First, fix the terminology. "Masturbation" means SELF-satisfaction. If someone else satisfies you, it's not masturbation. The word "chikiya" has entered the Bulgarian jargon, the meaning of which is a massage of the member, regardless of which. Example "I pulled a quick chick" or "babe, I got hit by a chick". Nobody says "masturbate me". Leaving that aside. The act of masturbating aims to achieve mainly one of two things - either to lead to orgasm (in its final phase) or to raise and maintain the level of arousal (in men erection) - an example is during an orgy and you wait your turn for a certain girl to be free - masturbating makes you ready for action. People often masturbate as a quick and easy way to relieve sexual tension - in the absence of a partner, in practice this is the only way. As far as I understand, what you want to raise an issue about is the act of sexual gratification by your partner's hands (in English they call it a hand job). From personal experience I can say that there is no ground for comparison with oral sex - in terms of intensity and quality of physical and psychological sensation and corresponding pleasure. The mouth, as a structure and sensation, is dozens of times closer to the female genitalia than a hand with bent fingers (even when lubricants are used). From a psychological point of view, the act of oral sex is much more intimate and personal. Of course, as many people as there are preferences, but few men will give up oral sex in favor of the "chick". Otherwise, if you have to choose between "masturbating" and "chick" made by your partner - it is clear. One of the great advantages of having someone else make you a "chick" before masturbating is the fact that during orgasm the muscles tense and your body "stiffens" including the hand with which you masturbate in anticipation of the ejaculation itself. As a result of the moment of orgasm, the man uncontrollably "freezes" and accordingly the stimulation stops. If your partner performs a massage, you have no control over the stimulation and it continues after the point of orgasm - this leads to increased pleasure due to the lengthening of the plateau of orgasm. Another point is how the massage is performed, it can lead to different sensations and type of orgasm - an example is the difference when the hand has covered the entire member and when you use the thumb and forefinger to stimulate the head of the penis (the base of the head). Different people prefer different sensations. For me personally, both are pleasant in different ways and I am diversifying. As for whether he is "more beautiful", many men like to watch their girlfriend or wife massage them and the reaction during ejaculation. Like any sexual thing - everyone's brain is individual and, accordingly, preferences are individual - it's not bad if you want your boyfriend to occasionally pull a quick cock if circumstances do not allow other acts. Be it because of time or circumstances. For example, when I wake up in the morning and know that we are both in a hurry for work and the weather is not suitable for foreplay and some other form of sex, I gladly agree to my wife hitting me with a "chick" as an alternative. It becomes easy, fast and achieves the goal of relieving tension. Elevated levels of dopamine in the brain from the resulting orgasm also improve mood and the day begins "brighter". The adrenaline released has an invigorating effect on waking up. The same goes for the end of a long day when you're both tired and you're not up to the "full-program" sex and the whole ritual associated with it. I count on it - before or after, I lick her to orgasm and we are both happy. Hand massage especially with her takes more time. Another example is the situation - it happened that she hit my dick in a movie theater with a jacket thrown on my lap - not that I encourage it - it takes a little experience so that you do not give any signs of what you are doing and no one has the slightest idea . I massaged her in the park or during a concert. A problem is when a man or woman uses masturbation or "chakradosvane" as an alternative to normal sex even when the situation allows it. Such a sexual health problem should definitely be addressed. Also remember that hand satisfaction in men is a relatively safe job and is quick and easy - for women the situation is quite different. They often need a certain psychological attitude to reach orgasm and rarely have "a quick clitoral massage" that has the same effect as "a quick pee". The act itself in this case is a bit unfair to the woman - during sexual intercourse. act it is right for both partners to receive something in return - I'm talking about pleasure. If you make your boyfriend or wife crack your chicks every time you want to without "compensating" her what does she get out of it? Some women are happy to know that they have satisfied their partner, albeit with a hand, but this is not equal to even a small part of the pleasure that a man feels - in short ... do not treat a woman as a machine for chikii. And to answer your question directly - it's hard to say that "women like it" - they don't take direct pleasure - it's no different than taking care of you, wrapping them in a blanket as you fall asleep in front of the TV or cook something they know you love. When the relationship is in the beginning, there is an element of "thrill", for example, often in teenagers "chick" and "whistle" are the first forms of sexual intercourse with a partner for those who want to check the water with their feet before jumping. When you are married for 20 years and your wife has hit hundreds of chicks in all sorts of places and occasions - for her it becomes a routine, without which you can safely pass. In short - there is definitely room for "chikii" in sexual relations, but they are a compromise and should not replace other forms of sex. From me - less routine actions like polishing canes, dandruff, throwing dice and whatever you call it - and more than anything else - the horizon for experiments is endless. Dr. Who rolling the dice and whatever you call it - and more than anything else - the horizon for experimentation is endless. Dr. Who rolling the dice and whatever you call it - and more than anything else - the horizon for experimentation is endless. Dr. Who
1 DivineHeart answered
It was two gentle female hands that mercilessly brought me to the top. It was the cherished stream that flew out and split the darkness ... and the EARTH SHAKED! But I'm rocking, I'm telling you !!! Objects were falling and walls were bending, making horrible noises! Ecstasy and horror merged into one - I was shocked by what a natural cataclysm we caused! Really - let's not underestimate masturbation! Practice with extreme care and away from populated areas!