"Yes, but it's not like that." He said and cut off ... I'm glad when a woman asks a question (which is a rare phenomenon, most "know everything"), but when a topic is discussed, arguments are needed ... Do you understand? Let's return to the topic of birds and bees ... The male reproductive organ generates gametes called sperm. And it generates them, as if there is no tomorrow, huge quantities and into old age. That is, a man, if he wants, can have thousands of children, literally ... That's why ... obviously his biological strategy for reproduction is to have sex with as many women as possible. This is already a FACT because there are arguments. Conversely, women have an exact number of gametes, and at some point the tap turns. That's why women generally try to catch a man who is the best party. Don't talk to me about love and other fantastic stories - that's how both sexes work, because ultimately everyone is selfish. Love does not make us less selfish - on the contrary - bigger. It just seems superficial that you are doing something for someone else, but in reality you are doing it again for yourself ... Why don't women complain that "they don't lack male attention". And why do they think so? Because they are great as a character and people :)? C ... because of what I wrote above - your gamete is more valuable than ours, and therefore sex for men is "cheap", for you it is "expensive". That's why they are looking for you, but with that there is the other side - it's not just you. These same men revolve around at least a few dozen other women. And whether we like it or not, this is the "balance of power". The woman's strength is to make herself inaccessible, the man's is that he can break. The opposite is not true. If a woman makes sex "cheap", yes, she becomes a whore because she denies the value of her own biology, the egg she has. These simple lessons, unfortunately, are no longer taught in school, they make them transsexual there ... That's why they once invented something called marriage. He is not part of "love", he is part of the responsibility you take on the other and on society. Looking at you is one thing, but getting to infidelity is another. One is biology, the other is choice. The question nowadays is which choice weighs. To take the responsibility and the shortcomings of being in a relationship, or to play the trick, and when it passes - pass. Marriage is not for everyone, it is also a fact. The problem is that exactly those for whom it is not, ruined it, so that it does not happen for those to whom it suits. So I will agree with your final conclusion, that nowadays, if you want a stable relationship, there is no way, and a person better to be alone. But the problem is far from who cares about his eyes, but the lack of psychological attitude to be with someone else responsibly, for something more, out of fun. Because what really happens is that the fun ends at some point, and from just staring, you move on to the next stage. And this applies to both sexes. Today's women do not have enough of one man, they are always looking for a better offer, or if there is no such, at least something new for variety. moves on to the next stage. And this applies to both sexes. Today's women do not have enough of one man, they are always looking for a better offer, or if there is no such, at least something new for variety. moves on to the next stage. And this applies to both sexes. Today's women do not have enough of one man, they are always looking for a better offer, or if there is no such, at least something new for variety.
1 realjknoxville answered
Very stupid question, if I'm with one I don't need others ... but apparently there are only animals around you.