I'm a woman, luckily I haven't come across a similar individual, but I know there's a lot. That's how the world turned out. I also think it's very embarrassing for a woman to endure a man. To that I would not feel a woman, I do not say that I want him to fully support me, but at least he has the income itself to cover the bills. To indulge each other from time to time, a gift or something else-yes, but completely enduring it's just funny. What kind of family head is that? Mocks is the very natural instinct and function of the man to protect the family and to provide food and resources, which is imposed by antiquity more. In our family, my mother makes more than my father, but she can't handle it.
Well, not exactly, but there is something true. I'm looking for a woman who has a job and makes some money, because I like to travel, but I don't like it all the time. There are women who don't work and are used to it, I don't need them.
Hahaha ' ' They are men, I do not ' ' ' We have a conservative eyelash:D!
I'm not one of those, but there's nothing wrong, the men evolved a little, and they're already looking for serious women, on their level, nobody wants that kind of feminine ligs to serve them all on a platter. Don't complain.
These are men who know they can not endure a woman and a family with their income. That's why they're looking for a woman who can also work and contribute to the family budget. Or those who are afraid that the woman will "use" them in some way. You don't need it.
It's true. Men are much more tangible than women.
Candy
My rich and fat aunt was hitting on me in my workplace, tipping me off, I was messing around, pretending I was okay with the tips. Finally, you sent a guy who told me directly--so, Mrs., who wants something from you. He offered me 500 leva for the whole night. 500 BGN! My paycheck was 15 a day.
Well, some men nowadays are so complex that they surround the money as a young Catholic maiden in the second century virginity. If they have been clenched like a man's butt in the bathroom of a Sofia prison, if they can't find a fool to nurse them, they can be a boob job. It's scary. I feel them like this, 360 degrees, and I'm moving backwards quickly, you don't know if they're going to sneak up on your back.
In a nutshell, does a man have a problem with his men's duties, and does he worry about the fact that he was born with a hose between his legs, instantly takes off from the male-sex column and hence from my life. I'm not a lesbian to be a woman, no matter how many chromosomes they have.
And they look at it, but most of the look.
I don't look at the woman's money, but I think it should work. It shows responsibility. A housewife or a muffin looking for a pass, I don't want to. And one more paycheck is never superfluous.
These are a lot of these days. Complex men who seek easy in life and are settled with wealthy chicks. They're going to get her every time they love her, and they're going to live on her own back until she's remembered. Why do they do that? Because they are good liars and know that with their incomes and professions they can not cope in life. Most often are such men who have not achieved anything substantial as work or accomplishments. Those who drift and live day to day. Charming and good liars. They found this way to survive and jump from woman to woman with money. People with no initiative.
Ha-ha, to you now equality between the sexes! Seeing us is easy for us to tolerate your whining and pretensions.
M
I'm a woman with 12 years older than me. I'm 30, she's 42, divorced. On the other hand, I do very well in bed.
At the insistence of my lover, I got one of the married and the girlfriends, and her husband was abroad. She's attending, but she's just watching.
Otherwise, I work for funny money. For the record, I'm single.
The truth is painful, but there's no point in covering it with courtesy. There are two types of women one set are getting laid, and the second is to dig the levels. A woman of the first type will never get to the situation described, and the rest if they have any other advantage they look to use it.
If there is binding naturally, yes. The weather of the Metresas and the Geisha is on the decline. But tell me honestly, how does it feel to be asked what you do, like it's the most important thing in your relationship, like they want to use you? You felt really bad, didn't you? That's how women make men feel when they ask the same question.
In any case, I look to be a woman who has the opportunity to be independent, i.e. Even without me being able to self-withstand as needed. That doesn't mean she has to take me, on the contrary. As long as we're together, I don't mind taking the bulk of it. But after a possible breakup, I don't want one of these to hang on my neck. A kind of reinsurance. The big difference in the material condition always leads to the collapse of the relationship. Mass women today have low incomes and bad occupations, and also spend almost everything just for cosmetology and procedures. I don't need this because I'm going to be dependent on me forever.
Yes, there's gotta be some money for the woman. Because if he only relies on p... And you're just it a prostitute, nothing that's family and with kids eventually. And if the man is willing to do anything just to have a place to dip his dick let him wear it on his back.
I think every educated and well-paid man would want the woman next to him to have achieved something in her life too. I don't know any intelligent and wealthy men who can earn their money with honest work and eat some people with no profession.
It's not about the woman resisting the man, but being able to endure at least part of herself.
Of course, most of them are looking for women with money. You know, a smart banker said, he's rich with breaking and entering, with a mind or a marriage. It's nobody's. Many men practice it. If they're mercantilus, you're not old, are you young, and how much money you have. For money, they're going to be all over it.
It's nice to have a woman deal with something. I like ambitious women. If I have to endure a woman, I can't imagine it. Alive and kicking, having a job, I wouldn't have thought it would ever hold me, and as a groundhog, I would stay all day. Well, true will have time for my hobbies, but then I'm going to have to depend on someone. I don't like this.
Uzunov
Your grandfather was extremely right... But for my time. Now there is probably about 1000 new professions that have not gone in the past and most do not require you to be in the levels from morning to night. In today's society it is normal for women to make money and to be a step ahead of men who, for one reason or another, were not fortunate enough to get a better paid job. Separate where there are different people with different preferences. Girls and boys, think outside the box. Do not make other grips and insane just because you are straightforward and you are used to judging in haste. This is a bad sign and I will give you an example: A woman with a successful business who earns a few thousand a day, accustomed to luxury and holidays has liked a teacher who is erapated, kind, brought up and good, but it makes 1200 leva per MONTH. Branko. In your logic, we should divide them? Or a simpler and closer to the household example: it works and makes 2000 leva, he is still studying or has recently graduated and there is no work... Are you chasing them again? Besides, there are women who just like being dominant. Tastes and passengers for trains a lot. You don't have to accept that there are others.
I'm a man of 30 from Sofia.
The answer is yes. The reason is I have a home, a car, a job and a etc. So I'm looking for a chick on my level. Such tales-I am born a woman and a lifetime someone will work for me do not fit.
Comments from the variety will such men do not feel safe in themselves are more than hilarious. I can safely stand alone a family of 4 people, but I don't want to become a slave to anyone. How does it feel to go to work and not go home while someone sits on the couch and doesn't rest all day? You wouldn't be in the house, would you? Why would I do that?
The difference in wages too. I can not take 2500 (for example) it 500. People on the site I have noticed that very harshly accept this thinking. But they forget that there are women who make better money, have homes and etc. I don't have to put up with the lesser once there's more.
There are a lot of women in your position. Parents don't work. I often run into them. Sometimes I sleep with them. For a serious relationship with the future, never.
Tying with a woman like that means pulling me down all my life. If you don't work and you don't support yourself, it means you've learned not to give money. Whatever you have to do, you take it for yourself, and You'il never think of taking anything for the house or paying for something.
Cars is the same thing. I went out with a woman who had a car, and she was about to give me money for driving her and not left me until I picked them up or paid the service account without me knowing if I didn't get her money.
You never gave your dad money for gas, you don't know how much it's going to take to keep a car and repairs on it. You would never have thought that gasoline is the smallest cost and it's just polite to pay it sometime.
The same will take place in the house. You would never have thought of giving money to bills or food since your mother didn't take you. You wouldn't pay for an example repair on the stove or join the purchase of a new one because you've never done it in you.
A lot of women who stay old girl, that's exactly the reason. They have the same thinking as you. They're not obligated to do anything. They don't want anything. How can I pick you up for my kids ' mother if you can't drive them to the park? It's your parents ' fault. They must have raised you for not being able to wait for ready. I can tell you at 1000% that there are girls who are taught exactly the way I talk to you. The mother raised her to know that you cannot wait on her own, and in her face you meet a man you can count on and not anchor in life.
Good luck in life! The more things you do and don't wait for you to finish, the higher the level of man you might want to meet.
Number 25 has written a lamentable comment. With that unfortunate thinking of giving you money for gasoline... I don't know who's going to lie.
A woman with an Amtemti and a jeep who spends 19/100 petrol (servicing 1500 lv.) from people like you I light it and run with 200.
You're doing it in general, N. 25, but you're a very critical friendly. People don't put themselves in columns. This one doesn't work, that one lives theirs, the third makes a little... What if you fall in love? Your criteria are reasonable, but very and unreal. You're 30. You're going to want a younger woman, aren't you? At 25 she had to be educated, with good work, and spent money on housing? If she doesn't need a car. Well, excuse me, but this and the West is hard to meet. If you don't adjust the criteria and attitude, you'il be alone. I am again confirmed by the theory that Bulgarian men are stingy, moneymakers and sour women.
Up to 25
Dude, I totally support you. Even now I think that in "equal" America, if a man is wealthy, in a divorce the woman gets quite a lot, but recently, and many women get rich and in divorce-using the same law in favor of the man-wow male! Why would I give him that?! I am very annoyed by this hypocrisy in women and their double standards-for the rights we are equal, for the obligations-"I am a woman"... I therefore always challenge them with replicas that I have gone bankrupt and a relationship needs mutual financial support. If I pass the test, then it becomes interesting... It's not a lot of past...
Author, there is no such thing as "all men/women are who you are".
This is childish and immature reasoning.
Each person is different and is a unique person.
I think a man should take care of his family and take responsibility.
And in order not to be apply, I will tell you that I married about two years ago and my wife came to me with a suitcase of clothes, without saving, was without work, etc. (I am not rich or wealthy-I work for a salary lower than the average, but thank God that at least I have a home) but we do not complain and live well: in a lot of love, spoken, together, we love and respect each other.
For me in life (in a family plan) it has always been most important to meet "the woman"-and it does not matter whether she is poor or not.
(And know that there are many other men who reflect in a similar way. It depends on the morality of man, on his spiritual values, on his faith in God, and on many other factors. )
For me, always in my life, spiritual things have been more important than temporal.
And I've always wanted to meet a woman to love, but not only that! And to be spiritually close. To perceive and value the important things of life in a uniform or at least similar way. To have common goals and priorities. And our love to be true-dedicated and sacrificing.
Many "draft-links" I have rejected before meeting "the Woman" for me. I've been looking for it for over ten years.
And thank God, I finally found her!
So I would advise you not to get discouraged and despair, but to look for the person who is right for you!
Ha-ha, god forbid...
A woman with money is like crazy with a machine gun! I can't even imagine a situation like this in which a woman will endure me, and I'm going to have to walk on the bagpipes because "whoever pays--he orders the music."
Forget it. You may need one day of ash to eat, but to the position you described, I will never fall.
I think that there is no more normal thing in the world to be preferred materially insured partner, whether it be men or women.
Another is the question that is really disgusting if you purposefully seek in the partner only financial stability.
I am a man, and if the question is whether you will prefer a manager in a large international company with at least 3 thousand leva pure salary, or a saleswoman in Kaufland with a maximum grand pure-well, on equal terms I would prefer the manager without even thinking. This is absolutely normal and would make any person, regardless of sex.
See, if the question is whether purposefully looking for successful and/or wealthy women, and if a woman is not one, then definitely will not even look at her-well, no, not at all. There is nothing abnormal in this person being attracted to a more humble representative of the opposite sex. I've had long-lasting relationships with modest women, and with successful ones, but I haven't searched for them deliberately, and it just so worked out.
But, as a matter of fact, given the work I am working on, as well as the money I make, I am really very difficult to start a serious relationship with a woman who is over 25 years old (less molest at all) and is still working low-skilled work for 700-800 leva. By the way, I would not start a relationship with such a woman, not so much because of her work and income, because in such places very rarely work women who can in any way to catch your eye, and if there are any, then they turn out to be some sort of elementary turbochaga buns that will expect me to work like crazy to make money to spend on them, to live the life they have always dreamed of living, but they cannot afford it because of their own limitations. A typical example of such women are sellers in malls, which are often even over 30 years old and are always made with hairstyle, make-up, etc., but I understand them too-you can never know when you can get lucky and enter a client to try to hang out.
And in order not to get too long-the world is changing at a very fast pace, so these clichés how the man made the money and passed the family can be sure that they stayed in the 20th century. Where the clichés are left, that women are some simple housewives, which are only made for watching children and keeping the home. The sooner you get out of these outdated frames, the more relaxed, free and well-lived. ;)
Yes, they have always looking for "hem work and land", but time and manners have obliged the man to be a man. Now, with the emancipation that many men misunderstand, things escalate into downright confusion of roles, genders, and ask to pay the coffee on the first date... These real estate and money interrogations are utterly disgusting to me, no matter whose side they're on. I like a woman I never allow myself, especially for inherited homes that are not mine and would eventually inherit after the death of a partner or stay for the children. And what about a MAN who has to radiate strength, confidence, courage to do it alone and proud to be able to take CARE of his family. FOR I am to share responsibilities, accounts, care, because though we are not ordinary roommates, and the time imposes it, alas. But more and more males weigh on them to be men and frankly use women to full wear and then without shame they seek something new and fresh. What do you think of one? In Bulgaria there is also age discrimination-hardly at 30 you're an old woman, nothing that you look outwardly younger than him, so you have to pay him, see that he has "taken" you, otherwise-alone and with the cats. We did a disservice, that we became like men and freed them from responsibilities, men are guilty-I do not know, but do not go to the right things. Just see what is in the transport-how often you do not give a place to a pregnant, mother with a child, does not help to climb a stroller with a baby, but watch yourself how you will torture yourself, or staring in the phone. Even the chivalry attitude more and more often looks like flirting because it is some kind of archaic in our day. So, this is what these days are looking for-not to be true, good and serious, but either the muffin, but another to bear the cost, or "puller" on the 100 front, engaged a woman who waits for a pumpkin medal for her diligence. Sad..
If the question was gender-equality, 50% of the comments would have been, that it is normal because they are maintained, beautiful and etc and etc, so that once for one side is "normal" and for the other is "normal", even here there was a theme whether the furnishing in the House of the man is important.
Number 33-These expectations you have for men to make you free services and gestures, just because your wife and so-called chivalry treatment are not granted. They are part of a culture of cavalmers and Ladies, in which strong men protect and protect the weak and fragile women, who then are grateful and thankful. In today's culture of feminism in which women are found to be able to cope with everything themselves and must be "strong" and even offend when you offer them help or are not grateful and grateful for the present, there is no way how the relationship of cavalmers and ladies will be preserved. If you think you're a "strong woman" and you can deal with everything on your own and you radiate that thing, a man understood you and sees you as another man, and he doesn't feel like he's protecting you. If you're strong and legal, fine. The notions of feminism and chivalry cannot coexist, because feminists are not ladies and do not deserve and do not need male help, and therefore men do not offer it to them mostly, because they do not feel femininity in women but rather masculine qualities. This made him feminism and not men. Feminism teaches women that they should not have feminine qualities and nature but to mimic masculine qualities and result in a strange creature with a woman's body, but a character of a man who does not attract a man intellectually and mentally but only possibly physically (if it is pretty enough). On the other hand, the fact that men are not seen as guardians and strong figures to protect weaker women leads to them not having the feeling of doing so. The problem only comes when a woman misled by feminism is being made of "strong and self" in order to pump self-esteem and to think, that so "raises the price" realizes that in fact the men do not care and do not perceive her much as a woman and instead of raising the price has become inconspicuous for them and do not make gestures and services and then begins to complain That men are not what they were in the "old days" or rather in romantic novels, fairy tales or knightly narratives without of course to pay attention to themselves and realize that she is not the lady of those tales and novels. There is no way to transfer the social profile of men from another time, but you are not yourself with a social profile of women from this other time. I didn't write that to argue who's wrong and who's right and try to tell me that men need a kind nowadays to have the duties of knights, but no rights, because the woman nowadays is "strong and independent" (and lonely) and to find out where the problem is rooted. If you deny the essence of the problem and refuse to see it, because the truth is not comfortable, then nothing will change and you will only purr for the "good old days".
Number 35 is up to the pain candid and said it in a very good way.
"Feminism teaches women that they must not have feminine qualities and nature but to imitate masculine qualities and, as a result, a strange creature with a woman's body, but a character of a man who does not attract a man intellectually and mentally but only possibly physically (if it is pretty enough)."
This answers the question of why nowadays only physics and things like spirituality are seen, character remains in the background. I would add that women are only looking for physics because they have a sense that they are unlikely to need a man, that it is a weakness to depend on him, and real in their idea the role of a man comes down to purely sexual, because that feminism cannot replace him, and possibly if he can tempt some Lev in case he does not make a good one.
There is no way for a woman to provoke a man of chivalry and masculine behavior with feminist views, nor a man to provoke in a woman femininity and tenderness, since she is convinced that this would make her look weak and dependent.
You do realize that feminism would not exist if men respected and valued women and female qualities? Instead of protection and protection, women received harassment, humiliation and crushing. When you treat someone as an object, you explain to him how he is not a person, how its realities are null and void, how it will not and should not have rights, of course it will not want to be what it is. Instead, he would want to become something meaningful, in a person--that is, by your criteria, in a man. Men you caused feminism and made women want to be men. And instead of being aware, you keep trying to crush and do the stubborn. Soon they will not want women to go back to their feminine, because no matter how much damage the current type of feminism is, it is better than being crushed, printed and devaluate daily.
38, as a man, I realize it. It's no coincidence that feminism has emerged. And I certainly don't condone women's squall and denying them rights. The problem, however, is that it goes too far with feminism, separately the problem is politicised intentionally and many people incubate the water further.
Basically, on one extreme we went to the other and we screwed up again. Instead of giving women equal rights and treating them as people, which should have been the aim of the exercise, turned it to deface the role of gender and struggle for supremacy, overbearing, politics and such dirty things, which ultimately do not win either women, men, children or society at large.
But that story always evolved. In our quest to escape from one pole, we come to the golden Medium, however, because the mind is already in the middle of speed, it does not stop there, but it thinks that there is better. Then of course when I get the money, I realize that there is not an offer. And so as stagger several times in extremes, it learns the blinds.
It's like alcohol--when you get the best, you have to stop. ' Cause the moment you think, "When I'm drinking, it makes me feel good, so with more drinking, it's going to get even better", you're crush in the opposite direction. The same thing happened with feminism. They saw that it became better at some point, but the momentum had already been dialed and the measure did not survive.
It's true for some men, but not for everyone. For the men I know, that's not the lead.
35, I did not read your entire comment, because I have no time, but I will tell you that life sometimes requires some women to be strong and feisty, because for example the man next to them dies, leaves them, or from small ones grow in a harsh environment and life gets them. The harsh environment alone does not allow you to be weak and feminine, and quite the opposite. There's another side. I'm giving you an example of myself-today I took taunts from some in the campus of the university because of my band shirt. They were smiling at me and they immediately took some insult from me and they shut up. How to be a woman among such "men" and "women" in such a relationship? And women in a situation like mine-a lot. Believe me, we do not want to be brutal, but quite the opposite, but in such likes of men and women it is difficult. For feminism in general I agree, but things do not always have a single country.
Black Sabbath
Number 40,
I totally agree with what you wrote. At the moment, the only thing that is achieved with this war is to disgust more and more of each other, until we completely erase the traits that we actually like and attract. And to make things right, we need to start to appreciate and respect each other. Men must appreciate women for being women, protecting them, and promoting their exact traits, rather than attributing to them that only masculine qualities are valuable or try to punish them for feminism. For our part, we women must support the male, not try to undermine him in the core struggle to prove, to donate tenderness and love, not to get back for things of the past. I believe that just when a man and a woman act like this, they are truly happy and I really hope that more people will think about it and change course.
From number 38
I'm 35-but you 38 and 40 are very entertaining as you develop theories about how women created feminism and men realized things and depended on something. Did you know that I, in fact, brought to this forum the idea of feminism in order to protect people from this evil and warn them, because inevitably this influence would have come to Bulgaria on the line of non-governmental foundations like America for Bulgaria, Soros and similar. Years ago I started writing here about feminism to prepare people in advance. At this time, no one has ever heard of feminism. Thank God a lot of people felt what they are talking about and prepared in advance for this and other distorted doctrines that are imposing on us. Thanks to the fact that people (not only from me) were warned in time about the things that are preparing us a lot of the evil precipitands that prepared us not passed-adoption and "integration" of "refugees", Istanbul conventions, feminism, genderisms and the like. And now years after I have alerted the dangers of feminism, which is dangerous to society as a whole, I see that there are people who still do not understand what he represents and do not bother to explore it. Here, some women become "feminists" to spite men and men think that women have created feminism. That's so funny, there's no more. People, study feminism carefully, along with other liberal doctrines to find out that feminism is not "created by women" nor its purpose is to protect women. Women are some unconscious victims of feminism, which is designed to destroy society. When the events in Germany became "refugees" why did feminism remain silent and did not say anything against Islamists? Because it is not a movement to protect women, it is a movement in order to destroy the European population that is why. I can't keep giving you all the time.
Not women looking for men with money, that's 20 years old, the wacky got them all, and the men were drunk, and alchies
To 35 – I appreciate that you've bothered to explain things that are supposed to be obvious to women, but they're not. I don't think They'il understand, it's hard to get out of the cliché of the wronged sex, they like to feel victims.
By 38-If you were more aware of feminism as an idea and movement, you would know that it has begun in the name of progressive ideas such as equal pay, right to vote and right to education-all the normal and correct things that equaled the rights of men and women. The problem comes when women are being put on the successes they achieve and are beginning to want more and more rights and privileges just because they are women, which is no longer feminism because it is not a struggle for equality-it is achieved with the second wave of feminism. From there, it is a struggle for more power without social, legal or occupational logic, which is an insult to women of the past, struggling against gender discrimination-to benefit from the privilege of sex, such as women's quotas or positive discrimination. Would you like to ride on a plane that was designed by a woman who came to study aerodynamics not because she was fascinated by it, but because she knew that because she had a quota for women, she would accept it? Not to mention the disproportionate sentences about the same crimes, social benefits, legal protection, early retirement and so on... You can't expect men to like and respect competition, it doesn't. Or your lady – with all the pros and cons of that, or your contemporary woman – equal in your duties and rights, and your so. It's not just about rights and no obligation.
God, you are pathetic all-money, money, and the other, the rest, such as feelings, liking, attraction, chemistry, understanding.... Horror!
The more tangible you become and your chasing steam, the more miserable you are in life and in bed, that you may cheaper the sex-dolls to Mirâsate!!!
Off, that damned feminism... How long have you been chewing on it and still haven't swallowed it? You seem to be very confused in your health.
From as the world began, it was the rule that the most desired bride was the daughter of the chief, the Prince or King, and, accordingly, the most desires for a man was the firstborn son of the ruler. Surely in the tribe or in the kingdom there were also more beautiful, however, the princess is the richest, no matter that she was usually the most pampered in the kingdom and can not cook or wash socks, she will come for a bride with her entourage and with enough income or at least often will cry to daddy or to her brother/if he has already inherited the kingdom/for financial help and for help in settling his husband in a higher position.
And today nothing has changed, as there is a queue of willing to be kings and a queue of willing to become future queens.
Most people in this world are pretending to not want to become a royal son-in-law, simply because they have no self-esteem that exactly they will be chosen. You still have to be a little crazy to make a wish like that and believe it's possible.
Accordingly, in the absence of a large number of princes and princesses, people strive for the one who can offer them no more to reconcile with the lesser, since there is a possibility of more, as the 25 said.
Women with money are looking for men-type incompetent, who simply can not cope with life and look for any maminka to adopt them and solve their problems.
Ladies, whether or not you have money-such a man you do not want!
1 lisawow answered