Question Mostly To Men

It's absolutely possible, even for years. You know, men and women are set up differently in this regard. Well, maybe in some men it is not possible, but in some it is definitely possible, even in most. When you think about it, half of them are, but they still have sex out of need and still don't fall in love again. If we feel that the woman falls in love - it depends on the man. Someone would take advantage of it to manipulate her, another would dump her so as not to complicate her life, and so it depends on the woman what she does. If he wants to obsess over him, he's jealous of him, and so on, she'il probably be dumped.

We can, I've been like this.

I am amazed how many women refuse to understand and acknowledge that genders have different thoughts and insist that men think like them. Men like with their eyes, have sex for pleasure, often without putting an ounce of feelings into it. This is as physiological a necessity for us as nutrition. You see a pretty woman, and you immediately want to have sex with her, only on the basis of her appearance, without even exchanging a word with her. It happens to me all the time, and I guarantee you that's the case with all men. even with married and solid gentlemen. If you think about it from a biological point of view, it's normal male behavior to spread your own genes. Since a man can never be sure whether the child he is raising is his (genetically), he, he, seeks at a subconscious level to fertilize as many women as possible. It's instinct. Now there are DNA tests, but millions of years before, there were not, and biology can't react so quickly :) You women have the exact opposite behavior - of all the men who want to have sex with you, you strive to choose the one with the best genes and with the best chance of ensuring survival and prosperity for you and future children. Therefore, you are looking for communication, security, want to "feel" something with a particular person, so that you want to have sex with him, etc. from a natural point of view you make a "genetic selection" of men. I hope you find an answer to your question somewhere in my speech ;) Good luck to you!

Stop letting go of him and you'il see how he's going to love you all of a sudden. The feeling that he doesn't care is because you're always available.

As of 3 I'm a woman, and I agree. And to all the men who think like 3 - not to wonder why women want: a handsome, strong, smart and financially wealthy man :) Selection, not superficiality. (for the stupid, I clarify that I am sarcastic.)

Author, the answer is very easy. If a healthy, straight man tells you he doesn't masturbate, it means he's lying. These men who went to the barracks know what I'm talking about. The woman serves only for breeding and for the pleasure of the man. I know you're not going to like this, but that's the truth. Only in puberty age do men fall in love truly, but this is for a short period. This means that most men satisfy their gender edict through women by having sex for fun, not that women need to marry, except when they decide to reproduce. Well, there is also paid love, but free is preferable, especially for bachelors! I hope I answered your question because that's my opinion!

About 5:00. 7 Yes, but in most cases these are 5 types of different men. And if there are any, they are some small percentages below zero. I mean, it's not for all of you. You have to settle for whatever you have.

5, do you like low, ugly and poor men? Make it even more stupid.

To H3: I disagree with another opinion full of all sorts of clichés and biological points of view from "scientists" aimed at making money from misguided people , as well as others. similar articles that men have more desire for sex because of testosterone,however REAL desire for sex depends on a person's libido, in which many other hormones play a role, etc. testosterone influenced as much as estrogen. Libido varies in each person differently, regardless of gender.There are men who have more desire than women, as well as women who have more desire than men. If women had less desire, there wouldn't be so many naked photos on social media - there would be so many prostitutes, buy vibrators and sex toys, also the industry has been launched by women, not men, clean and simple women are beaten in the head by society, that if they want sex first, in some cases they will not be looked after with a good eye, which is wrong (women also look at men, but have better peripheral vision, and do not get in the eye so much. Our society is sticking to the fact that men are different - than women and vice versa, but differences are in our behaviour - rather than biological differences. Given that humans don't get much into nature because we have reason, natural selection is done by two people (male and female) , so it can't be argued that a woman makes the choice, personally, it's 50/50. There are many successful and beautiful women who are tied to not-so-successful and beautiful men, and vice versa , despite feminism and more. such social movements(sects) that incite gender discrimination in order to reduce the population of the earth, which also succeed to some extent with others. ways so that the world is very diverse to be placed within such a limited framework as the opinion of H3. I strongly doubt that women have the exact opposite behaviour , because there are claims (but it is not certain, in my opinion, it depends on the man) that neither men nor women are suited to be monogamous, but imposed because of social norms that are imposed in today's modern world, because we are still in the 21st century. In animals, it's different - they're only guided by their instincts.

Well, the author can't put up with the fact that her colleague has no intention of being with her to the grave... She didn't like the comments on the previous topic, so she decided to release a new one. Woman, you'il hear nothing different.

#7 Well, that's because it's hard to combine into one, we want one to us, another to support us, etc... Nature, what to do, didn't create things like that, so that a man could be enough ;)

Although I am a woman and may be condemned by "comrades," I agree with both the animal beginnings, based on a man's sexuality and his biological justification. I'm not saying that everyone will cheat - some men find it very difficult to tie them up purely statistically. But these tintins-minders for hidden unconscious feelings are more of a mess. Men are jealous and don't like easy things, at least most of them..

Men that, women that. Guys, we have the same sexuality and both sexes, understand! The other is social norms and behavioral patterns. I'm a woman, but I don't want to get involved right now. I put too much pressure on myself that way. Not to mention that there's no scarier man than a man. Which a woman has experienced on her back, she knows. I'm running 200.

As of 8 out of 5 I like different people in vision. What does ugly mean? What about short? I'm 160 cm. for me, they're all tall. Poor? You mean - emotionally poor - yes, that's not what I like, but it's for them, this poverty.

A single man is married with at least two children, why? He probably wants to shift all the functions of the scumbag (sorry dude, but why do you trust your wife so much) and especially the money-giving function, right??? It makes perfect sense! Or does he want sex without commitment? If she wanted a commitment, she'd get a single one or a few kids. For him, it's clear, someone's stretching and he's using it. And the mother with the kids??? By telling you you're beautiful and smart to get free sex. But you believe him? Ask one of your children, it's very likely to be more mature. And in case your husband finds out, prepare for a heavy sitting on the ground!

What logic do you seek in illogical terms? Whoever has a family or a relationship, cares about them and as a mouse, when the opportunity is open. It's equally mean for both sexes. It's just that some are whores at heart, no matter man or woman. These biology explanations are... to put it mildly funny. A man is not cattle, he has a heart and a soul. I apologize in advance to the "biologists" and the dodbits, they always have a "reasoned" answer, even "scientific", that they are just whores or whores. What you give, that and you get at the end. In my opinion, if you can't control yourself and you need diversity, it's fair to live alone and hunt as much as your soul wants... not to lie to another person or to break the psyche of children and so... But she's right, number 11, the is about free time and laziness... without lies and tricks, there's no way it's going to happen... I'd remind her of another "natural" law- kick in the ass :) Who's got it or, if it's going through the trick- Okay... but does it pass? You've got a lot of "single mothers". something's not on their mind... it must be a "natural phenomenon"...

From #11 to #16 Maybe it's fair to explain the meaning of my comment. Many men justify how they were biologically meant to be with more than one woman. But if we start focusing on biology, and for women, the picture will be similar. And nature may have bet us on these things, but it's also betting that we don't like it when our soul mate makes them. And how is this dilemma resolved? A lot of people want to solve it like this, I'm going to do what "nature" put me up to do what I'm good at. Well, somehow it's not right. People need to understand that good things require "sacrifices" and you can't have everything because "everything" contains mutually exclusive circumstances. So if you go after your "nature," or in particular, those aspects that you're exporting, you have no right to complain and justify when you get the results or retaliate with the same.

What comments! Don't you finally realize that a man is a man and is the master of the world, and the world has always been male! If a man spits over 10 women, he's still a man and even more of a man than the others, and if a woman sleeps with more than 2-3 men, everyone thinks she's a cougar, and they don't look at her with a good eye, and no man will take her as a woman, and make her the mother of his children! Author, do you understand what I'm talking about?

Men who justify such behaviour as being naturally at stake themselves admit that they are nothing more than animals (I use the word in the best sense). Just because we have innate instincts doesn't mean we can't have free will and sensible behavior, because that would mean evolution has failed. I wouldn't recommend that the author keep seeing a poorly evolved individual - she'd better get a cat.