It's ugly, because every time they approve the requirements, even if they increase it by only 10 euros and you pay her lawyer's fee, and in the end you accumulate an amount of over 1200 euros only for fees and fees.
In reality, it insures that the maintenance is in black and white, and if you agree with each other, there will be nothing.
Just find a good lawyer who wants proof of the grounds on which he wants an increase, because if there isn't one, they won't increase it.
The bad thing is that the minimum wage is now raised every year and if you pay a minimum wage this is a reason to raise it
Well, why doesn't he tell you to pay them directly, don't they give them to you? Children are watched with money, 300 euros are nothing. To a person who is not spent, to be alone.
Appeal attorney's fees, and anything beyond the amount of support. Collect the court decisions and show them to the children the next time and tell them that instead of them, the money went to a stranger named a lawyer.
It's probably not a lot of fun for her either, but she thinks she has no choice if she wants to have security with maintenance. Why don't you agree in court directly for an amount higher than the minimum, so that you don't have to sue you again next year for a minimum increase? The money goes to your children anyway ...
Even often women lawyers there are looking for clients, of course they will inspire to sue constantly ...
from the author: in one sentence I have not finished - one topic can only be discussed with her - she has not used a lawyer and wants to and is quite confused. and for the agreement it would be notarized. she rather envies that I have a serious relationship. and I don't stop working to afford a lawyer. raising the minimum wage is a sufficient argument. this time I will go to the meeting.
Author, if you are conscientious and love and look after the children, you will not have a problem. I will give you a ridiculous example: when Ivan (from Ivan and Andrei) was divorcing his wife, she was jealous of his new relationship, just like you and wanted a lot of money for the child. He doubted that she intended to support herself with this money and gave her 300 euros with the explicit stipulation that all receipts to prove that the maintenance was used for the child would be with him at the end of the month. (In an interview with Karbovski years ago, Ivan himself spoke about the case). She also forbade him to see her child, but in time things got better. If all this is pure jealousy with you, it will pass. There are all kinds of cases. Without a court, it is always better for the extra money from lawyers to go to the children, but once you get there ... Can't you negotiate with your wife through some intermediary, even an informal one? You are parents first and foremost and you will still have to talk about children.
I don't know the author, why don't you try to understand her. He put himself in her place for just a moment. She looks after two of your children with the modest help of you in the amount of 305 euros per month, and until a month ago with a little help. At the same time, you, as a parent, not only do not take care of the children who are half yours, but you are cunning to insure yourself on the minimum wage only to pay a low amount for the upbringing and comfort of your children, and you allow yourself pleasures that you could not afford if your real income was the minimum wage. It is unlikely that if you had 168 euros per month, you would be able to establish a relationship with a new woman, so this money would not be enough just to eat.
Sit down and think real 305euros for two children is just their food, expect the former to bear all their other expenses and stop fighting for the 10euros giving children more.
There is no way to stop her from renewing lawsuits for money, unless you decide in the next lawsuit to offer to pay, for example, 250 euros per child and she has no option to sue you for the legal part of the minimum wage. You have a second option, fight for custody and look after your children, and let her pay maintenance, see how it is and wouldn't you judge for BGN 10 more if you are wondering how to cover their needs with the money you have.
But when I read you, your main idea is how to get thinner financially, for the children you don't care how much, you take them "when I can", and you don't fight to be with them as often as possible, for them to be well, to have the material things they need to grow. If you care at all, you give there the minimum that the court has sentenced you to and they will get better.
You are angry about the money given by lawyers, but if she does not agree to an agreement, you probably do not trust that you will keep agreements and promises. And alone with two children it is difficult to live with low income and it is almost impossible to start a high income job. You say "I don't stop working", and do you think that she doesn't stop taking care of your children and that's why she can't stop working like you?
Why don't you offer her more support if you can find lawyers, so you have children. If they relied on 150 euros a month to cover half their expenses, they would quickly die of starvation and cold. These are your children, man, you are responsible for them being well. With 300 euros a month, no child is well.
I was just wondering how no one had called yet and number 8 denied me.
You don't know what the situation is, number 8. In many cases, the wife takes the home, even when she is with her husband, at least until the children are 18 years old. By law she owes rent, guess if there is a judge to allow the law to be enforced. This mother has a bunch of protections from the state, we don't know the real situation with this person, but you rushed to defend. Well, if the blame for the divorce was hers or she divorced at her request, I don't see why she's not ready to take responsibility for her decision. At the same time, the mother usually wants revenge on the man and restricts contact with the children, thus creating a "parental alienation syndrome" - officially defined as a mental state, but unwilling to alienate the man from commitments to himself.
10 The woman does not take any housing! The children use the apartment until they turn 18! In reality, both the mother and the father can take parental rights and live with the children in the family home.
If she was so guilty of the divorce, it is even easier for the author to take parental rights, and if the divorce is at her request, you should think about what motivates the desire for divorce in a mother of two children, and not to put all the blame for the divorce on her. . Do you understand, dear and kind man, she bore him two children and divorced at her request, and now sues him regularly for maintenance in a minimum amount and renews cases for 10 euros per child per month, so out of badness she takes care of the children and fights for the 10 euros they deserve by law, and out of kindness he gives 300 euros a month for two children, creates a new family and sees his children "when he can", ie. when he is having fun.
I'm 10
The children use the apartment, but together with their mother, who by law owes rent. Usually such claims are denied in court. I do not comment on the ethics of both those who want and those who refused. Taking parental rights of a mother in Bulgaria is almost a lost cause - it must be a proven alcoholic, unemployed or other extreme condition, not to mention that most judges are women and will always stand by her side. As for the motives for divorce - a long topic, but in principle it is beyond the one we are arguing about, and it is why he is suing him non-stop. Which is wrong and which is wrong in this case is irrelevant. But information creeps in that explains such behavior - the person has a different relationship. And that motivates the former in my opinion. As for MU who gave birth to two children, if so, give her MU. When I buy my wife's coat, I don't wear it. It is a favorite female expression, it shows an attitude that speaks more than many other things. The children belong to both, the father owes alimony, but according to the law and his abilities. If a woman cares about the children and their relationship with their father, she can always send him an invitation for a mediator first and there they can agree out of court, but I don't know a woman who did it, they like to show strength over the other. through the court. Most fathers after a normal conversation and a reasonable proposal would not refuse to help their children. But it's different to say proud - I condemned him. You are aware that from the very first case she has guaranteed herself the minimum of the law and nothing above it, which the father would otherwise have given. My wife gave me 600 euros a month and all the bills. He decided to sue me to show me who was driving the train. Now I drive the train with 160 euros a month, I don't pay anything outside of them. What did she gain? There is no difference for the child - I dress him, take him out, he is not deprived of anything, but she has to work twice as hard to have the same life.
1 amywhitenessxx answered