Is Sex That Important ?!

   Well hungry millet hen dreams. Hey, such impotent people as Grandpa Torbalan can't do it anymore and that's why they fantasize on the forums.

   Hungry hen, millet dreams ... so it is with sex!

   Well ... the whole of human history is built on his empty sex. People have died, countries have fallen because of it. Instinct. Instinct to procreate. And if you don't have access to regular sex, usually, that's almost all you think about. Sex is one of the basic human needs (along with food and security) and if it is not met, you cannot fully indulge in higher goals. I think so.

   I agree with number 5. I would add one more thing, in general, the problems around sex are very difficult to share openly. That's why there are many such topics on the anonymous site. It is normal. People discuss other problems with their relatives and friends.

   "How did you stand on dry land and how are you going to go crazy. I had problems with you, people?" You're not me, I'm not you, you're not you ... Or something like that.

   If there is enough and easily accessible sex, people will not think about it, they will be satisfied and they will think about other things. However, to ask the hungry to stop thinking about food, because it was so simple and simple - I think it is clear to you that it will not happen, the hungry will think only about food, those who lack sex will think about sex. Because sex has become a difficult and difficult job and from something ordinary and normal it has become a privilege for the rich, beautiful and famous, that's why everything comes down to it.

   Yes, sex is important.

   To the first few comments, you are great philosophers. If I have to bet on your situation with sex priority number one, I would bet on workers at the box office in the ridge. It is very necessary to rock like rabbits 6 times a day for our relationship to work, right? In my opinion, sex is no longer love, and some primary manifestation of our instinct, unfortunately, no longer has the same value.

   Like you, I wonder. Not the most important thing. When a relationship is mature and secure and beautiful, you trust each other and in addition to sex, it is important to love each other as people and to be a team and partners and to be able to love each other without physical pleasures. A lot happens in life - heavy pregnancy and abstinence, old age and loss of libido, these are not reasons to stop loving the person next to you. I say it from personal experience! By this you will know the real relationship, sex is not everything! But it is important!

   Bravo Number 5, short accurate and clear!

   The author - Primary instinct, was a man. If there was no sex or your father had decided that there were more important problems, you would not have had them. There is no quality relationship without good sex. № 8 - sex "became a privilege for the rich, beautiful and famous". Seriously? That in Africa, India, Pakistan and the like should only be very rich, beautiful and famous as I see how many people they have? Or do they reproduce by budding?

   8 to 13 - This definition refers to those cultures with cultural foundations destroyed by feminism in which relations in society do not work, there is a breakdown in social relations, etc. These are the societies that perish, no children are born and they practically disappear. These societies, where there is no feminism and any "minority rights" according to Marcuse's ideology, are vital, a lot of sex is done, many children are born and they grow up. There, sex is not for the "rich, beautiful and famous" but starts early and does more, no waiting for princes and princesses, no expectation of "romance", "understanding", "respect", do not compose pre-expected more romance novels and things happen fast and a lot of sex is done.

   Sex is probably the only physiological need that does not depend on you. That's why it's perfectly normal to be one of the most discussed things on such sites. If it irritates you, you either need more sex or more rational thinking. Maslow's pyramid cannot be discussed from the top down. The direction is always up. In general, whether you like it or not, sex is more important than relationships, understanding, and so on. Relationships with good sex often survive in the absence of understanding, respect, etc. See the opposite, when people's sexual needs diverge and someone remains unsatisfied, they always end in either infidelity or separation.

   I quote from comment 5 '' And if you don't have access to regular sex, usually, that's almost all you think about. "Not to mention that at some point you can go crazy. A relationship without sex leads to infidelity, remember it, and it is hardly a relationship ...

   14, they Pakistanis have blossomed and tied up

   I haven't had sex in two years. Sometimes I miss him, but when I think about how bad a relationship is just for sex, I feel sick. In those years, I will hardly find a literate single man, so ... there are many other pleasant things in life. Sex is a very nice thing, not with a loved one. Otherwise I don't want to, loneliness doesn't bother me.

   It doesn't matter to me. Just a temporary short-term pleasure, without which everyone can, but not everyone wants. The whore prevails. If I love someone, even if we never have sex for some reason, I wouldn't look for another. True and pure love can do without any sex. It is built on many, many, many higher values ​​that most of you do not have. Woe to you and woe to you with your disgusting whore, woe to you and woe to those around you. F, 21

   To number 14 - yes, a lot of sex is done in such societies. Many children are also born there. No value, because human life has long been equated with that of a dog, and people die in 50 piles of disease or live in misery, spiritual, material poverty and leave behind more children to live the oppressed slave life of breeding cattle. .. Sex is for everyone, but for everyone it is culture, purity, and the pursuit of the better, whether in appearance, whether in the mind, whether in a good attitude towards others. I want people to have a lot of sex, to feel happy and confident and not to forget to respect others as well as themselves. To have sex because they like it, not because someone sold them at the bridal market or because "everyone does it"

   Looking at all women here, sex is not important to them. Then why did men cheat? We are mature young men, we have sex every night, every morning and you women still "hurt" you! What are you waiting for after 50? In a week I take my salary and start going out. Let the woman stay home alone and sleep.

   Number 19, warm my soul, there are worthy women!

   There is no way a person with high libido can explain to a person with high libido why sex is important in a relationship. Just as the scholar cannot explain to the layman why reading a book is enjoyable. Just as the athlete cannot explain to the fat man in front of the sofa why exercise is fun. There are many theories about the phenomenon of low libido. Some argue that people with poor genes are "programmed" not to want to reproduce. Others that it is a natural regulatory mechanism of the population. The truth is one, in life on top are people with high libido. This has been the case throughout human history. Julius Caesar was hyper lustful. Napoleon Bonaparte is known for his love affairs and the decline of his military genius, with the decline of his testosterone. Genghis Khan was so sexual, that 8% of those living in the territory of the former Mongol Empire carry his genes. Grandpa Torbalan

   24, you shout if you don't have sex, then you can't do anything, you even allow yourself to call it a phenomenon. And you're very cool because you "pop" around the clock. One wonders when you have time to hang in the shares and that other site where you write "prose". Fuck limited thinking. He gave 3 examples and has already made general conclusions about the whole of human history. I can dig up 3 opposite examples for you - and who are we doing? And you didn't tell Napoleon that you knew what his libido was?

   Number 26, why are you arguing at all with a "man" who compares morality and dignity to low libido. A modern primate ... a lower scumbag - a difficult finding of the obvious for those like him. I imagine what books he reads: D.

   Grandpa Torbalan talks about Genghis Khan - if he is not a layman, if he was an Armenian, you would be called "Mentally Underdeveloped-Gadorian", you are a phenomenon, to take up BAS - to defend your primitiveness, you are terribly hurried. In each comment you show how pathetic you are, the chance to understand the word morality - in fact small :(. If stupidity had a peak, you would have conquered it, because of your concentration in the lower passions did you humiliate yourself so much? Who allowed it? I was a father, I would probably think that with your creation I was humiliated :(.

   A simple fact from our little family: If we haven't had sex for a relatively long time, the air at home is irritating. We argue every day about such nonsense that then our neighbors laugh in the elevator. If we are angry and can't look at each other, but we have a desire to get everything out of bed, we immediately stop arguing. Sex raises dopamine levels. It makes you smile, so to speak, makes you happy. In a relationship, my libido is much higher. I want sex, but I usually want it with a specific person. Sex does not affect feelings, but it does affect mood, which in turn affects your communication with your partner. Sex is important, it's just not the most important thing. If you love someone, but there is a reason you can't have sex regularly, you will stand quietly on your ass and last. In any other situation, it's awful to want, to be able to, but let the other pull you and tell you that you are an animal and there are no feelings in you. I have a heart and I love my man very much, but at the same time I have a body and it wants sex from this man. If for some reason we had a huge difference in libido with him, I wouldn't cheat on him, but I would be sour more often than I want to admit to myself.

   Different people, different ideals, different sexes ... But there are the same things ... e.g. It should not be a bargaining chip --- give me a waffle, give me a sex, or I will give you sex if you dig my vineyard ... It should not be a monologue, always a dialogue ... It should be a joy and not a sorrow .. ..should come from inside, not from outside and most importantly --- sex is health ... make love, not war.

   In which film does Torbalan watch these fabrications about Genghis Khan? 8% carried his genes, but he was buried secretly and no scientist could study his genes. Therefore, this statement for the 8% is just a laudatory lie. Anyone who has read a little history knows that before his death, Genghis Khan divided the empire into four sons, so we have solid evidence that his male children are not thousands. With the same success in just a few years of media lies and gossip about non-existent research, you can claim that half of Bulgarians have the genes of Asparuh. Not to mention the proof of the lust of Julius Caesar with the ridiculous figure of 2-3 heirs. And Napoleon Bonaparte is known to have suffered from impotence 6 years after coming to power or at about 40, and his autopsy proves that his genitals were completely atrophied, as we know he died at the age of 51. Or how is it possible to give as an example a man with a high libido Napoleon, a man 155 cm tall, whose attribute was atrophied.

   up to 34, well, the Torbalanets has overestimated something. He claims to be a sexual guru, a connoisseur of history, an erotic writer, a successful blogger, a good statistician ... He thinks about who I am, but he doesn't see how funny he is from the outside, let alone tragic. It is very unfortunate when you have no real idea of ​​yourself. You keep making fun of yourself without realizing it and thinking you've caught the gentlemen by the raincoat.

   Genghis Khan. In addition to his four heirs, the great emperor left hundreds of daughters and sons by concubines. His DNA has been studied since 2003 by evolutionary geneticist Chris Tyler-Smith. He found that 8% of the population in the former territories of the Mongol Empire carried the same Y chromosomes traced to Genghis Khan. More information can be found in the book Human Evolutionary Genetics: Origins, Peoples & Disease. Julius Caesar. His passion for sexual adventure was won over by Suetonius' contemptuous definition of "a man of all women and a woman of all men." If you don't believe Suetonius, all we have to do is shrug. Napoleon Bonaparte. I sincerely recommend the incredible work for the life of Napoleon, as well as for Lord Wellington and Prince Blucher WATERLOO; The History of Four Days, Three Armies and Three Battles by Bernard Cornwell. However, it is a great folly to interfere with a man's height when discussing his libido. I explicitly emphasized that a few years before his death, Napoleon suffered from several diseases that affected not only his potency but also his adequacy to make adequate decisions on the battlefield, as was clear in Waterloo. That is, when he lost his libido, he lost his military genius. Number 24, I wrote you an answer, but the moderators twice refused to publish it, although it does not contain offensive content. When I get home from work I will release it again, eventually at some point a normal moderator will appear to approve it. Grandpa Torbalan which affect not only its potency but also its adequacy for making adequate decisions on the battlefield, as is clear in Waterloo. That is, when he lost his libido, he lost his military genius. Number 24, I wrote you an answer, but the moderators twice refused to publish it, although it does not contain offensive content. When I get home from work I will release it again, eventually at some point a normal moderator will appear to approve it. Grandpa Torbalan which affect not only its potency but also its adequacy for making adequate decisions on the battlefield, as is clear in Waterloo. That is, when he lost his libido, he lost his military genius. Number 24, I wrote you an answer, but the moderators twice refused to publish it, although it does not contain offensive content. When I get home from work I will release it again, eventually at some point a normal moderator will appear to approve it. Grandpa Torbalan eventually at some point a normal moderator will appear to approve it. Grandpa Torbalan eventually at some point a normal moderator will appear to approve it. Grandpa Torbalan

   Grandpa Torbalan from the village of Torbalazhi!

   Torbalane, if he had studied very little biology in high school, you would have known that the Y-chromosome from daughters cannot be inherited, women do not have one !!! You can also explain where "evolutionary geneticist Chris Tyler-Smith" got Genghis Khan's genetic material after he was secretly buried and no scientist has access to his body to take material for comparison!?! In order to have a comparison of genetic material, there must be something to compare it with, everything else is a conjecture. For Caesar, his soldiers chanted that he was a man to all women and a woman to all men in order to mock his bisexuality, not that he was very potent. Even if you read Suetonius, he quotes how the senators called him a woman when he became governor of Gaul, and he responded by comparing himself to women rulers who were proud of their homosexuality. Napoleon Bonaparte was so potent that anyone who read the story of his marriage to Josephine knew of the dozens of her infidelities that his relatives were vying to report to him. And he was so potent that he couldn't have a child with her, and she had two children from her first marriage. And according to his doctor, immediately after his marriage to Maria Louise, Napoleon suffered from impotence, which he could not hide.

   38, what do you do with this wooden philosopher? Don't you see that the man just wants to be right and for this purpose he has read 2 assumptions from dubious sources that fit his stupid thesis and makes historical facts, given that there is no way to prove them? There is no point in arguing with such beings who think that only they are always right.

   Number 35, the site has many primitives ("modern") like him and is not alone. Otherwise, there is no point in putting a lot of emotion into the "disputes" with him, I am amused that there is no great hope for them (them - the products of propaganda).

   "Sex is health ... make love, not war." - this is number 33, for them there is obviously no difference between love and sex. Grandpa and he with his libido - nonsense.

   And Grandpa ... What's good about a rapist ?? !? !? !! Will you be proud if your beast is a whore, a rapist or something, and you have 200 brothers and sisters? !? !!

   38, I studied biology, but if you had studied logic a little bit, you would have guessed that if 8% of the population inherited the genes from the male line, at least as many are from the female line, which makes the number even more striking. The whole science of history is built on assumptions and theories. The question is how reliable they are. If we know that at least 8% of the people there have a common ancestor and he lived in the time of Genghis Khan, there is no chance that it is not Genghis Khan. If there was another man in parallel with him who could afford such breeding, we would know. Tyler-Smith, of course, analyzes other factors, such as anthropological traits. By the way, his scientific work is internationally recognized, and if you take the trouble to check, you will see that there is no criticism of its truth. Not that you haven't heard of him in your village. Or have you not read Suetonius, or you are deliberately lying. The phrase refers to Caesar's prostitution and his famous bisexuality. By the way, he is also known for putting on the horns of many famous people of his time, Pompey, King Bogud, and of course, let's not forget his legendary relationship with Cleopatra. The Twelve Caesars is a publicly available book, anyone can check out. Josephine and Napoleon often cheated on each other. Bonaparte has so many famous love affairs that I don't understand why you argue about it at all. Christopher Hibert, in his book Napoleon: his wives and women, mentions that the lustful monarch often required his lovers to wait for him naked and ready. Napoleon's ability to make deza was proven during his marriage to the Austrian. They have a son who was to be crowned Emperor of Rome, but the child does not live. So, I bother to cite a bibliography. Please support your thesis in the same way. Grandpa Torbalan

   Number 38, Maria Louisa gave birth to a son of Napoleon, so he was not so impotent. Otherwise, it may contain historical inaccuracies, but I agree with Torbalan's thesis. We are driven by our instincts more than we allow. Sex is what a marriage is based on, whatever other "harmonious" relationship we have. I also speak from personal experience. My first husband was a computer genius, highly educated, wealthy, intelligent and ... impotent. A wonderful connection between two cultured people. And no sex. That's how I met my second husband. High school, poor as a church mouse, but hyper sexual. I was like a child who had never seen a pastry shop. I divorced without hesitation. And to be honest, today I can take a break from work to support my family, but I'm not complaining. All problems are solved between the sheets.

   44, we are not talking about impotence, but for people for whom sex is almost a fixed idea, they confuse it with love and this is almost the most important criterion for a partner. Of course, no woman will like a man and be impotent, but that's not the point.

   So, according to Torbalazh and his libido nonsense, people with low libido have poor quality genes and therefore are programmed not to want to have sex and resp. children. By this logic, gypsies have some of the highest quality genes, that when I look at them they do not lack libido.

   In each topic, the old man repeats like a parrot how high his libido was, how a person with low libido could not understand it and how people with high libido were a big job, and at the same time he said that his job is no longer done as in youth. This is not a high libido, but a dissatisfied one, there is a huge difference, because he simply does not have the physical ability to make a quality cake (if he can do without Viagra at all) and he cannot loosen his veins, which is why this libido is such a fixed idea. nonsense and sex are in his libido around the clock. It's just that when a person is not satisfied and his sex life is lame, it is normal to be blinded by the hormone and it is important to him. Hey, he was number 44 and he was impotent. Well, it is very clear that if you are not drilled for several years, sex will become important to you. Let me not eat for 1 month and food will become very important to me. Look, if I eat regularly and well, I won't even think I need food, I'll just eat when I feel like eating. So draw your own conclusions about who is important to them - the dissatisfied. I myself have noticed that, for example, at work, only single colleagues and widows are constantly talking about sex and just stalking a man to rob him. And they are usually 50-60 and up (because they are no longer attractive and there is no one to shake them). And those who have men have a completely different radiance and do not force every man to onodize them. It's a pathetic picture to be dissatisfied like Torbalan - you look desperate, obsessed, attention-hungry. And if they don't tie you up, you start to doubt yourself and why they don't want you and you make complexes, which you try to compensate with constant self-emphasis on how smart you are, how much I don't know what you are, how interested you are in history and the view becomes even more pathetic. It's as if you don't believe you're screaming to convince the whole world. That's why I became very disgusted with this dissatisfied pervert - because he is ready to tell the black and white, just to make himself what he is not. In general, this man has a lot of repulsive energy. But of course, those dissatisfied as number 44 on the site will always support it. But in the eyes of satisfied such specimens look, to put it mildly, repulsive. just to get what he is not. In general, this person has a lot of repulsive energy. But of course, those dissatisfied as number 44 on the site will always support it. But in the eyes of satisfied such specimens look, to put it mildly, repulsive. just to get what he is not. In general, this person has a lot of repulsive energy. But of course, those dissatisfied as number 44 on the site will always support it. But in the eyes of satisfied such specimens look, to put it mildly, repulsive.

   1. Only because of sex there is love and marriage between men and women. 2. It is important, but its importance changes over time. The purpose of sex is to have children. 3. In a more mature age, it will not be so important, in the foreground is love and respect with the man to you, sex is a supplement that gives pleasure nothing more. 4. The importance of sex also depends on prejudices and complexes. Unfortunately, Bulgarians are a rather backward and limited nation in this respect. Women who are told by their congested mothers that sex is bad, dirty, etc., will never be able to have an orgasm during intercourse, and for them, sex becomes an annoying obligation if their husband seeks it.

   Regarding comment 48 "Only because of sex is there love and marriage between men and women" A typical statement of a man amputated by feelings and emotions. "Women who are told by their congested mothers that sex is a bad thing, dirty, etc., will never be able to have an orgasm during intercourse and for them, sex becomes an annoying obligation if their husband seeks it." They are not told that sex is dirty, but that sex with another man and sex without feelings is dirty. There is a difference. Unfortunately, this no longer bothers them. They are told that they are free to do whatever they want, that sex and love have nothing in common, understand you can fuck with anyone and that's okay, because you see love does not necessarily have a place in sex. They are told that there is nothing wrong with going through the whole neighborhood before you get married. But the habit remains after marriage. They are also told that sex is a means of manipulation and making money, etc. Hey, this has been happening to them in recent years, which is much worse than denying sex to their husbands.

   49 These things are absolutely their right, and the fact that some non-pagans do not have their problem. ;)

   Whatever love and understanding there is in a marriage, it is based on sex. If things are lame there, everything goes wrong. But if the two have a strong physical relationship, even if external factors affect the relationship, then the couple manages to overcome the difficulties. My grandmother had memorized the following story from her great-grandmother: as the young family quarreled and the mother-in-law started to intervene, the old woman stopped her with the words: "Leave them, let them quarrel, they will get along under the quilt tonight." And there is no real trace of the quarrel the next morning and the young ones are cooing like pigeons. So even our great-great-grandmothers knew how important intimacy was in the family. Of course, in the dynamics of modern life, sex is sometimes influenced by fatigue, stress, commitments ... but if you do not want to press your body to that of your beloved man, and he has no desire to put you to sleep afterwards in his arms ... well, it won't happen. It happens, but no one is completely happy. But if he sees his happiness in money, cars, apartments and villas, no problem, many people live that way. For me, however, this is a business and has little to do with marriage.