It's the author. Give birth (or raise) one and then ask ;)
I'm 21, and no matter how much money I have, I wouldn't want more than three kids. My husband and I just won't be able to cope with the upbringing and upbringing itself. It's the money that never bothered me. I can't imagine having that many kids in the present situation, but if I ever give birth to a third, I'd have a mascara.
It's not just about finances, it's about a woman's physique. You have to make it clear that it is in perfect health, wide hips, without genetically transmitted diseases in both genera. Some give birth to 3-4 children and hardly see them. Others fall apart after one birth. So the job is not only to be enjoyed by 6 children, but also to have a healthy and reserved mother.
I wouldn't have more than two or three. Now I'm waiting for my second child. I don't know if money is that much of a factor, people wanting kids do it. It's hard to wear, give birth and watch, and it's not to the material part. It's not nice to be too satisfied and buy it all. Most of the day I deal with the child, we'il see how it's going to be when he grows up a little.
Not one.
I'm 28, i'm a materially secure, sociedent, I've got a serious friend. It's true that neither of us is a millionaire. I have no memory of ever wanting children, i doubt it, and I have a desire.
There are other reasons, beyond financial ones, that would prevent a woman from having children. Often, topics appear in which ladies complain of health problems or lack of a suitable partner. For them, it's extremely painful and naïve reflections, like yours, that make them feel even worse. That's what can stop them from having six or seven kids. And also that they just don't want to, as in my case.
I have enough of a child - I am neither an incubator nor a breeding animal to give birth in a year as if we were living 100 years ago, when there were no contraceptives and adequate medical care, so of seven to eight or 10 children in a family only 2-3 survived.
At least that's how I feel things, but I can also understand the women who want 6-7 and that makes them happy - the important thing is for everyone to do what makes them feel good, not to tax public opinion. Every woman senses how many children she is able to give birth and how much to take full care of - and for this there is no rule, for every woman is different.
There is another - objectively speaking the modern woman thanks to evolution and the way of life is much more exhausted and purely physical and healthy is rarely able even with the best desire to carry and give birth to more than 2-3 children - for many families even the conception and birth of a child is difficult and in many cases passes and with a risk to the woman - I think That unfortunately everyone already knows or has in their surroundings young women who have given birth extremely difficult and even against the recommendations of doctors and at risk for their lives, simply because many wanted a child, but this is today's reality. There are, of course, and enough examples of healthy mothers and trouble-free births - everything is of luck. But with lifestyle, movement and nutrition culture, air, water quality, products especially in Bulgaria, more and more young girls of kind of completely healthy bring much more severe health problems than the generations before them and this can not help but affect the birth rate.
I read the comments and think about how gypsies give birth to 5-6 children and nothing is wrong with them, and we with 300 dawns are curled up for 1, 2 children. That's why we're going to disappear and Bulgaria will become a Gypsy state. To be congratulated on the new dark Bulgarians! They're going to have a country!
(I'm not a woman)
First, a woman is not good to give birth at an interval of less than 4 years. This is related to the depletion of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) from her body, and the period associated with the most recovery. It is highly recommended, both during pregnancy (and especially in the last 3 months), as during breastfeeding to regularly drink highly concentrated (60-80%) fish oil of pharmaceutical grade in large doses (DHA min. 2 grams per day, EPA - 2-3 times more).
The child is also nice to give in the first years.
From this point of view, a woman who starts giving birth from 25 to 35 could have an optimal 3 children without compromising her own and their health and intellect.
And i think 3 seems optimal, come on, maybe four. Here I mean to pay enough attention to everyone and to raise and raise quality people, not to push a quantity at the expense of the quality that survives... The absolute maximum seems to me to be five.
Anything outside of these frameworks seems to me to be gypsy, and it would only be justified in the fact that the human population is highly endangered (for example - after a global catastrophe).
Women can give birth to a maximum of one child per year. It is the duty of men to fertilize as many women as possible, so that Bulgaria does not remain without sons and daughters. Once upon a time, thousands of beautiful women were selected in the harems of the emperors, and the emperor was obliged to fertilize two a day. He was ovulated for the day. That's why most people today are descendants of emperors and Genghis Khan.
Not one unless my husband insists too much.
I am 27 years old, 10years we are together with my husband, we have 3 children, fully planned and desirable, born naturally without anesses, etc., breastfed, viewed with repeated diapers.. If I had financial help that I could afford a helper with, I'd give birth to five. As a financial burden, I don't think they're a big expense. Watching the kids, I'm all in the business of the housework. No one is helping me, and for that I would love to have a woman I can count on, to look at the kids for a few hours, to see my husband.
Four. Two boys and two girls, and will not have more than two years difference between the two couples and a year difference between the children of each couple. I mean, I'm going to be almost permanently pregnant for seven years :-D We'il also have pets, and also a yard with seedlings.
Number seven, straight to the ten! On the subject 2 - 3 children. But for the reasons described by number 7, I have one after a lot of health difficulties.
It is bad for women to get sick, because this also leads to prolonged treatment for which also needs money and a lot! Types of cancers are the worst thing for a young family, not to mention if the child gets sick! Then the media thunders that a family is unhappy, because the mother or child has to be treated privately and abroad, for which a mass of money from donors is needed! And otherwise in our entrance we have three families with two girls and one baby boy alive and healthy, diseases not to enter their homes, yet we should not panic, and medicine has advanced, so diagnosing any disease is not a problem!
9, who wants no more kids is none of your business. With this edifying tone, you're getting ridiculous.
If I didn't have any financial difficulties, I'd give birth to 5-6
Number 10- I hope you specialize in ag, or at least you're studying medicine. Is this a four-year birth date? A million years have given birth almost every year or every year 10 children, now suddenly a 4d pause is requested. So a million years ago, things were going crazy, and it's only now that there's scientific data that's done right. In the West, they give birth en masse every year or two - didn't they tell them to be 4 years old? Make a few of the most of it.
The birth of 1 to 3 children depends on finances, the birth of more has no connection with the finances of the family, after the third onwards the desires for more children are related to a way of thinking and belief.
No9 is wrong that because of a lower birth rate, an ethnicity would disappear, and another because of a higher one would have its own state. A dear country is created with the upper not with the lower head. It's better to raise 1-2 quality kids than 10 balamurs. The famous of the world Mariaka gave birth to a child in Bethlehem, but she raised and raised him so well that already 2000 half the world have it for god and believe she did not feed him on a golden platter with a silver spoon. The Ottoman sultans never had turkish children, but their country is still called Turkey. It's not what ethnicity she gives birth to, it's how children are raised.
I have a 3, I'm planning a fourth. I wouldn't give birth anymore because you have to have the strength and energy to educate them, talk to them, keep an eye on their interests and develop them, cuddle them and tell them how much you love them. It's very cheerful, but the balance is complicated. When I cuddle them, it's always a little bit cuddly. With one more, it will be even more up-to-date for them, and every child wants his and has the right to receive it. The idea is not just to give birth to them and leave them alone. My children go to all kinds of lessons, according to their interests. Each every four weeks, for me, there are 12 visits somewhere. You're becoming a child driver. The optimal option for me is 3, 4 children maximum.
I'm 20 years old and I'm studying. For this reason, I would not consider children for the next 4-6 years. Even if I didn't have any financial difficulties in time, I still wouldn't have more than three children. Children require much more than money to be raised. Parents need to take time for each of their children individually, get to know him, understand his strengths, notice his problems and difficulties. I don't consider me some kind of facsimur on the subject of a child's psyche, I don't think I could handle more than 3 children because I know that motherhood is much more than a sum of money, food on the table and diaper changes. It takes time and attention for children, it is required to stay close with the partner, you are required to look at your household and to deal with your personal goals. Sometimes I think I can only be a housewife, and I'm sure it'il be easier for me, but in time I'm going to freak out. I don't have the right psyche, and I can't hope that something in me will break and make me the most patient person in the world. Three kids, I'm not going to do well anymore.
I'd give birth again, one or two. Because besides money, children need care and attention. And no matter how rich you are, it's only 24 hours for everyone, and I don't want to be one of those rich "moms" who have a lot of kids but have left them entirely in the care of babysitters. So if I'm going to take care of my kids myself, I want to have enough time for them, talk and spend time together at all.
<9>
1. Gypsies start giving birth at 15. They don't need education, careers, adulthood, etc.
2. Give birth to take children's. Gypsy with 3 kids takes more than a working woman.
3. They don't care how they're educated.
4. When they start talking and send them to beg, and while they are babies, they beg mothers.
You still want to ask?
If I don't ask, are you happy for the Bulgarians to give birth like this?
Three. One of each and three as it came. For me, the financial part is not a problem. For me, the man next to me is important.
If now, in these times, I had to decide whether to have children, the answer is none. The world is definitely going to failure, the world, not Bulgaria, so it just doesn't make sense. There's been such brainwashing of children since kindergarten that things are scary.
Under other conditions, no more than two. Now I have one.
4 and why not? I'd be very happy. But the hymer's good financial situation you're describing, I'm never going to get there. 2 if I raised in Bulgaria it would be an achievement by speaking GROW, and not as it is popular here for the grandparents to raise it. Everyone can enjoy a few kids and someone else can watch them.
My husband wanted an entire football team, but I with the first one barely survived, so maybe 2 or 3 is a good choice. And then graying the hair in proportion to the children.
G 27.
Author, what do you care who wants a lot of kids, or doesn't want kids? You want a lot of kids- go out in the middle of the world and find a woman who also wants a lot of kids. And do it. You're very funny to me when you start playing such meaningless themes, especially something about the gins and...
You sound like an aunt without a job who doesn't even look for a job, but neither is with a rich man, because in that case he would just travel and shop, and you're like one of those worst looks that they've already seen the child, and now the only thing they're capable of and who's getting them interested in people is to care about people. , especially from the young mostly in order to find occasions to doit and thus are fooled that they make sense of their otherwise pathetic daily lives.
On the subject - and I don't want children, not because I'm afraid of childbirth, not because I can't afford it financially, but simply because I have no desire to be a parent. Come on, give me a couple of times 1 out of 5 votes ;)
And yes, to tell myself, I'm also in my 30s, and I also support the opinion of number 6 - there really are often women, and in general couples, who very much want to have a baby, even a few, but for another reason can not have, as very precisely mentioned number 6. So think about it seriously, and other times, don't let yourself put that kind of crap on the net.
Like I told you in elementary school, go out and find a wife, make seven kids and so on. I bet all the women will be guilty and black.
Definitely 2 children. Having a child, raising and raising a child is a great responsibility. It's not just funding.
I personally only want one or two. I have one right now. It's so nice to have a child that when you see mature women in their 30s with makeup and no-child-free haircuts, and I wonder what the point is... and I do makeup and do a haircut, but now my nu is my obsession...
Hmm... Yes not want children, because there are people who believe that everyone should have children, that every woman should give birth, that this is the most important thing in life, etc.
Number 9 just told the truth and nothing more, of course everyone decides, but what's wrong with telling the truth, it may not be said, but what.
I want at least 7 or 8 children, but with a big difference that they're not in a pile.
Children are not just a cost, it is a huge responsibility.
I'm a 33-year-old man. I never felt any need or desire to have children. I don't know why. But it doesn't bother me. Otherwise, almost all my friends have children.
37, so you're going to give birth to 80.
7-8 children 7-8 years old and up the difference (that's a big difference), so for there-no-60-70 years you will see them. If you start at 20, you'il be ready by 80-90.
40 g No. I want them to be 2-3 for a period, then after 5 years another 2 and another 5 years more. We can collect them in 15 or 6 years.
I'm 29 and we're expecting our second child, our son is 1. Five years. We don't have financial difficulties, but purely physically and emotionally I think we can take good care of two children.
Although I have a sister 14 years younger, my mother gave birth at 37 and I think her birth has had a wonderful effect on my parents. I was old enough to help effectively and they somehow more conscious, calm, secure. So I like that option, but time will tell. If you ask my husband, he wants a football team...
By The Author. I read all the comments and it impressed me that some women of you have not paid attention to the most important in the topic-finances. Some of you said it was hard to look after children, that they had to hire a babysitter, etc. But I said financially you would be absolutely, fully insured. That is, you can have not one well and two babysitters, also a maid who will take care of the whole dwelling such as cooking, laundry, ironing, etc. I will even add that in the absence of any funding, you will certainly have a large house, even a villa outside the city where you live. Under such conditions, you will still have time for personal things or what you say personal space. You can visit friends, go on vacations, even travel outside the country, so you have a maid(s) and two babysitters. The point is, since all this (the finances) you will have it, then what is the real reason you don't want so many children. A large family without financial problems is almost equal to happiness, as some women say.
Let me give you two examples: Aselina Jolie and Brad Pitt have six children, three of their own and three adopted. What do you think, they don't have time for anything! They also had servants and babysitters while they were married, and they also have them now that they are divorced. Even when they were making movies, there was someone to take care of the kids.
The other she famously known as Julia Roberts (from Pretty Woman) who has three children. She and her husband also have babysitters and maids when they are busy filming. When a woman has no financial problems and she wants to have children, there is no reason why she should not have a few children. The question is whether more children will make them happier. For those families who have them, the answer is YES.
I also read that some women do not want to give birth at all, even if they are financially very well. I understand both of them, everyone has priorities, but I think a family without children is not normal if there are no medical reasons for it.
The financial side is most important especially in the early years of children! If I had a husband who had the "endless" income described and loved me, and was caring for me and the children, I would love to give birth to him. I've never thought about it. Hypothetically, I'm 23 today, getting married in a year or 24. 1 year of travel and entertainment and at the end I think things will happen on their own. 25 is a great age for kids. If I had to choose, I'd choose to be two at a time, like twin boys. In an ideal scenario, three or four boys and a little girl. Then whatever, as much as it is.
G23
23 am
Author, I'm going to repeat myself, but it's not just about money. Giving them love is the most important thing, and with more than 4 children it is very difficult. You're tearing up. The idea isn't just about being an incubator, giving birth and throwing to the babysitter. You're talking about happiness, what happiness it is to miss half your kids' good times, why haven't they been with you, but with the babysitter? I have a babysitter who I leave them to do something to do, and I'm sad when something important happens and I've missed it. I don't understand that babysitting with babysitters for 24 hours.
Do you have any idea how to be born?
Leave the money, and what pain is the birth itself?
Well, you don't! 6-7 children from 25-35 first author is not a nice child, after a child! It takes time not every 9 months, especially c-section births! I've found out so far that women are for breeding for you, but you gave birth to them 6-7, and we'il talk again.
It's not about finances, it's about not having a baby and not knowing what it's like to give birth. The best thing is, after hours of torment, they'il tear you apart, sew you up. Are they falling from the sky?
The pain, the recovery period, where did you forget them?
What to say to a man, not in vain there is after labor depression, not a few mothers die during childbirth!
These kids have to give them a life in the future, and these movies with the rich, and how many billionaires there are, these movie stars have money, but a normal person how, to support them to the full. Come on, cut the crap 6-7 gave birth to one and then mk talks about more. Birth, it's not like doing it!
Amman of such men. It's not all about money, here a woman's life is always in danger! How many women get hemorrhages, how many women are left with placentas on the verge of death, and others do not even survive. How many women give birth for hours, but a man can never know that these women don't scream for fun! It hurts, author! I have one and I'd give birth to a maximum of one, two, but I'm not even sure I want to have one! Because you don't know how it's born, and how you recover later. How they breastfeed, and wear.
A birth is nothing, it's stress, pain, etc. but you men are up to doing how, you know.
:) 2 enough for me to get to 3, but I'd limit myself to one, because I'm saying this birth is life-threatening, it hurts and it hurts!
So before you talk, for money, you remember that these women also feel pain, and childbirth is not pleasant - children yes, but not to give birth to them! And again I say born every few years, even in the c-section I think it's mandatory, I don't know how long before you get pregnant again, because it carries a lot of risks!
If I have a financial opportunity, no more than three. I'm 33 years old, I have two kids, with a big difference.
From 41
I don't understand why I don't like :( comment.
Is it wrong, is it bad?
I have lived in Denmark for 9 years and here two people with higher education can afford a normal life, even if they have more children.
I have four children- our first child, followed by triplets. Our first child was adopted as we could not have children for very long. After Kaya, I somehow calmed down, as if I felt like a mother and managed to conceive IVF a year later.
We also have a dog and it's a big madhouse, rarely can a person get a good rest. But we are very happy and somehow at home we are always cozy and nice.
It was the only career that was left in the background, and I didn't particularly like that, so I started working for myself. I'm a doctor and I've opened my own office, so I've got more free time, but it's still not easy.
You're very confused. Happiness doesn't come with giving birth and leaving a babysitter. Kids are really great and are the only people who will love you all their lives, but parents have to watch them. The more time you're with them, the better. If they're babysitters after a while, you'il regret not being with them. And first you find a woman to be really in love with, and then you think about these things. I don't think you're happy now, and you just want to settle for something. And kids don't get up with a magic wand. There are people who very much want to have children, but it doesn't work.
And what important did you miss? When did the kid run out of diaper needs? I don't see anything important here, if you want to take a picture of it, that's another question- and money is a factor, but as I said above, a tree, diseases don't come to us that otherwise bad! Whoever has some business, they'il have money, so when they decide to have kids, they raise enough money to have security for the kids! Don't look at gypsies-they're privileged, so they have at least five or six children and they get benefits for every child! And they don't work for that, because they support themselves from the benefits, and their children don't go to school- not at all, but most leave their children alone!
I'm 31.
I've met a man in my life who I can like to you. A woman needs to recover after one birth, there is no way to give birth to 7 children in 10 years, if there is no strong incitement or are not triplets, twins and so on or does not like endlessly children. If she wants to pursue a career, don't expect to be a good mother to many children and good in her profession. The more children, the more care there are. I think that even with babysitters and grandmothers, a mother should be there for her children, because only she can give them this support and love. No babysitter would love a child more than his mother. I don't accept sending my baby for a month to his grandmother.
G27
I can't afford more than one child because, by my comprehensiis, a materially insured person is a person who has a stable and permanent job, a home that is the size of the family members, can afford twice a year a holiday, as well as eat outside at least 2 times a week, not at home, to mention that everyone should have their own car for which they need insurance... I have a stable job, my husband also, but we both don't know how we would buy our children a place nowadays. If we have two children, it's two homes. Or a big house. We need to educate them, feed them quality food, lead social lives, give them pocket money, raise them. And don't explain to me that young children were not a cost- on the contrary, a much larger expense is because they are not single and therefore one parent will not be able to work for a long time or if they can, it will be part-time. But if all these things had them and someone on top was paying them for me or my husband was making the big money and having days off to enjoy my family I would have another child. The child's responsibility to have a happy childhood, which involves family warmth rather than two working and fatigue-wollen parents, is also great.
Four. I've always wanted four kids. For financial reasons, I'm going to stick with one thing, keep it alive and well.
And yes, it's only about money. One woman who works eight hours a day does not have the capacity for four children. She may have given birth to them and raise them somehow, but I don't care how. Children are treated with screams and slaps by overworked mothers. A tired mother won't take you to a pool after school, she won't enrol you at your favorite sport, where your friends go, won't have time to study with you and discuss your problems with you. The poor mother is nervous, she wants to give more to her children, she wants to get some sleep, she wants to take them on vacation... And out of frustration, sooner or later, he takes it out on the weaker, the children. That's why I've decided how many children I can give adequate care, including love, because you talk a lot about love here, but the child of a poor and nervous mother very rarely feels that love. Very rarely. Most of the time it feels like an obstacle and over time develops complexes.
1 mistress_deea answered