It will be necessary to look for info 😄. Coma" is definitely an original and fascinating movie with a rich visual world. We're in talks with the producers about acquiring the rights to the remake. History is universal and understandable in any language of the world. I am sure that with the right selection of recognizable actors the picture will have all chances of success in the United States. Mike Gabrawi, producer, list of overseas distributors who have acquired our fantastic action film about a team of stern survivors wandering through a surreal world of coma, looks impressive: the film will be shown in the UK, Australia, New york, Austria, Luxembourg, Liechtenstein, France, Belgium, Monaco, Africa, Spain, Andorra, Italy, Turkey, China, Malaysia, Indonesia, Vietnam, Vietnam, Japan, Japan, Japan, Japan, Japan, Japan, Japan, Japan, Japan, Japan, Japan, Japan, Japan, Japan, Japan, Japan, Japan, Japan, Japan, Japan, Japan, Japan, Japan, Japan, Japan, Japan, Japan, Indonesia, Vietnam, Vietnam, Japan, Japan, Japan, Japan, Japan, Japan, Japan, Japan, Japan, Japan, Japan, Japan, Japan, Japan, Japan, Japan, Indonesia, Vietnam, Vietnam, Japan, Japan, Japan, Japan, Japan, Indonesia, Vietnam, Vietnam, Japan, Japan, Japan, Japan, Japan, Japan, Japan The visual "Coma" is quite original, for the remake plot/dialogue will work - and go 😄
And who spreads such a snout? Promoters of the film?
And who spreads such a snout? Promoters of the film 😄?
And who spreads such a snout? Promoters of the film?
Colleagues from the United States are interested. Someone of Sariq's level, but from the U.S.... Who's going to take troma? Although, Throma is full of self-irony... Then it will be, alas, Ball.
interested colleagues from the United States.
Yes, alas, but he doesn't deserve more.
Recently i watched "On the Moon" by Egor Konchalovsky, came across this film by accident. Not bad in my opinion turned out. But "Coma" didn't go, that's all. Twice tried to start looking, both times did not advance beyond ten minutes.
Recently i watched "On the Moon" by Egor Konchalovsky, came across this film by accident. Not bad in my opinion turned out. Egor Konchalovsky did not really shoot anything worthy, this film rating is low, few reviews - sharply negative. I didn't even watch.
Recently i watched "On the Moon" by Egor Konchalovsky, came across this film by accident. Not bad in my opinion turned out.
Yes, actually, I did not want to watch it, too, but something once - and it went well. The main thing is to suffer, and then it will go. Or it won't.
epigraph "movie lover" my inner voice read with the intonations of the aesthetic image of Eugene (BK). that's how deeply penetrated into the consciousness, scoundrel)
When I saw the teaser a few years ago, I thought: Yes! Be sure to see. And when came a full trailer with these oak dialogues, the impression was exactly the same as Alex's: to draw special effects learned, scripts to write - so far not. I wanted to watch right away.
I liked the teaser, too, but I didn't see the trailer, but I agree - dialogues - "this is our everything" 😄
and even the Russian film "I stay"Alex, and "I stay" you fundamentally do not look, or have long looked, but did not reach the review of the hand?
and even the Russian film "I'm Staying"
No, it's not fundamental. Just missed in my time.
The only person who started talking about this film is the concept artist Valeriy Srazzewski. That is, we thought that there would be a normal film, but it turned out that there is nothing in it, except mesmerizing art - and pretentious world, and reapers these flowing. As they appeared in the teaser, and remembered. The work of this man who invented the visual world of "Coma" is worth the wait. Everything else in the film is not worth any attention.
and these reapers. Well, the reapers are a zashcuvar of some kind.
The work of this man who invented the visual world of "Coma" is worth the wait. Everything else in the film is not worth any attention 😄.
The work of this man who invented the visual world of "Coma" is worth the wait. Everything else in the film is not worth any attention.
It's a zasqvar. They're great. First, they are fluid, and not just, but as if all the time go against the wind. Or, for example, liquid, but they are affected by their own gravity - not down, but back and they seem to flow there. Or as a grain of manganese, not completely dissolved in water. It's still a grain, but there's a cloud around it. In short, they belong neither to our world nor to the world of coma. It's a line like Bardem's hair in "Caribbean Pirates" - it sways in the air like in the water. Secondly, it is not the people that emphasizes their multi-eyedness. Yes, this is already found (e.g. "Modified Carbon"), but these were invented in 2015. Good monsters. Even in that schizophrenia stand out at first sight, from the second it is clear that you will not agree with them, and from the third - that it is necessary to tick, yes the stitch, the seam!
The reapers are a zasqvar of some kind.
The reapers are a zasqvar of some kind. What, is the new depth depth taken - has it come out even worse than this unsurpassed bottom?:
The reapers are a zasqvar of some kind.
Even worse than this unbeatable bottom?No, it's from the chamber of measures and weights. It's defined.
worse than this consummate bottom?
Then it's definitely worth watching this "Who," "good visual now not so much to throw them" (c) old Giger
I really hope you copied this sheet from somewhere.
I don't know what to say. If yours is different, state, I'd be happy to read.
Rating and fees... write down the "involuntarily caused interest and respect" )
Rating of 6.4 is higher than most domestic sci-fi films...
The wretchedness of "most domestic sci-fi films" makes this film better)
You're right, it's certainly not a masterpiece of fiction. But he has his undoubted advantages, and indeed partly still "on the fishless" ...
And focusing only on the scripts, we will unwittingly slide to the level of criticism of some "Badcomedyen" whose squalid knowledge in the cinema is enough only on "gy-gy-gy, that's what they're going to do."
And focusing only on the scripts, we will unwittingly slide to the level of criticism of some "Badcomedyen" whose squalid knowledge in the cinema is enough only on "gy-gy-gy, that's what they put up."
You're right, it's certainly not a masterpiece of fiction. Weird. Just had you a whole sheet rolled out that it was actually a masterpiece. But he has his undoubted merits. The picture is beautiful. At the same time the production - helpless, the script - full of madness, especially from the second half of the film, dialogues are hollow, the characters are stilted, the actors play very poorly. But a masterpiece, of course, who would argue. And then involuntarily we will fall to the level of criticism of some "Badcomedy" with his squalid knowledge.
You're right, it's certainly not a masterpiece of fiction.
But he has his undoubted merits
What do you disagree with?) Do his reviews seem to you to be a deep meaningful analysis? Honestly, I don't know of a single person who understands the movie who would like them... Comrade in most cases takes frankly bad movie and a broken hour tells everyone that it is frankly bad, on the example of almost exclusively the script, ignoring everything else ... If anyone likes it, ok)
"We will unwittingly descend to the level of criticism of some "Badcomedy" whose squalid knowledge in the cinema is enough only for "gy-gy-gy, that's what they're going to do"" ---dude, that's, well, 100% past the box office.
"Comrade in most cases takes frankly bad movies," i.e. the name of the channel did not tell you anything. With such care, it's not surprising that you found nothing but "gy-gy-gy, that's what they're doing."
I didn't find the script frankly weak, yes, it changes tone from the middle of the film, becomes more serious, sullen. And the actors play their traditional roles, nothing more. At the same time, the director managed to play some of them to benefit the film, such as the "uncertainty" of Rinal....
No, I've seen a lot of it. That's the impression, alas, but once again - this is my personal opinion ...
What do you disagree with?) Do his reviews seem to you to be a deep meaningful analysis? To me, his reviews seem exactly what they are - funny and high-quality banter over bad movies. I understand that in your opinion Badcomedian should do his reviews in the style of "the finest film analytics" of some venerable film critic from "The Art of Cinema", but I must disappoint you: this film critic in "The Art of Cinema" reads a few people, god forbid, because no one these high-pitched words did not give up, and reviews of Badcomedin watch millions. Honestly, I don't know of a single person who understands the movie who would like them... What do you think "a little movie-savvy person" means? If someone likes it, ok) Thank you so much!
What do you disagree with?) Do his reviews seem to you to be a deep meaningful analysis?
Honestly, I don't know of a single person who understands the movie who would like them...
I didn't find the script frankly weak, yes, it changes tone from the middle of the film, becomes more serious, sullen. That's just from the middle of the movie there's the blizzard and went.
I didn't find the script frankly weak, yes, it changes tone from the middle of the film, becomes more serious, sullen.
Well, I certainly did not want to offend anyone, to seem impolite, etc. I do not like his style of reviews - I wrote everything above, the film does not consist of just a script. In nevsky's case, such criticism rolls on films like "Prometheus" or "Alien." Covenant" annoys me personally - in addition to a relatively weak script in these films there is an excellent visual, some good acting, etc. But, once again, if you and other readers love his reviews so much, then accept my apologies for the infree rudeness. And in general, I wrote a review about the film, not about Badcomedy, it is strange that we talk about it so much ...
I will try to express my opinion about "Coma" in a few phrases, maybe it will seem closer to you and other readers of the blog. Secondly, the film has a bold and non-standard concept, different from most domestic crafts ... Thirdly, the film was shot clearly by fans of their business, with a great love for the genre and a prudently spent budgetIn the fourth, the film luxurious visualIn the fifth, the film tried to fill meaningfully, to give philosophical depth, which not always turned out ... What do you disagree with? In my opinion, it allows you to recommend the film to fans of fiction
What do I disagree with? Yes, I wrote a whole review, which clearly outlines what I do not agree with.
I don't know what to say. If yours is different, i'll be happy 😄 to read.
I don't know what to say. If yours is different, state, I'd be happy to read.
My opinion is different from yours. I can't call it "non-original fiction." As for the mediocre play of the actors completely agree, but again, the director managed to use these standard types competently. But the problem with the speech of actors and changes of sound exists in most domestic films, on this, I think, it is not necessary to focus on ...
I did not seem the script frankly weak I did not seem the script frankly weakmain hero wakes up in the midst of delirium. He is attacked by revived fantasies directly from Kashchenko. Here would be a carachun, but come to the aid of ragged from the Hollywood post-apocalypse. Then he runs (on the run he is given a mini-lecture about the nature of this world), jumps and falls into the lair of some survivors of the "Water World" in half with "Mad Max". And what first question does he ask as soon as you can? The most pressing, the most asking: "THIS YOU WITH YOU?" Oh yes, you feel the hand of the master.
I didn't find the script frankly weak.
I didn't find the script frankly weak.
But the problem with the speech of actors and changes of sound exists in most domestic films, on this, I think, it is not necessary to focus on ... You don't sharpen up, I don't mind. But I have never seen such a madhouse with sound in any other Russian film. In tv series - yes, all the way. In the films, after all, the mixing is done quite competently. But this Argunov - the director is extremely weak, which the film showed. It's going to be at every turn. What often happens when all sorts of cameramen or computer graphics specialists sit in the director's chair. Graphics - there, directing - no.
But the problem with the speech of actors and changes of sound exists in most domestic films, on this, I think, it is not necessary to focus on ...
You forget that the action takes place in a surreal, irrational world of dreams, in which everything is possible, a kind of Looking Glass ... Are you very logical in your dream?) Try to look at the events of the film from this angle..... I agree about secondaryness - but there are examples of disproportionately worse secondaryity, all sorts of "Paragraphs 78," "Attraction" and other "Forbidden Realities"
To "Cage" the visual will still be a long way 😄 off.
Look for yourself and draw conclusions) Maybe, Of course, I do not know anything in scripting and staging, but personally I have a fair part of foreign comics, for example, caused much more rejection ...
Well, maybe it's all flavoring... or maybe just fiction and horror - it's not your genres. You can find negative reviews on much more recognized films, actually classics of the genre, such as "Black Hole", "Starship Troopers," "Independence Day", so it is not surprising that the more modest "Coma" did not go ... If you move away from personal preferences, I still think objectively for fans of the genre "Coma" - it's a bright event
Well, maybe it's all flavoring... or maybe just fiction and horror - it's not your genres. That's funny. You can find negative reviews on much more recognized films, actually classics of the genre, such as "Black Hole", "Starship Troopers," "Independence Day", well, what a scoundrel I am! If you move away from personal preferences, anyway, I think, objectively for fans of the genre "Coma" - it's a bright eventCinema without a normal script, with a mad director and wooden actors - yes, the brightest. It's just Supernova.
Well, maybe it's all flavoring... or maybe just fiction and horror - it's not your genres.
You can find negative reviews of much more recognized films, actually classics of the genre, such as "Black Hole", "Starship Troopers," "Independence Day",
If you move away from personal preferences, I still think objectively for fans of the genre "Coma" - it's a bright event
I say, all this taste)When you put -123 "Black Hole", a staged in fact the film, actually resuscitated in the late 90's genre of space action, as well as "Gladiator" resurrected the genre of peplum (you have it, by the way, as much as three deserved, the victory of Ridley Scott)... And on the other hand, five points "Paper House" - a caricature "soap" for housewives, in comparison with which the novels of Barbara Cartland is just "epic saga" ... Well, apparently, under the same hand and "Coma" got)
When you put -123 "Black Hole", a staged in fact the film, actually resuscitated in the late 90's genre of space action, as well as "Gladiator" resurrected the genre of peplum (you have it, by the way, as much as three deserved, the victory of Ridley Scott)... And there is so much pathos, pathos! Just don't cry from the senses, okay? And on the other hand, five points "Paper House" - a caricature "soap" for housewives, in comparison with which the novels of Barbara Cartland is just "epic saga" ... You can bet at least a "Paper House" stake and at least a hundred points to this stupid "Black Hole", I have nothing against. I usually only care about my own opinion in these matters.
When you put -123 "Black Hole", a staged in fact the film, actually resuscitated in the late 90's genre of space action, as well as "Gladiator" resurrected the genre of peplum (you have it, by the way, as much as three deserved, the victory of Ridley Scott)...
And on the other hand, five points "Paper House" - a caricature "soap" for housewives, in comparison with which the novels of Barbara Cartland is just "epic saga" ...
How about you... That... I've had a shot! 😁
And by itself belonging to this rare, undeveloped genre in Russia unwittingly arouses interest and respect for the projectThis passage, perhaps, did not understand a little more than others. Belonging to the genre itself causes respect? What kind of joy is it? Not if, within the framework of binary division into "hat"/"not a hat," I agree, "not a hat" - a priori respect. But here, judging by the pile of comparisons, it is about a formal approach. But, as if 16 years have already passed, and what is not that and now there, no, he rolled into the abyss from the hill and crashed into slivers.
And in itself belonging to this rare, undeveloped genre in Russia unwittingly causes interest and respect for the project
Do his reviews seem to you to be a deep meaningful analysis? I don't agree here. His reviews have grown strongly and reached the level of intelligent semi-professional criticism with entertaining entourage, long ago overcoming the bar "gy-gy-gy, that's what they put."
Do his reviews seem to you to be a deep meaningful analysis?
Look for yourself and draw conclusions) Yes, I plan to make a teaser with my visualize for a long time interested, and the attempt in film fiction - it's always 1 to the karma of the creators, but according to the reviews of those who have seen about understand what other aspects of this film production will have to face 😄 In the end, I was able to see "Invasion".
See for yourself and draw conclusions)
In nevsky's case, such criticism rolls on films like "Prometheus" or "Alien." Covenant" annoys me personally - in addition to the relatively weak script in these films there is an excellent visual, some good acting, etc. Aa Great visual is a beautiful fantasies, nothing more. If you are given a kilogram of a kilogram of adhesive, carefully wrapped in beautiful gilded fantasies, it will still be a kilogram of lice. And in an idiotic scenario, no acting will save, proven repeatedly.
In nevsky's case, such criticism rolls on films like "Prometheus" or "Alien." Covenant" annoys me personally - in addition to a relatively weak script in these films there is an excellent visual, some good acting, etc.
Try to look at the events of the film from this angle..... Well, I did. The first thing I do is to understand where I am and what I am. Sur or not sur, no one canceled the psychology. A man just nearly got killed, no, he's got to decide the heart. For the viewer waits (as the screenwriter thinks).
Try to look at the events of the film from this angle.....
And in an idiotic scenario, no acting will save, proven repeatedly.
And in an idiotic scenario no acting will not save, proven repeatedly.
You can write: the house does not consist of only one foundation. But the fact is that no matter how beautiful, comfortable and functional the house, without a foundation, it will simply collapse. Also with the film: no script - no movie. Whatever the visuals, acting, cameraman, costume designer, etc.
I really hope you copied this sheet from somewhere. Even starting to read this review, I was 99% sure that I know the author. I didn't make a mistake.P.P. Read the exchange of comments. It turns out that "Independence Day" - almost a classic of the genre (although in the NAM there is one plus - the notorious Jewish dad there is magnificent), and a fuflo called "Gladiator" revived peplum.I was delighted.
I really hope you copied this sheet from somewhere.
I will try to express my opinion about "Comey" in a few phrases, maybe it will seem closer to you and other readers of the blog. To one phrase: "But they tried!"
I will try to express my opinion about "Coma" in a few phrases, maybe it will seem closer to you and other readers of the blog.
And even though there's a hundred points from that stupid Black Hole, there's nothing stupid about the Black Hole. It's a great movie.
and at least a hundred points from that stupid Black Hole.
Even starting to read this review, I was 99% sure that I know the author. I'm also gradually growing in skill. Starting to read, he scored with himself that it was a cute supon and won!
Even starting to read this review, I was 99% sure that I know the author. I wasn't wrong.
The girl who saved the architect with the nickname Fly (people at the base do not remember their names) explains that everyone here is in a coma, as well as Victor. Fragments of their memories create this world in which they have to somehow survive, because they are hunted by the same monsters "reaper" - it's other people in a coma, whose brain died. ----idea is very interesting! the main problem could be the idea that a "safe island" would never be allowed out of a coma and the antagonist would try to prevent people from getting out of a coma.
The idea is very interesting! That's what I'm talking about. It all started very well, but then completely screwed up all the raspberries.
The idea is very interesting! could be really cool.
Well, let's wait for the remake! 😄
What kind of remakes are there with similar fees...
It's not a sequel, it's a remake of some Hollywood company 😉
They've had it all taken down a long time ago.
They've had it all taken down a long time ago. And also with the Architect 😄I recently read that it is "Who" want to remake in the U.S., their rather innovative visual hooked, the picture will leave 😄 and the plot is updated.
They've had it all taken down a long time ago.
Hehe, Alex, it never stopped them! 😄)
one could make the idea that a "safe island" would never be allowed to come out of a coma.
could make the idea that a "safe island" would never be allowed to come out of a coma
1 imahousewife answered