Is There Such A Religion

   Same thing with me. I don't know exactly what we are, we are not exactly atheists, because we believe in the existence of some higher power, whether you call it God or not, but we are not religious ... we have our own faith and that's it. It all comes down to the idea that if you try to do good, to be honest in your relationships, to help people, etc. one day it will come back to you somehow. You don't have to pray, perform any rituals and the like, you just try to be a "good person".

   There is, and it is YOUR religion. I don't know what your needs are served by an artist, but here, you have adapted them to them. Every religion is born of man, without man there is no faith. It helps him not to explode, to come to terms with death. The truth is that we know very little about the nature of matter and energy in the universe, and we do not know whether it is one. So we are free to believe in whatever is convenient for us. Being a good person is certainly a good intention. I hope you meet more and more good people.

   I guess you're a Muslim if you don't say your religion. In Islam, it's just what you take. If you do this, they will give you this and that. If you want to know more about this religion and understand what it is about, read Chapters 4 and 9 in the Qur'an. If you want to know more about Christianity, you just have to read the 10 commandments of God and everything will become crystal clear to you. Remember that faith is in the heart of man! Some think that by going to church and confessing, their sins will be cleansed and they can do the same wrong things again. This is not so! Everyone can make mistakes and God gives us the opportunity to repent and not repeat our mistake! We are in this world to show what we really are, it is a test. The Lord will judge us for what we have done in our lives, not for how many times we have gone to church, how many candles we lit and how much money we donated there. Remember that you cannot bribe God!

   Theologians group people according to their beliefs whether there is a higher divine power or not. 1) Theists - These are adherents of traditional religions. According to them, there is a God 2) Deists - There is a higher power, but this power is not represented in any religion. If he created everything now does not interfere in the affairs just stands and has other priorities 3) Agnostics - It is impossible to determine whether there is a god or not. This thesis is not ambiguity, ie agnostics do not doubt whether there is divine power or not, they accept that the presence of a god is beyond our ability to define or reject this claim. Atheists do not use faith as a tool for proof. Our current evidence does not lead to the existence of such a force. You belong to the group of deists. I was also a believer, now I'm more of an agnostic.

   And Job took unto him a pot of wine, and sat on the dunghill (out of the city). And his wife said unto him, Thou art still strong in thy integrity. Blaspheme God and die! * But he said unto her, Thou speakest mad. Will we accept the good from God and not tolerate the evil? "In all this Job did not sin with his mouth."

   Isn't that agnosticism or am I mistaken?

   Agnosticism.

   It is interesting how people invented God. Because the universe had to be made of something. And why should it be created from something? Can't the universe just be, just as they say God is. When you ask religious people, "who created God?" they say "he's just E". Well, I say, why can't the world just be? Why can't the universe just be? Why should it be created by God? That is exactly what you are talking about, author, in my opinion. The universe has always been, always has been and always will be. There is no need for God to create the universe. The universe itself operates in its own way, it can be said that the universe itself is one with God. People invented the anthropomorphic God because they like the idea of ​​being able to communicate with God as a human being (because they know it). This is especially true of the Abrahamic religions - Judaism, Christianity, Islam. My philosophy is similar to yours, except that I even remove the anthropomorphic God from the equation. To me, the universe is divine and unique to God. As the universe is, so is God. With all the good and bad inside, good and ugly (these are subjective labels without it), everything And how to say this philosophy - I have no idea. It is actually a natural philosophy. The most primary consideration of things. If you let a small child grow up without introducing a particular religion, but at the same time explain to him to approach natural phenomena scientifically (so that he does not start bowing to fire or lightning and fall into irrational beliefs), he will probably reach similar conclusions. As the universe is, so is God. With all the good and bad inside, good and ugly (these are subjective labels without it), everything And how to say this philosophy - I have no idea. It is actually a natural philosophy. The most primary consideration of things. If you let a small child grow up without introducing a particular religion, but at the same time explain to him to approach natural phenomena scientifically (so that he does not start bowing to fire or lightning and fall into irrational beliefs), he will probably reach similar conclusions. As the universe is, so is God. With all the good and bad inside, good and ugly (these are subjective labels without it), everything And how to say this philosophy - I have no idea. It is actually a natural philosophy. The most primary consideration of things. If you let a small child grow up without introducing a particular religion, but at the same time explain to him to approach natural phenomena scientifically (so that he does not start bowing to fire or lightning and fall into irrational beliefs), he will probably reach similar conclusions.

   Only one person has said of himself that he is the WAY AND THE TRUTH AND THE LIFE AND THE RESURRECTION. There are even witnesses outside the Bible. What words only !!! Such witnesses are Josephus and Tacitus and others. Why do we count 2019 years after Christ? Why does the whole world conform to Him if it has not happened?

   8, I think more or less like you, only I did not think to delve. If there is any God outside the universe who created the universe, then who created God? Another God? And who created this other God? Ie again we come to the idea of ​​self-creation or as E. said. Did some God create himself and then create the universe or did the universe itself create itself, i.e. she herself is God, it doesn't matter much to me. Either way, there is an idea of ​​self-creation. And this self-creation presupposes some power that we can call God. But there is another point. If there is any creation at all, it automatically means that we accept time as a rectilinear and constant flow. Ie until one moment there was nothing and after that there is already a (self) created universe. Well, yes, but time is not absolute, but relative, and this has already been scientifically proven. Ie there is no absolute moment in which everything was created. This moment is relative. And the question arises - what time was this moment? Because the time of the Earth flows in one way, of the Sun in another, and next to some black hole, there is no such thing at all, it has stopped there. So what time and what time are we talking about? More logically, nothing has ever been created, and everything is just E. But still this E obeys some laws and some idea, ie. there is still something higher behind this E. The Taoists call it Tao, i.e. that's it. Hey stuff like that. But whatever the truth, even if I understand it, I will neither get rich nor my life will become easier and happier. So it's still what it is to me. Anyway, it's what it is. Where there is a saying "before enlightenment you chop wood, you carry water, after enlightenment you chop wood, you carry water". So the same cock.

   Up to number 9. Not the whole world complies with the counting "before Christ / after Christ". In English BC- before Christ and AD- Anno Domini which in translation is "The years of our God". The idea of ​​Before / after Christ as a kind of measure of the years was proposed only in 525. by a monk. Naturally, this idea extends to Christian lands. But in other non-Christian countries, academics use the term "BCE / CE" Before common era / Common era. The term Before / After Christ was simply used for convenience. As required measuring systems, such as centimeter, millimeter, inch, kilogram, etc.

   pantheism

   The Bible is the truth. It says that Adam lived 950 years after him, 600 by 500. To this day, there is a Greenland shark that lives 400 years and the Galapagos tortoises that live 300 years. After the fall, things went wrong.

   deism

   It's called Lucefirianism. In fact, Lucifer is the true creator of this reality, and all high-ranking sticks worship him. You are not the first to come to these conclusions and how life really works ... Otherwise, Christianity has long been lost as a true teaching, because its true followers were killed a long time ago. What has been replaced is the Roman Church, which is actually Luciferian at the back and is ruled by a white and a black pope. The church uses Christianity as a screen, and this is the reason why its truth is lost to most. Without much reading and reflection on life, there is no way to understand what the true message of Christianity is, it is not what is preached ... If you are a Muslim, Islam goes with its own lies ... Just if you think that the job of an official religion is to educate you spiritually - you are deeply mistaken. But still, these religions have set foot on something, there is something true, the dawn is to understand it. These are basically complex topics, if you are really interested, look for sources and read. It is difficult to bring it to light, but we live in the information age, most of all we need desire. To ask here in public space, people with zero religious and esoteric knowledge is completely meaningless ...

   I have been trying to become a Christian for years and it still doesn't work, I don't turn from my sins and I satisfy my flesh. God wants you to follow him, to live righteously (for him), but He will not force you, because He created us with free will and everyone chooses how to live. And I always feel like I'm forcing myself to do, to live in a way that I don't like, it's limited and it's boring ... I'm totally confused. I don't know what kind of life God wants us to enjoy and what abundance in life He is talking about ... I want to become a Christian (not religious but real) but I still can't jump over this trap (this confusion) and the fact that my life as a Christian will be lonely (because it is.) I will try again and again.

   Well, it's a bit like agnosticism, ie you assume that there may be some higher power, it may be God, but you are not religious. I personally do not believe in God, but I assume that, if there is, he is either not omnipotent or does not do his job properly, judging by the state of the world in which we live.

   Up to 15 Black Pope? Ahahahahahahaha - all Satanists are white, it was a boy. Black dad ... And dad milking and what is it? Yellow?

   Watch Frater Xavier - mindandmagick's YouTube channel. There is much to be learned from this man, but it is not for narrow-minded and low-intelligence wooden philosophers who cannot accept new ideas and take everything that is written in the Bible literally.

   Such a philosophy is called - REALITY and NATURE! Man is no different from other animals. Notice how many animals suit humans, most have five fingers on their limbs, internally we also have the same device. But man was lucky enough to develop his brain faster and to dominate other animals through his mind, but with strength and cunning. He is like an ant in front of the elephant, but he subdues it with his mind. No religions were created, yes "created", because they were invented by tricksters - Jews who sought to dominate other races by deceiving them with various gods. If there was an omnipotent God, it would be very easy to bring peace to the earth, there would be no wars, no people would be killed for their ego. In nature, animals are killed to feed, not because they want to conquer the whole world, like the animal Hitler was. This makes me think that man is the most backward animal in his evolution, even though he is technically evolving. Through the technique he creates, he will actually commit suicide, is this a civilized person who seeks suicide? Well done author, you got it right!

   Deism is yours. It acknowledges the existence of God and the creation of the world, but only as the root cause, and denies its existence as a person (theism), as well as the fleeing intervention and control of events in nature and society.

   There is only one true religion and that is Christianity. This is the only teaching that will explain to you what is good and what is evil. Read the Ten Commandments and you will see that if you follow them, you will be a really good person! Islam is nowhere mentioned, including in the Qur'an, as a religion. The difference between Christianity and Islam can be summarized in two passages; - Christianity; - "If you have two shirts, give one to your neighbor, who does not have one." - Islam; "If you have two shirts and you see someone has one, get together with other Muslims, punch him and take him." And the "religion" you are looking for is called; "Breathe on me" and with it you will get nowhere.

   Моля №22 да коментира следните цитати и как те кореспондират с истинността, мира и добротата. 1 Царе 15:3 "Иди сега та порази Амалика, обречи на изтребление всичко, що има, и не го пожали; но избий мъж и жена, дете и бозайниче, говедо и овца, камила и осел." Псалми 137:9 "Блазе на онзи, който хване и разбие о камък Малките ти деца!" Съдии Израилеви [19:25] Но те не искаха да го слушат. Тогава мъжът взе наложницата си и я изведе при тях на улицата. Те я познаха и изнасилваха цяла нощ до сутринта. И я пуснаха призори. [19:26] И призори дойде жената, и падна при къщните врата на човека, у когото беше господарят й, и лежа до съмване. [19:27] Господарят й стана сутринта, отвори къщните врата и излезе, за да тръгне на път: и ето, наложницата му лежи пред къщните врата, и ръцете й на прага. [19:28] Той й каза: стани, ще вървим. Но отговор нямаше (защото тя бе умряла). Той я тури на осела, стана и замина за мястото си. Второзаконие, гл.25 11 Ако се сбият човеци помежду си, и жената на единия, като пристъпи да освободи мъжа си от ръката на тогова, който го бие, простре ръката си та го хване за срамните му части, 12 тогава да отсечеш ръката й; окото ти да я не пожали. Числа 31:17-18 17 За това, убийте сега всичките мъжки от децата, и убийте всяка жена, която е познала мъж, като е лежала с него. 18 А всичките момичета, които не са познали мъж, които не са лежали с такъв, оставете живи за себе си.

   №23 Why don't you explain to the people here what it is about in Islam. Syrah 4 (Chapter 4) in the Qur'an is entitled "THE WOMAN". In it, Allah, in 176 stanzas, explains to the Muslims that the WOMAN IS NOTHING! She is the property of the man and has no rights and is obliged to obey him, if not - fight. In Islam, when a girl turns 9, she is considered a mature woman and can marry. In Islam, a man can even marry a baby, but only with the permission of his guardian / father, and cannot have sex with her until she is 9 years old (reaches maturity). In Syrah 9 (Chapter 9) in the Qur'an, Allah says to the Muslims; "Go to non-Muslim countries! Lie to the people there! Trade with them! Deceive them ... and when you're ready, kill them, decapitate them and turn their land into Muslim." Go to Youtube and type in the search engine "

   Number 23 is unique, the described bad deed presents it as Christian. Christianity describes life situations and their consequences. As for having to celebrate. I became a Christian without anyone in my family telling me about this religion. I don't believe it, but I know it's right. There is a huge difference between the two. And I was impressed by the free will that is there. If you want you celebrate, if you want you don't. There is no obedience as in Islam. It must be there and it doesn't really matter if you are celebrating a holiday and "in your heart", the important thing is to do the right thing. It's different with us, you have to want to celebrate it. You can literally hear, "If you think otherwise of your truth, look for it." Of course they tell you that this is the truth, but free will is most important. Otherwise, I don't know what it's like for you to curse God, yes, probably just an example. But he looks like a boy held short, trying to prove something to someone. It is not exactly the best motivation to look for such complex and fundamental questions. But as we know, everyone is free to choose ...

   I can give another example. Here is an example of the Psalms written by King David. He is a sinner like us, Christianity speaks of his mistakes, but in addition to them he has done a lot for the Jews "to be in the truth." He ruled an entire nation well enough, there was prosperity in every aspect. Accordingly, as a person, somewhere in the Psalms he said something wrong and not so Christian. The Bible itself tells of his mistakes. So this Psalm is just an example of all such attempts to denigrate, it doesn't show things in full context, and it may seem logical to someone unfamiliar. If a person has decided to find evidence that something "is not worth it and is a lie", then he will find a way to deceive himself and his brain to make a slight product positioning: D. But I understand, Christianity requires too much honor, dignity and real morality, let's choose something more comfortable. It is different to spoil something or to be "modern".

   24, I did not say this to denigrate Christianity specifically and to say that Islam is cool. My idea is that religions in general are nonsense. When it comes to the woman - 1 Timothy 2:11 NP Let the woman study in silence and in complete obedience. 25, Jeremiah 19: 9 Is a bad deed described again? And I will feed them with the flesh of their sons, and with the flesh of their daughters; and every one shall eat the flesh of his neighbor, when he is besieged and afflicted, when his enemies and them that desire their soul oppress him. "Everyone is free to choose" does not correspond to "It is different to spoil something or to be" modern ". philosophy of all religions, you seem to have free will, but if you do not listen and do not believe, you go to hell. But otherwise God is merciful, no matter that most of them burn in hell. It is full of contradictions - both tooth for tooth and give the other cheek. God is both love and we must fear his punishment. Both God helped by praying, and Jesus on the cross in his despair and in anticipation of help said, "My God, my God! Why have you forsaken me?" and help does not come even for Jesus himself. We are both sinful and we are in his image and likeness. He is both omnipotent and the world is full of suffering, even for good people. and help does not come even for Jesus himself. We are both sinful and we are in his image and likeness. He is both omnipotent and the world is full of suffering, even for good people. and help does not come even for Jesus himself. We are both sinful and we are in his image and likeness. He is both omnipotent and the world is full of suffering, even for good people.

   Allah also says in the Qur'an; "He who doubts my words and tries to judge them is not a Muslim and is legally punishable by death." It is well documented in Islam that Prophet Muhammad married a 6-year-old girl named Aisha, but they consummated the marriage when she was 9 years old, that is, she reached maturity (in Islam). Go to any civilized country and have sex with a 9 year old girl and you will see what will happen to you.

   28, and I say that. Both Islam and Christianity are perverted. Not to be confused with spirituality.

   Number 27, my opinion is atypical, it is the opposite of what is now common, while yours is the typical one, yours is actually modern. Things taken out of context again. There is an explanation for everything, but not everyone has it. I used the Psalms as a collective image of people without elementary knowledge who are ready to qualify. You call my understandings nonsense (without visibly understanding things in depth), and then I humiliate: D. Of course, there will be responsibility for the crime. You don't have to be a Christian to know that. Only a naive person would believe that you can do anything. Such thinking is typical of a confused child. The laws are not for the Lord to earn slaves and become even more proud. They are so that one cannot lose oneself. Just as parents don't let their children go anywhere because they know it's dangerous, and children do not understand (for the most part) why their parents "take away their freedom." Another collective image of misunderstanding is "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth", the meaning is well enough explained, but who cares. We are very smart, we will only take out the quotes, which themselves look bad due to the lack of explanation, of completeness. This means simply and simply that you should not do evil because it will come back to you. God does not need to punish, from the point of view of Christian ideology there is not only one force. This is also too deep. To use the example of the parents, a naughty teenager is punished by his parents because he fights and deals in drugs, and simply does not understand from conversations. He has already been warned by the police and they are afraid of going to prison because of his mistakes. It is the same in the spiritual world. This is too complex a matter. And since someone has chosen to be a horse with caps and prejudices, there is no way to get to the truth. As I mentioned in a previous comment. I became a Christian, I wasn't like that. Since I was a child, I have listened to the same "arguments" as yours, I must admit, more than once I have written and spoken them thinking I am very knowledgeable and smart. "We are the 21st century." But thank God, man learns (who wants). There are wrong and right actions, one cannot do what one wants, no matter how much one wants. I wrote if anyone is in the middle, think about it. Lack of elementary real argument is what I encountered against me. But it is normal. A lower mind that has reached a higher mind, although it has learned a great deal, cannot prove to another lower mind the existence of one who is higher. And from the beginning, things seemed very different to me, but I decided to study the other point of view to the end. And it turned out to be a puzzle. 70% of you have ordered it and you are already sure what it is, and in the end you are surprised by the hasty decision that turned out to be wrong. Everyone alone can reach the truth ... or not. Convenient lie / truth. Obviously, there is no point in writing more, an objective statement ... greetings.

   Number 28, Christianity and Islam in their most important aspects are literally opposite. "But at school they said God is one, so religions are the same" - no, they are not.

   My religion says: Speak softly and carry a big stick with you!

   30, both you do not humiliate me, and "uneducated situation". Why are only the religious considered enlightened, and those who are not are "unenlightened"? Why are religions arrogant towards others? Why is religion considered to be a higher consciousness? And most importantly, why is there a sign of equality between religion and spirituality, between religion and morality? Can't you be spiritual, moral, without being religious? So if one philosophy considers itself higher and the others lower, something in me begins to doubt it very strongly. Come on, homosexual priests, mercantile priests with Lincoln cars and their religion, I'm not going to open the topic, because you'll still justify that it's out of context, that they're not really Christians, etc.?

   Number 33, when you talk about something you obviously don't know, what makes you? There is no need for an answer, the question is rhetorical. We are not talking about possible bad representatives, but about the ideology itself, which with its words conquered the strongest empire. You didn't have to be part of a religion to be spiritual. Religion is a system of worldviews, understandings, etc. As I said, the convenient truth sweeps away the incapable of real in-depth analysis. More writings are meaningless. I answer and receive other of the "accusations" on duty. Of course, everyone who chooses a particular religion believes that it is closest to the truth and will defend it. With no arguments, we suck things out of context and throw them as bait for the same strangers, and of course, we make sacrifices. This is modern.

   34, Does my choice bother you? Did you get acquainted with my philosophy that you judge my choice? You shouldn't have judged, why should you? Where you left, I return from there. For 40 years I was deluded like you and judged non-religious people like you, but now I have upgraded my consciousness. You still have a lot of bread to eat with your ideas about God and the creation of the world. I give logical arguments, and your only "argument" is "out of context" and so it says in the Bible. Who is deluding - me who thinks or you who follow the writings of someone before 2000? He didn't even answer my quotes adequately. Didn't you answer me why your god didn't help your prophet on the cross? Why, being omnipotent, did he allow the devil and not create people and the world to be perfect, but to be wrong by default? What was before the world and the word? One nothing? Elementary logic. And at what point was the world created, as the theory of relativity has already been experimentally proven and there is no absolute time? A little rational mind wants you to understand what nonsense religion is. But it's different when you don't have the capacity to answer to conclude that I'm "uneducated" and that it's "out of context" (typical of a politician) and get out of the situation so easily. But no, you have to believe in religion, not to know and think with logic and evidence. So if you think a little rationally and impartially, you come to the absurd. The acquaintance does not need to believe in anything, he just finds evidence and knows. You have absolutely no proof of anything but some bare writings with which you blindly agree. But otherwise I have followed some modern trends. It is you who follow something devoid of logic, absolutely at the first sign. By the way, some of the biggest perversions are made on a religious basis such as the Inquisition, what morality, what spirituality, what BGN 5? I can do all your fluff and dust only with logic, but I don't care to write for another hour. Religion is based only on one's faith and writings. There is no rational and common sense, no logic, no evidence, no right to even doubt. And most importantly, leave me alone to believe in what my soul desires, I have free will, you have no right to judge and humiliate me, it is written in the Bible, and you as a "great" Christian do not observe it. I am neither simpler than you, nor more immoral than you, nor do I owe you anything. I didn't promise to believe anything, just not to create discomfort in your brainwashed.