Skip to content
Movie Reviews

Tekst Review (Drama, 2019)

Last updated May 28, 2020
Learn more about the movie "Tekst" released in 2019. Honestly review and critics. Is it worthing to watch "Text"?
1
section

Tekst - Storyline, Actors And Ratings

The movie "Tekst" is a Drama production.

IMDB rated the movie with 7.0 / 10.

According to Google Users - 88% of the people watched the movie liked the story.

Director: Klim Shipenko Actors: Alexander Petrov, Ivan Yankovsky, Kristina Asmus, Kirill Nagiev, Sofya Ozerova, Maxim Vinogradov, Dmitry Glukhovsky, Elena Finogeeva, Vladimir Kapustin, Pavel Golubev

Text has been produced with the budget of Budget: $ 1.2 million, Fees in Russia: $ 6.3 million. Gloomy, hopeless, intriguing, and powerful.

Agame actors are good, but the script itself is complete shit, sorry for the money and time! Olesya In a word - a nightmare! I regretted that I went to a movie picture. Not a fan of Asmus, much less Petrova, but I respect Yankovsky (the son of Fandera, after all). Briefly about the film - no! I have never met a hero dumber than Goryunov, in such pictures! Asmus, as she was in the role of the girl Vary in the interns, remained no more than her. Otherwise, the ending of the film was clear to me at the very beginning. Such a G ... no need to shoot !!! Better let it stay on the pages of books. Catherine, I went to the movie, with my girlfriend! On the bed scene, I went nuts, and she watched as if nothing had happened and we quarreled because of this, the movie poop.

2
section

Tekst Review

Twenty-year-old Ilya Goryunov (Alexander Petrov) is a student of the Faculty of Philology at Moscow State University. He lives in the suburbs of Lobn with his mother (Elena Finogeneva), a teacher of Russian language and literature. Ilya in honor of the end of the session is going to go with his girlfriend Vera (Sofia Ozerova) to a Moscow nightclub, my mother is categorically against: Ilya was left with one unsold subject on Romanesque philology and his mother believes that until Ilya does everything, there should be no trips to the clubs.

Ilya with the help of an ugly maneuver escapes from the house, meets with Vera, and they go to the club "Paradise" where they drink and pull off. Suddenly, the FSKN drug police burst into the club, accompanied by a plainclothes employee, Petr Khazin (Ivan Jankowski). Khazin detains Vera. Goryunov tries to stop him and notices that Khazin himself is doused with cocaine. Peter lets go of Vera and orders the police to detain Ilya. During the search Khazin throws Togounov cocaine, the young man is tried and jailed for seven years for drug trafficking. 

Returning after serving time, Ilya finds out that his mother died of a heart attack, Vera does not want to communicate with him, because she has her own life, and even with his best friend Serega (Maxim Vinogradov) he has a relationship not the same as before: Serega family, his worries and problems.

Goryunov finds Khazin's page on social networks. He is the son of a general of the Interior Ministry, so in life he has everything in full chocolate: promotion, cool cars, a beautiful girlfriend, rest in exotic countries and all that.

Ilya also finds out that Peter is dealing with criminal circles: as it should be the FSKN officer, he resells confiscated cocaine. Goryunov meets with Khazin under the guise of a drug buyer, tries to find out for what he on an even place spoiled his life, they have a fight, and Ilya Petra accidentally kills. He then picks up his gun and smartphone.

Goryunov knows the password from the smartphone, and he begins to correspond with Hazin's mother, his girlfriend and his boss: he needs to buy time. In addition, he had one idea how to make money from it. 

***

The story of the popular writer Dmitry Glukhovsky "Text" was published in 2017. Shortly after the book's release, Glukhovsky began to receive proposals for the film adaptation. "Text" was interested in the producer Alexander Rodnyansky, also Timur Bekmambetov considered the book suitable for the creation of a film in the style of screenlife (Bekmambetov staged several films in this genre, he was the producer of the film "Search"). Glukhovsky also received offers of film adaptation from other countries - the United States, Italy and South Korea.

As a result, the rights were sold to Central Partners in Russia, the script was written by Dmitry Glukhovsky himself, the film was directed by Klim Shipenko, and the main role was originally planned by Alexander Petrov.

Interestingly, in the book there are certain parallels with the case of Ivan Golunov, to whom the cops planted drugs and were going to roll up an innocent young man to the fullest, and only the noise raised by the public, as well as the fact that the cops on Golunov had nothing at all, allowed to stop the lawlessness and save Ivan. However, unfortunately, this is almost an isolated case, when a person was rescued, and how many such innocent young and young people are sitting in Russia in prisons because they simply did not like some cop or their business decided to squeeze some law enforcement officer?

By the way, the artists from "Text" took part in actions against arbitrariness against the journalist, and the director Klim Shipenko and even with Golunov studied in the same class.

But back to the movie. Unlike Golunov, Goryunov's film turned out much worse. The fused major from the FSKN never sent the guy for seven years, completely breaking his fate. 

Hazin broke his fate too, but he had no idea about it yet. However, the picture shows that Goryunov, in general, did not plan to kill Khazin, he just wanted to find out why he did this to him. But Khazin showed no remorse, it's still the same groomed cop major, by permissiveness, so what happened happened.

And then three-quarters of the film will tell the story of how Ilya studies the life of Peter on his smartphone and how he in correspondence with family, friends and acquaintances Hazin impersonates him, and he will have there one very clear goal.

Criticism, speaking about this film, for some reason weaves "Crime and Punishment" Dostoevsky, although there are no parallels here, also call the character Petrov "anti-brother", referring to "Brother" Balabanov, which is also absolutely pulled by the ears. But with "The Joker" there really are certain parallels - first of all in the fact that here and there shown absolutely distorted and sick society: young people who have no prospects because of dangling social elevators, and the richest "elites" for whom there are no laws, which the rest and for people do not consider. It is no coincidence that in "The Joker" politicians call ordinary people "clowns", and in "Text" the fucked-up major Khazin says to Goryunov: "What are you going to do to me? You're a clown!"

In The Joker - politicians, in Text - law enforcement officers who are so fused with crime that it does not differ from it at all. But only in "The Joker" all ended with the fact that the bottoms refused to continue to tolerate it all, and in "Text" everything is vital and in Russian: the tragedy of Ilya remains his personal tragedy - some major lowered his life in the toilet, Ilya lowered the corpse of the offender into the sewer, and, in general, with him went there, because the chances of all this to sort it out. Plus, the upbringing of the mother-teacher interferes.

After all, little Ilyus was taught to live properly: to help others, to sympathize with people, to distinguish good from evil. And, in general, it is burned, because when you come across people like Khazin, who have completely different ideas about good and evil, who believe that if they have a mental (faesash, deputy or some other) certificate, then all other people, except the superiors - it's just garbage, against them with simple human values do not understand.

Alexander Goryunova played well. But the role was very difficult: a nice student-philologist in the beginning, after that a man with a completely broken fate, who on the way out of prison did not have loved ones - it was necessary to be able to play. By the way, the episode immediately after the murder of Khazin was a pure improvisation of Petrov: he and the director did not discuss this scene in detail, as a result of which there in the frame get really random passers-by. And although they then made a few more takes, the picture included the very first improvisation.

Some spectators put in a rebuke to the picture that, they say, "here again Alexander Petrov, as if there are no other actors." Well, let's put it this way. It doesn't bother me when a good actor is in demand. And Petrov is a good actor. Yes, he does not impress the actor's reincarnation, his types of similarities, but here they are something he plays quite decently: he is natural and organic. I like him. 

Ivan Jankowski - well, just like on the notes played this Petya Khazin. He's a slob, a self-confident man, with a sash in his pocket, a coke in his nostrils, a dad-general - I've met them. And his conversation with Ilya, who was released from prison after seven years in prison, is very revealing. He doesn't care about the guy he ever jailed for seven years. And he will survive - he will get another seven years. And you can see how much he believes that this xyva in his pocket makes him invulnerable and untouchable - even in relation to the man to whom he has ruined his whole life. 

Christina Asmus (which I honestly did not even recognize, although "Interns" of course, watched) here appears only in a few small episodes, among which was one rather frank sex scene, filmed on a smartphone - it is viewed by Ilya. A certain part of the audience this scene terribly subdued (see epigraphs to the review), to me it seemed quite organic (and that's not on smartphones do not shoot - yes, of course), and what there the audience so terribly resented - it is unclear completely. 

The painting also claims that there are often sound mater expressions. Well, yes, they do. Do you think that such people in real life talk without a mat? In my opinion, here with this everything was quite vital and quite in moderation, the stick was not overstepped. 

I liked it. Well written, well delivered and well played. Dmitry Glukhovsky himself, as far as I read, is pleased with the picture. It differs from his story, but the picture on the story and should not exactly correspond to the literary original: after all, everyone has his own vision - the director can have his own. And the fact that Klim Shipenko has this vision is very good. 

P. S. I love it when Russian films turn out to be worth watching. And then they will release some large-budget slag - it immediately becomes embarrassing. But here - the film is quite worthy, and the box office collected a good, which can not but please. 

Comments 136

1
sunybabby answered · May 28, 2020
Some illogical blackbird... (
2
xxxxxxxleev18 answered · May 28, 2020
I'd take the money.
3
ashleylove77 answered · May 28, 2020
The whole film was very much in the way: completely, including the moments that were criticized. I'm even surprised that the scene with Asmus didn't seem too much to me. Since I found few comments in defense of this segment of the plot and a lot against, I want to reveal my idea in more detail. It seemed to me that, thanks to its naturalism, it reinforces the contrast between death, captivity, broken fate - and the life of the characters - hot, young, full of energy, including the desire for sex. Watching this scene was bittersweet to me - Khazin is already dead, Ilya definitely after the murder does not expect anything good. And Ilya wants to live: how he starts, looking at hot sex with a beautiful girl! And also how he wants to Colombia, as a pleasure listens to the story of the girl-tour operator about other countries (by the way, personally for me this moment in the film touched the most, when I could hardly keep from tears), how dancing in the club until I fall! And Khazin also wanted to live, and loved as much as he could - like in the video, with all the pleasure of early ending youth. And the girl loved him - that's how it is shown. And there won't be any more. There's no one now. With the review of Alex in solidarity, except for me the film scores at 8.5 about came out 😄
4
marrygrayes answered · May 28, 2020
I didn't watch the movie. Hype knows. I liked the way Garik made fun of this in Camedy in Vera Brezhnev's standup... Vera: Garik, what are you? Forgot the text ?Garik: Yes, I will not forget the Text for a long time...
5
monstercock15inches answered · May 28, 2020
Oh, yes... someone can explain to me the final scene... Well, at the graveis, what kind of scare is she standing there? how did she know about him at all... Well, let's say I found out what? This is the killer of her fiance and the father of her child... Why go to his grave, with the child and stand?
6
sweetf0xxx answered · May 28, 2020
Well, like, he saved her from an abortion.
7
lilcaramelcutie answered · May 29, 2020
There are two options - either she came to the grave of the man who talked her out of abortion, that is, saved her daughter, or just went to the grave of the killer of her child's father. Both can be.
8
oatsljo3 answered · May 29, 2020
and such, purely technical, the moment did not confuse anyone?dude goes for a week somewhere with the phone of the murdered, with the same sim, corresponds even talking all wanted strenuously, generals of the FSB, bandits, anyone ... and no one can punch him on the phone? Come on... once in the cafe showed, but here he turned off the phone and all ... he could not be seen, got up and left as something strangely fancied and stretched
9
liz_lemon_ answered · May 29, 2020
For the first two to three days, he managed to smear himself with texting. And then they started looking for the FSB.
10
sweetdream7 answered · May 30, 2020
While watching the Text, for some reason I have a strong association with the 25th hour film with Norton. That day before leaving under the sky in a cage ...
11
vale_jones answered · May 30, 2020
I am so annoyed by this climbing from every iron Gosh Kutsenko of our days - Petrov with his role of an screaming gopnik ...
12
arisha_u answered · May 30, 2020
The last ten minutes of the film - one of the most powerful dramatic endings that had to see in the movie. And by a combination of duration, integrity, and even perfectly matched music - generally the best.
13
averymia answered · May 31, 2020
Alex, to you, as a person who believes in the celestialness of Russian cinema, please check "Faith" for its review. The film, in my opinion ambiguous. It seems that not the worst script and actors seem to be good, but somehow does not hold up. With the nature-invoice there is all right, but that's too painful "wooden" in all senses (thought-emotional) there heroes.
14
dicksmoothie answered · May 31, 2020
There and Glukhovsky flashed. 1h 35m.
15
hairstylesdc3 answered · May 31, 2020
Dear Alex. It's not a question. You've written great reviews of the last three parts of The Terminator. Is it possible to hope that you will watch and write a review of the last part? The film, to put it mildly, is worse than all the previous ones, but as you sometimes write in such cases you can "break away in reviews." Thank you in advance.
16
berry_keyra answered · June 01, 2020
Pardon that, but, for those on the armored train, the ending of the review to Genesis: "In general, me and Bublik, as you understand, the movie did not like. Wildly secondary, nothing new: I understood, the next twenty years "Skynet" and will send various robots to dunk Aunt Sarah, and the husband of Aunt Sarah, her son, grandson, great-grandson and all this anti-border tribe will hang out in time, as a punishment in the hole, and protect Aunt Sarah, periodically meeting himself young, while completely confused, who of them at all. But it's no longer me. It's not fun. " (C)
17
benwilson69 answered · June 01, 2020
I remember it all very well. I just hope that Alex can change his mind, especially considering that Aunt Sarah and her descendants should not be wet, and given the "heretor" thrown out the authors of this "masterpiece". I'd love to read Alex how it's going to blow it.
18
lovelyannasq answered · June 01, 2020
By the way, I recommend the russian movie Dead Swallows. Very
19
hendrixx89 answered · June 01, 2020
I recommend reading Daria Bobyleva's novel "The Viewrs" if you liked "Swallows" (I liked them too).
20
milk_with_blood answered · June 02, 2020
I recommend reading Daria Bobyleva's novel "Vuirki" if you liked "Swallows" (I liked them too).Thank you, just today Tinkov gave the book for free, took on a litre of 😉
21
lovely_madeleine answered · June 02, 2020
I recommend reading Daria Bobyleva's novel "The Viewrs" if you liked "Swallows" (I liked them too).
22
secretary_bj answered · June 02, 2020
Thank you in general. Although the ending is a little pumped up, but in general - very normal.
23
thatguy9908 answered · June 02, 2020
Pardon, of course, for boring, but once in the review there is such a conclusion: In Text - law enforcement officers who are so fused with crime that it does not differ at all, I would like to be accurate in the statement. It is clear that filmmakers have no time to observe logic and accuracy, but in the review to interfere with everything in a heap is not correct.I am about all the phrases "narco-police FSKN", "orders the police to detain Ilya" and the like FKSN is not since April 2016, and in fact it has not performed its functions since 2015. And taking into account the 6-year sentence of the main character then still the police we had, but it's not only this. The FKSN had its own nines and they were called the special unit "Thunder", and they had a different form, of course. Also for information since April 2016, the fight against drugs only under the Interior Ministry. Writing laziness as many still small and not very inaccuracies in the review and film.
24
scottbrendalatincouple answered · June 02, 2020
I believe that Alex living in Spain does not cut this eye at all, I am in the U.S., too.
25
simon_butler answered · June 03, 2020
The fact that the machine gun does not jump out of the casing - is it letter-eating? Although yes, I have little interest in kutuzov's lamp color.
26
sofia_rose69 answered · June 03, 2020
I don't think it's a movie, it's not about ignorance. Such unambiguous shoals in the film for Americans will be if the CIA is confused with the NSA, and for the Catalans it does not matter what if the Catalan says like "came home to Barca."
27
madamxenti answered · June 03, 2020
I will not argue with you, i would not be interested, but I must say that I watched the press conference of the director, where he told that during the filming of the detention scene in the club there was a consultant directly behind the scenes, so that the scene of Goryunov's detention was as plausible as possible. At first, the director wanted to see real officers in the frame, but then realized that it is not doable, but the consultant was.
28
chris_jade answered · June 03, 2020
Well, yes, they all love to write about based on real events. And does anyone believe in the words that sound from the media during PR campaigns?
29
_marilyn__ answered · June 03, 2020
And the letter-eating at the level of "in 1943 patrons were the wrong caliber!" always caused me a mixture of bewilderment and some pity for the indignant movie slack. 😄 But the Fritz with the Kalash in the "movie and the Germans" about the 43rd year cause laughter only in childhood-youth, and getting older and wiser already begin to squeamish and squeamishly spit on slackers and neves.
30
ddboubou answered · June 04, 2020
And the letter-eating at the level of "in 1943 patrons were the wrong caliber!" always caused me a mixture of bewilderment and some pity for the indignant movie slack.
31
nastylilmilf2000 answered · June 04, 2020
By the way, even Urgant, having watched this film said that the mat in the cinema should be returned. Well, I mean, not stuttered, not retouched.
32
tobimcfly713 answered · June 04, 2020
Totally agree with the review. And thank you to Alex for protecting Petrov. I liked the film too. gave him 7.5/10. Well, maybe over time the score will change even by 8/10.
33
riverroze69 answered · June 04, 2020
I read the story with great pleasure. In the film tried to convey the main plot, but a lot of nuances remained behind the scenes or sketched with a glimpse, strokes. I understand that timing and all that... Good movie.Alex, I advise you to watch Mangaloretz. Coolly stylized as the first trilogy of sV.Well and Epidemic continued to be released into the show, although threatened to freeze until next year.
34
beehint answered · June 04, 2020
In my opinion, the film is very successful. If you do not look all sorts of slags, then Petrov is quite normal to fit in, as well as Asmus. The story of the scandal shames only those idiots who participated in his unbreakment.
35
jaylen_smith answered · June 05, 2020
If this snout (I'm pro-scene) secis is, then I'm inn (((
36
sexxymeriemm answered · June 05, 2020
The dude on the cover is Nikolai Coster-Waldau!
37
rightpy answered · June 05, 2020
I'll tell you right away, I haven't read the book, and now I won't. The Joker remember in detail, the text passed by my memory. It was the first domestic film (if you do not take Smesharikov with children), which I went to the movies in my life, and only because Glukhovsky impressed me. Vru, on "Ten Negroes" parents drove. We see the stories in the news more swirling, compiling - Do not want. Well, compare the atmosphere of despondency here and in the same Joker (take a fresh example).And without history, there is nothing left to look. Well, yes, actors, well, ok, what does that give in this case? All (most likely, I do not remember already) well done, but the kina did not turn out IMHO. No different from the kina for which give money from the treasury, to my great regret. Maybe a little bolder. But there is good news: in the cinema to our cinema you can not go on and do not spend money and time 😄
38
big6incheragain answered · June 05, 2020
What a pity. But there is good news: in the cinema to our cinema you can continue not to go and not spend money and time 😄A so force what?
39
lily_cry_baby answered · June 05, 2020
What a pity. But there is good news: in the cinema to our cinema you can not go on and do not spend money and time 😄
40
devi_fox answered · June 05, 2020
I feel bad for the power. It would be a movie, I would go with joy.
41
insatiableslut answered · June 06, 2020
What does the power have to do with that? Movies are made by people, concrete, power and art to combine - it turns out...
42
bahrovv answered · June 06, 2020
And the power has nothing to do with it 😄?
43
marcelotorello answered · June 06, 2020
What does the power have to do with that?
44
zayfer_1 answered · June 06, 2020
But there is good news: in the movies at our cinema you can continue not to go and do not spend money and time 😄Any hairstyle of everything and all under one comb - it's always a strange step. Even if you do not like this film, in Russia they make a good movie. And to say that all our movies are bad - well, it's not so.
45
big_honey answered · June 06, 2020
I didn't say that, I said that I didn't see the point in going to the movies. Very rarely, but intelligent films are, with this no one argues.
46
touch_me111 answered · June 06, 2020
And to say that all our movies are bad.
47
kris_ty answered · June 07, 2020
It turns out to be like a power and a sport. It's just that Russian cinema is almost not watched; but not because of doping 😄Amid the general boredom of "Text" is almost a masterpiece. "The Collector" was still good, but the passion "on the ground to collect sour cream" (see Solzhenitsyn, "In the circle of the first") renders a disservice to producers; saving on voiceacting - nonsense. If half of the film is necessary to strain the ear, then guess what will do a normal person - will go to the cinema or prefer to watch downloaded from the torrent, where you can adjust yourself, and if still not heard, then rewind? A rhetorical question, of course.
48
raquellablack answered · June 07, 2020
"Entertainment 4, Actor's Game 5, Director's Work 5, Scenario 5," and "Exler's Rating: 7.0"So it's intended? )
49
fantasticfantasy420 answered · June 07, 2020
Why not? It happens so - some aspects of the system are excellent, and put together - and it turns out not so much.
50
bellavontease1 answered · June 07, 2020
Again Petrov! How much can you do?
51
molly_and_paul answered · June 07, 2020
Here in KVN this moment was beaten (look from 2:47):
52
smoothmove882 answered · June 07, 2020
(Paphosno) One actor's theatre is born in Russian cinema!.. (Scream) Petroff is our face!!
53
lina_cosmicbaby answered · June 08, 2020
Duck it wasn't that long ago - kicked them out of the tower, yes. Apparently rehabilitated - but it's not the season - it's a musical quince.
54
sexythecity93 answered · June 08, 2020
About the sex scene. She didn't bother me, of course, but she seemed completely unnecessary. Well, I mean, there's a feeling that it's been added for PR and lure. And, in my opinion, the film does not need it at all. It's just that Dostoyevsky has committed a crime and he paid for it through moral suffering, remorse, fear and all that. And then one committed a crime (Khazin), and the other paid (Goryunov). Khazin, too, of course, paid in the end, but not through remorse. His soul remained as black as it was, he just died. In general, this is exactly the modern "Crime and Punishment" in my opinion. Adapted to the unscrupulous reality of our time and our space. I didn't expect this Goryunov to be such an idiot. That's just everything he's been doing since the start of that healthy 20-year-old's conversation with his mom is idiocy. And the farther, the cooler.
55
alessawow_ answered · June 08, 2020
The whole salt of the sex scene is that in the background, for Asmus, on TV normal, revisit
56
nicollewalton answered · June 08, 2020
About the sex scene. She didn't bother me, of course, but she seemed completely unnecessary. Well, I mean, there's a feeling that it's been added for PR and lure. And, in my opinion, the film does not need it. Through this "correspondence" the director tries to reveal the reasons for the origin of Ilya's attachment to Nina. And to use tits for PR and lure of a film of this genre - it would be a clear failure to get into the target audience.
57
just_sammy answered · June 08, 2020
About the sex scene. She didn't bother me, of course, but she seemed completely unnecessary. Well, I mean, there's a feeling that it's been added for PR and lure. And, in my opinion, the film does not need it at all.
58
pily_pink answered · June 08, 2020
Through this "correspondence" the director tries to reveal the reasons for the origin of Ilya's attachment to Nina. Are you talking about this "correspondence"?
59
renpic1 answered · June 08, 2020
Through this "correspondence" the director tries to reveal the reasons for the origin of Ilya's attachment to Nina.
60
axel_d1 answered · June 09, 2020
Offtop - thanks for recommending the series. Sneaky Pete's pretty good. Harrow - now watching the second season, very cool, learned there Ashka from the beloved Wizard 😄 She, it turns out, a lot where filmed, but how she aged ... But still I would like something more fun...
61
wrestler6 answered · June 09, 2020
"P. S. I love it when Russian films are worth watching." It's bad that only blackbird works well 😒
62
eveafoxy answered · June 09, 2020
It's just because it's like reality. Cheerful cheerful idiocy turns out noticeably worse. And it's clear why.
63
fine_specimen answered · June 09, 2020
There was yesterday on TV how a disguised Putin travels around the country, correcting the shortcomings. "President's Vacation" Look dainishly even in the background.
64
your_poison_girl answered · June 09, 2020
I didn't. Petrov doesn't pull as an actor. With his blank eyes and snout not philologists or heroes play imho.
65
discosticks answered · June 09, 2020
That's right. with that look -- only the scoundrels and play. Something reminds me of the Priludny.
66
zeigesaumuc answered · June 09, 2020
they play him - peppers in a mask, a corner to ask to go out to sort out. there's nothing to talk about. worse only the son of the Terminator-Makarevich Jr.)
67
jadestone2020 answered · June 11, 2020
It turns out that my mother had to obey ...
68
stevimeadows answered · June 11, 2020
Mom needs to obey all the time!
69
oyasamu answered · June 11, 2020
Listen to your mother. because Mom is a climber (c) "Rapunzel"
70
esmeralda68 answered · June 11, 2020
Scenario -5? Seriously??? The film about the asshole, who twice burned because of the woman and "it's five"? 😒
71
seb69069 answered · June 11, 2020
I understand that 5 should be put in a scenario where a clever crosacheg twice did not burn because of the women, and the women because of it burned, right?
72
camila_lara_ answered · June 11, 2020
Alex, correct "He lives in the suburbs of Lobn with his mom."
73
amorette7 answered · June 11, 2020
Corrected, thank you.
74
phillyguy0022 answered · June 11, 2020
Good crime drama. Literately-black, without busting, and as actualized as possible, both in terms of socio-political subtext, and in the form of material supply. At times there was a feeling that I watch a new film by Yuri Bykov. Pilgrim, Pain Threshold, Plant, Russian Bes, Ninth, Break, Dead Swallows... At least in some direction our cinema is gradually progressing. "Three Seconds" is the second in a row of a powerful performance by Joel Kinnaman, for those who have already missed Takeshi Kovac from "The Modified Carbon". Simple, even secondary in something, but very strong and charming in his "knighthood" crime-prison thriller. Unofficially, many have dubbed it "Shot in the Void 2" and are partly right. "Gangster, Cop and The Devil", which absorbed all the best features of Korean crime thrillers. "First Love" by Takashi Miike, a cool yakuza action with signature black humor and inevitable notes of branded madness. Miike is one of the most prolific and unstable directors, but this time he certainly did not miss. And, already quite distracted from the genre, very much liked from the fresh "Combyland-2. Control shot." The sequel went even better than the original, carefully preserving all the good and improving all that was needed. Don't miss who hasn't seen it yet!
75
lexi5star answered · June 11, 2020
loved the fresh "Combyland-2." Control shot"Particularly pleased that saved in the film Bill Murray!
76
macarenamiler answered · June 11, 2020
loved the fresh "Combyland-2." Control shot"
77
tripleddumbbells answered · June 11, 2020
Great, thank you, I'm going to be looking for "Three Seconds" and Asian. I'm waiting for the second "zombieland" too.
78
sexyjane10 answered · June 11, 2020
-- Who's Bill Murray? - I've never hit kids before, but it's like asking who Gandhi is.
79
lina_cosmicbaby answered · June 11, 2020
However, the film adaptation of "Metro 2033" Glukhovsky i would please even moreVery difficult. It's like doing a normal Witcher TV series after very good books and great games. Perhaps for those who did not read and did not play quite nothing, but we know how it would be better))))The universe "Metro" has a very large positive background also from books and games. It is unrealistic to please fans of one and the other.
80
canadiancreme answered · June 11, 2020
However, the film adaptation of "Metro 2033" Glukhovsky would have pleased me even more
81
just_sammy answered · June 11, 2020
I don't know, I've read everything from the 1992 story "The Witcher." And at the same time the series was watched with great pleasure. Only one minus - I would like twice as many episodes. Cavill fit into the image impeccably, although before I did not like anywhere and only his name in the credits has already caused skepticism. Beautiful stylized music, special effects, make-up monsters, amazing staging of fights. The lost atmosphere of "combat fantasy" of the 80s type "Conana", "Love Death", "Lady Hawk" causes a colossal nostalgia. The plot will be revealed in all its diversity in the next seasons. Well, i'm not a fan of the cycle, so maybe I judge a little superficially, as an ordinary viewer and some small details do not cut my eye.
82
lark_obsessioned answered · June 11, 2020
The Witcher? Well, I was really delighted, for a long time such pleasure did not get from the series in the genre of "fantasy", perhaps expectations were understated. For comparison, the first season of "Game of Thrones" caused me much less enthusiasm (they are often compared now).
83
nina_paez answered · June 11, 2020
Chord, I can't hold back....:) WITCH ING!
84
thequeenboni answered · June 11, 2020
By the way, you're right, he played well there, too. I just in general did not really film came, such a glamorous pastiche for schoolgirls) In fact, I remember the still strongly underrated horror of Schumacher "Bloody Creek" and not too deep, but very beautiful film Tarsem Singh "War of the Gods: Immortals", he also performed well there. But in the last "Mission," "Superman," "Hannibal's Game" did not like it at all. And after these roles, I doubted that Geralt's image from Revia would be up to him, but no, it flashed so.
85
jacker4478 answered · June 11, 2020
Yes, despite the simplicity of the motive, it is very difficult to get out of my head) As well as sounding on the final credits of the first series stylized as the Eastern European ballad "The House of the Rising Sun" ...
86
keira_angel answered · June 11, 2020
For me, "The Witcher," "See" and "Mandalorets" - the three best series of the last months.Two of the last stopped watching: "See" still on the first series, "Mandaloreets after three or four. It looks budget, really.
87
elektra_4_you answered · June 11, 2020
For me, "The Witcher," "Seeing" and "Mandalores" are the three best tv series of recent months.
88
_jessi_arias_ answered · June 11, 2020
Yes, there is nothing in "3 seconds" except the charm of Kinnaman, a lot of plywood, the plot banal, in general, solid nais... "Call Shot" is much stronger. And "zombieland-2" looks good, although it is worse than the first, but where will you put Woody Harrelson, coupled with good music. Jokes are deliberately "deliberate", they (gl/heroes) almost quote themselves ... Well, traditionally, you have to look in the original with Anglosabs, including songs, really, other sensations.
89
sparkletoes420 answered · June 11, 2020
I'm really from the series I haven't watched yet, but I'm already judging) Well, next week, i guess there's going to be time. I don't know what to expect, all the fans are not very happy. I really do not say from Game of Thrones that I am delighted that the books (read four) that of the series (watched the first 2 seasons).
90
18andsyrianxxx answered · June 11, 2020
The series has not yet watched, but is ready to beat the mortgage - the song from the game Witcher 3 is much better ...
91
isabelle_adjani answered · June 11, 2020
Absolutely awesome! In the cinema twice in a row on it went ...))
92
emmawinns answered · June 11, 2020
"all the best features of Korean crime thrillers" is too much. More or less not bad against the background of this year's criminal-free fish in Korea, yes. Well, even this year "Extreme Work" and "Without Mercy" (such a female version of Oldboy). Part 1, Cold Eyes, New World. Or quite a long time outlaw (2010).
93
rubenmatthews answered · June 11, 2020
The question is not in quality:)
94
atennea_2 answered · June 11, 2020
I've seen almost all the variants of "Let It Go" of different localizations. All excellent, some are better perceived purely because of the language, but I would not explicitly single out Russian. And some covers are clearly not worse)
95
pink_velvet_dreams answered · June 11, 2020
The second "zombie" is in excellent quality on the hdvideo box
96
melkitty20 answered · June 11, 2020
Second "zombieland
97
xxbbybellaxx answered · June 11, 2020
I really want to ask the next morons how they managed to make "Three Seconds" from "Informant". The film itself is so-so, I do not regret the look, I will not advise others.
98
nastyjessica90 answered · June 11, 2020
I would advise not to read, but to listen to this book performed by Igor Knyazev. By the way, this version of the voice over is considered official and glukhovsky himself fully approves. This is one of the best audio books that I have heard and Igor Knyazev here is simply incomparable. In general, I love two recites - I.Knyazev and A. Klyukvin. After listening to the book in the film I really lacked the melody of "Narcos" (from the series I was delighted in my time), which in the film is almost absent, and in the audio version of this melody is very cleverly woven into the thread of the narrative, which can not be said from the film. And of course the text itself, as the main character analyzes the correspondence, in the film very little of course, comparing with the book. But it is quite expected, when going to the cinema all thought: "How will they embody so much text in the film?" But it would be a completely different story) Well, logically, how the heroine K.Asmus could understand that it was Ilya Goryunov who corresponded with her? Only if Hazin's father had made a special report to her, but why would he need it, to emphasize once again that his son was a freak? What they liked was how, unlike the book, they emphasized the spiritual connection of the mother with the son and stretched the logical thread from the first scene of the film to the last, not the last scene with Asmus on the credits of course.
99
maturehotslut answered · June 11, 2020
I tried it. I couldn't. It's too gloomy. Some other time.
100
wetbeaverrr answered · June 11, 2020
I willingly believe that the audio is good, but your advice is not for everyone. Since I read three times (minimum) faster than a book read aloud, I do not care whether there is Knyazev or someone else.
101
lissy_hg answered · June 11, 2020
It is clear that you can read faster, but you can not only read at speed, but also enjoy a good reading to others. And you can listen where you can't read. For example, I listen on a treadmill and in the pool, and also behind the wheel, when you go long distances on a familiar road (not on the city on the navigator ) then listens perfectly behind the wheel.
102
alicelighthouse answered · June 11, 2020
Good movie, sorry without a happy. But Dagestan (or Chechen?) bandits are well completely caricatured. It's somehow knocked out of the total. I think the American hero would shoot to the end.
103
xana_faye answered · June 11, 2020
I didn't watch the film, I read a book. The book is good, but it's driven into a terrible depresniak. If the movie's good, it's going to get worse, isn't it? Paradoxical situation - I will not go because the film is good ...
104
rudie20 answered · June 11, 2020
If the film is good, it will be even worse?
105
8inch_aussie_perth answered · June 11, 2020
If the movie's good, it's going to get worse, isn't it?
106
northforestdick answered · June 11, 2020
The film is really good and for all my dislike for Petrov, here he for me was reborn into a truly dramatic actor, I hope that he will grow creatively and stop acting in any slag. Two points in the film which the authors could avoid: with Asmus (well, there is such a move to attract the viewer) if you cut this scene then really nothing will change, and the abundance of mate. Through the phrase mate-re-emboss. I can bend myself so that the ears wither but insert non-normative vocabulary into the film supposedly to convey emotions justifying it by some "tension" or something else.... You can always replace swearing with another swearing. You children will watch!))))
107
slaveass123456ysh answered · June 11, 2020
Dramatic Actor, Call DiCaprio Look
108
sweettfairyy answered · June 11, 2020
dramatic actor,
109
liam_long7 answered · June 11, 2020
You probably haven't seen the TV series "In the Cage" yet. After that, the brute from "Text" will seem to you high school students rosy 😄.
110
thickricancock answered · June 11, 2020
The series Traitor 2012, too, in terms of showing the life of the FSKN sheep is not bad 😄
111
sharomsmith answered · June 11, 2020
Watched with my wife in the cinema. It's a great movie. Petrov as always at the height. Without a scene with Asmus the movie would have lost nothing, just a marketing move. Annoyingless less product placement, and to look more interesting 😄
112
lolprincesss answered · June 11, 2020
The sound in the film is absolutely innositic, in dialogues it is necessary to constantly listen. However, as in all Russian films the same trouble.
113
aliceolight answered · June 11, 2020
There's such a problem, yes. Here's another back and forth, but in the series - in general a nightmare. Save.
114
sweetnaugthty answered · June 11, 2020
Specifically in this film there is no "trouble" in the movie, nor on the version that is in the network now. The sound of 5.1 DD is recorded quite correctly, in terms of dialogues. But the trouble is really there and is connected with the fact that the originally recorded 5.1 sound for an online show is incorrectly shoved into the 2nd channel, as a result of the dialogues are jammed with the background. Some TV series I instead watched online from the same premiere (for example "Dead Lake") rocked with torents only to look at D.C., where the receiver laying out the sound from 2.0 to 5.1 was making the pseudo-central channel and the dialogues became noticeably more discernible
115
ninaleeonetrue answered · June 11, 2020
The scene is terribly subdued (see epigraphs to the review)And the epigraph is one.
116
latinsweetx19 answered · June 11, 2020
Ah, thank you 😄
117
violetax3 answered · June 11, 2020
Question. Is it better to open them up right away?
118
zennybee answered · June 11, 2020
Of course. They're epigraphs. They set the tone for the whole narrative!
119
sexyhanny4u answered · June 11, 2020
Let's do it.
120
miamaxxx answered · June 11, 2020
Alex, you've always had them open before. and then whether the engine changed, or just changed and became only the first visible. I was surprised at first that you had a lot of epigraphs in your reviews before, and then there was only one.
121
courtkey31 answered · June 11, 2020
We've changed the new design. But there's also a button that's like "All epigraphs."
122
kathy18hot answered · June 11, 2020
I didn't notice right away. That's right at all not at once:) probably just didn't expect it there, so I didn't pay attention to it:)
123
schoolgirlwow answered · June 11, 2020
Especially "he's the son of Fundera" 😄
124
xxx_flash answered · June 11, 2020
It's done.
125
mja30 answered · June 11, 2020
Question. Is it better to open them up at once?
126
oldviceman answered · June 11, 2020
Question. Is it better to open them up right away?
127
margot4u_ answered · June 11, 2020
Criticism, speaking about this film, for some reason weaves "Crime and Punishment" Dostoevsky, although there are no parallels here Glukhovsky in several interviews himself called his novel "Punishment and Crime." When I read Dostoevsky's novel, Too. Probably because it also shows a modern slice of society. Such novels in the future will be able to study the history of modern Russia.
128
16cummmerr answered · June 11, 2020
Criticism, speaking about this film, for some reason weaves "Crime and Punishment" Dostoevsky, although there are no parallels here
129
miomioss2 answered · June 11, 2020
And what can you see without cops and bandits? I would like to see a modern version of "No Witnesses."
130
sexxxkitten317 answered · June 11, 2020
The story is embroidered...... Khazin's friends and acquaintances...
131
nevadabbw answered · June 11, 2020
"However, the picture shows that Goryunov, in general, did not plan to kill Khazin, he just wanted to find out why he did this to him." - in the original source: "Ilya removed the paper back in his pocket, said, "Yes, I did nothing ... and from the pocket immediately, up the edge, hit Peta in the soft chin with a sausage knife and a soft sausage knife. Petya gurgled and flowed. I tried to plug a hole with my hand."
132
lycrahb answered · June 11, 2020
That doesn't negate the fact that he wasn't going to kill. Talk, find out the reasons... But when you continue to get in the way with the mud...
133
veronicatropic answered · June 11, 2020
In the film, this moment was changed.
134
estash answered · June 11, 2020
And how to kill on the basis of "sudden personal animosity"? The same mechanism is word for word, h.. m on the table. And here such relations are far from sudden, so a break from the coils is much more likely. The student, the weapon to take nowhere, and realizes that goes to a meeting with the, having a gun. So I took what could find a weapon to equalize the chances in a possible conflict. But you have to read the book. "However, the picture shows that Goryunov, in general, did not plan to kill Khazin, he just wanted to find out why he did so to him." - in the original source: well, it is different from his story, but the picture on the story and should not exactly correspond to the literary original: after all, each of his vision - the director can have his own
135
samhairy2 answered · June 11, 2020
"However, the picture shows that Goryunov, in general, did not plan to kill Khazin, he just wanted to find out why he did this to him." - in the original source:
136
im_crazy_ answered · June 11, 2020
It differs from his story, but the picture on the story and should not exactly correspond to the literary original: after all, each has his own vision - the director can have his own

Frequently Asked Questions

No added frequency questions and answers yet.

Community - Q&A

Ask a question — Sign In
No added questions yet.
Resources