Eat as much as you want, but just train more. That way you're going to gain muscle mass, and you're going to tighten your body. So it's going to have a double-positive effect for you.
Do it for yourself - there will be a much bigger frock.
An ex of mine so i was told to pull myself together. I kicked him between his legs and told him it was to grow up. Then we split up. I lost weight and i got a grip, but i don't think he's grown up.
Well, you can see you're fat. I don't know why you dropped the subject. You probably want someone to reassure you that you're not. Follow a diet and go to the gym regularly, and in no time you will lose weight and tighten up. If you love food, eat. But don't eat junk, you eat useful things. To take off, you have to burn more than you take. I mean, you can eat on your stomach, but if you run 100km a day and another 200km you go on the bike, you're still going to lose weight. If you can't run 100km a day, cut your ration.
You're crazy, you're not going to lose a pound, you shouldn't get fat. The way you're describing yourself!
You women are big daffodils! And what if a person is slightly full (I'm not saying you are)??? Just physics, appearance and vanity - is this more important than a person's personality characteristics? It doesn't matter if they endanger healthily! Live your life and accept yourself for who you are!
P. S. Don't rush the attacks. I'm a skinny boy at 26 - 1, 75 to 73 kg, I say this because you're going to immediately declare me a fat complexer who's lazy him to lose weight and that's what he says so!! Vision is nothing more than a great illusion. :))
3, do you have any idea how many 100 km, this and a marathon runner can't escape him, even more every day! I don't know what you like about skinny bones.
Well, you like to eat, and you're lazy to work out. What do you expect us to tell you, you're okay? You're not to me. First, excess weight is bad for your health. Second, if you're fluffy now, I imagine you starting a job in an office or buying a car - a big cellulite pig can get up. There are men with a fat fetish, but this is a fetish dictated by some kind of psychological trauma of them, not a compliment. I personally see fat people and avoid them - they scream at me for laziness in every way (work, household, raising children, hobbies, travel), lack of will and desire for men who would tolerate them whatever pigs they become.
Number 6, not everyone who doesn't have excess weight is a "skinny costramba." And I don't understand why, under such themes, people like you immediately pour out their malice against weak people without anyone even mentioning them. So if I say, for example (purely hypothetically): "I don't know what you like about these fat guys," I'd be a superficial vicious bitch, but on the other hand, it's perfectly acceptable for you to call this guy and that kostrambi. Double standards, I see something. First, read my first sentence again. Second, some people just can't put on weight, no matter what they do. Third, those who deliberately do not eat and lose weight suffer from a mental illness consisting of an unreal idea of their body and need help rather than blunt comments.
No 7, you're talking big. What's keeping a complete girl from having a hobby or traveling? Where's the logic here? And it's not true that men who like more chubby have trauma. Why should only tight bodies be liked, can't fluffier girls like each other? Everyone with their taste. Just because you have a certain taste in women doesn't mean you have to impose it on others. This is your point of view and it does not concern anyone - this is your story, as toltek philosophers would put it. And you have to respect the way of life of others, as long as this way of life does not endanger yours in any way. And why are you insulting this way... Pigs. Watch your mouth a little bit, for Christ's sake. Don't you think you're insulting the author and other complete readers of the subject in this way? By the way, the author is not complete. 54 kg by 160 cm is normal. It's even normal 60 kg by 160. It's not harmful to weigh 60 kg if you're 1. 60 meters. Such an attitude between weight and stature is completely natural. Author, you're not complete at all... why are you putting in your head. Some guy told you you had to pull yourself together. And you throw something at him, and you'il be calm- you'il be even. What's your attention to this kind of thing? It doesn't matter if we're tall, low, full, weak - it's about what the soul is. And the beautiful soul is a beautiful face. And the body can be nice when it's weak, and when it's full. You have a Brazilian ass... Super. Your ass is great.
From your height you draw 100 - that's the weight you shouldn't pass - in your case, 60 kg. Don't listen to.
Don't listen to what others say. It's important for you to like yourself if you want to lose weight, do it for yourself. All I think is, you just need to pull yourself together, and everything's going to be fine :) even though you're not fat at all now.
Number 10, 110 is being pulled out for women.
The fact that you're doing 110 or 200 or 300 is. because two of the same stature and the same kilograms may look radically different. Maybe one man is 180 cm and 100 kilos, but only muscles without an ounce of fat, the same man could be still 100 kilos, but he doesn't have muscles, just fat. So, is it the same? Not to mention that bone density and structure also matter a lot. There are people with a larger and denser bone, who, even if they don't have fat or muscle, still weigh a lot and don't look weaker.
There was a fitness instructor who had taken a picture before and after. In the first photo, she looked a little thicker, and it turned out that she weighed less on it. It has simply replaced the fat with a little muscle and looks weaker, but the muscles are denser than fat and even smaller muscle volume, those more than fat.
So forget those 110. Rather, the percentage of fat is important, although it does not give a full picture, but is still a more reliable source.
The most important thing is how you look visible, not some numbers.
From number 10 to 12: "the weight you should not pass." Minus 110 is the ideal weight, not the upper limit. And yes, it's relative, that's why the boundaries are wide. It's just that the author isn't "fat," as they've written, so I wrote this norm.
The one who gave me 1 of comment 13 to look at this picture and still tell me that -110 is some kind of universal formula.
http://paleozonenutrition.com/2012/04/25/what-does-your-body-look-like-on-the-inside-more-reasons-to-lift-weights/
Number 15, I'm number 12 and I just said how it's generally considered. It's indicative, and I'm not saying it's a universal formula, nor have I given you a star. I agree with your comment, and in other places I've written it - the same weights look different to different people, it's also important whether those pounds come from fat or muscle because the muscle weighs more. I myself are a dozen kilos below my -110, so this should prove to you that I'm orientating myself on my body, not formulas.
What I wrote was supposed to "fix" number 10, which I also seem to be angry with, but now I see that I really didn't understand his comment true, for which I apologize.
Don't be mad at me :))
He wants advice because lately, people have been judging by appearance. There are few who see the character.
If you want to lose weight, there's only one way and you're going to have to work hard. First weight training. Don't think you're going to be like a man, that's not true. These workouts have numerous benefits and prevent the loss of muscle mass, because cardio is lost mainly muscle mass and fat remains. I suggest watching videos on the topic on youtube there are many Bulgarian fitness gurus (something of the kind of mistakes that women make in the gym)I recommend the workout for women in the channel of Radostin Kuzmanov. A second calorie deficiency means you have to calculate how many calories you need to maintain weight and therefore take 200-500 less, but no more otherwise it is not healthy. For example, I need 2,300 to maintain weight, but I take 2,000. Download your cronometer app to see if your micro and macro nutrients are in optimal values. Don't follow scarce diets and make sure you don't exceed the calories of the day. There are other things to calculate, so with these guidelines do your research. Success
Make sure your meal is 80-90 per cent clean food (not processed, healthy) and 10-20 can be something sweet/salty you eat when you need to be in calorie deficit and plug it into your calories. You may have one day a week where you can afford more, but without exceeding your calories.
1 joethemann answered