Love And A Little Fight For Dessert

   Consult a lawyer, he threatens you not to prosecute him.

   You'll excuse me - I don't know what his attitude is, really, but housework is for women. I wouldn't let a man touch the broom, it's funny even imagining, and cooking - I like to cook, so ... I think that the man works, works, and the woman keeps the house and looks after the children. This does not mean being stupid, you can read books, paint, play the piano or something else that suits a woman better. I haven't worked, I have no intention, especially nowadays, to work for someone, to earn their money to get a salary, to be out of my house with strangers, every day, for eight or more hours? !! ... I'm too gentle about that. I wrote all this because from what you have shared, from you, I judge that you have a problem with taking on the female role in the family. That's right, two men in one house - you can't, so you fight, there must be more,

   Bullies like him only understand by fighting! Have your relatives or friends crush him, but crush him in a fight. Then he will be ashamed to look at you, as well as fear. The other option is to move out. You call the police to get him out of there and give the apartment for rent. Or you can catch a new man to ring his bell. Anyway, find an ally no matter what, and get out of this one before something bad happens. That's my opinion. You thought well, because you know him as a person.

   Calm down, if he treated you well, you would get bored or you would be rude to him!

   Find a strong lover and he will do the job.

   2 Not every man wants only to support the family, and with one salary it will not be easy. I can't imagine sitting at home all day watching the children, and not every man would support his wife. The author's husband is not normal when he pulls out a knife. Once they both work the household is divided, not only the woman can be burdened.

   While he's at work, pack his luggage and leave it outside. A locksmith to come to the place and change the lock and if yours gets angry outside you call 112 so that he can hear you!

   Get rid of him because no one deserves the treatment you get and because it's only a matter of time before he starts treating your child rudely! You are worried that he would not be able to see the child - well, in fact, it would be best - because people like your husband (there are such women, aggressors) should be forbidden by strict law to have contact with children at all! Because such people are harmful to the psyche of every child! The other thing is - I suspect that he is a simple man working a low-skilled job, in which there is nothing shameful and unworthy, but with the character / temperament that he has and the upbringing he received, if at some point he loses his job for some reason, it will hardly easily find a new one, and it may even lose the motivation to do it at all ... Then you will have to support it financially. Think seriously.

   To 6 and to the author of 2 And why not endure being with your young children all day? Whoever is with them, some unknown babysitter or grandmother who is years old, to rest, not to look after children, or even worse, to give them to a kindergarten with various coughing, ill-mannered children and women who work reluctantly. Absurd! And the man, how he will not want to support and protect his family, is his mission. If he wants to be a clergyman, a traveler or a creator (meaningful goals are, however, not everyone wants a family) - he will not make a family, but will give himself to the goal, which he considered to be his mission in life. Judge your partners, and be honest about your desires, because not everyone wants or is suitable for the family. You have to take family seriously, it's not presumed, not everyone is capable of having a family, devotion and perseverance are needed, as with artists, athletes, clergymen, etc., people doing something in its fullness, otherwise - do not get involved ... It's like painting a picture and leaving it unfinished, or giving it to someone else to draw it while you are resting / doing something else. It's not serious. If the woman is a real woman and the man is a real man, and if they both want a family, everything will be wonderful. I said if the woman is rude, the man stops perceiving her as a woman and attacks her, if the man is indecisive, etc., he stops being a man, the roles turn around, scandals start, you feel powerless, you attack each other and of course is that the man will prevail physically, it is logical, he is stronger, but this is the last 'straw' that a man, not just a man, clings to, physical violence is the last attempt to deal with helplessness. You both have a responsibility.

   Number 2, can you turn your back on your ego for a moment and answer us honestly, do you really apply these principles in your happy family life or retell a lecture / book by Kobilkina, Larisa Renard and company? If tomorrow, God forbid, something happens to this man, what will happen to this family? Will you support it with knowledge from novels and hobbies? And doctors, teachers and others. Are working women doomed to an unhappy family life? Do you feel insured that when your children are taken out of the home, you will have life satisfaction? Or will you start living theirs, as my observations make women housewives? Do you think of taking on the female role in the family and say, creating a home as an oasis. In which the man is greeted with a smile, a delicious dinner, a well-kept wife, a clean house. Do you think that these prerequisites guarantee you that your husband won't decide to be 50, become a traveler, look for himself, or just fall in love with another True Woman? Thanks in advance for your answers.

   2, I think you came across the wrong site. This is for unattached lonely aunts who can only communicate with cats. And every problem related to a man is answered with - dump him. In this way, they justify their own failures in life because they have listened to ideologies such as feminism, and that woman and man are one and the same. Let's not forget feminism is spread by the United States, which is a capitalist country, so at the heart of this ideology is the expansion of the labor market. In the 1960s, only the man worked in the United States, and through a completely normal bachelor's job he bought a house and supported a family. In the 1970s, feminism flourished, through social assistance, especially for the black population. The result is abortion, unmarried children, and total degradation of the black population. Who doesn't know a little history, actually before the 70's, blacks are making great strides in all areas. 40 years ahead, and two salaries are barely enough to support a family. At the same time, science has advanced to transfer much of the work of robots and artificial intelligence. What is "magic"? Feminism, and the doubling of the workforce. Anyone with a cursory knowledge of economics will tell you that everything is supply and demand. By doubling something (like labor), you make it twice as low. But people are too dumb to understand how two workers are actually equal to one and who benefits from the whole job ... And I have nothing to say to the author except - you took it like that, you will deal with it. People don't "change", only the mask falls off ... When women learn to love a man, not the mask,

   From the author, number 9, I really liked your comment, because you put hope as a presumption. And how two mature people should take on their roles. I am not mature, but I take my role, but this is not respected by the man, he is not worthy of a family from the first day of our life together. But love is blind, and since we are together there was a reason, hopefully our relationship will not end with the creation of our treasure. Because it was his role that made him so aggressive. He can't carry the burden of being a father, a husband and whatever, and he still wants to be a small child raised by a mother eagle. He is angry with me because internally his family life is heavy.

   number 2, you are a complete parasite. she was too gentle to go to work, my dear! because a princess was born with a golden spoon in her mouth and felt a pea through several mattresses :-) and what will happen to you, princess, if your husband accidentally assumes that he is ill and unable to work? if he dies? there are accidents, diseases, everything happens in this world. If he meets another, even more tender princess to turn his head? you will say that it is impossible, but it is a pure reality for some women. just think what will happen to you if your hypothetical pink bubble bursts?

   Number 2, it's great that you have your views on life and you resist them, but in this case your comment doesn't help the author much. It is not normal to physically assault her, to leave her with all the housework given that she also works, and to receive threats from her husband that he will set her on fire if she evicts him! Her husband is clearly wrong as long as he is capable of such violence. If you are OK like that, live this way, but I think you also think about how you would feel when your children grow up and no longer need your care. You can invent a hobby that will become a pleasant profession for you at some point and so you will both fill the time freed up by the children and take out some money. Number 11 I will not comment on it - a very rude comment that does not add value to the topic. I'm just wondering what he does with the unattached aunts on the site like me, for example - at 27, a working and married woman. Author, you certainly do not deserve such treatment. In my opinion, there are options for a way out - 1) go to a lawyer, 2) go to a relative / friends / in another map / in another country, 3) call the police to evict him, 4) file for divorce. Be sure to seek the support of another man. If you tell him to just get out, no wonder he's beating you up. You can even record the threats on your phone and use them as evidence in court. Be sure to seek the support of another man. If you tell him to just get out, no wonder he's beating you up. You can even record the threats on your phone and use them as evidence in court. Be sure to seek the support of another man. If you tell him to just get out, no wonder he's beating you up. You can even record the threats on your phone and use them as evidence in court.

   I'm number 6, I just can't imagine watching the kids for years, I love my job and I have to practice it. The children will go to the garden. I think that everyone is obliged to support themselves and to be able to give to the children. Otherwise, for a woman who wants to have more time for children, she can work part-time, but have her own income. I don't always like to ask my husband, I don't know how men perceive the housewife. Everyone decides how to live and whoever wants and can let them be at home.

   I'm number 2 and 9. I understand. In this case, it is best to separate, if it is not suitable for a family, forced beauty - it does not work. But I want to know, I've wondered about others who have shared with me, similar to yours, the author - torment. My question is - is it not understood that the person in question is an inappropriate partner from the very beginning? People who have lived together for years, whether one or ten years, say they have rediscovered the partners next to them, that they have been deceived, that their partners have changed by throwing on them, all the blame for the breakup of their relationship, which is ascending to some extent, but not quite, because one person is in essence - either a family type or unable to have a family, in my observations, this does not change over time, there may be a change in the person, but not the whole essence, not so drastic.

   And author, if your husband can't handle his roles and you agree with number 9, does that mean you have to put up with him?

   What evil female comments, what evil feminism is preached here is not true !!! Horror !!! Only comment №2 has real value and is objective to the author. Author, how do I understand this? "How to kick him out of my house threatens to set our house on fire. We're both poisoning our nerves and our lives and we don't love each other." So you admit to yourself that you're poisoning his nerves and then complaining that he threatened you with a knife. or that he did not suffocate ??? Poisoning the nerves of a man who supports his family is a crime wherever you look at it. This is called female arbitrariness. Women do not have the natural right to do so. Just think of one thing! Where does this female courage-insolence come from today, to poison men's nerves and make them feel untouchable? Which of the two sexes is physically stronger and can beat the other without a fight? Why is violence against women (fighting and killings) progressively increasing, and preventive measures only accelerating the process? Author, you can be grateful that your husband only threatened you with a knife but did not act in a state of nervous disorder caused by yourself. There are all kinds of men, and not so noble as to tolerate female perversions. To such women and in other societies, their men draw their knives without thinking. That is why there is no violence against women, because women know their place, and everyone fulfills their duties as intended. Here, all the evil feminists convince you that you should banish him, setting an example for you! - "What will happen if he dies, who will support you?" It is as if all men who support their wives die and women are left without any income? What about countries where there is no masculine nobility, and men do not emancipate their wives, lest women die there after their husbands die? There is a Bulgarian folk tale-wisdom, which is philosophically instructive! - "He who does what he does to himself"! Couples used to have at least six months to get to know each other before they got married. The family is united and is a small country in which everyone fulfills his purpose according to his abilities for the common good. When the roles are exchanged, there is no efficiency and progress, but what happened to you and your husband is obtained. Today, the marital institution has become invalid and the former responsibility-morality (generally adopted laws without pressure from governments) is no more! That's why your husband won't care about you and his family if he doesn't get the respect he needs, ignored by today's status quo. If the home is yours without a man's contribution to it, you can safely evict the man, as the evil feminists advise here, but in today's conditions of cohabitation your husband is also equal and entitled to property under the same law that women take homes and money to men in case of divorce with them, if you do not have a prenuptial agreement. There is no guarantee that finding a "STRONGER" man to beat the current one, you will feel better, because then the new one will beat you without any problems, as a privilege, and you will be indebted to him for the service that he did to you. I advise you to listen to comment №2! This is the most reasonable proposal for the right action and a recipe for a happy family life! if he does not receive the respect he needs, ignored by today's status quo. If the home is yours without a man's contribution to it, you can safely evict the man, as the evil feminists advise here, but in today's conditions of cohabitation your husband is also equal and entitled to property under the same law that women take homes and money to men in case of divorce with them, if you do not have a prenuptial agreement. There is no guarantee that finding a "STRONGER" man to beat the current one, you will feel better, because then the new one will beat you without any problems, as a privilege, and you will be indebted to him for the service that he did to you. I advise you to listen to comment №2! This is the most reasonable proposal for the right action and a recipe for a happy family life! if he does not receive the respect he needs, ignored by today's status quo. If the home is yours without a man's contribution to it, you can safely evict the man, as the evil feminists advise here, but in today's conditions of cohabitation your husband is also equal and entitled to property under the same law that women take homes and money to men in case of divorce with them, if you do not have a prenuptial agreement. There is no guarantee that finding a "STRONGER" man to beat the current one, you will feel better, because then the new one will beat you without any problems, as a privilege, and you will be indebted to him for the service that he did to you. I advise you to listen to comment №2! This is the most reasonable proposal for the right action and a recipe for a happy family life! If the home is yours without a man's contribution to it, you can safely evict the man, as the evil feminists advise here, but in today's conditions of cohabitation your husband is also equal and entitled to property under the same law that women take homes and money to men in case of divorce with them, if you do not have a prenuptial agreement. There is no guarantee that finding a "STRONGER" man to beat the current one, you will feel better, because then the new one will beat you without any problems, as a privilege, and you will be indebted to him for the service that he did to you. I advise you to listen to comment №2! This is the most reasonable proposal for the right action and a recipe for a happy family life! If the home is yours without a man's contribution to it, you can safely evict the man, as the evil feminists advise here, but in today's conditions of cohabitation your husband is also equal and entitled to property under the same law that women take homes and money to men in case of divorce with them, if you do not have a prenuptial agreement. There is no guarantee that finding a "STRONGER" man to beat the current one, you will feel better, because then the new one will beat you without any problems, as a privilege, and you will be indebted to him for the service that he did to you. I advise you to listen to comment №2! This is the most reasonable proposal for the right action and a recipe for a happy family life! but under today's conditions of cohabitation, your husband is also equal and is entitled to property under the same law that women take away men's homes and money in the event of divorce, if you do not have a prenuptial agreement. There is no guarantee that finding a "STRONGER" man to beat the current one, you will feel better, because then the new one will beat you without any problems, as a privilege, and you will be indebted to him for the service that he did to you. I advise you to listen to comment №2! This is the most reasonable proposal for the right action and a recipe for a happy family life! but under today's conditions of cohabitation, your husband is also equal and is entitled to property under the same law that women take away men's homes and money in the event of divorce, unless you have a prenuptial agreement. There is no guarantee that finding a "STRONGER" man to beat the current one, you will feel better, because then the new one will beat you without any problems, as a privilege, and you will be indebted to him for the service that he did to you. I advise you to listen to comment №2! This is the most reasonable proposal for the right action and a recipe for a happy family life! because then the new one will beat you without any problems, as a privilege, and you will be indebted to him for the service he has done for you. I advise you to listen to comment №2! This is the most reasonable proposal for the right action and a recipe for a happy family life! because then the new one will beat you without any problems, as a privilege, and you will be indebted to him for the service he has done for you. I advise you to listen to comment №2! This is the most reasonable proposal for the right action and a recipe for a happy family life!

   From the author. Which woman would enjoy watching her husband throw his socks where he wants, throw his jacket and clothes on the ground, serve, serve and wash, wait for him to be cared for as a prince, be the linen and clothes are washed, it is neatly arranged in the wardrobe, a vacuum cleaner is turned on, there are no dirty dishes on the table. The child should be fed, cared for and so on. As long as we love each other, I will enjoy it. I do not agree to clean all day and the next day again the same and thank you not to hear, and I even have to be silent in the presence of my husband, because if he hears my voice gets angry. If I wanted to go for a walk, he was tired. If I want to go to a party, he was tired. If I buy clothes, the child frowns, and I haven't bought mine since I was pregnant, because I don't have a salary in the family. This is not feminism and equality, it is not from the last century, but from the past, a kind of slavery. He was tired after work and needed a rest and a maid. If he were a single man, he would at least have the respect that someone cared about his comfort. And so he doesn't even notice it, but tries to crush me with threats and slaps. When a girl commits to a family, she expects happiness and harmony in her home. I'm not a nymphomaniac, but sex 5 times a year doesn't suit me. He doesn't want us to talk either. So what do we do together then and why doesn't he want to leave? If this is normal cohabitation with a man, I don't like it. And so he doesn't even notice it, but tries to crush me with threats and slaps. When a girl commits to a family, she expects happiness and harmony in her home. I'm not a nymphomaniac, but sex 5 times a year doesn't suit me. He doesn't want us to talk either. So what do we do together then and why doesn't he want to leave? If this is normal cohabitation with a man, I don't like it. And so he doesn't even notice it, but tries to crush me with threats and slaps. When a girl commits to a family, she expects happiness and harmony in her home. I'm not a nymphomaniac, but sex 5 times a year doesn't suit me. He doesn't want us to talk either. So what do we do together then and why doesn't he want to leave? If this is normal cohabitation with a man, I don't like it.

   Author - do not excuse yourself - you are right. Given that both partners work, it is not normal for only one to do the housework, but the upbringing of the child should be done by both. Really difficult situation. There is no point in talking to him and warning him of your plans - at most to get angry and attack you again. Consult a lawyer and, if possible, go somewhere immediately - if you have no relatives to shelter you, there are special homes for women suffering from domestic violence. Do not tolerate - you will harm the child's psyche. At 2 (if by chance it turns out that he is not a provocateur or the uncle who wrote 18, who spam similar topics) I will say that he is not doing himself a favor with this behavior. I have a lot of examples around me of husbands leaving their wives either because of another woman or because they decided that family life is not for them. A submissive maid cannot be interesting to any man and has a high risk of being left alone after 20 years, without money and without a profession. In the best case, you will be able to throw yourself at your parents and squeeze out the few years they have left to enjoy a peaceful life.

   Author, if you worked, you would not be a maid. The first independence is financial. It's normal for you to take on all the housework every day when you're not working, and it's not that much, to be honest. We both work, get more or less the same salaries and ruin everything at home - neither of us deserves more rest than the other. Either leave yourself a housewife and don't complain, or find a job.

   From the author to 21, did you laugh at me, I have a job, I am a mother or do you advise me to leave the child alone to look after at home? Joke aside, but the father's behavior is not normal. I ask how to escape from this man without persecuting me?

   Consult a lawyer.

   №20, I'm not 2, I'm 18 and I felt affected. Where do you see spam in my comment? "What do you think is spam when answering questions from the author or users on a particular topic? And who is the uncle you are comparing me to? I'm not commenting №2, but I totally agree with him. №20, you advise the author to take actions to help her, I do the same from my point of view Author: If you want to get rid of the man, you will have to make a lot of sacrifices and suffer not only material losses but also moral decline. which in the eyes of men will already be second-hand, or simply "read newspaper"! The most correct and painless for you will be for a while to tolerate it silently and at some point in a favorable situation to offer him to separate calmly, explaining to him that since you are no longer interesting to him, it is better to find another, and to leave you alone. For the child you will find a solution together without disputes and claims on your part, if you separate. This is your first step towards separation, and if you do not find understanding and goodwill on his part, then follow the advice of №20! You need to know that rampant feminism in our latitudes is the main reason for men's attitudes toward women. Feminism cannot conquer men for the simple reason that men are stronger than women. Look around and see what is happening nowadays. Since the beginning of the year, 22 women have been killed by their husbands for female insolence incited by feminism. And do you want to follow their fate? "The sentence -" Where there is power, there is justice "remains relevant at all times. The man as a sex is much stronger than the woman and therefore as the head of the family he sets the rules. Another question is whether we are talking about family or family life today. If a woman wants to achieve a certain goal, she uses her charm to manipulate the man, who gives in to the woman's innocent shyness. That is, the woman is strong with her weakness, and the man then respects her desires. No one can take away her right. My comment is my personal opinion and view as a man about your situation and you do not have to comply with it. Advice and suggestions are never superfluous, even from hostile users, but you follow your intuition. It will tell you to make the right decision, and women, if nothing else, have a highly developed sixth sense, but do not always follow it, blinded by feminism!

   It is best to spend some BGN 30. for consultation with a lawyer. You can file a complaint of psychological harassment, you can find witnesses, you can get a medical certificate, the child can also have an epicrisis from a child psychologist. Many things can be done in the direction of a restraining order and full custody.

   I'm 2, 9 and 16 to 20 and other women outraged by my comments. This is my last comment on the subject, because I don't see the point in advising people who don't listen to other people with different opinions. In that case - keep your monologues! Put aside your paranoia about my personality, number 20, and read my comments, again, think a little, and you'll know I'm right. I am also a woman with an art profession. The so-called 'servants' of you, I don't know them, I speak from my position of a person who can live with himself and from his work, but who prefers family values, and when you are in a family, you are no longer a unit , and not everyone knows how to love and be caring. This is important for family life, to be calm, not - interesting. I'm not one of the rude women who doesn't look like a woman, works, who are absolutely slavish or career-making, materialistic with a hundred diplomas that look like nothing on a personal level, one wonders what this career is for and any money, once they are alone, and neurotic. To cope, each with their own choices, do not bother me. However, the question is when some people have requirements that no one is obliged to meet! It's also a problem that they don't know how to judge people (I didn't get an answer to my question under number 16) and in general, I judge from your comments that you only know one thing, you read and answer selectively, I don't know about your men if you have them next to you but I don't like your thinking and behavior, I'm a woman. and neurotic. To cope, each with their own choices, do not bother me. However, the question is when some people have requirements that no one is obliged to meet! It's also a problem that they don't know how to judge people (I didn't get an answer to my question under number 16) and in general, I judge from your comments that you only know one thing, you read and answer selectively, I don't know about your men if you have them next to you but I don't like your thinking and behavior, I'm a woman. and neurotic. To cope, each with their own choices, do not bother me. However, the question is when some people have requirements that no one is obliged to meet! It's also a problem that they don't know how to judge people (I didn't get an answer to my question under number 16) and in general, I judge from your comments that you only know one thing, you read and answer selectively, I don't know about your men if you have them next to you but I don't like your thinking and behavior, I'm a woman.

   From the author. The essence of the topic is the rude attitude of the man towards me, not a stranger, but the man with whom I started a family, to whom I gave birth to a child. He wants to impose himself to such an extent that he does not have the strength and patience to talk and uses force. Everything is the result of everyday life, when we were boyfriends he was by no means rude to me, but after the birth of the child we were both completely changed and traumatized. I struggled to recover, and he backed away. An example of this is when the child cried and calmed down by hugging and talking to him. I was taking the child, but my husband had started telling me what he was doing at work. As soon as the child cried and I ignored my husband, I started drooling and enjoying the baby, my husband got angry and stopped talking. He would burst with anger at why I had ignored him and not looked him in the eye. He wanted all my love.

   Author, just ask him to leave, and if he doesn't want to, contact the police. A man who abuses his wife does not deserve to have a family. He will never get better, so go on raging elsewhere, and you must keep your composure and continue your life.

   She showed herself where the dog was buried - you don't love him and you're obsessed with the role of a mother. Your behavior is offensive to your husband. The child needs to know from an early age that his father comes first in the family, not him. Nowadays it is fashionable for a child to be placed on a pedestal and is full of 10 years old who fall into hysteria if they are not paid 5 minutes of attention. 18 years old who consider their parents to be lifelong donors of money. Take a change of priorities and understand that a family can have many children, but your husband is one.

   I vowed one last comment, but I can't ... Now what, the child is guilty of being helpless when he's small and needs attention, and your husband is selfish who doesn't love his child ... and you're the long-suffering, which 'can't please everyone' ... Enough! Just be careful not to say these and other horrible things to your child when he begins to understand the meaning of your words, because you will blame him for the broken family ... Everyone who is unable to have a family takes it to the children, in the end, the children are victims, I know from personal experience ... And no material care can mask the dissatisfaction of the parent and the guilt he imposes on the child. May your poor child be healthy and sensible.

   To 30 of 2,9,16,26 and 31 ... horror just. You're in a big mistake, man, but you're cruelly wrong. I'm sending you a reading. http://webstage.bg/roditelstvo/1993-zhivotat-na-deteto-zavisi-ot-tzeluvkite-koito-maikata-e-dala-na-tova-dete.html This is for the author and for anyone who wants to read. https://istina.bg/uchitelya-petar-danov-za-semeystvoto-i-jenitbata/

   "A man who abuses his wife does not deserve to have a family." It scared me a lot, I even sweated when I read it! №28, you were very cruel, don't do that, there are weak men who, if they read it, will faint. Well, express yourself more understandably, because a man can show disrespect or disregard for his wife, but he can use violence directly if he deems it necessary, because he is stronger, not to show it! Author, the man's rude attitude towards you is caused by your attitude towards him. Read yourself and pay attention to how you speak with a sense of ownership! "The man with whom I created a family, to whom I gave birth to a child." You created the family with him, and you became the mother of his child. Children are the best thing in this world and are the continuation of the family. " I started drooling and rejoicing in the baby, my husband got angry and stopped talking. He would burst with anger at why I had ignored him and not looked him in the eye. He wanted all my love. And I gave it to the youngest man. "This sounds like revenge, which does not lead to anything good. What's wrong with a man who wants all the love from his wife, and the result is the little man? Author, there is wisdom in folk psychology! -" Two sharp stones, do not grind flour "Who do you think should give in ... the man or the woman? You are certainly not to blame for your behavior and your expectations of the man. It is the utopia of feminism that incites women to disrespect men and proclaims women's independence and self-sufficiency. But the reality is different, and only women lose out on this self-sufficiency. Freeze around! Women with a mania for independence, struggle for a career at 30-35 years and suddenly left without children, and after 45 already, "the wind blows them on a white horse"! Are they very happy with this independence? At least you already have a child and a husband. If you want to be without it, you can always do it, as other feminists here advise, but think about it! Instead of "taking out his eyes", you can "paint his eyebrows"! Male independence from the female presence is inherent, while the opposite is unfavorable for the female sex. After the age of 40, women are unattractive (unlike men), gain weight, become rough, and find it difficult to hide cellulite and other imperfections on their body. That's why they have no choice but to keep most of them self-sufficient for the rest of their lives. "the wind blows them on a white horse"! Are they very happy with this independence? At least you already have a child and a husband. If you want to be without it, you can always do it, as other feminists here advise, but think about it! Instead of "taking out his eyes", you can "paint his eyebrows"! Male independence from the female presence is inherent, while the opposite is unfavorable for the female sex. After the age of 40, women are unattractive (unlike men), gain weight, become rough, and find it difficult to hide cellulite and other imperfections on their body. That's why they have no choice but to keep most of them self-sufficient for the rest of their lives. "the wind blows them on a white horse"! Are they very happy with this independence? At least you already have a child and a husband. If you want to be without it, you can always do it, as other feminists here advise, but think about it! Instead of "taking out his eyes", you can "paint his eyebrows"! Male independence from the female presence is inherent, while the opposite is unfavorable for the female sex. After the age of 40, women are unattractive (unlike men), gain weight, become rough, and find it difficult to hide cellulite and other imperfections on their body. That's why they have no choice but to keep most of them self-sufficient for the rest of their lives. you can always do it, as the other feminists here advise, but think! Instead of "taking out his eyes", you can "paint his eyebrows"! Male independence from the female presence is inherent, while the opposite is unfavorable for the female sex. After the age of 40, women are unattractive (unlike men), gain weight, become rough, and find it difficult to hide cellulite and other imperfections on their body. That's why they have no choice but to keep most of them self-sufficient for the rest of their lives. you can always do it, as the other feminists here advise, but think! Instead of "taking out his eyes", you can "paint his eyebrows"! Male independence from the female presence is inherent, while the opposite is unfavorable for the female sex. After the age of 40, women are unattractive (unlike men), gain weight, become rough, and find it difficult to hide cellulite and other imperfections on their body. That's why they have no choice but to keep most of them self-sufficient for the rest of their lives. they gain weight, become rough, and find it difficult to hide cellulite and other imperfections on their body. That's why they have no choice but to keep most of them self-sufficient for the rest of their lives. they gain weight, become rough, and find it difficult to hide cellulite and other imperfections on their body. That's why they have no choice but to keep most of them self-sufficient for the rest of their lives.

   30 The man can feed himself, change his clothes, etc. Naturally, he must look after the child, and for the man it must be just as important. Apparently the man still wants to be watched as a child ....

   It is absolutely unacceptable for your husband to threaten you with a fight or a knife, no matter how affected he is. If you still want to be together, just sit together, without little people and other slimy things, and kindly and calmly explain to him that he may beat you, but then he may not wake up after eating a hot plate. soup with strychnine. People like him are timid. At the same time, do not close your eyes to your own mistakes. 1. You allowed yourself to become a servant. You began to serve him of your own free will. 2. You are obsessed with your child. You made the man feel used and abandoned. You say yourself that you give ALL YOUR love to the little man. Well, when there is no love left for your husband, he is satisfied with the maid. As a true aristocrat. The child is with you for a while. After 18 years, she remembered to call you on Skype once every 3 months, I don't. To know in advance, do not leave your husband a second violin, if you first behave lovingly, do not expect to be treated as a loved one. I wish you success, whatever you decide. However, a new start seems to me the best solution. Grandpa Torbalan

   I am the author and again I want to ask you how it is possible to leave a 2-month-old baby to wake up and roar and have a quiet conversation with his father, and maybe have a coffee and go for a walk outside without paying attention to the child and take him in my arms, and then ask "and what happened next", and the answer is "you interrupted me and do not look me in the eye while talking". Is it a wrong choice to take care of the little man, because he would still be crying and there would be no conversation again. I don't understand why adults are selfish! I calmed the child down and continued the conversation, but when it stopped he was not the same.

   Author, you are making the typical mistake of a novice parent. Namely, you jump and take the child in your arms every time he is jealous. This is how you develop a habit of roaring in him until he finds himself in your arms. If you also say that you sleep with the baby, the picture will be complete. As monstrous as it may seem to you, sometimes the child has to let himself bark. Otherwise you are raising a little tyrant. Clearly, you want to hug him, but responsibilities as a parent require personal sacrifices. Your comment only confirms how obsessed you are with your child. This is not good for you or him. Grandpa Torbalan

   Author, you have received many answers, many of them contradictory, but you should feel things because you participate in them. Grandpa Torbalan has given you a lot of useful advice, but to live in peace, you do not need to take advantage of strychnine in your husband's diet. If your husband threatens you with a fight and a knife, pay attention to when and why he does it. Maybe the reason is in you, without realizing it. "A dog that barks doesn't bite!" feminist and secured by the laws. Pay attention to the constant howling of BFZ (Bulgarian Women's Fund)! More than 22 women have died unnaturally since the beginning of the year, caused by their recklessness to punish men with verbal violence and with their vast legal powers. There are natural laws that do not combine with civil ones, which are eternal and unchangeable. Reasonable women feel and comply with them, no matter that feminists proclaim unlimited women's rights and dream of turning men into slaves to women through perverted women's laws. It cannot happen, even if the entire legal power is usurped by women, because of the nobility of men. There are just (and always will be) a large percentage of normal and sensible men who will not allow it. That is why you must have already felt it during your life so far, that a man does not ask a woman, and does not comply with her, unless she considers that the woman is right! So, forget about matriarchy and look at your husband as the most necessary thing in your life, to be happy and get the respect you need, and the child is just as dear to him as it is to you. Therefore, if your relationship is normal and not feminist, your child will enjoy a happy childhood and parental love. The man is the head of the family, not the woman, don't forget him! There is no father who does not care for his child, which is his blood, unless he knows that the child is not his! Before you do anything about your husband, look around and see today's reality. Over 50% of divorced women live alone and raise their children alone in deprivation and adversity. Men don't care much, they're even happier after divorces because they drop family commitments and don't feel guilty because the reasons for divorce are women and they can always find younger women or places,

   Grandpa doesn't know much that he's in every subject with his stupidity.

   38 - the man can be the head of a family if there is one. For this to happen, he must find a woman who will agree to start a family with him. I understand you've sunk into a prehistoric hole, but wake her up and look around? Women do not need a man, nor do men need a woman. Each of us today can survive alone. A man and a woman should get together and be together because they enjoy each other and for no other reason. I won't even comment on your last sentence - believe me, we women will find sex partners much faster than you. To the author - you allowed him to behave like that with you. Humans are animals - they instinctively sense when someone is weak and then attack. You have lost your authority. Nowadays, children are a luxury that not everyone can afford. A woman should give birth only if she has enough savings to support herself and the child during motherhood. Otherwise, there is a great danger that she will become economically dependent on the man and he will start bullying her, because she knows that it will be very difficult for her to leave him. Don't live with the thought that if you don't become a parent, you've wasted your life and your chances. Life is much more than natural instincts.

   "38 - a man can be the head of a family if he has one. In order for that to happen, he has to find a woman who will agree to start a family with him." or if there are any, they depend only on the benevolence of the woman, and the man will be the head of the family, and he cannot bring order if the woman does not allow him! I don't know if I have sunk into a prehistoric hole, but in the countryside there are still real families with male heads of families, and Sofia and two or three other urbanized cities are not all of Bulgaria. Maybe you are fantasizing and moving into a future that no one can predict. What do you think? Whether the author started a family or her husband did. In extreme situations, men always survive because they are physically much stronger and more ... let's not say what, and women cannot do without male help. The history of mankind confirms this. So it is clear who cannot do without whom, but everyone has the right to an opinion. "A man and a woman should get together and be together, because they enjoy each other and for no other reason." With this opinion of yours, it just struck me !!! Well, let me ask you then, how will there be a reproduction of the human factor, if as a man and a woman they will get together only if they are happy and for pleasure ??? How will there be a sequel to humanity. Surely women will be fertilized by the "Holy Spirit"! "Believe me, we women will find sex partners much faster than you." I have no doubt. about 10% of women have an attractive sexy look and will always find sex partners if they are not mentally ill, as a result of which they become frigid and get vaginismus and anorgasmia! Well, for us men, sex is always there, and even without ever looking for it, and paid love comes out much cheaper than the dumps and landings of women we liked. "Nowadays, children are a luxury that not everyone can afford. A woman should only have a child if she has enough savings to support herself and the child during motherhood." That's the tip ... I give up and I can't arguing with you. You must be absolutely right. Apparently, dark-skinned women who give birth to 5-10 children have enough savings to support themselves and their children during motherhood, and children are not a luxury for them because they vomit like a conveyor belt. Author, wise people have said: "Measure three times, cut once!" before you listen (if you listen) № 41 think carefully about the consequences afterwards. 41 lives as a mistress of men. You didn't let your husband behave like that with you, you challenged him to behave like that. Think again, who allows something to whom and who is more independent of the other. A man can never be economically dependent on a woman unless he is crippled, sick or very old and helpless. It has always been the opposite. In their prime, men are as free as birds, and women cannot impose anything on them unless they are their mothers. I am convinced that you are under feminist influence and ideology confuses your consciousness. That's why you have this behavior and attitude towards your husband. I will not remind you of folk psychology about the subordinate and the dominant, or who is lower or higher in the family and society. To be more precise, I say that a man doesn't ask a woman and doesn't ask her permission for anything, if he doesn't really love her! And for a man to truly love a woman, she must first love him and prove his love for him.

   42 - there is no dispute with the lantern, I will only comment on your question "how will there be a reproduction of the human factor"? And why do you think there should be one? The planet can only thank us if we stop multiplying. We are all just pests and consumers, if we reduce by 1-2 billion nothing so fatal will happen, although we think that we are unique and unique, and if we disappear the world will end.

   You are absolutely right №43 !!! The people have told us: - "There is no dispute with a woman and a radio station, especially after women received more equal rights than men in 1947! And if you say that we are only pests and consumers, even if I do not agree , I will still have to agree with you that otherwise they will not post my comment and you will not know how I think about this case.The planet will surely thank us if we stop multiplying, even though we think we are unique and unique, and if we disappear, the world will end, well, the world will not disappear, only we as a nation will disappear and Bulgaria will exist only as a territory inhabited by other ethnic groups that do not recognize the ideas of feminism, but skillfully take advantage of European privileges, provided to them through directives and imposed laws harmful to our society!

   44- I haven't seen a really more limited comment in a long time. Instead of thinking about what is outside the planet Earth, you clung to a miniature settlement called Bulgaria, and you were worried about what would happen if the people in this place did not multiply. Well done, really cosmopolitan thinking. Be sure that people born in this place are no different from people born in another place - for example, Romania, Ireland, Norway, Canada, Tanzania, Pakistan, Myanmar, Peru, etc. Why do I think so? Let's see. People in all the settlements I have listed have two arms, two legs, one head, the same genitals, and everything else you have. So, whether 10,000 fewer children will be born in the town of Bulgaria and 10,000 more in the country of Canada, does not matter on a planetary level. I know

   №45, I'm 44! You can hardly imagine my knowledge but astrophysics and space sciences. As a kid, I loved science fiction. Stanislav Lem was my favorite author. I have the whole Galaxy series and a whole science fiction library. As I grew older, I fell in love with technology and thought of studying astrophysics, but I became interested in radio electronics and now it's a hobby. So, I guess I have a lot more knowledge about you and I know what's outside the planet Earth, as well as the solar system in the Milky Way galaxy! "However, the topic is different and I answer the author's questions from my point of view. Now I will answer you too, even though you don't want to. This miniature settlement called Bulgaria is my homeland, and I love my homeland the most, and I am ready to defend it from modern liberalism and other invasion as far as I can. Somehow it hurts me that people in Bulgaria are already with negative growth, and in 3/4 of the world some other people with the same physiology as us, have two arms, two legs, one head, the same genitals and everything another thing that you and I have are multiplying progressively and by extrapolation I guess that in time they will inhabit the few remaining places like my Bulgaria, and we local people will disappear! That is why I am concerned about the demographic collapse and I am interested in the future, which will be a consequence of the present, even historically! The planetary plane is a doctrine of the universal mind, and we humans cannot change anything because we are still powerless. We just exist as a puzzle piece,

   44- Enter a gypsy neighborhood or a neighborhood inhabited, for example, by Pakistanis and Arabs, if you live abroad, but alone in the dark of night, and you will find out if people are the same as you claim. While in a gypsy neighborhood you are more likely to be robbed than raped, in one of the Arab ghettos in Western Europe you may not come out alive. Those who think exactly like you dragged these hordes of migrants to Europe, and now Europeans are roaring. It is very easy to give these minds from a wealthy neighborhood populated mainly by white and educated people, but if you live a little with those same people who claim to be the same, you will not think so. And before you accuse me of racism, I will say that people are really born equal, but it is very important in what environment you grow up. I stop here, you will hardly understand me, so there is no need to waste time explaining more.

   47 - I do not intend to enter dangerous neighborhoods because of my innate instinct for self-preservation - what to do, that's how we were created. I lived in Iraq for a few years before the war and in Syria for half a year, again long before the war. I never felt in danger. There were very strict rules there, which, unlike in Europe, were followed. The women did not wear burqas, I walked the streets alone without any problem. Christians and Muslims respected each other. Then the Americans (with the support of Europe) decided to create problems for geopolitical reasons and turned some normal people into beasts. Be sure that if tomorrow Bulgaria is attacked in the same way and we will lose the human at most in a month or two. The fact that the worst of the Arab world are currently coming to Europe under the guise of migrants, we all know whose fault it is. My comment was intended to show you that we humans deal with and argue about some complete nonsense that doesn't matter on a planetary level. We spoil everything with our thirst for power, sex and money.

   From the author. Let's return to the topic and solution of my problem. On a large scale, we can help ourselves and the nature of our planet and space and galaxy, but we will not escape our microcosm and our daily lives. Problems like mine are common and I really want there to be no domestic violence. No matter how angry a man is, it is not masculine to attack a woman, to bully, threaten and beat. Don't call this the result of feminism. Nowadays, when men have a child, they stop thinking about many things, give up goals, dreams, ambitions, if they had any at all. I already think that a man's main goal is to have sex and reproduce. After all, women are very good, we have to provide housing, we have to fix the equipment, we have to look after our children and we have to provide money for the child's education and everything else.

   Author - you make an impression of a good woman, with moral principles, convinced of her right and firmly on the ground. Not all men are like the ones you described above, but there are quite a few lately. Unfortunately, we can't always weed them out, because some of them are excellent manipulators and may not show their true face for years. It is our duty as women and mothers, however, not to allow such behavior to continue. A lot of advice has already been given, the topic is almost a month old. Will you share whether you have taken any action to get rid of this abuser or the situation is the same?

   Author, you judge for yourself that you and your husband are not a family and everything is very artificial between you! Were you very much in love, and did you have a child? So far so good, but suddenly hop, and he has changed dramatically. How do you explain it? Why has the man changed so much, what is the reason? I will answer you author. Neither you nor he is to blame! The poison of feminism has changed your attitude towards him and he reacts by defending his male "I"! When you mention that you didn't take on the housework, do you think it's right to make a man the head of a family? Think about it, didn't you provoke him with the wrong attitude and excessive pretensions without reason to threaten you with a knife, scream and grab you by the throat? You say he took you as a maid ... again a feminist expression of enraged feminists. Before emancipation, women mothers were not servants of men when they gave birth to their children, raised them, raised them in human virtues, as men and women according to their sex, and did all the housework, and the man who provided for himself has he returned tired and greeted by his wife and the tickling kids? Not an author, today post-post-modernism has distorted the notion of normalcy, and chaos and perversions are revered by the new world order. You have claims on your husband, disrespecting male authority, and this is normal because feminism encourages women to provoke against men by seeking perverted laws to protect female impudence. Think objectively about #Me Too? Can a woman claim that a man raped her 30-40 years ago was no evidence, and pass a law, with which the man should be directly convicted, without the right to prove his innocence, since every woman, no matter who named him (appointed) a rapist? So the rule "Innocent until proven guilty" does not apply once the woman decides that the man is guilty! With the Istanbul Convention, feminists wanted to enslave men in our country through legal perversion, but they do not assume that then men will start killing them en masse, because there will be nothing more to lose, and revenge will be a reward for them. Distributing your masculine justice This is how far feminist impudence has gone, forcing men to have a character like your husband. Violence against women is being talked about everywhere today and no one is saying the reason for it, no matter how normal everyone knows it. The feminist war for female domination over men is useless and will never be won. Male superiority over female weakness is a natural algorithm that ensures the continuation of life on the planet. A man is stronger than a woman as a sex and can always beat or kill her when provoked, no matter what the civil laws for the protection or prevention of violence against women. This is something that feminists deliberately ignore and naively strive for female domination, which is virtually impossible. Their protests for legal power over men, even if respected, will accomplish nothing. Women have a single weapon against men that can prevent violence against them. "A woman is strong only with her weakness"! Only then the man instinctively protects her and respects her desires, if they are normally permissible! A woman's attitude towards men like: - "Do you want to stop seeing your children, take everything from you and drive you out on the street, condemning you to pay me a living wage if you don't do what I say" leads to the murder of women , like the ones that feminists point out from the beginning of the year until now! The solution to your problem, author, is in yourself. Abstain from the "equality of men / women" that feminists are trumpeting and look at things objectively. The man cannot submit directly to the woman in the family, that even outside of him, because he and not the woman is the head of the family. Civil laws are powerless over natural ones, and nature has determined the supremacy of the male, not the female! For as much as you don't want to,

   From the author to 52. I can not agree with your hypothesis and your arguments, because we women are not just furniture in the home, as long as we have a man next to us. And it's even funnier when a man doesn't take his position and has decided that everything in the family is provided with crossed arms and legs. While my husband has lost my respect, and perhaps every third girl, because I am no longer eighteen years old with beetles in my head, but I am part of a family without a head in the family. For every urgent question, whether something will be repaired, whether something will be bought, I have to pull the strings. And if I'm seriously ill, I still have to think about the smallest details. When I asked questions of great importance at the beginning, such as where we would live, I was told: now is not the time, we will talk about this later, I don't know, he thinks that if we live here, then I have decided, after the baby was born, it stayed that way. When asked if we would get married, he answered me - he didn't care, in the beginning it was different. There is no elementary position and no head in this family. If we can't solve some issues concerning the two together and there is no desire to solve them, what kind of equality and superiority are we talking about?