I Don't Like Women Without Hair

   Welcome to the club. ;) And I'm one of those men who can't stand "naked snails" between a woman's legs. I would show you pictures of my wife, but politics forbids it. Otherwise, type HAIRY PUSSY in Google and you will see what I'm talking about. In other words, we are calm - we are many! ;)

   I do not like shaved p. tki, and those who are hairy on their hill !!! The hair around the labia can be removed, it is necessary, but above NOT!

   That's right, dude. I don't know who introduced this ... is it American, is it Arab fashion through porn ... For me it's unnatural, I have the feeling that I'm sleeping with some underdeveloped girl and I feel like a pedophile. Maybe a light hairstyle yes - not everything is in hairpins, but otherwise shaved and tanned - definitely not! By taking to explain to me how "hygienic" it was! For the Arabs, where they see running water once a week - for sure, but for a Bulgarian woman who can wash herself at any moment - hardly. The sanitizing tool is called a shower, not a razor.

   Well, everyone has a taste. But I don't find anything beautiful and feminine in holding a woman next to you, raising her hand and hanging a bush underneath. It's just disgusting. I would think she was crazy. For the bottom - well, I do not like to eat hair! And I don't do it to my wife either. That's what I can tell you. I see no reason to ask people, since everyone has their preferences and there is no law for and against. No fines, man!

   Egati claims, egati "men". o_O You find someone to tie you, whether with or without hair - can be corrected.

   Different men like different things. There are those who do not tolerate hairless, there are those who do not tolerate hairless. You may have a fetish, if there is no excitement, if there is no hair, and even the arms / limbs should be hairy. Otherwise, the argument with my natural is a bit funny, the person changes a lot of things in himself and in most cases for the better. Over time, evolution itself erases some things. So, everyone has the right to choose, and just because you like something doesn't mean judging those who do otherwise. Look for a woman who shares your views and feels comfortable that way. Otherwise things will not work out. I'm also curious, do you shave your beard and cut your hair?

   From the author: I didn't shave my beard. I only get a haircut once a month or less. This haircut is very old since ancient times, because it grows all the way to the ground and it is not pleasant to drag such long hair. The maintenance of the beard may also be a long time ago, but hair removal in Bulgaria and throughout Europe came into mass practice only 25 years ago !!! . Until the 1990s, for thousands of years, men and women walked naturally without posing any problems for anyone. There was no such thing as shaving for "personal comfort" or "hygiene." In old German, Italian, Czech and other films you can see footage where the armpits of the actresses are seen. This hair removal from below is a pure pornographic fashion - invented and entered precisely from porn. In the United States, women have been shaving their legs and armpits since 1915, when Gillette launched the first razor for women, believing that their profits from selling knives to men were not enough. Then, through advertising, they gradually began to impose this fashion. Shaving completely from below appeared only in the 90's and was invented only to make things in pornography more visible to the viewer. It has nothing to do with hygiene or aesthetics. Until then, in pornography, women were either naturally hairy or with a haircut. Otherwise, the hair on the legs, arms, legs and chest in men may be just a remnant of evolution, but the hair under the armpits is needed. They stayed there just for personal convenience, not to be removed to have one. Underarm hair prevents abrasion of both skin surfaces, which are there, collect the sweat, which is excreted as not and allow it to flow directly on the body. The hair underneath protects against sexually transmitted infections and maintains heat during the winter months. Prevent accidental rubbing during intercourse. Shaving only causes itching, ingrown hairs and microscopic wounds on the skin. Female genitals are extremely sensitive and their hair needs, as a protective barrier against bacteria and to prevent irritation. I see comments here and elsewhere about how there are women who would not look at a man who is not shaved in the intimate area and armpits. Big claims. Great thing. Although I mentioned above that certain hairs are just a remnant of evolution, I think a man looks more mature and more masculine when he is hairy. Hair removal is just a waste of time, excess money in the wind and it is of no use. All in a simple artificially imposed American model by the media for many years. When a person is young, he has all the time in the world to deal with all sorts of nonsense, but at an earlier stage, when he is already engaged with children and a family, it will be difficult for him to find time for such things.

   I don't care what men like, life is different now and people are different. I do NOT tolerate hair anywhere and I am research smooth everywhere. Those that the author is looking for are very difficult to find in my opinion. Some will be women from 30-40-50 even from the old days and some will just be dirty ... Today I saw a man with hairy hands and honestly I guess a man should be supported. :)

   A hairless woman is like a plucked chicken's tail. Why don't they remove the hair on their heads?

   I am a 34-year-old man and it is absolutely mandatory for me to shave both sexes under the arms from a hygienic and aesthetic point of view. For women, hair removal on the legs and arms is absolutely mandatory, and for men it borders on pederasty. Otherwise, in addition to the armpits, I regularly shave in the intimate area, I just do not like there is a forest. Yes, there may be hair, but little, because otherwise it becomes ugly and unpleasant. If he grew a little older, if he started to thicken, he immediately shaved to the skin. I regularly make sure my balls are completely naked. Apart from being more aesthetic, I really like women to suck and caress them. If they are hairy, no woman likes it. As for women's intimate hair, I don't mind, as long as it's not forest. Shaving under the venereal hill and leaving an intimate hairstyle on top is a good option. I love to please women with my tongue, whether it's shaved or not. The female vagina is the sweetest thing, I go crazy for fun to do cunnilingus, with or without hair, I'm dying for fun to lick, suck and drink women's juices ... mmm

   Well, I wish I could find someone like you ... but all my boyfriends have always wanted me to have no hair anywhere ... I hope more guys think like you

   I can't understand the meaning of the post. If you don't like it, don't be with them. Who likes - the opposite. Why do you have to impose your taste at all ?! You don't argue about tastes, have you heard it?

   I am for shaving both men and women. I am a nudist and I prefer to have well-maintained bodies around me. When it comes to sex, mostly oral hair removal is absolutely mandatory. And the pleasure of shaving your partner, caressing her gently and finally licking her is supreme, at least I do it to almost all the partners I've been with ... Well, there is no woman who can piss "" ""

   My husband and I are always arguing about this. We are both in favor of cleaning the armpits for purely hygienic reasons, but he hates women shaved in the intimate area. And sometimes I feel uncomfortable. I still have the feeling that I'm not clean enough and finally I grab the epilator again. He is angry. It is argued as follows: "When a woman is shaved from below - she says - it's like I'm with a little girl and given that I have a daughter, it just repulses me." So I stick to a compromise option - both to have something there for his joy, and to satisfy my hygiene needs. Author, you are neither unique nor perverted. Many men prefer a woman's natural hair, but fashion dictates otherwise. And we women, as you know, are easily guided by fashion.

   Good boy and I'm like you, but I'm 50. Once upon a time until the early 90's women did not get hair at all and were much sexier than now. This madness literally fried the brains of most Bulgarian women, and men began to tan. I also forbade my wife to shave her pussy, and in the winter and the spring-autumn season, when she walks with long sleeves, I make her not to shave her armpits either. It turns me on a lot and fucks her like a boar. I love kissing her hairy armpits and licking her hairy pussy. Type hairy women or hairy armpits women on Google and many videos, movies, sites, galleries with natural women will come out. In the West, women are not as clogged as ours and do not tan as much. For me, this fetish for women's hair originated in puberty, because when you see a woman's armpits, you immediately imagine it from below and you get aroused strongly. And even then the Bulgarian and foreign women at sea, both western and eastern, were naturally hairy, especially the German women from the GDR, even their legs were not tanned and were great.

   Well, if you like them, go with them. Personally, I am very hairy, but I can't stand my hair. It is disgusting in the summer to walk with hair in the intimate area. It's hot, you're sweating, and that makes you even hotter. Vaginal secretions stick to your hair, disgust. I don't know what many men like, but I don't think I go for the hair to please them. I have enough hair on my head. I don't need it anymore. Just forget to say you like women with mustaches.

   Calm down, dude, I'm a 20-year-old man and I'm telling you there's nothing more exciting than a hairy pubis. Unfortunately, there is a fashion in Bulgaria that everyone follows, whether they like it or not. :) I personally do not understand the reason why everyone shaves, not only women but also men? !! Hygiene is not an argument, bathe every day, let's see if there will be a problem. Come on success!

   Number 18, haha ​​I don't know what happened in the GDR in your time, but now the Germans shave everywhere, I would understand some hairstyle intimate, but hairy female legs .... it's just disgusting. For men I agree, legs no chance to shave them ever: D.

   I work in a place where my boss and boss live. They have a room next to the room where there is a bathroom with toilet. I also stay in this room. So in the summer I start my working day in a hurry. But aren't the bosses sleeping until about 9.00-10.00. I was sitting in a chair opposite the door that leads into the room. At one point the door opened to the end and my sleepy boss / 55 years old / shone on me in some panties only. I don't know if they were lace, but I stared at the mane between my legs, which couldn't hide a ribbon. Years ago, she boasted (interfering in a man's conversation about intimate hairstyles) that it was not necessary for a woman to shave. She tried to interfere in my work constantly with her mind or with help. I have been at this job for many years and it is in front of my eyes. I've been with them for 17 years and I've never seen her in a bra or shave her armpits. I may have stayed in this place because of her. Not only do I like natural women, but I also like people older than me. Even in those years, she has a beautiful body. And her breasts drive me crazy even when I think of them. I always peeked through the neckline or through the sleeve of the T-shirt when it was convenient. Big enough. Naturally relaxed. Its areolas are slightly larger than an egg. Dark brown. Slightly protruding darker grains with pink tips. And the most pleasant / at least for me / with two or three longer hairs around the areolas! We had sat down one day to talk and drink coffee in the room, and carelessness, and she chose to put on a T-shirt with a hole through which one of her beans had pierced with all its brilliance. Of course I didn't tell her about it. Who would want to end something beautiful. Half a meter away from her, staring at the "holy grail", I could look at her with a braid of hair around the areola. But when she opened the door then, I snapped so brutally that if she had just told me "- what are you staring at me" I would have carried her with my tongue at my feet. I still remember the "hairstyle" and I still hope to see it again.

   Dude, it's a very ugly woman with hair under her arms or on her legs, but if you think it's normal, then something is wrong with you. I understand about the intimate parts, but not about the other.

   № 29, your boss is a dream woman!

   The author - In general, it is not a problem for me if a girl does not have hair on her armpits and legs, but below I can no longer allow it. I don't want to be with a girl who's getting hairless there. A hairless woman underneath is very ugly and looks like a little girl or an inflatable doll. Such women are indifferent to me and do not arouse me. When I watch one of these in a video or in a photo on the Internet, I can't even hold back my erection. However, just at the thought of natural vegetation below, I get very aroused, and for a negative time. It's so sexy! Hair removal from a woman's bottom will always remain a taboo for me, a perversion and a trampling of femininity and a hoax about a woman's beauty, and I will never take it for granted.

   Author, not only from below, and the armpits are very important. Kissing a woman on the hairy armpits is much more pleasant and arousing than kissing a bunch of puffy hair. Besides, the naturally oxen woman is a completely finished woman, natural and with secondary sexual characteristics, mature, sexy, not to imitate a girl from before puberty, who is disgusting subconscious or unconscious pedophilia.

   Unfortunately, we live in an exception. a hypocritical and perverted society that imposes unnatural and ugly stereotypes of behavior. And to find such a woman, friend, you will enjoy her charms, only in autumn, winter and early spring. When summer comes, he will pluck his legs, shave his armpits, and if you go to sea, he will prune his garden below. Under socialism, women were much freer in this regard, and no one urged them to tan. There weren't many people tanning, and they were just making a wax mask on their feet. for the first time I saw a woman with shaved armpits at the institute, a colleague from our group was shaving her armpits and at first I thought she was Turkish, but she noticed 1 of a whole stream of 120 people. We also had Turks, then they got their names back, but they also had hairy armpits. And now it's horror and madness.

   We live in a perverted world, for example, the bald man (he is 42 years old and completely tanned) explains to his son, a teenager, that he must shave his armpits and penis! Absolute simplicity, and she is not very intelligent.

   Porn stars have said it to each other ... "If you are disgusted by intimate hair, you are not old enough to touch your vagina at all." ;) I'm a woman and I'm smooth: D and yet I agree with you, there is nothing shameful and disgusting in the natural

   8, you with men or with women go out to ask only? : D But it's great to go to bed with your husband and talk about who has shaved their legs and what kind of aftershave lotion you use, you must be the same. Do you take him for a manicure? : D I'm a woman of 20 and honestly the only place I don't like a man to have hair is his chest and not for anything else, but when I lay on them and pricked me: D Otherwise it's much sexier to have a beard, hair on the arms / legs ... it's much more masculine than walking in a car mask ... sorry, but I'm a little fagot (I'm not homophobic, but a fact) And as for women .. I'm shaved and I like yes, but I'm always ready to experiment: D I don't think there's anything disgusting about a woman having hair on her private parts, it's completely natural.

   In my opinion, it is unhygienic for a woman not to be epilated, these are hairs, no matter how much you bathe, they still smell. A woman with hair under her arms, I can't even imagine what it would look like to wonder if a man is a woman or a man? : D For the intimate parts, it's still weird for me, it's still a matter of hygiene, but it's also a matter of taste. I agree with 15, there is no point in imposing your taste in any way, the times are different now, everyone is free to do what he wants. F19

   number 40 with what right, you and your subordinates, impose your perverted understandings on me! Epilomania is a perversion, can't you understand it, the hairy female armpit and pubis, the hairy female legs, are frankly erotic, arousing, perverted, radiating a desire for sex. Epilomans, as you can't think of anything of value, keep blabbering on about this hygiene. Shaved armpits sweat a lot more than unshaven, will you tell me. Hygiene depends on bathing, not on shaving and car masks! The truth is that you are a dumb zombie generation, molded! Equally dumb and equally without their own views, whatever they put on your ads - that's it! These consumers manipulate you as they want to buy them meaningless hair removal items. The hairless woman undressing is not interesting, bottom and shiny slit like a torn zipper on the bag, no surprise individuality, nothing! As in a uniform, to be the same - skinny, skinny and that's what you call eroticism - disgust! Once, when I saw the armpit of a classmate, a fellow student, I immediately imagined her overgrown from below and I got angry! And for you, zero surprise - the same in mold.

   I suggest epilomaniacs shave their heads and eyebrows. Did you know that hair is a breeding ground for microorganisms, fungi - dandruff, etc. It is extremely unhygienic, shave it, let your hollow gourds shine! And your brains are smoothly epilated, as your only thought is to blindly copy the ads! We live in a world where the disgusting, the perverted, the unnatural, such as epilomania, kloshchomania, queerness, genderism, are considered normal, and the natural and traditional are considered perversions. And all this is the work of the Empire of Evil called the United States! How could I not want atomic mushrooms to grow over Hollywood, as well as over this whole ugly country! To all representatives of the current epiloman generation! Did you know that your mothers conceived you in their shaggy hairy pussies, and your fathers, they fucked them with their overgrown hairy cocks and kissed your mothers on the hairy armpits, arms, thighs, etc.! Disgusting, then vomit and go to hell and as Botev said, you, you seem to be idiots!

   We don't live in the jungle to be overgrown. How do you imagine a young woman wearing a cool dress, and showing underarm hair? Or to go to the beach, and get out of the swimsuit and hair? If my legs are hairy, then what kind of woman is she? And for hairy breasts, like the boss of number 29 - disgust. Well, it's really ugly how such women take care of themselves by having wool under their arms. Not to mention how they take off their T-shirts and tank tops for the summer. It may have been acceptable 50-100 years ago, but it is not now. Now you can see women who look like this at 50-55, although they are no longer so neglected.

   Number 42, probably the author, to go hug the monkeys at the zoo, and then be sure to go through the psycho. I doubt they'll let him go home.

   Author: Number 43, Number 41 and it's not me, but this person is right and he's definitely my favorite. It is extremely disgusting for a naked woman to stand in front of you and for her to be seen as a little girl. It is different when it is naturally hairy - it excites and fills the eyes and soul. Women without hair underneath are disgusting, indifferent, and disgusting to me. I don't understand what the girls like so much. All hair removal methods there are unpleasant and painful. Why do girls have to undergo painful interventions like a wax mask, causing themselves the unpleasant feeling of shaving with a razor in such a sensitive place, wasting their time and throwing their money to the wind instead of liking themselves as they are.

   From number 43 to 45 For me, it is unnatural for a young woman to walk with a wave underneath. With a hairstyle styled you can, completely without too, but with an excuse, some thicket-no. I epilate for my own convenience, not for who will look at me naked or not. It's just that since I grew up, I started to maintain myself in this area, and so to this day. It's become a habit, and I don't even think about why I do it. And for a man not to want to sleep with me just because of that is stupid. It's like I refuse him, because there's a lot of hair there. In either case, it would sound silly and offensive. Tastes and understandings of all kinds.

   Author, are you wondering why most women epilate down there? I personally do it for a man. Most men prefer no hair there. I will not pose for doing it "for myself." I don't care. It is also not a question of hygiene, because hygiene is achieved by bathing. If I was with a man who prefers natural hair, I wouldn't make a wax mask there. Alpha, w. 30 years

   I will allow myself an opinion on the subject. At least because of my experience, I'm still 54 years old and I remember very well the time when 90 and more percent of women were not epilated. And what an exotic and excitement for me was the sliding of my hand between the legs of a beautiful Czech woman in the MMC. For those who don't know, this was a favorite place of the Bulgarian "glaruses" :) And as a fan of cunnilingus, I discovered the new sides of the pleasure of doing it as a "naked chicken". And I keep saying that the sight of "shaved cream" is more beautiful, more inspiring. Especially if the inner lips are well shaped. And this greatly affects the "winding" and devotion of the man. From which everyone benefits :) Ah ... ah, with a well-cleaned bush for us men, the "stick" for purely visual reasons looks bigger. And without complaining about the size of mine, I feel a millimeter though, but my satisfaction is more than the sight. But, not to go into the depths of the male ego :) Uncle Vlad

   41, he just broke me ... You have epilation as a perversion, and others who have anal sex don't take it as a perversion at all, hahaha, yes, I also have a hairless problem ... I understand short and blond hair, but for thick and black ... Besides, the hair below interferes with the feeling and the touch is different, otherwise there is no problem, but the legs, armpits and beard or mustache, sorry, it's like they will be two and a half men: DDD

   My boyfriend and I have hair down. He prefers that, I don't care. And he prefers hairy legs and arms. He is 20, I am 19. And so I feel better, the troubles like infections, etc. that I had drastically decreased.

   Catch a man It's normal for homosexuality to spread like this these days. Slowly brainwash you. Surely you want hair on your chest too?

   № 48, oh how I fondly remember the naturally hairy women of that time, Czechs, Poles, Germans from the GDR, and our Bulgarians, all were completely natural without a gram of dull hair removal. Only Soviet women shaved their armpits, which didn't please me, but they were natural underneath. The current bitches are useless, ducks, to take to shave and dumb gourds.

   Don't you remember your mothers' hairy armpits !?

   Having hair around a woman's areolas is very sexy!

   54, what's his sex, to be like a man? For a while it may have been normal, 50-60 years ago, but now it is uncomfortable and downright disgusting. What fun is it to hug a woman with hairy armpits and have breasts as big as you? Some of the older commenters fondly remember their youth because other women did not know them. If everyone had supported each other then, he wouldn't have made such an impression now. A razor didn't cost millions then, there was simply no one to think of.

   That someone makes you like them, was the author? Different people, different ideals. :)))