Some illogical blackbird... (
The whole film was very much in the way: completely, including the moments that were criticized. I'm even surprised that the scene with Asmus didn't seem too much to me. Since I found few comments in defense of this segment of the plot and a lot against, I want to reveal my idea in more detail. It seemed to me that, thanks to its naturalism, it reinforces the contrast between death, captivity, broken fate - and the life of the characters - hot, young, full of energy, including the desire for sex. Watching this scene was bittersweet to me - Khazin is already dead, Ilya definitely after the murder does not expect anything good. And Ilya wants to live: how he starts, looking at hot sex with a beautiful girl! And also how he wants to Colombia, as a pleasure listens to the story of the girl-tour operator about other countries (by the way, personally for me this moment in the film touched the most, when I could hardly keep from tears), how dancing in the club until I fall! And Khazin also wanted to live, and loved as much as he could - like in the video, with all the pleasure of early ending youth. And the girl loved him - that's how it is shown. And there won't be any more. There's no one now. With the review of Alex in solidarity, except for me the film scores at 8.5 about came out π
I didn't watch the movie. Hype knows. I liked the way Garik made fun of this in Camedy in Vera Brezhnev's standup... Vera: Garik, what are you? Forgot the text ?Garik: Yes, I will not forget the Text for a long time...
Oh, yes... someone can explain to me the final scene... Well, at the graveis, what kind of scare is she standing there? how did she know about him at all... Well, let's say I found out what? This is the killer of her fiance and the father of her child... Why go to his grave, with the child and stand?
Well, like, he saved her from an abortion.
There are two options - either she came to the grave of the man who talked her out of abortion, that is, saved her daughter, or just went to the grave of the killer of her child's father. Both can be.
and such, purely technical, the moment did not confuse anyone?dude goes for a week somewhere with the phone of the murdered, with the same sim, corresponds even talking all wanted strenuously, generals of the FSB, bandits, anyone ... and no one can punch him on the phone? Come on... once in the cafe showed, but here he turned off the phone and all ... he could not be seen, got up and left as something strangely fancied and stretched
For the first two to three days, he managed to smear himself with texting. And then they started looking for the FSB.
While watching the Text, for some reason I have a strong association with the 25th hour film with Norton. That day before leaving under the sky in a cage ...
I am so annoyed by this climbing from every iron Gosh Kutsenko of our days - Petrov with his role of an screaming gopnik ...
The last ten minutes of the film - one of the most powerful dramatic endings that had to see in the movie. And by a combination of duration, integrity, and even perfectly matched music - generally the best.
Alex, to you, as a person who believes in the celestialness of Russian cinema, please check "Faith" for its review. The film, in my opinion ambiguous. It seems that not the worst script and actors seem to be good, but somehow does not hold up. With the nature-invoice there is all right, but that's too painful "wooden" in all senses (thought-emotional) there heroes.
There and Glukhovsky flashed. 1h 35m.
Dear Alex. It's not a question. You've written great reviews of the last three parts of The Terminator. Is it possible to hope that you will watch and write a review of the last part? The film, to put it mildly, is worse than all the previous ones, but as you sometimes write in such cases you can "break away in reviews." Thank you in advance.
Pardon that, but, for those on the armored train, the ending of the review to Genesis: "In general, me and Bublik, as you understand, the movie did not like. Wildly secondary, nothing new: I understood, the next twenty years "Skynet" and will send various robots to dunk Aunt Sarah, and the husband of Aunt Sarah, her son, grandson, great-grandson and all this anti-border tribe will hang out in time, as a punishment in the hole, and protect Aunt Sarah, periodically meeting himself young, while completely confused, who of them at all. But it's no longer me. It's not fun. " (C)
I remember it all very well. I just hope that Alex can change his mind, especially considering that Aunt Sarah and her descendants should not be wet, and given the "heretor" thrown out the authors of this "masterpiece". I'd love to read Alex how it's going to blow it.
By the way, I recommend the russian movie Dead Swallows. Very
I recommend reading Daria Bobyleva's novel "The Viewrs" if you liked "Swallows" (I liked them too).
I recommend reading Daria Bobyleva's novel "Vuirki" if you liked "Swallows" (I liked them too).Thank you, just today Tinkov gave the book for free, took on a litre of π
I recommend reading Daria Bobyleva's novel "The Viewrs" if you liked "Swallows" (I liked them too).
Thank you in general. Although the ending is a little pumped up, but in general - very normal.
Pardon, of course, for boring, but once in the review there is such a conclusion: In Text - law enforcement officers who are so fused with crime that it does not differ at all, I would like to be accurate in the statement. It is clear that filmmakers have no time to observe logic and accuracy, but in the review to interfere with everything in a heap is not correct.I am about all the phrases "narco-police FSKN", "orders the police to detain Ilya" and the like FKSN is not since April 2016, and in fact it has not performed its functions since 2015. And taking into account the 6-year sentence of the main character then still the police we had, but it's not only this. The FKSN had its own nines and they were called the special unit "Thunder", and they had a different form, of course. Also for information since April 2016, the fight against drugs only under the Interior Ministry. Writing laziness as many still small and not very inaccuracies in the review and film.
I believe that Alex living in Spain does not cut this eye at all, I am in the U.S., too.
The fact that the machine gun does not jump out of the casing - is it letter-eating? Although yes, I have little interest in kutuzov's lamp color.
I don't think it's a movie, it's not about ignorance. Such unambiguous shoals in the film for Americans will be if the CIA is confused with the NSA, and for the Catalans it does not matter what if the Catalan says like "came home to Barca."
I will not argue with you, i would not be interested, but I must say that I watched the press conference of the director, where he told that during the filming of the detention scene in the club there was a consultant directly behind the scenes, so that the scene of Goryunov's detention was as plausible as possible. At first, the director wanted to see real officers in the frame, but then realized that it is not doable, but the consultant was.
Well, yes, they all love to write about based on real events. And does anyone believe in the words that sound from the media during PR campaigns?
And the letter-eating at the level of "in 1943 patrons were the wrong caliber!" always caused me a mixture of bewilderment and some pity for the indignant movie slack. π But the Fritz with the Kalash in the "movie and the Germans" about the 43rd year cause laughter only in childhood-youth, and getting older and wiser already begin to squeamish and squeamishly spit on slackers and neves.
And the letter-eating at the level of "in 1943 patrons were the wrong caliber!" always caused me a mixture of bewilderment and some pity for the indignant movie slack.
By the way, even Urgant, having watched this film said that the mat in the cinema should be returned. Well, I mean, not stuttered, not retouched.
Totally agree with the review. And thank you to Alex for protecting Petrov. I liked the film too. gave him 7.5/10. Well, maybe over time the score will change even by 8/10.
I read the story with great pleasure. In the film tried to convey the main plot, but a lot of nuances remained behind the scenes or sketched with a glimpse, strokes. I understand that timing and all that... Good movie.Alex, I advise you to watch Mangaloretz. Coolly stylized as the first trilogy of sV.Well and Epidemic continued to be released into the show, although threatened to freeze until next year.
In my opinion, the film is very successful. If you do not look all sorts of slags, then Petrov is quite normal to fit in, as well as Asmus. The story of the scandal shames only those idiots who participated in his unbreakment.
If this snout (I'm pro-scene) secis is, then I'm inn (((
The dude on the cover is Nikolai Coster-Waldau!
I'll tell you right away, I haven't read the book, and now I won't. The Joker remember in detail, the text passed by my memory. It was the first domestic film (if you do not take Smesharikov with children), which I went to the movies in my life, and only because Glukhovsky impressed me. Vru, on "Ten Negroes" parents drove. We see the stories in the news more swirling, compiling - Do not want. Well, compare the atmosphere of despondency here and in the same Joker (take a fresh example).And without history, there is nothing left to look. Well, yes, actors, well, ok, what does that give in this case? All (most likely, I do not remember already) well done, but the kina did not turn out IMHO. No different from the kina for which give money from the treasury, to my great regret. Maybe a little bolder. But there is good news: in the cinema to our cinema you can not go on and do not spend money and time π
What a pity. But there is good news: in the cinema to our cinema you can continue not to go and not spend money and time πA so force what?
What a pity. But there is good news: in the cinema to our cinema you can not go on and do not spend money and time π
I feel bad for the power. It would be a movie, I would go with joy.
What does the power have to do with that? Movies are made by people, concrete, power and art to combine - it turns out...
And the power has nothing to do with it π?
What does the power have to do with that?
But there is good news: in the movies at our cinema you can continue not to go and do not spend money and time πAny hairstyle of everything and all under one comb - it's always a strange step. Even if you do not like this film, in Russia they make a good movie. And to say that all our movies are bad - well, it's not so.
I didn't say that, I said that I didn't see the point in going to the movies. Very rarely, but intelligent films are, with this no one argues.
And to say that all our movies are bad.
It turns out to be like a power and a sport. It's just that Russian cinema is almost not watched; but not because of doping πAmid the general boredom of "Text" is almost a masterpiece. "The Collector" was still good, but the passion "on the ground to collect sour cream" (see Solzhenitsyn, "In the circle of the first") renders a disservice to producers; saving on voiceacting - nonsense. If half of the film is necessary to strain the ear, then guess what will do a normal person - will go to the cinema or prefer to watch downloaded from the torrent, where you can adjust yourself, and if still not heard, then rewind? A rhetorical question, of course.
"Entertainment 4, Actor's Game 5, Director's Work 5, Scenario 5," and "Exler's Rating: 7.0"So it's intended? )
Why not? It happens so - some aspects of the system are excellent, and put together - and it turns out not so much.
Again Petrov! How much can you do?
Here in KVN this moment was beaten (look from 2:47):
(Paphosno) One actor's theatre is born in Russian cinema!.. (Scream) Petroff is our face!!
Duck it wasn't that long ago - kicked them out of the tower, yes. Apparently rehabilitated - but it's not the season - it's a musical quince.
About the sex scene. She didn't bother me, of course, but she seemed completely unnecessary. Well, I mean, there's a feeling that it's been added for PR and lure. And, in my opinion, the film does not need it at all. It's just that Dostoyevsky has committed a crime and he paid for it through moral suffering, remorse, fear and all that. And then one committed a crime (Khazin), and the other paid (Goryunov). Khazin, too, of course, paid in the end, but not through remorse. His soul remained as black as it was, he just died. In general, this is exactly the modern "Crime and Punishment" in my opinion. Adapted to the unscrupulous reality of our time and our space. I didn't expect this Goryunov to be such an idiot. That's just everything he's been doing since the start of that healthy 20-year-old's conversation with his mom is idiocy. And the farther, the cooler.
The whole salt of the sex scene is that in the background, for Asmus, on TV normal, revisit
About the sex scene. She didn't bother me, of course, but she seemed completely unnecessary. Well, I mean, there's a feeling that it's been added for PR and lure. And, in my opinion, the film does not need it. Through this "correspondence" the director tries to reveal the reasons for the origin of Ilya's attachment to Nina. And to use tits for PR and lure of a film of this genre - it would be a clear failure to get into the target audience.
About the sex scene. She didn't bother me, of course, but she seemed completely unnecessary. Well, I mean, there's a feeling that it's been added for PR and lure. And, in my opinion, the film does not need it at all.
Through this "correspondence" the director tries to reveal the reasons for the origin of Ilya's attachment to Nina. Are you talking about this "correspondence"?
Through this "correspondence" the director tries to reveal the reasons for the origin of Ilya's attachment to Nina.
Offtop - thanks for recommending the series. Sneaky Pete's pretty good. Harrow - now watching the second season, very cool, learned there Ashka from the beloved Wizard π She, it turns out, a lot where filmed, but how she aged ... But still I would like something more fun...
"P. S. I love it when Russian films are worth watching." It's bad that only blackbird works well π
It's just because it's like reality. Cheerful cheerful idiocy turns out noticeably worse. And it's clear why.
There was yesterday on TV how a disguised Putin travels around the country, correcting the shortcomings. "President's Vacation" Look dainishly even in the background.
I didn't. Petrov doesn't pull as an actor. With his blank eyes and snout not philologists or heroes play imho.
That's right. with that look -- only the scoundrels and play. Something reminds me of the Priludny.
they play him - peppers in a mask, a corner to ask to go out to sort out. there's nothing to talk about. worse only the son of the Terminator-Makarevich Jr.)
It turns out that my mother had to obey ...
Mom needs to obey all the time!
Listen to your mother. because Mom is a climber (c) "Rapunzel"
Scenario -5? Seriously??? The film about the asshole, who twice burned because of the woman and "it's five"? π
I understand that 5 should be put in a scenario where a clever crosacheg twice did not burn because of the women, and the women because of it burned, right?
Alex, correct "He lives in the suburbs of Lobn with his mom."
Good crime drama. Literately-black, without busting, and as actualized as possible, both in terms of socio-political subtext, and in the form of material supply. At times there was a feeling that I watch a new film by Yuri Bykov. Pilgrim, Pain Threshold, Plant, Russian Bes, Ninth, Break, Dead Swallows... At least in some direction our cinema is gradually progressing. "Three Seconds" is the second in a row of a powerful performance by Joel Kinnaman, for those who have already missed Takeshi Kovac from "The Modified Carbon". Simple, even secondary in something, but very strong and charming in his "knighthood" crime-prison thriller. Unofficially, many have dubbed it "Shot in the Void 2" and are partly right. "Gangster, Cop and The Devil", which absorbed all the best features of Korean crime thrillers. "First Love" by Takashi Miike, a cool yakuza action with signature black humor and inevitable notes of branded madness. Miike is one of the most prolific and unstable directors, but this time he certainly did not miss. And, already quite distracted from the genre, very much liked from the fresh "Combyland-2. Control shot." The sequel went even better than the original, carefully preserving all the good and improving all that was needed. Don't miss who hasn't seen it yet!
loved the fresh "Combyland-2." Control shot"Particularly pleased that saved in the film Bill Murray!
loved the fresh "Combyland-2." Control shot"
Great, thank you, I'm going to be looking for "Three Seconds" and Asian. I'm waiting for the second "zombieland" too.
-- Who's Bill Murray? - I've never hit kids before, but it's like asking who Gandhi is.
However, the film adaptation of "Metro 2033" Glukhovsky i would please even moreVery difficult. It's like doing a normal Witcher TV series after very good books and great games. Perhaps for those who did not read and did not play quite nothing, but we know how it would be better))))The universe "Metro" has a very large positive background also from books and games. It is unrealistic to please fans of one and the other.
However, the film adaptation of "Metro 2033" Glukhovsky would have pleased me even more
I don't know, I've read everything from the 1992 story "The Witcher." And at the same time the series was watched with great pleasure. Only one minus - I would like twice as many episodes. Cavill fit into the image impeccably, although before I did not like anywhere and only his name in the credits has already caused skepticism. Beautiful stylized music, special effects, make-up monsters, amazing staging of fights. The lost atmosphere of "combat fantasy" of the 80s type "Conana", "Love Death", "Lady Hawk" causes a colossal nostalgia. The plot will be revealed in all its diversity in the next seasons. Well, i'm not a fan of the cycle, so maybe I judge a little superficially, as an ordinary viewer and some small details do not cut my eye.
The Witcher? Well, I was really delighted, for a long time such pleasure did not get from the series in the genre of "fantasy", perhaps expectations were understated. For comparison, the first season of "Game of Thrones" caused me much less enthusiasm (they are often compared now).
Chord, I can't hold back....:) WITCH ING!
By the way, you're right, he played well there, too. I just in general did not really film came, such a glamorous pastiche for schoolgirls) In fact, I remember the still strongly underrated horror of Schumacher "Bloody Creek" and not too deep, but very beautiful film Tarsem Singh "War of the Gods: Immortals", he also performed well there. But in the last "Mission," "Superman," "Hannibal's Game" did not like it at all. And after these roles, I doubted that Geralt's image from Revia would be up to him, but no, it flashed so.
Yes, despite the simplicity of the motive, it is very difficult to get out of my head) As well as sounding on the final credits of the first series stylized as the Eastern European ballad "The House of the Rising Sun" ...
For me, "The Witcher," "See" and "Mandalorets" - the three best series of the last months.Two of the last stopped watching: "See" still on the first series, "Mandaloreets after three or four. It looks budget, really.
For me, "The Witcher," "Seeing" and "Mandalores" are the three best tv series of recent months.
Yes, there is nothing in "3 seconds" except the charm of Kinnaman, a lot of plywood, the plot banal, in general, solid nais... "Call Shot" is much stronger. And "zombieland-2" looks good, although it is worse than the first, but where will you put Woody Harrelson, coupled with good music. Jokes are deliberately "deliberate", they (gl/heroes) almost quote themselves ... Well, traditionally, you have to look in the original with Anglosabs, including songs, really, other sensations.
I'm really from the series I haven't watched yet, but I'm already judging) Well, next week, i guess there's going to be time. I don't know what to expect, all the fans are not very happy. I really do not say from Game of Thrones that I am delighted that the books (read four) that of the series (watched the first 2 seasons).
The series has not yet watched, but is ready to beat the mortgage - the song from the game Witcher 3 is much better ...
Absolutely awesome! In the cinema twice in a row on it went ...))
"all the best features of Korean crime thrillers" is too much. More or less not bad against the background of this year's criminal-free fish in Korea, yes. Well, even this year "Extreme Work" and "Without Mercy" (such a female version of Oldboy). Part 1, Cold Eyes, New World. Or quite a long time outlaw (2010).
The question is not in quality:)
I've seen almost all the variants of "Let It Go" of different localizations. All excellent, some are better perceived purely because of the language, but I would not explicitly single out Russian. And some covers are clearly not worse)
The second "zombie" is in excellent quality on the hdvideo box
I really want to ask the next morons how they managed to make "Three Seconds" from "Informant". The film itself is so-so, I do not regret the look, I will not advise others.
I would advise not to read, but to listen to this book performed by Igor Knyazev. By the way, this version of the voice over is considered official and glukhovsky himself fully approves. This is one of the best audio books that I have heard and Igor Knyazev here is simply incomparable. In general, I love two recites - I.Knyazev and A. Klyukvin. After listening to the book in the film I really lacked the melody of "Narcos" (from the series I was delighted in my time), which in the film is almost absent, and in the audio version of this melody is very cleverly woven into the thread of the narrative, which can not be said from the film. And of course the text itself, as the main character analyzes the correspondence, in the film very little of course, comparing with the book. But it is quite expected, when going to the cinema all thought: "How will they embody so much text in the film?" But it would be a completely different story) Well, logically, how the heroine K.Asmus could understand that it was Ilya Goryunov who corresponded with her? Only if Hazin's father had made a special report to her, but why would he need it, to emphasize once again that his son was a freak? What they liked was how, unlike the book, they emphasized the spiritual connection of the mother with the son and stretched the logical thread from the first scene of the film to the last, not the last scene with Asmus on the credits of course.
I tried it. I couldn't. It's too gloomy. Some other time.
I willingly believe that the audio is good, but your advice is not for everyone. Since I read three times (minimum) faster than a book read aloud, I do not care whether there is Knyazev or someone else.
It is clear that you can read faster, but you can not only read at speed, but also enjoy a good reading to others. And you can listen where you can't read. For example, I listen on a treadmill and in the pool, and also behind the wheel, when you go long distances on a familiar road (not on the city on the navigator ) then listens perfectly behind the wheel.
Good movie, sorry without a happy. But Dagestan (or Chechen?) bandits are well completely caricatured. It's somehow knocked out of the total. I think the American hero would shoot to the end.
I didn't watch the film, I read a book. The book is good, but it's driven into a terrible depresniak. If the movie's good, it's going to get worse, isn't it? Paradoxical situation - I will not go because the film is good ...
If the film is good, it will be even worse?
If the movie's good, it's going to get worse, isn't it?
The film is really good and for all my dislike for Petrov, here he for me was reborn into a truly dramatic actor, I hope that he will grow creatively and stop acting in any slag. Two points in the film which the authors could avoid: with Asmus (well, there is such a move to attract the viewer) if you cut this scene then really nothing will change, and the abundance of mate. Through the phrase mate-re-emboss. I can bend myself so that the ears wither but insert non-normative vocabulary into the film supposedly to convey emotions justifying it by some "tension" or something else.... You can always replace swearing with another swearing. You children will watch!))))
Dramatic Actor, Call DiCaprio Look
You probably haven't seen the TV series "In the Cage" yet. After that, the brute from "Text" will seem to you high school students rosy π.
The series Traitor 2012, too, in terms of showing the life of the FSKN sheep is not bad π
Watched with my wife in the cinema. It's a great movie. Petrov as always at the height. Without a scene with Asmus the movie would have lost nothing, just a marketing move. Annoyingless less product placement, and to look more interesting π
The sound in the film is absolutely innositic, in dialogues it is necessary to constantly listen. However, as in all Russian films the same trouble.
There's such a problem, yes. Here's another back and forth, but in the series - in general a nightmare. Save.
Specifically in this film there is no "trouble" in the movie, nor on the version that is in the network now. The sound of 5.1 DD is recorded quite correctly, in terms of dialogues. But the trouble is really there and is connected with the fact that the originally recorded 5.1 sound for an online show is incorrectly shoved into the 2nd channel, as a result of the dialogues are jammed with the background. Some TV series I instead watched online from the same premiere (for example "Dead Lake") rocked with torents only to look at D.C., where the receiver laying out the sound from 2.0 to 5.1 was making the pseudo-central channel and the dialogues became noticeably more discernible
The scene is terribly subdued (see epigraphs to the review)And the epigraph is one.
Question. Is it better to open them up right away?
Of course. They're epigraphs. They set the tone for the whole narrative!
Alex, you've always had them open before. and then whether the engine changed, or just changed and became only the first visible. I was surprised at first that you had a lot of epigraphs in your reviews before, and then there was only one.
We've changed the new design. But there's also a button that's like "All epigraphs."
I didn't notice right away. That's right at all not at once:) probably just didn't expect it there, so I didn't pay attention to it:)
Especially "he's the son of Fundera" π
Question. Is it better to open them up at once?
Question. Is it better to open them up right away?
Criticism, speaking about this film, for some reason weaves "Crime and Punishment" Dostoevsky, although there are no parallels here Glukhovsky in several interviews himself called his novel "Punishment and Crime." When I read Dostoevsky's novel, Too. Probably because it also shows a modern slice of society. Such novels in the future will be able to study the history of modern Russia.
Criticism, speaking about this film, for some reason weaves "Crime and Punishment" Dostoevsky, although there are no parallels here
And what can you see without cops and bandits? I would like to see a modern version of "No Witnesses."
The story is embroidered...... Khazin's friends and acquaintances...
"However, the picture shows that Goryunov, in general, did not plan to kill Khazin, he just wanted to find out why he did this to him." - in the original source: "Ilya removed the paper back in his pocket, said, "Yes, I did nothing ... and from the pocket immediately, up the edge, hit Peta in the soft chin with a sausage knife and a soft sausage knife. Petya gurgled and flowed. I tried to plug a hole with my hand."
That doesn't negate the fact that he wasn't going to kill. Talk, find out the reasons... But when you continue to get in the way with the mud...
In the film, this moment was changed.
And how to kill on the basis of "sudden personal animosity"? The same mechanism is word for word, h.. m on the table. And here such relations are far from sudden, so a break from the coils is much more likely. The student, the weapon to take nowhere, and realizes that goes to a meeting with the, having a gun. So I took what could find a weapon to equalize the chances in a possible conflict. But you have to read the book. "However, the picture shows that Goryunov, in general, did not plan to kill Khazin, he just wanted to find out why he did so to him." - in the original source: well, it is different from his story, but the picture on the story and should not exactly correspond to the literary original: after all, each of his vision - the director can have his own
"However, the picture shows that Goryunov, in general, did not plan to kill Khazin, he just wanted to find out why he did this to him." - in the original source:
It differs from his story, but the picture on the story and should not exactly correspond to the literary original: after all, each has his own vision - the director can have his own
1 sunybabby answered