Homophobia!

   There is no way to change your parents. Just explain what you wrote here to your mother (that the characters are just your favorite and that you're not the other way around).

   We live in a homophobic state. That's it. Think about moving out when you grow up, but keep in mind that countries like the United States and Sweden are on the other extreme. I'm not for homophobia, but I'm not for extreme liberalism where young children are preoccupied with things like sexual orientation and gender identity ... The truth is always somewhere in the golden mean. By the way, I'm bisexual myself.

   I'm gay. Being a lesbian, gay, straight is not a choice. None of those who are hetero have consciously chosen to be who they are. They just are. The uneducated to hide hatred. If it is not for gays, it will be for minorities, other religions, poor / rich, women / men, young / old and so on. And being a lesbian / gay isn't bad at that. First of all, what is your mother looking for in your phone, secondly, did she make such a big problem? Or are you ashamed of what? If you are the opposite and expressing yourself in Rusyn, you can take the opportunity to tell her. If you are not the opposite but support education, you can stand behind your values. That's why I left Bulgaria

   Explain to your mother that she has no right to violate your privacy. The phone is part of it. The other option is to put a password on your phone, laptop, tablet.

   Up to 2 The big problem of most Bulgarians is that they are not used to accepting the different and have too much self-confidence and would never admit that they are gay people. The biggest homophobes are undercover gay people.

   Understand them. In their time, there was not the same awareness (or someone would say "brainwashing", ie it depends on the point of view) as now. They didn't have books with gay characters. Now every movie and TV series has gay characters. This was not the case at the time. If you had grown up 20-30 years ago, you would have been homophobic, or at least you would have been indifferent.

   No, we are not a homophobic state, and our people's psychology is not to believe everything we hear. Look at Germany, for example - as soon as Hitler said that so many Jews had to be killed (!!!) so many people, the people immediately betrayed them. without thinking about whether it is right or not. Bulgaria is the only country that has saved its Jews. 50,000 Jews were saved. We are one of the few countries in Europe that has not given up its Cyrillic alphabet. It's the same with gays. I am not against these people, I have gay friends, but I am extremely against parades and the fact that we have as a norm and almost, if you do not support them unreservedly or you are not a homosexual, you automatically become homophobic and do not keep up with fashion, lol. This has become exactly the fashion. And it is no coincidence that they are attacking us, the young - we are the most naive. They lie to us with all sorts of things and manipulate us as they please. Don't take offense, but behind homosexuality there is always some psychological trauma - the growth of a boy without a male example, rape in women or just any other bad memory of the opposite sex. The other reason is hormonal imbalance. A gay friend of mine himself admitted to me that he blamed his father for it, who had abandoned him since he was a baby. He told me that if it hadn't happened, he certainly wouldn't have been the other way around. Sorry, but I will not fight for the cause of promoting such imbalances. I'm not saying it's a disease, but it's an imbalance. Again, I have nothing against these people, but I am against having it as the norm. Nature has decided that man and woman create life. Are we taller than her? ж21 but behind homosexuality there is always some psychological trauma - the growth of a boy without a male example, rape in women or just any other bad memory of the opposite sex. The other reason is hormonal imbalance. A gay friend of mine himself admitted to me that he blamed his father for it, who had abandoned him since he was a baby. He told me that if it hadn't happened, he certainly wouldn't have been the other way around. Sorry, but I will not fight for the cause of promoting such imbalances. I'm not saying it's a disease, but it's an imbalance. Again, I have nothing against these people, but I am against having it as the norm. Nature has decided that man and woman create life. Are we taller than her? ж21 but behind homosexuality there is always some psychological trauma - the growth of a boy without a male example, rape in women or just any other bad memory of the opposite sex. The other reason is hormonal imbalance. A gay friend of mine himself admitted to me that he blamed his father for it, who had abandoned him since he was a baby. He told me that if it hadn't happened, he certainly wouldn't have been the other way around. Sorry, but I will not fight for the cause of promoting such imbalances. I'm not saying it's a disease, but it's an imbalance. Again, I have nothing against these people, but I am against having it as the norm. Nature has decided that man and woman create life. Are we taller than her? ж21 The other reason is hormonal imbalance. A gay friend of mine himself admitted to me that he blamed his father for it, who had abandoned him since he was a baby. He told me that if it hadn't happened, he certainly wouldn't have been the other way around. Sorry, but I will not fight for the cause of promoting such imbalances. I'm not saying it's a disease, but it's an imbalance. Again, I have nothing against these people, but I am against having it as the norm. Nature has decided that man and woman create life. Are we taller than her? ж21 The other reason is hormonal imbalance. A gay friend of mine himself admitted to me that he blamed his father for it, who had abandoned him since he was a baby. He told me that if it hadn't happened, he certainly wouldn't have been the other way around. Sorry, but I will not fight for the cause of promoting such imbalances. I'm not saying it's a disease, but it's an imbalance. Again, I have nothing against these people, but I am against having it as the norm. Nature has decided that man and woman create life. Are we taller than her? ж21 but I will not fight for the cause of promoting such imbalances. I'm not saying it's a disease, but it's an imbalance. Again, I have nothing against these people, but I am against having it as the norm. Nature has decided that man and woman create life. Are we taller than her? ж21 but I will not fight for the cause of promoting such imbalances. I'm not saying it's a disease, but it's an imbalance. Again, I have nothing against these people, but I am against having it as the norm. Nature has decided that man and woman create life. Are we taller than her? ж21

   I don't understand why you are so fascinated by the opposite? Really, I'm not picky, I just don't see what's attractive to homosexuals. And as for your mother, considering the things you write and paint, she thought you were a lesbian.

   I am a homophobe and I will simply not comment on your abomination, as far as I can tell you that it is one thing to support the different, but it is quite another to LIKE their fashion and their disgusting demonstrations and parades. My skinhead friends and I love seeing people like you the most.

   By the way, I am also very supportive of these people. Otherwise, as for the story, I just want to ask you how old are you? If you're 18 or about 17, I don't think it's right for your mother to look at your phone. She's worried, but that's your job. And you have to defend yourself, not only because of your personal space, but also because of what everything revolves around. It is homosexuality. I advise you to talk seriously with yours or with this parent who you understand as more understanding. Explain that there is nothing wrong with that, because there really isn't. You're not like that, but you just like people like that. This is a personal choice and you are mature enough to defend your opinion. Don't stop doing what you like just because yours isn't okay with it. Like I said, I advise you to talk to one or both of them and make it clear that there's nothing wrong with that, they are also human, not guilty of their sexual orientation and not making them bad. You can even give them an example: If you found out that your best friend was gay, would you leave him, despite everything you've been through just because he's not straight? I hope they think about it. And even if they don't agree, you don't hurt or offend anyone. You have the full right to paint what you like and create as you like. (Sorry for the crucified sweets: E) Justartlover which you like and create as you like. (Sorry for the crucified sweets: E) Justartlover which you like and create as you like. (Sorry for the crucified sweets: E) Justartlover

   Haha, you need advice because you are just interested in the topic and have a hobby, and if you ask us - the people who are part of the LGBT community and witness the constant hatred of what we are. :) Your problem is not really that big, you just have conservative parents, like most people in Bulgaria. It is a pity that all homophobes would not be like that if they were more educated on these topics and did not believe the myths and legends, the fruit of their frightened consciousness. The topic is very indicative of the need for education and its low level in our dear country - it is no coincidence that we are in first place in most negative rankings in Europe and last in the positive. I recently read some statistics that tolerance for LGBTI people is also linked to the level of education and culture of the citizens of different countries, the better the country has in terms of the level of good education, the greater tolerance and vice versa. So do not be surprised that the situation in Bulgaria is like that, just our mentality is not of people who strive for education and development. I will also add that people have become very angry and this also prevents at least a little empathy. A month or two ago, someone here posted a topic on a similar topic, it was about adoption by homosexuals. A seemingly well-meaning woman was trying to convince me how bad, immoral, and abnormal it was to be homosexual by ensuring that she read a lot of literature on the subject. When it comes to facts, however, the lady very quickly decided that it doesn't matter what literature we read, personal experience is important. My thought is, that malice does not allow homophobes to look at things realistically and challenge facts proven by the scientific majority. I will conclude, author, with the fact that your parents are unfortunately part of the infection called hatred in Bulgaria. It is normal for haters to be like that, too, so it's not just their fault. I also want to congratulate you that, despite everything, you have the position of a hetero person who has a positive attitude towards us LGBTI people and I strongly hope that in time you will not be influenced by hatred. I wish you all the best! :)) you have the position of a hetero person who has a positive attitude towards us LGBTI people and I strongly hope that in time you will not be influenced by hatred. I wish you all the best! :)) you have the position of a hetero person who has a positive attitude towards us LGBTI people and I strongly hope that in time you will not be influenced by hatred. I wish you all the best! :))

   Your drawings are perverted. There is no parent who is happy that his daughter paints such things. I guess they wouldn't have enjoyed it if she had painted executions and severed heads. To soothe you drawings with fagots is not good.

   From the author ~ Number 2, yes, I decided a long time ago, when I grew up to go to study and live in England ... I would do it now with joy, but I am a minor Number 3, my mother often checks my phone ... According to its so right

   Girl, get angry at your parents' measure. From an early age we are taught to hate everything "different" and out of the "norm". When I was a kid, I hated them too, but why? Why did I hate them? I finally realized that I had been taught to hate them since I was a child. Now I accept all people, all who do NOT hurt. I'm just still against people changing their gender. And whatever you explain to them, you will be neither understood nor heard. :( Helga

   If you're not a lesbian, why are you so obsessed with painting them? Did I find it interesting?

   Номер 7, съжалявам, но много бъркаш. Чудесно е, че сме опазили евреите в онези отвратителни времена, наистина можем да се гордеем с този факт от богатата ни история. За кирилицата не съм съгласен до някъде, защото като че ли латиницата или така наречената "маймуница" измества много сериозно кирилицата особено сред млади хора като мен например. Жалко е да виждам, че когато им се налага да ползват кирилица, много от хората правят съчетания, типични за латиницата, например sht за щ го изписват шт или пък вместо ъ пишат а и много подобни. Направих това въведение, защото не е редно да правиш такива глобални заключения, защото смятам, че за хомофобията в България не са причина високите ни принципи и осъзнаване, а по-скоро ниската образованост особено към тези табу въпроси и за съжаление силно маргинализирани общности. Малкото ти познания, номер 7, много личат от коментара ти, чудесно би било ако се образоваш повечко по въпроса. На български има доста литература, има и доста чуждоезична, обхвата на която се разширява и на български, ако знаеш английски пък чудесно, няма да имаш никакви ограничения. Но за човек на 21 години мисленето ти към този момент определено се нуждае от обогатяване. Нелепо е да твърдиш, че тези, които не се определят като част от ЛГБТИ общността биват определяни за хомофоби, съветвам те да прочетеш значението на думичката. И ако наричаш опит за налагане на норма борбата ни за равни права, опитите ни да се пресече дискриминацията, заклеймяването, потискането на ЛГБТИ, то нека да бъде норма, нека уважението между хората бъде норма. За това и правим паради, за да бъде повишена видимостта на нашата силно маргинализирана общност, по този начин демократично воюваме срещу омразата. Ще кажа още, понеже си подхвърлила, че това е някакъв дисбаланс, че няма никакви научно валидни данни, че човек придобива сексуалната си ориентация или полова идентичност поради различните социални фактори. Научното мнозинство е на мнение, че това се случва още в ембрионалното ни развитие. Можеш и тук да се образоваш повече като прочетеш за хомосексуалност при животните, от там ще ти се изясни, че хомосексуалността също е част от нормите в природата, просто ние я демонизираме със страховете и омразата, която настоятелно държим в себе си, така че този твой аргумент също отпада. Така подробен съм към коментара ти, защото много ми напомни една силно озлобена жена в друга подобна тема в сайта, предполагам, че дори отново си ти, за това и ще допълня нещо. Пък дори и да не си ти, хубаво е и с това да се образоваш. Прилагам линка, който ми беше приложила: https://dariknews.bg/regioni/varna/kak-roditelite-da-predpazqt-decata-ot-bolestta-homoseksualizym-1360800 Понеже ми стана много интересен този въпрос се разрових доста и се оказа, че авторите на книгата са взели солидни пасажи от друг гуру в тази тематика, а именно Джордж Рикърс, който е посветил целия си живот в това да изследва "болестта" хомосексуализъм. В книгите си той описва как момченцата трябва да пипат пенисите на бащите си докато са малки, за да не им е интересно в бъдеще. Същият Рикърс е хванат с платен мъжки ескорт на връщане от екскурзия в Европа. Интересното тук е, че най-запалените хомофоби в един момент се оказват скрити гейове. :) Тогава ме уверяваше, драга, че имаш много познания по темата, но някак ми стана смешна като видях за какво става въпрос, надявам се, че вече си искрена със себе си и четеш повече както не веднъж те призовах тогава. Поздрави, драга ;)

   I am gay, but my father is homophobic. Of course I didn't tell him. I will not do it because I am 26 years old. I live alone and enjoy myself

   I'm a homophobe and I feel great about it. I support your parents' position.

   From the author: I am not allowed to have a password. And I have no right to privacy in those years.

   I support the opinion of # 2 and # 7. I support them, but as long as they do not intrude on society. Otherwise, if they take my phone straight away, they will kick me out of us with these gay fan art, edits and photos where I have them. I support homosexuals, but if a boy starts dressing in women's clothes, I get more.

   So, the only thing I do not approve of in the act of yours is that they do not allow you the right to privacy. Such parental acts are punished with alienation by children at a later age. As for the topic of the opposite. Well, what can I tell you, I was taught from an early age to sympathize with them and not to hate them because they are "different". Until a year ago, I had no problems with them until I got to know them live and noticed some rather unpleasant traits in the characters of the opposite, which are common in many of them. For example, they not only want to be accepted and supported, they want to be considered "better than heterosexuals" and given the right to have children. Now you will tell me that this is normal and they had the right to be parents. I do not agree.

   I'm a 50-year-old woman, straight, and maybe it's too late for me to "educate" on the subject, but somehow it seems insulting to be called "homophobic," "hidden gay," or "uneducated." The term "fob" accuses me of hatred, and I am well aware that I do not hate anyone and do not wish anyone harm, I just have against anyone who demonstratively through parades on the street to tell me who he sleeps with. Just as I did not go to demonstrate dressed in a provocative suit that I have sex with my husband, I do not find it necessary for someone else in society to inform me through a parade with whom she has sex. Just as I do not wave a banner about my differences from other people in society, so I am badly impressed by the people who demonstratively impose their differences on me. For example, I have impaired vision, I wear glasses, but I have neither set out to parade the spectacles, nor do I demand that all the people of the planet be educated in detail about the specifics of my difference. And I don't call them uneducated people just because they don't know in detail why I wear glasses and where my difference came from. So I don't understand why I need to study homosexuality in detail? Not to mention harassing all people with normal vision "hidden blind". Just as I am strongly against children in education getting acquainted with the specifics of reduced vision, I am also against getting acquainted in detail with the specifics of homosexuality. It is possible that there are homosexual children among adolescents, but the percentage of children with reduced vision is much higher, this does not mean that we should impose differences on all children. I do not understand and why I am accused, together with almost the whole society of discrimination, please explain to me personally who and with what I discriminate? What equal rights are they fighting for when all people in the country have equal rights? No person or state restricts the right of anyone to sleep with anyone as long as it is not violent. And the right to have children is a restriction not by the state, but by God, or more precisely by nature. It is not the state that gives me the right to have a child, nature has given me this right or not. And parades against nature seem illogical to me. №16 gives an example of homosexuality in animals, but no homosexual animal behaves differently from heterosexuals of its kind, not to mention that it has no children and has no right to be angry that it does not, these animals do not parade, do they? I accept that there are people, units that attack, insult or even insult homosexuals, they are criminals and should be punished, but by the court and the police. Just as people who attack people for other reasons are punished. But I am also aware that if someone behaves and dresses normally in society, no one would attack him, because there will be no way to distinguish him from others. Just as homosexual animals do not demonstrate their homosexuality. I imagine that if some ill-mannered people from the society go to insult and assault people with glasses, I would wear lenses so that I don't see them and I would call the police to catch the bullies. I would certainly not rule or participate in half-naked demonstrations in defense of the right of spectacle wearers to wear spectacles. And I would not go against the state and society to conform all the written signs in the state to my short-sightedness,

   You are fine. I am a pan but our people will never understand because they are homophobic and I do not want to be evicted from my home

   And I would like to add about the cases of gays and lesbians who become heterosexual after using LSD. Search lsd homosexuality in google. Homosexuality does not seem to be genetic.

   We live in a homophobic country, unfortunately ... just because your parents don't support same-sex relationships doesn't mean you have to be like them. I write gay stories, watch movies and TV series on such topics and I have a lot of fun with them, although I'm not the opposite. My mother is against such things too, but I will not change my interests because of her.

   21 ... Wait ... Are you listening to k-pop? That's where most gay things come from. Although the idols themselves are not gay, but still ... My drawings are not related to them (only sometimes) but I like them too My drawings come from my favorite books ....

   Number 24, it seems insulting to me to express "competent" opinions and at the same time to say that you can't get an education because it's too late for you. In this case, you could leave this to the more competent people who are not afraid to get educated and are much more familiar with the subject. In general, in Bulgaria, decisions are made by incompetent people, and those who know and can push into a corner, that's why we are in this situation. However, my grandmother is 68 years old and has a huge library that continues to expand more and more to this day. He's not afraid to get an education and he's a great person, so don't be afraid, it's useful, and you're not that old - you're 50. Then we would certainly have a constructive conversation, beyond the topic of "glasses", which was so pointlessly interesting to you.

   27, let me guess, K-pop?

   Number 26, another provocation that I will devote my time to, not because of you, but because I know that the site is read by many people and it is wrong to deceive them in this way, provoking them to make unhealthy choices (for people who have decided that this would really "cure" them) First, if the pills you so frivolously advertised were a little effective, they would be sold in pharmacies, or at least a serious legitimate institution or organization would stand behind their promotion. However, the institutions, especially the health ones, are on the polar opinion of your proposal. It is time to mention that the World Health Organization almost 30 years ago excluded homosexuality from the international classification of diseases (you can find out how adequate your thinking is by comparing it with this fact). Second, attempts to " to figure out how wrong you are focusing all your energy instead of trying to do good for someone. I don't know how you live with yourself and all the hatred, honestly. When you can't help it, at least stop aggressively harming and spreading false information that you don't believe in yourself.

   Number 32, mentioning the WHO, I immediately recognized you from the previous topic of homosexual adoption. Since you had admitted there that you were the opposite, we can safely say that your opinion is not objective, because you would support any nonsense in favor of the opposite. Tell me, how are you sure the things are true? Not that they are true, there is just a benefit for you. "Homosexuality is not a disease because, you see, there was no cure." Well, it still has diseases for which there is no effective cure, such as AIDS. Yes, there is a life-sustaining treatment, but no cure has been found to kill the virus. Does this mean that AIDS or HIV are not diseases because "attempts have been made to cure them, but no drugs have been found to eradicate them"? Amy not very clear. Not to mention the acronym for HIV ... not to mention that homosexual intercourse and sexual intercourse lead to a much higher risk of sexually transmitted diseases if condoms are not used. Yes, this also applies to indiscriminate heterosexual contacts, but there the chance is less. You may be right that homosexuality cannot be cured, so it is better to prevent and prevent it. Unfortunately, nowadays it is impossible to protect everyone, because everywhere it is trumpeted that it is normal to be the other way around. These vulgarities ruin children and destroy family values, raise perversions to a pedestal, and give them the appearance of "something good." It may be convenient for you to assume that being the other way around is not a disease, because many patients do not want to admit that they are ill. But for us heterosexuals, it's not pleasant to watch gay parades, to allow you to "make children gender neutral" and to legalize perversions. Because same-sex intercourse is against nature and cannot be for the better. If it were not against nature, then it would be possible for the opposite to multiply with each other in a natural way. There is no such way without an intermediary. And by the way, because you refer to statistics and writings on the Internet, here's something interesting. In the so-called Lierral countries, where children are taught tolerance and gender neutrality (Sweden, the Netherlands, Iceland, etc.), the number of suicide attempts is the highest today, because there young people experience an existential crisis due to mental illness. BOOM from "learning that gender is not a natural thing, but a social status". Here is some material on the topic: https: // www. webcafe. bg / lifecafe / zhivotat / id_1838879746_Momche_ili_momiche _-_ TO_shte_pretseni The only advice I can give to people reading on the subject is to ask what is really going on in countries where same-sex marriage and gay adoption are legalized. And in general, those countries where you are obliged to "sympathize with the opposite", because while defending their rights, our rights remain forgotten. Real statistics created by psychologists and sociologists, much more knowledgeable on the subject than we can, can show you the result of over-tolerance, and it is more valuable than the decrees of the World Health Organization or the American Association, etc. No. I expect many people to understand what I am saying or to share my opinion. I'm sure you'll accept it as hate, but you have to accept that not everyone can agree with you.

   №29 You didn't understand what I wrote at all, but it's good to praise your grandmother, well done! I did not say that I am not educated on other topics, but that it is too late for me to be educated on the TOPIC / homosexuality /, I am not afraid, maybe I am simply not sexually attracted to my gender, I think it is too late for me to turn the thread . I'm glad for your grandmother that she is well educated on homosexuality, most likely she had impulses to enrich her sex life with a friend of hers. But isn't a whole library of books on homosexuality too much for her?

   Number 33, it would be very nice if you read comment 16 in this thread. There I set aside a paragraph specifically for you to comment on your false confidence to know about the topic. I also attached the link in case you forgot the nonsense you shared. In the same comment, I described homosexuality in animals, which refutes your argument that this is contrary to nature. There are also many theories and publications in support of the fact that nature NEEDS homosexuality to reduce overproduction, to prevent overpopulation with one species. And here nature has found its solution, it knows its job, the problem remains your hatred and fears. Also, dear 33, I do not know why you continue to reject everything proven in front of world-renowned institutions and continue to live in your fictional world. Your example that HIV was also incurable is very stupid, darling, because HIV has not been declared normal, but is a disease. I don't even understand in what connection you tried to make the comparison, there is no logic (like most of your statements in principle). I want to emphasize to you that after reading in detail the article (which you can see attached in comment 16) and the authors from whom information is borrowed from the book that is advertised in it, I finally realized how little your word costs. You don't even deserve what I'm writing right now, but I do it because of the people who are looking for themselves and because the site still has good traffic and it's worth promoting adequate information. You pointed out that I am interested in statistics and readings on the Internet .. wasn't it you who in the previous topic assured me what "variable statistics" you read and what psychologists. However, based on the facts, I came to the conclusion that it did not matter what we read. I can't end with anything but: YOU ARE FUNNY!

   Hello, dear number 35! I see that again you have misunderstood neither my previous nor my current words. In the last topic I wrote to you that "statistics are not a reliable source of information because they are variable", so I do not believe in the sources you quote me. But you kept insisting that I had "not read anything on the subject" and asked me "where did I read the things in question that I am writing." Only when I sent you a counter-argument material of yours, then you remembered that not everything written on the net is true. Not for nothing, just nowadays people think that in order for something to be true, it must be written and read from somewhere. Stupid idea, but anyway. No, I'm not the one referring to the changing statistics, while your mercy claimed that "I almost didn't read anything on the subject at all." E, as you can see I have read, but only when I sent you some articles, you remembered that "maybe not everything written on the net is true" I believe in things that correspond to what is heard and seen, so one knows which scripture to reject and what to accept. Or so it should be. I'm not saying that "it doesn't matter what we read," it matters what we trust. :) And as we have already understood, there are other ways to understand the truth. But for many people, it is a matter of perspective. Except that the facts (which you keep talking about) do not depend on our opinion, on what we write or read. They are facts. Here I expect you to counterattack me immediately that "you have presented the facts, and I refuse to believe them that your opinion is much more correct and that the truth weighs before my ignorance" (as your intelligent person would put it). And no, I do not believe in bribery organizations that manipulate humanity behind false nobility. Don't get me wrong, I have nothing against you personally. But gay ideology has long gone beyond borders. Heterosexuals are also fighting for what we are, and it is not at all pleasant for some of us to have some human rights revoked in favor of the opposite. You should remember what I'm talking about, you still live abroad. You say that homosexuality arises in order to prevent high birth rates and overpopulation. Come to think of it now, nature usually "takes care" of these things through disasters. Well, if we assume that homosexuality is a natural phenomenon, in this line of thought it turns out to be a "natural disaster." And natural disasters can be "for good", but they also do a lot of damage. Not to mention that there are other phenomena, which "prevent overpopulation of the Earth," such as disease or murder. AIDS is also said to have been created artificially in order to reduce the population so as not to overpopulate the planet. Yes, but can we say that this terrible disease is "for good"? The killings are also declining, are they for the better? Let us tolerate them then, in order to "protect nature." (No, dear, that doesn't mean I don't care about the cleanliness of the environment and the balance of society, quite the opposite! Unnatural things don't lead to a good result.) Also, notice the conditions under which homosexuality occurs! In moments when an individual of the opposite sex is missing. That is, the imbalance leads to this phenomenon. Something abnormal or inharmonious leading to this phenomenon ... what more can I say? And something a little off topic. "My word" or "someone's word" can "cost" something (or nothing) in making promises and keeping promises, not in ordinary arguments and discussions. I would like to say that you are funny to me, or that I feel sorry for you, but the truth is that I am not at all funny when I see how far the manipulations of the movements of gender and extreme feminists have gone. I feel sorry for the people who are subject to this manipulation. And if you remember what I wrote earlier, my problem is not with your sexual orientation, but with all this propaganda and this global hypocrisy, which still hurts. I know, I know dear, you don't think so! By the way, I see that you took to heart what we wrote in the previous topic, that you even memorized and analyzed my comments. I don't know what to say, except for a big "I'm flattered!" "Although I shouldn't because I know that in principle the opposite you are quite sensitive natures. I'm not saying it badly, I've just noticed that it is so. I wish you good health in the United States, if you understand me! Now I stop so as not to spam this topic. However, the author needs advice, not our "discussions". Goodbye!

   And just to add something, number 35. Something went wrong. Comment number 7 was NOT written by me. Another person thought of me.

   To number 7 I just read your comment. I see that we are quite similar as a way of thinking and even as a statement. And yes, I agree that young people are most susceptible to this "fashion" and this manipulation. And I'm against gay parades and all this ostentation. P. p. Don't take offense at number 16/32, he confused you with me. Obviously why. :) I stop myself. From number 33

   So, I apologize for writing this huge firman, but I can't wait for my previous comments to be published. This one may not be approved, but I will take the risk. Dear numbers 16, 32, 35, only now I read what you wrote in this topic and I noticed how many mistakes you made. In principle, I did not intend to pay attention to your provocations, because only one line written by you kills some urticaria on my body. First of all, I want to thank you for opening me up to George Rickers. I wasn't really familiar. But this is not compromising for me, but for you. Apparently, the man was ashamed of his sexuality, so he wanted to "cure" himself, but he did not succeed. Not to mention that his methods of treatment were quite wrong and perhaps the hidden goal was not to heal, but to turn people into homo. Second, only now did I see how you came across comments numbers 7 and 26. I want to emphasize that they were NOT written by me. I don't see how vicious and hateful there is in comment number 7. The lady in question wrote, "that she has nothing against reversals, but against excessive ostentation and even has a gay friend." So where is the malice? Where is the hatred? According to her friend, this is the opposite of the imbalance, ie her sources of information are from a person with first-hand experience. Maybe you should "educate" him on the subject. I didn't write this about LSD either, and I don't believe it's true, because the drug is also harmful and it's not a good idea to advertise it. The same goes for homosexuality. Third, he had asked me what the connection was between AIDS, HIV, and the topic of gays. Well the connection is as follows. No cure has yet been found for these diseases. For many diseases there were no pre-advances in medicine. But they are physical and easy to detect, while mental ones are difficult to analyze and even harder to treat because many people do not know they have them and do not recognize it. And when we add the manipulation that "homosexuality is normal," no one will be cured of it. But the fact that there is no cure does not mean that it is not a disease. Just because the treatments were wrong doesn't mean it's not a disease! And no, I don't care what the WHO and the American Association say. America as a country has long since lost my respect. Dear, in principle I do not like to give advice, but I would give you a very valuable one. Do not rush to quarrel with anyone who does not sympathize with the opposite! By doing so, you are greatly compromising your "ability to understand and empathize with others," which he boasted of in the previous discussion. In fact, most gays are like that, and that's exactly the problem with the opposite. You want understanding, tolerance and empathy, but you do not give the same to others. In reality, you discriminate against us and do not tolerate when "it is not yours". This cannot be "forgiven" by anyone. You claim to be fighting for equality, but in fact you want supremacy over heterosexuals. That's why you are hated. Primitive theories that "homosexuality is genetically inherited" are a pathetic attempt at deception. "... I will say more because you have suggested that this is an imbalance, that there is no scientifically valid data, that a person acquires his sexual orientation or gender identity due to various social factors ..." - this to comment number 7. Sorry dear to me, but that sounds like complete nonsense to me! By nature we are born with an attraction to the opposite sex, but social factors affect our psyche and this forms any identity. That's why "modern psychologists and writers" want to transform our notion of "sex" by "proving that sex is not a biological fact, but a social status." This "intention" is, in the words of an acquaintance of mine, who is engaged in placing these wrong ideas. You yourself have pointed out that homosexuality can occur situationally, so it is not genetic, but a consequence of a social factor. How much contradiction and misunderstanding, I have no words ... Learn to think! Besides, humiliating man to an animal is stupid and wrong. Even immoral. Aren't you a fan of Sigmund Freud? The creator of one of the greatest deceptions in psychology. Remember psychoanalysis, according to which Libido determines our actions and it turns out that "man is an irrational being, completely subject to instincts and instincts." By this logic, we are no different from animals and can have sex with them. Emmy I don't like zoophilia, thanks! You can read a little about Freud's biography and his fate. If you are interested in psychology, I would recommend that you read more classical literature on the subject, rather than modern fiction and deception. Or rather, I recommend it to others because you are already "lost". Before, it was not so difficult to study the human psyche, because society was not so sick. Nowadays, we are all "harmed" by non-verbal violence and the compulsion to accept perversions as normal. As one of my university professors said, “We are mentally raped by a sick society, in which we live. We have to accept violence and perversions as normal since we are children, which makes it possible for the opposite to rule us. They are looking for a way to brainwash children and make them like them. This is their way of "multiplying. “. I will not mention his name because the site is anonymous. "... I finally realized how little your word costs. "Honey, why are you acting like I owe you something? Most reversals demonstrate just such behavior. You think that: -everyone owes you everything; -you are all victims and misunderstood; -everyone else discriminates against you; -all others are limited and uneducated; Well, the truth is that no one is obliged to accept or like you. Besides, it seems to me rather foolish to call anyone "limited" or "uneducated" who does not support your ideology. Not to mention that you discriminate against others and imagine that everyone is obliged to like you. This is not so! You seek the care and support of others to gain rights, and then you abuse those rights. The gay parade is unnecessary ostentation and is like "praising the homo-idea as a value." No thanks! As a matter of fact, most of the opposite are aggressive towards others and are much more vicious than young ladies in a cycle. Subtle, overly sensitive, "eternal victims", well what can I tell you ... it's hard not to hate you personally! Communicating with you is quite stressful for me, which is why I have decided not to allow such people within my reach. Because he called me "evil" many times, I can only answer that in one way. Herbel laughed at Sturbel! Look at how much time you spent on our discussion, that you even confused other people with me! And I had even forgotten you! Take a look at the vicious "greetings" with which you end your comments! Your complexes were evident even before you admitted that you were gay! You don't even have to study psychology to find out. Typical behavior of the opposite, dare I say. Your mentality is unbearable for most normal people. That's why you don't fit into society. However, I also have known the opposite, which is the real reason I became "homophobic". Before I met them, I supported them - irony? They demonstrate the same pattern of behavior and no one can tolerate them. True, there are exceptions, but they are few. ".... It is ridiculous to claim that those who do not define themselves as part of the LGBTI community are defined as homophobic, I advise you to read the meaning of the word. And if you call it an attempt to enforce our struggle for equal rights, our attempts to stop discrimination, stigmatization, oppression of LGBTI people, let it be the norm, let respect between people be the norm. That's why we make parades to increase the visibility of our highly marginalized community, in this way we are democratically fighting against hatred ... "- again to comment number 7 We all know the definition of the word and that's why we are not called homophobes but other uneducated enthusiasts stick this label on us. You have to blame them, not us. "Homophobia" is "fear of the opposite" and "hatred of the opposite". Most true homophobes are not ashamed to be. Unlike the opposite, who are even secretly ashamed of themselves, and hide behind false homophobia, as you yourself have noticed. An example of this is George Rickers. And no, I will not refute this aspect of your writings, because there is a dose of truth. But that doesn't mean "every homophobe is a hidden gay." So if you "say you hate the opposite, you're gay"? Egati and science, your apology! Your inferiority complexes have been proven by your inability to tolerate criticism. You even looked for information to compromise my words. And he had accused me of mania ... Typical behavior of the opposite, most behave like that! You may not believe it, but the argument with you confirmed my opinion to the contrary, instead of changing it. I am not malicious, dear, nor unhappy. I am normal and I am grateful to my parents for this, as well as to fate. I don't know why you feel the need to "punish" anyone who doesn't like you. Be who you are, but don't force it on others! I like my "fictional world" much more than our damaged social system. You really are right that I hate the world we live in. Because this world is a parody of the public, a carnival of perversions. A constant gay parade ... Gay parades are too ostentatious. You say you want equality, but when you did a straight parade, you were all jealous that "it was a show." So you don't want equality, you want supremacy, just like feminists. That's why people hate you. One of the most visible proofs of the harm of homosexuality is written in the Bible of Satan. It explicitly states that "one must indulge in innumerable vices, including homosexual inclinations." I am not a fanatic or religious, but I am sad that Christian and family values ​​have been forgotten. It is clear what the goal is - a decline in morality and control over fools. The sad thing is that this is happening. Nikola Nikolov has written a wonderful book - "Secret Protocols", which is an interpretation of the "Protocols of the Sages of Zion" where the Rothschilds' plans for manipulating society are. The means is to preach false ideals and indulge in indiscriminate sexual "pleasures," which normal people call "perversions." By the way, I want to share two theories that I have heard personally from psychologists. One states that "homosexuality arises as a result of complexes to one's own appearance and one's own body, so one begins to feel attracted to people of the same sex to whom one wants to look like" The other states that "excessive rejection and disapproval by the opposite sex makes us resort to homosexuality. " They are quite identical and according to them the inferiority complex makes us distort our sexual affiliation. Don't be in a hurry to argue with me, dear! These are not my words! I am sending you two short films created by manipulated and misguided directors: https: // www. youtube. com / watch? v = V0DrhpnKGCM & t = 694s https: // www. youtube. com / watch? v = 5MZ4Bp8LpFk & t = 291s My personal response to these attempts at manipulation are two songs that should be banned in the United States because they are "not politically correct." https: // www. youtube. com / watch? v = _EVKy35L7MM https: // www. youtube. com / watch? v = JoNTXx_0Zdw I wish you pleasant watching and listening, dear! In the future, I do not intend to even read your jokes, because it is a pure waste of time (like any argument to the contrary). However, I will continue to defend my position, because I have that right too! It will not be bad for you, the opposite, to remember it! Goodbye and thanks for the fish! (from The Galactic Hitchhiker's Guide by Douglas Adams) which are created by manipulated and misguided directors: https: // www. youtube. com / watch? v = V0DrhpnKGCM & t = 694s https: // www. youtube. com / watch? v = 5MZ4Bp8LpFk & t = 291s My personal response to these attempts at manipulation are two songs that should be banned in the United States because they are "not politically correct." https: // www. youtube. com / watch? v = _EVKy35L7MM https: // www. youtube. com / watch? v = JoNTXx_0Zdw I wish you pleasant watching and listening, dear! In the future, I do not intend to even read your jokes, because it is a pure waste of time (like any argument to the contrary). However, I will continue to defend my position, because I have that right too! It will not be bad for you, the opposite, to remember it! Goodbye and thanks for the fish! (from The Galactic Hitchhiker's Guide by Douglas Adams) which are created by manipulated and misguided directors: https: // www. youtube. com / watch? v = V0DrhpnKGCM & t = 694s https: // www. youtube. com / watch? v = 5MZ4Bp8LpFk & t = 291s My personal response to these attempts at manipulation are two songs that should be banned in the United States because they are "not politically correct." https: // www. youtube. com / watch? v = _EVKy35L7MM https: // www. youtube. com / watch? v = JoNTXx_0Zdw I wish you pleasant watching and listening, dear! In the future, I do not intend to even read your jokes, because it is a pure waste of time (like any argument to the contrary). However, I will continue to defend my position, because I have that right too! It will not be bad for you, the opposite, to remember it! Goodbye and thanks for the fish! (from The Galactic Hitchhiker's Guide by Douglas Adams) youtube. com / watch? v = V0DrhpnKGCM & t = 694s https: // www. youtube. com / watch? v = 5MZ4Bp8LpFk & t = 291s My personal response to these attempts at manipulation are two songs that should be banned in the United States because they are "not politically correct." https: // www. youtube. com / watch? v = _EVKy35L7MM https: // www. youtube. com / watch? v = JoNTXx_0Zdw I wish you pleasant watching and listening, dear! In the future, I do not intend to even read your jokes, because it is a pure waste of time (like any argument to the contrary). However, I will continue to defend my position, because I have that right too! It will not be bad for you, the opposite, to remember it! Goodbye and thanks for the fish! (from The Galactic Hitchhiker's Guide by Douglas Adams) youtube. com / watch? v = V0DrhpnKGCM & t = 694s https: // www. youtube. com / watch? v = 5MZ4Bp8LpFk & t = 291s My personal response to these attempts at manipulation are two songs that should be banned in the United States because they are "not politically correct." https: // www. youtube. com / watch? v = _EVKy35L7MM https: // www. youtube. com / watch? v = JoNTXx_0Zdw I wish you pleasant watching and listening, dear! In the future, I do not intend to even read your jokes, because it is a pure waste of time (like any argument to the contrary). However, I will continue to defend my position, because I have that right too! It will not be bad for you, the opposite, to remember it! Goodbye and thanks for the fish! (from The Galactic Hitchhiker's Guide by Douglas Adams) t = 291s My personal response to these attempts at manipulation are two songs that should be banned in the United States because they are "not politically correct." https: // www. youtube. com / watch? v = _EVKy35L7MM https: // www. youtube. com / watch? v = JoNTXx_0Zdw I wish you pleasant watching and listening, dear! In the future, I do not intend to even read your jokes, because it is a pure waste of time (like any argument to the contrary). However, I will continue to defend my position, because I have that right too! It will not be bad for you, the opposite, to remember it! Goodbye and thanks for the fish! (from The Galactic Hitchhiker's Guide by Douglas Adams) t = 291s My personal response to these attempts at manipulation are two songs that should be banned in the United States because they are "not politically correct." https: // www. youtube. com / watch? v = _EVKy35L7MM https: // www. youtube. com / watch? v = JoNTXx_0Zdw I wish you pleasant watching and listening, dear! In the future, I do not intend to even read your jokes, because it is a pure waste of time (like any argument to the contrary). However, I will continue to defend my position, because I have that right too! It will not be bad for you, the opposite, to remember it! Goodbye and thanks for the fish! (from The Galactic Hitchhiker's Guide by Douglas Adams) In the future, I do not intend to even read your jokes, because it is a pure waste of time (like any argument to the contrary). However, I will continue to defend my position, because I have that right too! It will not be bad for you, the opposite, to remember it! Goodbye and thanks for the fish! (from The Galactic Hitchhiker's Guide by Douglas Adams) In the future, I do not intend to even read your jokes, because it is a pure waste of time (like any argument to the contrary). However, I will continue to defend my position, because I have that right too! It will not be bad for you, the opposite, to remember it! Goodbye and thanks for the fish! (from The Galactic Hitchhiker's Guide by Douglas Adams)

   Number 36-40, makes me very happy with his long novel. I can't help you with urticaria, maybe you need a dermatologist. It is possible that your body is trying to somehow get rid of the malice you hold in yourself, you need to think about it. :) I read your explanations quite briefly this time, even if I have to be honest I just looked at the huge amount of information you vomited, I guess like the previous times, it is based on your sacred "personal experience". Don't blame me for looking at your writings very superficially this time, I appreciate your efforts, but as I wrote in comment 35, you lost me. You can't toss articles found by chance on the Internet, present them as the pinnacle of evolution with "proven specialists" and at the same time turn out to be unfamiliar with reading, which you offer and throw so lightly. To this I will add that I do not intend to read your firman, because I prefer to waste my time with reliable, proven by the scientific majority information, and yours is clearly not. What's more, you lightly reject organizations that are globally recognized as the World Health Association and the American Association, and I guess you'll reject everyone else with a positive attitude toward LGBTI people. I, on the other hand, the most logical thing I can do is simply reject your OPINION and "personal experience". My attention to you was so great, because I see great hatred in you, and my noble goal was to help you get rid of it, because in this way you are harming yourself first of all (urticaria will be your least problem). Then you harm the people around you. After all your firman, I see that the cause is lost. Since in the previous topic she shared that you have gay friends, please do not be hypocritical and stop pretending to be their girlfriend. With such a person next to you, they will never feel good and accepted, stop harming them, I guess they have done you no harm. Again in the previous topic I advised you to visit a psychiatrist, because it is not right to be so hysterically excited about issues that do not directly concern you so much. With your long explanations, not only did you confirm my assumption of some kind of mania, but I already think that things are much more serious with you. If you don't take matters into your own hands after 10 years, I guess your psyche will completely collapse, because the world, no matter how much you don't want to, is moving forward and after 10 years with your beliefs it will seem like a very hostile place. Success! :)) Since in the previous topic she shared that you have gay friends, please do not be hypocritical and stop pretending to be their girlfriend. With such a person next to you, they will never feel good and accepted, stop harming them, I guess they have done you no harm. Again in the previous topic I advised you to visit a psychiatrist, because it is not right to be so hysterically excited about issues that do not directly concern you so much. With your long explanations, not only did you confirm my assumption of some kind of mania, but I already think that things are much more serious with you. If you don't take matters into your own hands after 10 years, I guess your psyche will completely collapse, because the world, no matter how much you don't want to, is moving forward and after 10 years with your beliefs it will seem like a very hostile place. Success! :)) Since in the previous topic she shared that you have gay friends, please do not be hypocritical and stop pretending to be their girlfriend. With such a person next to you, they will never feel good and accepted, stop harming them, I guess they have done you no harm. Again in the previous topic I advised you to visit a psychiatrist, because it is not right to be so hysterically excited about issues that do not directly concern you so much. With your long explanations, not only did you confirm my assumption of some kind of mania, but I already think that things are much more serious with you. If you don't take matters into your own hands after 10 years, I guess your psyche will completely collapse, because the world, no matter how much you don't want to, is moving forward and after 10 years with your beliefs it will seem like a very hostile place. Success! :)) that you have gay friends, please don't be hypocritical and stop pretending to be their girlfriend. With such a person next to you, they will never feel good and accepted, stop harming them, I guess they have done you no harm. Again in the previous topic I advised you to visit a psychiatrist, because it is not right to be so hysterically excited about issues that do not directly concern you so much. With your long explanations, not only did you confirm my assumption of some kind of mania, but I already think that things are much more serious with you. If you don't take matters into your own hands after 10 years, I guess your psyche will completely collapse, because the world, no matter how much you don't want to, is moving forward and after 10 years with your beliefs it will seem like a very hostile place. Success! :)) that you have gay friends, please don't be hypocritical and stop pretending to be their girlfriend. With such a person next to you, they will never feel good and accepted, stop harming them, I guess they have done you no harm. Again in the previous topic I advised you to visit a psychiatrist, because it is not right to be so hysterically excited about issues that do not directly concern you so much. With your long explanations, not only did you confirm my assumption of some kind of mania, but I already think that things are much more serious with you. If you don't take matters into your own hands after 10 years, I guess your psyche will completely collapse, because the world, no matter how much you don't want to, is moving forward and after 10 years with your beliefs it will seem like a very hostile place. Success! :)) don't be hypocritical and stop pretending to be their girlfriend. With such a person next to you, they will never feel good and accepted, stop harming them, I guess they have done you no harm. Again in the previous topic I advised you to visit a psychiatrist, because it is not right to be so hysterically excited about issues that do not directly concern you so much. With your long explanations, not only did you confirm my assumption of some kind of mania, but I already think that things are much more serious with you. If you don't take matters into your own hands after 10 years, I guess your psyche will completely collapse, because the world, no matter how much you don't want to, is moving forward and after 10 years with your beliefs it will seem like a very hostile place. Success! :)) don't be hypocritical and stop pretending to be their girlfriend. With such a person next to you, they will never feel good and accepted, stop harming them, I guess they have done you no harm. Again in the previous topic I advised you to visit a psychiatrist, because it is not right to be so hysterically excited about issues that do not directly concern you so much. With your long explanations, not only did you confirm my assumption of some kind of mania, but I already think that things are much more serious with you. If you don't take matters into your own hands after 10 years, I guess your psyche will completely collapse, because the world, no matter how much you don't want to, is moving forward and after 10 years with your beliefs it will seem like a very hostile place. Success! :)) stop hurting them too, I guess they didn't do anything wrong to you. Again in the previous topic I advised you to visit a psychiatrist, because it is not right to be so hysterically excited about issues that do not directly concern you so much. With your long explanations, not only did you confirm my assumption of some kind of mania, but I already think that things are much more serious with you. If you don't take matters into your own hands after 10 years, I guess your psyche will completely collapse, because the world, no matter how much you don't want to, is moving forward and after 10 years with your beliefs it will seem like a very hostile place. Success! :)) stop hurting them too, I guess they didn't do anything wrong to you. Again in the previous topic I advised you to visit a psychiatrist, because it is not right to be so hysterically excited about issues that do not directly concern you so much. With your long explanations, not only did you confirm my assumption of some kind of mania, but I already think that things are much more serious with you. If you don't take matters into your own hands after 10 years, I guess your psyche will completely collapse, because the world, no matter how much you don't want to, is moving forward and after 10 years with your beliefs it will seem like a very hostile place. Success! :)) With your long explanations, not only did you confirm my assumption of some kind of mania, but I already think that things are much more serious with you. If you don't take matters into your own hands after 10 years, I guess your psyche will completely collapse, because the world, no matter how much you don't want to, is moving forward and after 10 years with your beliefs it will seem like a very hostile place. Success! :)) With your long explanations, not only did you confirm my assumption of some kind of mania, but I already think that things are much more serious with you. If you don't take matters into your own hands after 10 years, I guess your psyche will completely collapse, because the world, no matter how much you don't want to, is moving forward and after 10 years with your beliefs it will seem like a very hostile place. Success! :))

   I immediately thought of you when I read the following information

Because life is very ironic and is not excluded despite your much "knowledge" on the subject for your children to be homosexual, please do not get there, because according to my observations you are capable. Greetings! :))

   From number 33 There may have been a link error. The films are "Pretty boy" from 2017 and "Homophobia" from 2012. Strong acting and directing, but quite ... banal plot, in my opinion. I have already commented on the ideas they present.

   I didn't say I had gay friends, but gay acquaintances. There is a difference between "friend" and "acquaintance" :)

   Dear, in the previous discussion I wrote to you that the issues we are talking about affect everyone, and that's why so many people are excited. An interesting article. I guess it was the hysteria and the mother's mental disorders that influenced the boy to become what he was. However, nothing is mentioned about her previous life. Which, again, is a kind of social factor and proves that parenting is important for these things. Otherwise, I do not approve of her act, after all, murder is an extreme and a crime. And yes, the sentence is deserved. Of course, there is a chance that if I have a child he will become one of you. After all, you are everywhere and you pass on your stupid ideology to everyone. I have no intention of pretending to be a "girlfriend" at all, I told myself that I do not want such people in my area. I said I had "gay acquaintances," not "gay friends." Just as there is a difference between "science" and "pseudoscience". If I "pretended to be a friend", would I publicly share my strong dislike for this type of people? Of course not, but how would you think. It is primitive to say that social tendencies do not affect our psyche. Of course, they have a strong influence. And sexual orientation is part of the psyche. There are other examples of abnormalities and deviations in sexuality. For example, you all know about the Oedipus complex and Electra Syndrome. This is not about homosexuality, but obviously the attitude of the parents influences our future development in every aspect. One of them is our attitude towards sex and our partner. There are many cases in which raped women are disgusted with men and become lesbians. Or cases where men who have been raped as boys "turn the thread". Sexual deviations are a kind of mental deviation and anyone who denies it is funny to me. You all know about Ancient Greece and Ancient Rome, where homosexual contact and pedophilia are perfectly normal. That's why the boys didn't intend to abuse them. So, what can we say about society? I know you wouldn't trust my experience, dear, but I'd like to share some of it. I used to have a lesbian friend. I emphasize, familiar. She told me that she was straight until she was 16-17. She was attracted to boys and men, she had a sexual desire for men. But when she decided to "become a woman," her chosen one was quite rude to her. Since then, she has become disgusted with men and switched to women, she said. The reason I stopped having contact with her was her sexual attraction to me as a woman. Well, I'm sorry but here I could not "distort my soul." Otherwise, nothing against her and I hope she found happiness. But the attitude of the opposite sex has an effect on our sexual orientation and, in part, on our consciousness of the world. This attitude is a social factor, if you think about it. Your "noble cause" needs a lot of refinement, thank you otherwise! I don't believe any of us are potentially gay by nature. See, based on the tendencies you preach, it is more possible to turn men into "women." If the opposite hadn't gone too far with their pretensions, they might not have been so hated, and it would be foolish to accuse anyone who doesn't like them of being "limited." Greetings! But the attitude of the opposite sex has an effect on our sexual orientation and, in part, on our consciousness of the world. This attitude is a social factor, if you think about it. Your "noble cause" needs a lot of refinement, thank you otherwise! I don't believe any of us are potentially gay by nature. See, based on the tendencies you preach, it is more possible to turn men into "women." If the opposite hadn't gone too far with their pretensions, they might not have been so hated, and it would be foolish to accuse anyone who doesn't like them of being "limited." Greetings! But the attitude of the opposite sex has an effect on our sexual orientation and, in part, on our consciousness of the world. This attitude is a social factor, if you think about it. Your "noble cause" needs a lot of refinement, thank you otherwise! I don't believe any of us are potentially gay by nature. See, based on the tendencies you preach, it's more possible to turn men into "women." If the opposite hadn't gone too far with their pretensions, they might not have been so hated, and it would be foolish to accuse anyone who doesn't like them of being "limited." Greetings! based on the tendencies you preach, it is more possible to turn men into "women." If the opposite hadn't gone too far with their pretensions, they might not have been so hated, and it would be foolish to accuse anyone who doesn't like them of being "limited." Greetings! based on the tendencies you preach, it is more possible to turn men into "women." If the opposite hadn't gone too far with their pretensions, they might not have been so hated, and it would be foolish to accuse anyone who doesn't like them of being "limited." Greetings!

   I have never said that social factors do not affect the psyche, stop if you like to distort everything I say and change it as you please. It is really difficult to have any kind of dialogue with a person who accepts and distorts things constantly through his sick point of view. As I found the pointless discussions with you extremely unpleasant, this will be the last time I write to you, but it was important for me to clarify that social factors affect the psyche, but not sexual orientation, at least there is no evidence to support this. statement. I don't know for what purpose you are repeating the same nonsense, maybe this time you have decided that you will be more convincing by changing my words again. I got the accusation in your farm that I humiliated man to animals. Nothing like that, darling - if you are offended to be told that you are part of the diversity of nature, I'm sorry, but that's a fact, no matter how much your ego makes sense of it. If you don't know, man is a mammal. I gave the example of animal homosexuality at the beginning of the topic, because it is very indicative of the fact that homosexuality is not influenced by "propaganda, ideologies, parades", etc. It just has it and is a natural part of the psyche and diversity. in nature, but of course you also decided to change this so that your hollow statements would look more substantiated. Here is interesting information on the subject: https://dariknews.bg/novini/liubopitno/dvojka-gej-pingvini-v-berlinskiia-zoopark-shte-stavat-roditeli-2181111 From all our long discussion I conclude for you that you are a woman who claims to be educated and knowledgeable, but in practice only your claims remain. You are neither able to adequately comprehend new information without giving it your reading, nor do you have the desire to educate yourself on issues in which you have many omissions, and you repeat the same thing as a broken gramophone, nor do you think about what your interlocutor said. I refuse to have any conversation with you because it is impossible for it to be constructive and meaningful. P.S. much "helped" the author with her troubled homophobic parents. Here you not only strengthened your position as a sick homophobe, but also confirmed my claim that you are incapable of any empathy. and you repeat the same thing like a broken gramophone, nor do you think about what your interlocutor said. I refuse to have any conversation with you because it is impossible for it to be constructive and meaningful. P.S. much "helped" the author with her troubled homophobic parents. Here you not only strengthened your position as a sick homophobe, but also confirmed my claim that you are incapable of any empathy. and you repeat the same thing like a broken gramophone, nor do you think about what your interlocutor said. I refuse to have any conversation with you because it is impossible for it to be constructive and meaningful. P.S. much "helped" the author with her troubled homophobic parents. Here you not only strengthened your position as a sick homophobe, but also confirmed my claim that you are incapable of any empathy.

   Personally, I do not hate the opposite, but I do not support them

   "... Nowhere have I said that social factors do not affect the psyche, stop if you like to distort everything I say and change it as you please. "--- comment number 47" ... I will say more because you have suggested that this is an imbalance, that there is no scientifically valid data that a person acquires his sexual orientation or gender identity due to various social factors. The scientific majority is of the opinion that this is happening in our embryonic development. “--- this in your earlier comment number 16 :) :) :) Isn't sexual orientation related to the psyche, in your opinion? This is also a primitive statement, in my opinion. Okay, wrong statement. Our sexuality is part of the dear psyche, the two are connected and it is not just about physics, biology and genitals. Sexual manifestations speak a lot about our mental state, hence it is understood that sexual perversions are a sign of deviations. There is ample evidence of this throughout human history. (Of course, for you to be "homo" is not a perversion or a deviation.) One would say that you are just looking for an excuse. You've probably heard that some psychopaths aestheticize their sick actions. Well, maybe it's the same with sexual deviations. Physical states are directly related to mental ones. And does the WHO have no scientific data on this? Homosexuality is excluded from disease under the pressure of reverse and their movements. As for the article I sent you, I read it from end to end. Here she is again. https: // dariknews. bg / regioni / varna / kak-roditelite-da-predpazqt-decata-ot-bolestta-homoseksualizym-1360800 You claimed that I was not familiar with the readings, which I send. Well, it's not like that, I read the article. I wasn't just aware that the authors of the aforementioned book "got ideas from George Rickers," nor did I know those facts about his life (not to say I'm contradictory). I have admitted this before and thank you again for opening me up! I have spoken personally with psychologists and psychologists and they claim that our mental health is very decisive for our sexuality and our attitude towards intimate partners. As well as for our selection of partners. Even intuitively one can think of this. So here's the question, "Where did you read this?" "It doesn't work for you. Although I can answer again - in psychology textbooks. There was a whole section on human sexuality and the things that could affect it. You will probably think that they are "too old editions" ... We repeat what we think is not understood. Just because I don't empathize with you or certain people doesn't mean I'm not capable at all. It's just that some people (and certain things) don't deserve it, in my opinion. However, you are not the "whole world" that my attitude towards you determines my overall attitude towards people. :) Besides, I've explained enough times "what is my problem with the opposite". "Lack of empathy" is not always the right expression when someone disagrees with you. (I'm talking in principle, not about our discussion.) My "mania" is my rebellion against what I think is wrong. Just as you have the right to defend your position, so I have that right. And just as gay parades are being described by you as a "protest against hatred," there will be counter-protests. Many people have explained that the problem is not with your difference, but with the constant intrusion. "Homophobe" for me is not an insult, but a compliment, although until recently I did not define myself that way. Ok, it's really time to end the discussion, because we spammed this topic as well. I have already left a comment-advice to the author in the above comments. I personally apologize to the girl for this argument under her subject. Author, talk to your parents about it and hope you find a common language! Try to explain to them humanly what these drawings mean to you and also discuss the issue of your personal space. Because their attitude is not quite right. They can't help but give you no right to independence. Success! I personally apologize to the girl for this argument under her subject. Author, talk to your parents about it and hope you find a common language! Try to explain to them humanly what these drawings mean to you and also discuss the issue of your personal space. Because their attitude is not quite right. They can't help but give you no right to independence. Success! I personally apologize to the girl for this argument under her subject. Author, talk to your parents about it and hope you find a common language! Try to explain to them humanly what these drawings mean to you and also discuss the issue of your personal space. Because their attitude is not quite right. They can't help but give you no right to independence. Success!

   Of course, it is part of the psyche and sexual orientation, darling, but the difference is that it is a natural component of her wholeness. It is no coincidence that there is no evidence that someone has changed their sexual orientation, just against nature, a person can not go, and should not. This is not the case with people who have suicidal thoughts, depression, anxiety, panic attacks, etc. after such reorientation therapies, and here it is clear that I do NOT deny that social factors naturally affect the psyche. Apparently, with you, things should be written in detail and as if you are stupid so that you do not make stupid interpretations of each of my words when you like. I will also clarify my statement that you are not familiar with the readings you offer. I didn't mean you didn't read your article to the end, it's clear that it was so that you could make your argument in the previous topic not so lean and I guess when you saw the article, your evil soul was inwardly happy. Well, my impression (at least in the beginning) was that once you offer such a reading and advertise a book on top of everything, you will be familiar with what you are offering. I specify (you just have to), I expected that at least you will have read the proposed book or at least you will have a little more in-depth knowledge in its entirety. Perhaps I should thank you here for showing you that you definitely lack in-depth knowledge. I must also thank you for proving my words that the articles you send are an additional argument, because your hollow personal experience could not work. You are definitely a sick, honest word to me. Search for random articles on the Internet, to look smart is weird and disturbing, definitely. The good thing is that I'm here to bring a little normalcy to things, and we realized that you're not as smart as you want to think you are. Regarding your ridiculous statement about the WHO, how did you judge that they were under pressure? !! Did they tell you? Well, I want to tell you that in addition to the fact that the WHO rejects homosexuality as a disease, in the United States more than half of the states have a federal ban on any treatment for LGBTI people because it has been shown to be ineffective and harmful. . Recently, there are such bans in Europe, in countries well ahead of Bulgaria. We in Bulgaria are still fighting for something else. Since you mentioned the psychologists again and I will dig here (this time I think I will spend more time with you :)) I will allow myself to quote you to make my remark more specific: "I have spoken personally with psychologists and people, dealing with psychology and they claim that our mental health is very decisive for our sexuality and our attitude towards intimate partners. As well as for our selection of partners. Even intuitively one can think of this. So here's the question, "Where did you read this?" "It doesn't work for you. "You probably weren't hypocritical here, and you reproduced the words of the psychologists exactly. You tried to present statements as your argument, but you exposed yourself again. There is a difference between sexuality, darling, and sexual orientation. Your familiar psychologists said nothing about sexual orientation. , and for sexuality, which is normally influenced by various social factors.The fact is that our libido decreases when we are under stress, for example.So here I agree with your statement, but I do not agree with the context in which he tried to you try it. You may ask your familiar psychologists what they think of homosexuality from a psychiatric point of view. To make it easier for you, I will answer you right away - it is not a disease. In no edition of modern psychology will you read anything other than this statement, but you still ask them. :)) In conclusion, I will say, because she called one of my statements primitive in this context: It is primitive to divide people by race, skin color, gender, sexual orientation and / or gender identity or eye color ( I list them together because they all do not depend on us and are determined before we are born). Even if they were not determined before we were born, these characteristics should not be a reason for discrimination or unequal treatment in any normal person. Even if they were acquired by various social factors, discrimination should not be directed at these marginalized communities, but at people's hatred. I personally divide people into such: good and bad. Any other type of discrimination I can safely say is caused by a lack of empathy, education, conscious thinking and kindness. I'm sorry, darling, but I can safely tell you that you are a BAD PERSON and you definitely get my discrimination.

   Up to 47 Well, it is clear that "propaganda, ideologies and parades" do not affect homosexuality itself. But many interfere with others. Obviously why! This statement was very "kring" on your part. Man is a mammal, but he is "at the top of the food chain" and is considered a rational being. If we are enslaved only to our instincts, then we are not humans, but beasts. Have you seen a "wild beast" think rationally and defend ideas, for example? You yourself have obviously chosen the primary inclinations. Animal writes in Share ..

   51, there are enough cases in which a person 'changes' his sexual orientation under the influence of external factors. The ancient Greeks, for example, took great care to 're-educate' little boys, if you understand me. Although by your logic, everyone may be born the other way around. A real gay idyll. Now I remember the movie "Quills" (The Story of the Marquis de Sade), which says that "homo-perversion is a disease that occurs in prison." Isn't the lack of an individual of the opposite sex an external social factor?

   Dear number 51, I have already talked about these things with the experts in question. I know the difference between "sexuality" and "sexual orientation", and according to psychologists, there are many factors that affect our sexual orientation. That's exactly what I dare say. You'll probably say I'm making it up. And no, the quote is not accurate, the conversations were long and wide. I have never said that parades affect homosexuality, but that they are unnecessary. That parades and ideologies themselves are the result of homosexuality and this particular consciousness of the world, so they rather depend on it. While homosexuality itself is the result of something else. There are many other conditions that affect our awareness of the world and our orientation in sex. The formation of orientation is a matter of many things. I will repeat it until the rollback. If you had read my firmans, you would have known what I was talking about. Choosing a partner is also a testament to our preferences and orientation. This situational homosexuality is also influenced by an external factor. After all, in prisons and in the armies, many men "turn the thread" because of the lack of women. Some of them "come ready", others due to this external factor become some of you. So I can't agree with the lies that are written everywhere. The same ones you show me to watch, because life and my "hollow personal experience" have already proved to me what is true and what is false. I do not divide people by race, gender or appearance, but by mentality. I have already explained in my firman why certain social groups are not to my liking. As well as certain people. It's great that you can distinguish (at least) some of the things but don't forget the connection between them. Just as there is a difference between "sexuality" and "sexual orientation," there is a connection between them. For example, a gay man will accept himself and his own sexuality quite differently from a hetero alpha male. Although, according to some, there are no such men. A reverse man can be considered the "woman" in a relationship, and a hetero is always a man. It is so obvious that there is no denying it. You'll probably get bored of knowing what the connection is, and I, the "bad poop," didn't understand anything. I highly recommend you watch Brooke Heatherley's youtube channel and his series "No bullshit", where he shows all the contradictions and double standards of the so-called Polit. Correct movements, as well as the misunderstood consciousness of most "different". When I was 12, I read a 'children's' book called "What's wrong with me?". It explained everything about the changes during puberty, sex, etc. About homosexuality, it was written that there were two types - congenital and acquired. Even assuming that there are people born that way, it is obviously quite possible to acquire. Yes, this can be done on the basis of external influences and I have already listed many examples. Besides, I still can't believe that you can be born this way, with absolutely no explanation for the reason. There is simply no logic. There are people born disabled as Emperor Caligula, but he is the fruit of incest, so there is a logical scientific explanation for his epilepsy. The whole world is under pressure from the opposite and minorities, which is why many institutions enslave them. America doesn't praise me at all because this country discriminates against heterosexual white people, which is blasphemy on the part of an institution "fighting for equality" and justice. We are not really equal, we are not born equal (especially if we accept your words as true), we do not develop equally in any aspect of things, so there is no way for everyone to be equal in everything in any way. Even in nature there is a hierarchy of what is left for people and social movements. Now you will probably take my words and be jealous that I contradict myself on the subject of the innate and the acquired. Therefore, I will hasten to clarify that the above paragraph applies to everything, not just the topic of the opposite. It's very funny to me to call a "bad person" someone who doesn't support your distorted pseudo-scientific ideas. You sound like a little girl. I wouldn't be surprised even before they told you ... In the future, don't take everything so literally, don't take it upon yourself to expose yourself somewhere. :) :) :) Since I have been reproached by my hatred many times, I will tell you that I have nothing to hate you for. However, you are not regrettable, because most of the reverse are looking for just that. Bye!

   What can I tell you ... I am gay and have been living with my partner for several years, but I never thought that same-sex marriages should be legalized. However, everyone can live their life as they see fit, without being included in any text of the law and showing their preferences in any parades. It is true that society does not ... look kindly on the different, but perhaps they are the ones who must perceive it as it is so that others can begin to perceive it.