If I have to analyze the opinion of number 7 (I quote it): "Your observations, author, are aside. The fact that purely technically the man took out his wallet does not mean that its contents were won only by him. In most families The budget is formed by both.Before the man paid at the gas station, the woman bought products and cooked.He will pay in the restaurant, but she chose and bought him a new winter coat.He will pay for her bag in the mall, but she took the curtains for the living room and the dining set. In that spirit. The line cannot be drawn. "- In most families, only the man brings money home and the woman households. In the case of older families who were active during communism and at the beginning of the transition after the 1990s, there was greater equality between the number of working men and women, but then the state policy was simply that there should be no unemployment and that everyone should be engaged in some activity. But in the vast majority of families aged 30-40, working men predominate and women are at home. The same thing happens with young families aged 18-25 with children, as many women who are in a hurry to catch a man and give birth to a child purposefully strive for the role of "mother profession", which will provide them with at least 10 years. standing at home or walking outside, under the pretext that otherwise there is no one to raise the child while the man is at work. These mothers conveniently avoid the fact that as long as their child is in kindergarten (all year round) or school (9 months a year), they could easily work. And if they want to be at home all day, they can find work from home. I have such acquaintances - the mother after a one-month course became a freelance graphic designer and works from home, looking after their young child, while the father works in the same profession, but in the service of a company and is paid more. - If the woman bought food from the store, there is no mention of whose money she spends, but we all know that in 99% of cases this money is given in advance by the man or the woman uses his bank card for payment. I witness this every day in a number of grocery stores, clothing stores, cinemas, restaurants, etc .. For cooking, I agree that in most families it is done by the woman (precisely because they have divided their roles in the beginning and the man brings the money home). In more modern young families, both sometimes cook, but the woman rarely works if she is also a mother at the time. - How often does a woman buy a man's winter coat? And not with his, but with her money? Once every 5 years? Or rather never? And how often will the man pay the restaurant bills? How many times do they go to a restaurant. And this can be every day, every other day, at least once a week ... But it is not once every 5 years or never, as is the case with the covenant coat. Number 7 did not even say how often the man pays for the woman's clothes, as well as for countless other expenses. We conveniently skip this truth, don't we? - He paid for her bag in the RUM (it is certainly one of the many purchases he makes for her, and women like to change their bags quite often because they are still not happy with the current one they have; therefore, many women have several bags), while she would buy curtains (which can last 10 years or more) and a dining set (which is enough to use 10-30 years in advance if not broken by clumsy hands). Both the curtains and the tableware are for common use, but number 7 gives them as an example, as if the woman pays for them and is supposedly a gain of the man! - Also, it is convenient to remain silent about who bought the car, whose fuel (along with tax, insurance, vignettes and parking fees) the man pays out of pocket. Let's not forget the home, which is almost always owned by the man and not the woman. If it is common (mostly for young families), then both pay it, and in almost all such cases the man pays a much larger share than the woman. An acquaintance recently found a husband and is already pregnant by him, not stopping to brag about how they pay for their common home. The truth is, that he accepted her in his home when he had already repaid BGN 10,000 from the housing loan, and in addition took her to work with his own car. Their salaries are almost the same, as they work in a company, but the difference is that while in recent years she spent money on clothes, phones, jewelry, bags, traveling with friends, etc., he lived modestly and collected money to invest in your future! Against the background of the many men with their own homes who have taken a woman homeless, I have so far met only four women who have their own home and have taken a man with them. And here's the interesting thing! Three of them had been bought by their parents, and the third by her ex-wealthy boyfriend because she let him cum in it several times a day and fulfilled all his fantasies in bed. In other words, none of these four women had given a lev for the purchase of these homes, but had received it as a gift. To be technically honest, at least one of them worked with all her holes against the acquisition of the apartment, so she still made some effort and deserved it because of the deal. I agree with number 7 that "the line cannot be drawn" when comparing who pays how much, as it is to the detriment of the man. Kifloprizemitel
1 liquidtage answered
I pay for everything myself, I work, I keep myself in perfect shape and when men see that they can't be useful to me, they become more complex and start spitting on feminism ... Drummers.