Skip to content
Movie Reviews

Duelyant Review (Production Drama, 2016)

Last updated June 13, 2020
Learn more about the movie "Duelyant" released in 2016. Honestly review and critics. Is it worthing to watch "Duelyant"?
1
section

Duelyant - Storyline, Actors And Ratings

The movie "Duelyant" is a Production Drama production.

IMDB rated the movie with 5.8 / 10.

According to Google Users - 85% of the people watched the movie liked the story.

Director: Alexey Mizgirev

Actors: Pavel Tabakov, Yuri Kuznetsov, Sergey Garmash, Yuri Kolokolnikov, Alexander Yatsenko, Peter Fedorov, Vladimir Mashkov, Julia Hlynina, Francis Petri, Martin Wuttke, Dmitry Lysenkov

Duelyant has been produced with the budget of Budget: $ 11 million, Charges in Russia: $ 6 million. My hero is obsessed with a high goal. Of course, this is a story of revenge and the path to oneself. When I read the script, it immediately seemed to me that this was all about me. What we are talking about on the screen worries me. I would like to be like my character.

Starring Peter FedorovPlus - well-thought-out - almost half of the text is pronounced in German. The steroids 'historical reality' comes to life from this speech, it becomes - this is a paradox - absolutely understandable and consecrated. Mizgirevskaya riskiness, excitement made of “Duelist” something much more than just a good and fascinating film. He began the history of mass cinema from scratch. He showed an alternative way.

The types in the film are spelled out very vividly, even somewhat posteriorly, and represent the opposition, immediately fraught with conflict: wave and stone, ice and flame, honor, and meanness. The exalted and romantic craving for conflict is the very essence of the era, very accurately captured in the film. And those who do not agree should be called to a duel. Katya Zagvozdkina A detailed review of the cat BagelFrom such a concentration of honor in one place, I already nearly fell asleep all over.

2
section

Duelyant Review

By about this film a lot of writing and talked long before his exit. The A powerful Russian blockbuster; Film Year there will be a world premiere; Will Showing in Toronto; arthouse director, winner of "Kinotavra" and "Minotaur" And Bucentavra; Huge budget gangster Petersburg, no stranger Notions of honor; the century before and all Is. In short, Guy Ritchie with his Sherlockholmes Nervously smoking!

For the film, delighted in articles, director Gizgirev found and bought In Europe, real old duels Guns. How many people have shot these weapons, written with delight authors of articles, how much blood we've seen the old muzzles! But the director wanted to see the actors a real, unimagined world.

For this picture, they wrote in the articles, Vladimir Mashkov learned to ride Bike. Two months of stress Effort. Because the bike is old, can only drive in a straight line, and for the plot was extremely important to the hero Mashkova didn't go in a straight line - he's not like that. Straight man!

Peter Fedorov, after reading the script, immediately realized that's about him! He wanted to be similar to his character, he's two months before the shooting, he killed people in duels, to understand what he thinks and feels it hero, and a two-liter bread wine a day. Oh, though, it seems to be the same They didn't write.

In general, I was waiting for this picture with a Great Look. No matter what, I'm still I'm rooting for Russian cinema. I'm worried about Him. It is clear, of course, that in Russia removed a wild amount of all sorts junk and that's often on set just stupidly laundered money, but sometimes so it's nice to get caught happy exception when you see that They can do it! It can be extremely rare but still happens.

(Epic.) And I waited for the exit of this movie, and I watched it. And I was in greatly perplexed, for, on my View, Mizgirev had some kind of Its complete set.

Script this movie is so delightful idiotic, stupid and ridiculous, that I would not refuse myself in the pleasure of making a brief outlining for those who have this movie or already looked, or vice versa, not going to look. The rest of the text below is better not to read, because it, of course, contains top-secret officer information honor and high spirits.

In the film itself, the events set out somewhat chaotically -- well, it and Understandably, it is necessary to catch up with the fog. But I'll give you it's all set out clearly, slenderly and in order From egg to chicken.

***

So. When hereditary nobleman Kolychev (Peter Fedorov) was a young man, with a curly head, then he is, as it should be aristocrat of the time, went to the hussars. And here kolychev once sat in officer's meeting, eating the bullseye with vodka, and there was a ranting someone Count Beklemishev (Vladimir Mashkov) - the identity is dark and suspicious. That's what I'm doing not to mention the fact that no one knew why Beklemishev, not being an officer, sits in an officer's meeting.

It the graphic count was broadcasting that, they say, all officers must fight in a duel. For without this officer will not be an officer, but a dog deadly. Young and hot Kolychev retorted to the Count himself that not all such beasts like him, and some poetically soar, have a soul as tender as a flower, that's why they don't want to fight in a duel. (What, note, particularly touching sounded in officer's mouth, which Kolychev, unlike Mr. Earl, just as he was.)

No Count Beklemeshev objected, since you - a nobleman, you have the honor. And the honor requires blood -- it's you aristocrat will say, at least at night his Wake.

"No one will force me to shoot!" said Kolychev proudly, junior lieutenant, young guy, the sworn-in king of the father-in-one that he's going to shoot someone who The bosses will point out.

Here Count Beklemeshev has built a Hulu on the glorious Kolychev's mother, but even then the youngest lieutenant didn't shoot the count, he said, that such a pig doesn't deserve a bullet, but deserves to be beaten with sticks and further withering in order to obtain health-healthy ham.

Count, they also tried not to shoot Kolychev, but they promised that the junior lieutenant will greatly regret disrespect that he showed by the attitude towards the count, without shooting him for offensive words about Mother Jr. Lieutenant.

Junior lieutenant's gone, and the count of the rest officers commanded "Fire!" and these decent people have become struggling throw apples at a woman standing at the walls: it is just such fun to be taken At the officer's club.

After this count took under the arm of his clover Juncker, and offered him to visit Kolychev's mother to abuse her. You know, Junker. He just comes to the old house aristocratic surname, abused over the beautiful madame aristocrat - then it was fashionable.

However, characteristically, Kolychev, upon learning that The Ostrich had abused his mother, disapproved of his behavior, erupted and shot Junker right on the street, without even going to the front room.

Count Beklemishev announced Kolychev's police unit, followed by Kolycheva stripped of the noble title, condemned as the killer, they put a thousand spitzrutens on him and exiled by a simple soldier to the Aleutian Islands where the king-father is fire and sword subdued the audacious Aleuts.

And Kolychev's abused mother when she declared a man of low origin, could not stand the shame and threw herself out of the window right onto the pavement. Her face twisted to one side, her nose and lips moved, the ear fell into the skull, left hand to snore - in half, right hand I'm shooting in half, that's what these the pavement is driven.

On Kolychev hosted the Aleutian Islands cold baths, and the shaman-aletoka treated suffering by popular means and even spoke of the bullet, shaking magic scraper and scraping it Kolychev's scraper.

Kolychev cured, scurs edited the dead man's documents Officer Yakovlev and began to impersonate Him. He returned to Peter and as it south of the aristocrats, began to perform With circus tricks: a shot from the belly Kolychev made a magic ricochet, who's been stitching anything but parts of Mr. Kolychev's body.

Also, Kolychev dreamed of returning his last name lost noble dignity, for what was saving money to make it a nobility, As usual in the Russian Empire, buy with bribes to the officials: Well, you know, honor and dignity are the same It's expensive.

But such money for a bribe by one circus is not earned, so Kolychev took Earnings: Commissioned by the mysterious Kolychev's men participate in duels instead of other people and duel ingress these certainly wins, as his the shaman-aletok spoke. True, bullets it gets into it at times, but they themselves clog an artery or even spank in the images that Kolychev recalls the abused mother- You can't kill kolychev's way.

Besides, he's like a horse, and that contributes to the fact that no bullet-incurable infection in Kolychev did not Delay.

However impersonating Yakovlev Harder and harder: Brother Yakovleva raised the issue of Kolychev in officers' assembly -- they say, it's an impostor posing as his late brother. But Kolychev quickly found a way to provide strong evidence: he's playing right in the meeting with his brother. Yakovleva in Russian roulette - one a six-shot cartridge. After a couple of blank shots brother Yakovleva concludes that Kolychev - It's brotherly, in kind!

But apart from the goal of restoring their honor and Kolychev's good name also faces a challenge to deal with the old enemy - Count Bechlemish, a tweed, by an order which was abused by his mother and Kolychev's honor was lost. What Kolychev prevents you from meeting Mr. Earl somewhere in the alley and shoot him in the forehead - It's not known for sure, but apparently it's the case. it would be too easy.

Then Kolychev clicks on a vile German Baron (Martin Wuttke), who brings him orders for a duel, and he admits that the orders are just from Beklemishev and Come.

Was that the count had long missed the parent inheritance and estate, so that lives on the contents of the great princess Alexandra Josephovna (Francisa Petry), who teaches the graph German. And the Count figured it out. Cunning thing. He's been stuffing a bunch of people everywhere. money, and as soon as it requires money return -- substitutes the lender under the duel, his own money pays for services Kolycheva, and that poor man in a duel and Targets.

The graph's closest plan is to frown Young Princess Marfa (Julia Khlynina), heiress of a huge fortune, but to him interferes with the prince's brother - Prince Tuchkov (Paul Tabakov).

With Tuchkov carried out a deft maneuver: his planted to play poker on a small with the unbreakable baron, and he at some point tells the prince that he owes Ten Thousand. The prince is sure that more than five he did not lose rubles by appropriations, and pay refuses, and times refuses - perhaps to a duel. And Kolychev immediately arrived another Order.

But Kolychev already knew that customer - Beklemishev, so during the duel spared Tuchkov and deft circus ricochet edited the second Tuchkova, Beklemishev's creation.

Count Beklemishev was furious when he found out who actually carried out his orders. And then he hired two binduzhs with bludgeoned them each for three roubles appropriations, commanding over them delivered a one-armed disabled man (Sergei Garmash) - and sent to break the heads of the Tuchkov and Kolychev. What got in his way do the same with your other victims -- incomprehensible at all, but, Apparently, it's just an officer's thing. Honor.

Tuchkov's head was broken, Kolychev, as usual, turned out and in once again promised to destroy Mr. Earl.

In the morgue goodbye to Princess Martha's brother came in a touching dress with translucent tits, and then when Kolychev told her about his unhappy mother who has nose and lips moved, it's touching co-duped with a stern duly in the carriage In the middle of the street: these are the aristocrats, underuse.

A what Interestingly, Kolychev failed using a huge bribe to recover his honor. An official from the commission restoring the lost honour (Dmitry Lysenkov) and would be happy to get rich for a hundred thousand that Kolychev had allocated for this God's business, but here's the bad luck - ober-prosecutor petition will never sign because Count Beklemishev personally requested no Kolychev's honor cannot be restored, for Unworthy.

Well All, Kolychev's lid was ripped off. He rushed to look for Beklemishev, who at that the moment he dined at the Grand Duchess in the Hermitage. Lunch passed very sublimely: the princess with Bechlemishev ate various dishes and wine, and there was a Russian aristocracy and behind all this respectfully observed. Kolychev broke in into the room, defused the personal Count Rotmistra's bodyguard Chichagova and imprinted his face Beklemisheva to the table, demanding satisfaction.

The dog you, jackal lousy, says Mr. Count, you're nobody and you can't be called, so there won't be a duel for you, squalid, snout Here. Nicht duel, nich, echoes him The Grand Duchess, whose dearest her current lover.

Here in the bushes quite by accident The dead man's brother is discovered Yakovleva, who is his officer honorably swore that Kolychev was Yakovlev is, a nobleman from all sides, Gentlemen, I'm telling you for sure.

There's nothing to cover for the Count, so Beklemishev and Kolychev shoot straight in the Hermitage Hall at the wall: without leaving, so say, from the box office.

Bullet sent by an unshuddering hand vile Count, Kolycheva hit her right in the heart. But as usual, saved the image, and besides the bullet pinched the artery, so courageous sufferer managed to shoot the count of his vile liver.

And now with Princess Martha, they go to the blue distance, and they are waiting for exhilarating honeymoon on the Aleutian Islands. Evil is punished, honor is saved, justice prevails. Amen.

***

A what You think I made it all up, can't be on such delirium Russian blockbuster? No, I didn't. that's the way it is, and he can see it. anyone, having seen this schydevre.

However, for the completeness of the picture I note that in Hollywood movies and It's crazier, but it's not it's quite clear why imitate the worst samples, not the best.

In terms of the vaunted "historical authenticity" about which even there's some criticism, it's all pretty lousy. It's not Peter 19. it's something quite disvemean.

Especially I was pleased with the room in which for the sake of being filmed and the officer's club, and the grand princess's reception hall in The Hermitage, where many Events. The style of the design room resembles a cross between the hall Railway Man, Roman Caesar's times, and the Reich Chancellery. It looks so caricatured, what seems to me, gentlemen, that Misgirev filmed a comedy.

With Clothes are all pretty fun too. But it's and it is clear: the money was not gardens, clothes were collected by theatrical workshops that match the style They didn't bother much, so there's very funny looked dresses on lightning, and when the inconsolable princess Martha came to the morgue to say goodbye to brutally murdered brother in A dress from which it is touching shone through her tits - we're here with a cat The bagel was just swayed with delight.

 

Well, and they didn't bother with everything else. Completely. Unless guns duels got as if those times. And once there are pistols, the rest - trampling it Horse. That's why Kolychev walks with hairstyle "Long live disco of the eighties" and with a speech, Peter 19th century Gizgirev as a screenwriter doesn't steam out of principle considerations, and in general with the dialogues, he straightens strictly and militarily, so that sounds amazingly oaky. "Radi love for you, princess, I will kill anyone. Even you" - what a delight! Well, just a charme, Sharman!

Peter those times made in the style of 'recently there was flooding, so there was water around, half-naked people build and swim something on boats, and the rain pours without ceasing." Well, okay, let's say. But here's why opposite Isaac's are building whether tower bridge over the Thames (it was already built-in Sherlock Holmes" Ritchie), or a bridge for New York subways - I don't know. But it looks Spectacularly, yes.

With acting, everything is here. more than average, although the actors are busy really good.

Peter Fedorov is a good actor and tries all but with such an idiotic script from his character is very hard to do something a little less cardboard. Fedorov trying to breathe life into this hero, but this occupation is enough Hopeless. And I hope the phrase "I would like to be looking like your character" he uttered only as ordinary nonsense that speaks actors for the promotion of the picture.

Mashkov - the actor is good, very experienced. Of all the Force plays graph-reiscus. But infernal villain here is not pecks out, the plot base is not enough. And it reminded me of how utterly idiotic Hollywood action movie "15 minutes of glory" Mashkov played Russian Plumbing. Played honestly, with a full Impact. But to look at it was somehow Embarrassing.

Julia Well in much brain-brain exhaustion gleefully chirped about how she was glad she got the role, how she dreamed of playing the princess, and how she gave herself up and the role in the carriage.

So Here, actress she's just no, princess Martha is such a disgrace that You can't tell you. And the character is something. utterly ridiculous, well, let's give credit Khlynina - more talentless to play this It was impossible for Marfo, just really horror-horror.

Good actors playing here all sorts of secondary-third-tier roles, a little brighten up a common madhouse, creation on the screen, but pull out the picture they are certainly not able to.

Well, and I was somewhat surprised by the fact that some critics have particularly appealed attention to the work of Maxim's operator Its precipitation. Yes, Maxim's enemies sawed-off two-thirds of the three-year-old's tripod of his camera, so ninety percent of the scenes shot off the bottom points that created extremely amazing angles. But I still don't get it. what was the basic artistic idea? Models at fashion shows usually take off from below - it lengthens their legs. And that's why to lengthen Mashkov's legs and Fedorov, I don't really understand.

More The sedimenting likes to fill the horizon - so, in his opinion, the frame looks more dynamically plus viewers have to tilt your head, and this develops the cervical Muscles. And sometimes it does fill up. camera under ninety degrees -- apparently it's such Fashionable modern shooting style. So, a good operator, an innovator like me Believe.

What we have as a result? In my opinion, the movie is completely failed. Some kind of It sucks! With a terrible scenario, more than the average game of actors and full lack of immersion in Peter means the 19th century. But this is my personal opinion, many viewers and critics liked the film, and some even sing to the director Eulogies.

Well everyone has the right to their own opinion. I've expressed my opinion.

P. S. At the box office, by the way, completely failed. It's weird, usually. many viewers like such nonsense. Brutal men; Officer's honor; bullet fool, bayonet well done; Princess with aristocratic tits; Dc Hall "Railroader" made-up under Caesar's palace. What else is needed Asked?

Comments 82

1
lisa_pussy007 answered · June 13, 2020
The coolest review in a long time. Especially about ham liked the 😄
2
xsexylady23x answered · June 13, 2020
But Kolychev quickly found a way to give strong evidence: he plays with Yakovlev's brother in the collection in a ruffled roulette - one cartridge on a six-charge revolver. After a couple of blank shots, Yakovlev's brother comes to the conclusion that Kolychev is a brother, in kind! We didn't understand anything! He, as he was, and remained against the duel, and at this moment clearly demonstrates to the gentlemen officers how naive their opinion that the issues of honor is permissible to decide in a duel. Gentlemen officers observe this theater of absurdity and naturally wiped out. When Watching everything remembered the old Soviet cartoon, where put the production of a nursery rhyme "one-two-three-four-five, came out bunny walk / suddenly the hunter runs out, right in the bunny shoots" in different styles. The film can be safely added to that cartoon. 😄
3
pinkelboy answered · June 13, 2020
Sincerely spoiled, reading the review - one of the best, in my opinion. I haven't watched the film and I'm not going to. The only thing is that the description of the plot, IMHO, is a little drawn out.
4
misshotdream answered · June 13, 2020
I love such reviews of Alex on stupid, such as "Godzilla" or disliked movies, they are much smarter and more truthful than any paid enthusiastic ravings of professional critics and cheerful banter "Father of the Cat Bublik" (tm) is read-re-read with laughter, which prolongs. Selfless willingness to watch sucks and sometimes frank thrash, especially Russian - it is akin to a feat, and to grow on this soda flowers of humorous and sharp reviews - expensive. Thank you, Alex! After reviews, it becomes clear in 99% of cases that there is no need to watch the overlooked. The kaif from him has already been received indirectly, through Alex's statement. With "Duellant" is still a little different - I'm going to see it myself, although I laughed, with pleasure reading the review. I was hoping, after the trailers, that this movie would be something like "Wanted", which I watched and did not regret it, with all its flaws. Actors, style, plot, a little action attract, the scene in the carriage, than the devil is not joking, can give a new experimental, as say ex-compatriots 😄 Suddenly at least a little in it will find from the films Guy Ritchie and "Vidok." So I'm looking at what I'm losing, right? "True detective" first season - excellent, second - unsuccessful, imho:) If anything.
5
hexe40002 answered · June 13, 2020
The film - a movie comic, respectively, and it should be evaluated as a movie comic. Therefore, he can be forgiven for some convention of the script. Although the film has historical characters and there are real dueling pistols, to call it historical language will not turn. It's the same as calling Snyder's 300 Spartans a historic peplum - one laugh.
6
pauldoesecret answered · June 13, 2020
Ichy: That's why he can be forgiven for some convention of the script. Some convention, of course, can be forgiven. But I personally cannot forgive him for the complete debilitation.
7
boobliciousnat answered · June 14, 2020
Ichy: That's why he can be forgiven for some convention of the script.
8
a_arora27 answered · June 14, 2020
Um, with all that, even here in the vote 30% - 5 and 4.
9
brandonandsarah1980 answered · June 14, 2020
It's a shame that ours again stole in visual style something from Vidok, something from Sherlock. Nothing original.
10
fatmagul_j answered · June 15, 2020
Alex, thank you, great review. Laughed from the heart
11
maxgunn5 answered · June 15, 2020
Alex Exler : I'm sitting here. Boredom-y-schna... I think it's time to have fun, I open the review, and what I see there: "From such a concentration of honor in one I almost sat out..." But my home strictly forbidden me to rust like a cabman, say they have all sorts of indigestion happen, and nervous fevers. And I got a repreand. I don't know who to call a duel now?
12
kinkydoll_ answered · June 15, 2020
Defy: But my home strictly forbidden me to rust like a cabman, to say they have all sorts of indigestion happen, and nervous fevers. And I got a repreand. I don't know who to call a duel now? :D Bublik's cat, of course, is a famous bretta 😉
13
arianaasantx answered · June 16, 2020
Defy: But my home strictly forbidden me to rust like a cabman, to say they have all sorts of indigestion happen, and nervous fevers. And I got a repreand. I don't know who to call a duel now?
14
dirtycouple2522 answered · June 16, 2020
Slightly out of the question... Maybe someone has already mentioned... Alex, interesting your opinion about the funny Italian comedy "To hell with the horns" (about the vicissitudes of the Italian official and the differences in the mentality of Italians and Norwegians)))
15
millycollins answered · June 16, 2020
qezalqoatl: Slightly out of the question... Maybe someone has already mentioned... Alex, interesting your opinion about the funny Italian comedy "To hell with the horns" (about the vicissitudes of the Italian official and the differences in the mentality of Italians and Norwegians))) I've heard it's worth the plans, I'll be watching 😉
16
lexawolf answered · June 17, 2020
qezalqoatl: Slightly out of the question... Maybe someone has already mentioned... Alex, interesting your opinion about the funny Italian comedy "To hell with the horns" (about the vicissitudes of the Italian official and the differences in the mentality of Italians and Norwegians)))
17
doodler_1234 answered · June 17, 2020
Alex Exler: in Hollywood and for 200 million manage to make films on such a lusta delirium ... With the fact that the writers there get very good Well, why in Hollywood is just understandable. There and with a fierce scenario you can collect a good box office. And maybe just because a good script there costs good money. And why spend on it, if on a blockbuster and so earn. And in Russian films, apparently, the task to earn on the box office is not worth it. Probably make money on something else. Well, only Russian filmmakers can safely shout that they made a masterpiece, although it is obvious to everyone that the head has come out. Alex Exler: This is how these reviews are often written on promotional materials, before viewing. Pros... I mean, that's what I mean. I wonder if anyone takes them seriously or is it true to report to the customer?
18
vanesalop answered · June 17, 2020
Alex Exler: in Hollywood and for 200 million manage to make films on such a lusta delirium ... With the fact that the writers there get very good
19
dirtyharry2069 answered · June 17, 2020
Alex Exler: This is how these reviews are often written on promotional materials, before viewing. Pros...
20
devorah_soto answered · June 18, 2020
Redy_: I'm actually talking about the same thing. I wonder if anyone takes them seriously or is it true to report to the customer? That's their job. Writing about a movie you haven't seen. For this reason, I have always refused to cooperate with any film magazines. There quite seriously offered to watch the screens to have time to write something about the new film. Nafiq-naf.
21
sucking_self answered · June 18, 2020
Redy_: I'm actually talking about the same thing. I wonder if anyone takes them seriously or is it true to report to the customer?
22
pastmyprime answered · June 18, 2020
I look at the screenshot with the unfinished bridge and Isakia and wonder - where is the Alexander Garden, The Senate Square and the Copper Horseman? I think that this is an insult to the feelings of St. Petersburgers.
23
kawaiisashastorm answered · June 18, 2020
I seriously can not understand how they manage to make films with a budget of more than 10 million dollars and at the same time do not care about the basis of the film - the script. Especially when you consider that the screenwriter in Russia - it's probably the lowest paid of the creators. Well, that's really a thrash out. I can still understand the scripted thrash in the series, but in a major blockbuster ... Here I remember the recently unreleased Belarusian "superblockbuster" Code Cain (aka "Abel", aka "We are brothers"), filmed with the money of Belarusian taxpayers. It turned out, of course, the same thrash, which has become familiar and native. It's A good one. The quotations from the epigraph are a separate p.. Although it is clear here - paid people for a high-pitched review, so they gave out to the advantage of their capabilities. You don't have to watch a movie for that.
24
soifyoucaretofindme answered · June 18, 2020
Redy_: I really can't understand how they manage to make films with a budget of more than 10 million dollars and at the same time not to worry about the basis of the film - the script. It's not a big deal, in Hollywood and for 200 million manage to make movies on such a terrible delirium ... With that, the writers there get very good.
25
bareexposurecamsmia answered · June 19, 2020
Redy_: I really can't understand how they manage to make films with a budget of more than 10 million dollars and at the same time not to worry about the basis of the film - the script.
26
biancaandibai answered · June 19, 2020
Redy_: The quotations from the epigraph are a separate p.o. Although it is clear here - paid people for a high-pitched review, so they gave out to the advantage of their capabilities. You don't have to watch a movie for that. So these reviews are often written on promotional materials, before viewing. Pros...
27
lindseybaby69 answered · June 19, 2020
Redy_: The quotations from the epigraph are a separate p.o. Although it is clear here - paid people for a high-pitched review, so they gave out to the advantage of their capabilities. You don't have to watch a movie for that.
28
bicums answered · June 19, 2020
Redy_: I really can't understand how they manage to make films with a budget of more than 10 million dollars and at the same time not care about the basis of the film - scripts Yes normal scenario) That's just the film should be called "Maximus - demon-duelist with Flotsoka Street" 😄 If you know what I'😉
29
itsjustjust answered · June 19, 2020
Redy_: I really can't understand how they manage to make films with a budget of more than 10 million dollars and at the same time not care about the basis of the film - scripts
30
sskaterpaul1229 answered · June 20, 2020
I haven't seen the movie yet, but I read the description of Exler's film, I didn't even know what was there and who was there. it's all complicated. )))
31
cowsgomoo101 answered · June 20, 2020
Terminator: but read the description of Exler's film, not even a fig But just after looking, I didn't understand a damn thing. I even thought some pieces were lost in the rip. Thank you Exler, explained what was what was in this idiotic thrash.
32
tamsiin answered · June 20, 2020
Terminator: but read the description of Exler's film, not even a fig
33
jennyquinn answered · June 20, 2020
Alex, thank you for the review. I read just in one breath, like some Monte Cristo as a child! It's really exciting.
34
miss_arabia answered · June 20, 2020
In addition to the frankly blunt script, in "Duelant" is absolutely stupid work of a sound engineer. They whisper, they shoot, they mutter slurred. Pregnant female neighbors were very unhappy 😄
35
watchus1112 answered · June 21, 2020
San_s_usam: absolutely stupid work of a sound engineer. Russian sound engineers have a birth trauma. Even with the voiceover of foreign films, this problem regularly comes out. Especially if you can compare the tracks. Original ok, and Russian - think, well, that's how it happened ...
36
sumiso20 answered · June 21, 2020
San_s_usam: absolutely stupid work of a sound engineer.
37
number_3 answered · June 21, 2020
San_s_usam : There is such a moment, half of the words is impossible to make out.
38
ohevelynlike answered · June 21, 2020
I laughed so much that I poured half a cup of coffee on the keyboard. And barely fought off the demand of colleagues to translate such funny into Hebrew. Said it's our Russian, untranslatable:-)))
39
want_me19 answered · June 21, 2020
Finkel : Are you on my comments? Or Alex's review?
40
1anonymousmouse answered · June 21, 2020
Alex, why do you even do such extensive reviews of frank trash? It would be enough somewhere on the site to make a small piece with a brief personal rating of movies viewed, and only on worthy write reviews. And in the comments will be much more interesting, because to defend a positive opinion is more interesting and more difficult than just pouring a bucket of washes on the already squalid picture. Trying to be a little film critic (the distinctive feature - to look through the trash to the end), it seems to me, the case is completely ungrateful, because the people will still vote purse and any even the most common in a bad sense "masterpiece" will find its viewer, so that the meaning of negative reviews is generally lost, unless you get real money for a deep analysis of the film deployed writing an objective review. So you could free up a lot more time and spend it on watching the action-based pictures, which are a lot and write a lot of good words that will encourage your readers to watch. It is necessary to sow goodness 😄 Exclusively my IMHO, because I myself i start to watch such movie-stuff, but if I see that the matter is quite bad, or throw instantly, or wind up, and check for a tick or in the best - absolutely pointless. So it goes to any dump no more than 10-15 minutes and not 1.5-2 hours.
41
annemanifique answered · June 22, 2020
Bamboliny: Alex, why do such extensive reviews of frank trash? For the people to be spoiled. He's the first to read the trash. Bamboliny: It would be enough somewhere on the site to make a small piece with a brief personal rating of viewed movies, and only on worthy write reviews. Enough. Bamboliny: And the comments will be much more interesting, I don't set goals for myself to be much more interesting in the comments. Bamboliny: Trying to be a bit of a film critic (the hallmark is to look through the trash to the end), I think it's completely ungrateful, You don't understand. No real film critic does not fully see anything. And I'm looking at it precisely because I'm never a film critic and I never intended to be. Bamboliny: so the meaning of negative reviews is generally lost That's cool. And they are read the most. Bamboliny: So it could free up a lot more time and spend it on watching the action of the pictures Do you always know in advance whether it's worth the painting or not? Bamboliny: Exclusively my IMHO, because I myself start to watch such movie-stuff, but if I see that the matter is quite bad, or throw instantly, or wind up, and check for a tick or in the best - absolutely pointless. So you're not Exler, right?
42
krystalblakexxx answered · June 22, 2020
Bamboliny: Alex, why do such extensive reviews of frank trash? For the people to be spoiled. He's the first to read the trash. Bamboliny: It would be enough somewhere on the site to make a small piece with a brief personal rating of viewed movies, and only on worthy write reviews. Enough. Bamboliny: And the comments will be much more interesting, I don't set goals for myself to be much more interesting in the comments. Bamboliny: Trying to be a bit of a film critic (the hallmark is to look through the trash to the end), I think it's completely ungrateful, You don't understand. No real film critic does not fully see anything. And I'm looking at it precisely because I'm never a film critic and I never intended to be. Bamboliny: so the meaning of negative reviews is generally lost That's cool. And they are read the most. Bamboliny: So it could free up a lot more time and spend it on watching the action of the pictures Do you always know in advance whether it's worth the painting or not? Bamboliny: Exclusively my IMHO, because I myself start to watch such movie-stuff, but if I see that the matter is quite bad, or throw instantly, or wind up, and check for a tick or in the best - absolutely pointless.
43
poundhoundcolo answered · June 22, 2020
Brilliant review, Alex, thank you! You're five, the movie's one." It's fair! I myself heal the moral trauma of mentioning the tv series "True Detective" ... 😒
44
vicka_a answered · June 22, 2020
Liora: I'm healing the moral trauma of mentioning "True Detective" ... 😒 How can you like that, you're a girl!
45
sexybetty130 answered · June 22, 2020
Liora: I'm healing the moral trauma of mentioning "True Detective" ... 😒
46
antonia1995 answered · June 22, 2020
Beautiful, uplifting review:)
47
thevedm09 answered · June 23, 2020
Alex Exler: we're here with bublik's cat just smirked with delight Did Bublik have his own cat? What's the name? 😉
48
xxhugecockxx21 answered · June 23, 2020
Alex Exler: we're here with bublik's cat just smirked with delight
49
sweetishcake answered · June 23, 2020
Alex, are you planning to watch "The Crew" with Mashkov and Kozlovsky?
50
gisellafox answered · June 23, 2020
donmega: Alex, "The Crew" with Mashkov and Kozlovsky plan to watch? Well, maybe I'll take a look.
51
cafecito6 answered · June 23, 2020
donmega: Alex, "The Crew" with Mashkov and Kozlovsky plan to watch?
52
fvckingbabeeexokinkx answered · June 23, 2020
Types in the film are written very brightly, even somewhat poster, and represent the opposition, immediately fraught with conflicts: wave and stone, ice and flame, honor and meanness ... ... grass and wood. In the role of a tree...
53
annaoholya answered · June 24, 2020
Types in the film are written very brightly, even somewhat poster, and represent the opposition, immediately fraught with conflicts: wave and stone, ice and flame, honor and meanness ...
54
xxxx13xxxx answered · June 24, 2020
After such a review I see only such a picture. The doorbell to Exler. It costs Mashkov: "Head or belly"
55
hothoney4u answered · June 24, 2020
Here are exactly the same words described his impression: "rare shit." And say that most of the characters as, as a first-grader in front of the class rhyme reads like a figure cardboard. The only thing that's not bad is the picture. Colors, this rain is constant, a kind of noir. And all the rest - horror, horror, horror.
56
jaydeluxe665 answered · June 24, 2020
About the kina and all that. There are a lot of good or even great series. There are almost no good movies. The concept of elderflower is very different and not in favor of single-part films.
57
emily_sweets answered · June 24, 2020
1000Ninja: There are a lot of good or even great TV series. There are almost no good movies. The concept of elderflower is very different and not in favor of single-part films. Well, there's an aspect of the issue. Purely commercial - monetization goes to the Internet, and the Internet is literally created for TV series, and the permanent viewer-subscriber is much more profitable and predictable in terms of revenue than the vague object of the box office. There is also the author's aspect. The original plots are few, and the full meter long ago switched to recycling. (One theorist generally wrote that the main subjects of the scenes of the scenes are three or four and everything else is variations on the theme). You can play with composition, atmosphere, tone, genre, etc., but still repetitions are inevitable. Producers have to rely only on the fact that every five to ten years a new generation of viewers grows up, who have not seen the previous versions, and they can pair all the same. There are probably independent authors with new plots somewhere, but until they make it to the production, they are already starving. Series, at least temporarily, give the illusion of escaping such restrictions. As a rule, in a major series there is one main "infinite" storyline ("Cinderella," "Count monte-christo," "world government," "through the thorns to the stars" etc.), sometimes so amorphous that it is not seen at all. Neither a carefully constructed composition, nor any well-established sequence of events is required here - the action takes place without beginning and end, as Santa Barbara ... But other than that, again, as a rule, there are independent mini-plots, separate series (monster of the week), which allow you to take a break from the main intrigue, and give the authors the opportunity to frolic.
58
sonyalight answered · June 24, 2020
1000Ninja: There are a lot of good or even great TV series. There are almost no good movies. The concept of elderflower is very different and not in favor of single-part films.
59
dirtydiana702 answered · June 24, 2020
And, of course, for the average Russian moviegoer, the film is too mannered and pretending to be Style. Nothing, here closer to NG will be a couple of films in which evil villains will spread the bricks of Cheremushki and South Butovo - will have our average to get used to. Not everyone can admire how New York for the 100th time for parts disassemble . . .
60
trippiehippie13 answered · June 25, 2020
And here at the visiting festival of Russian cinema "Russian Revival" this film took the first place. But at this event, the quality of the film itself almost plays no role. People loudly and flaunted such crafts only to show off in the pose of fans of Old Russia with Its Greatness, Russianness, Honor, Russianness, Sovereign, Russianness, Orthodoxy, Russianness. Yes, that's right, with Russianness through every word. Despite the fact that in Russian many of these movie lovers say something like this: "I went to the market today to buy a prons, so I had to wait half an hour."
61
davestupsi8 answered · June 25, 2020
Labert: Even if in Russian many of these movie buffs say something like this: "I went to the market today to buy a prons, so I had to wait half an hour." Well, in Old Russia and it was ) Tok replaced Aglytsky - Khrezzuski was in trend. The whole woman spoke on it, emphasizing the same difference from the serfs 😄
62
punkysdilemma answered · June 25, 2020
Labert: Even if in Russian many of these movie buffs say something like this: "I went to the market today to buy a prons, so I had to wait half an hour."
63
alternative_couple answered · June 25, 2020
When looking at the historical authenticity did not pay attention - it is still better to read books, rather than teach history on feature films. In general, everything is filmed well - reminiscent of "Vidoka." In my opinion, Sherlock Guy Ritchie - it's quite a fairy tale about superheroes.
64
rachel_myers answered · June 25, 2020
Any native of Peter (me, for example) was very heartily pleased with the constantly flashing on the back of the double portico of the New Hermitage. Who saw these Atlantean o'still work - immediately understand how the second tier will look)) The film looked like a pretentious fantasy comic book for quasi-historical motives (everything seemed like a mad Rodion roaming on the back of the side with a bloody axe).
65
jinuvs45 answered · June 25, 2020
There's another scene in the carriage. Where Count Beklemishev with all passion is given... Who? Yes, the Grand Duchess Alexandra Josephovna herself, mutter her breath! The Grand Duchess! In the carriage! With a coachman on goats! In the middle of the street! Where people walk and many even have a very low rank. And all of them, if desired, can watch the joys of the great princess, who, for a moment, is just the wife of the royal brother. And to silence all possible witnesses, Count Beklemishev will not have enough Kolychev. So the theme of the boobs in this film is fully disclosed.
66
dezislav answered · June 25, 2020
The bridge is beautiful. You give the Golden Gate in St. Petersburg!
67
ivysamus answered · June 27, 2020
Uh.. How is it? "I was exiled to Kamchatka, Returned aleut - And the hand of the unclean
68
emilybr0nte answered · June 27, 2020
5anjuro: Uh.. How is it? "I was exiled to Kamchatka, Returned aleut - And the hand of the unclean It's about Tolstoy-American, whose image was clearly inspired by the director Misgirev. Because it was about Tolstoy and his friend Naryshkin told the story that is shown in the film. This is when Kolychev, Tuchkov and the German play cards, after which Tuchkov a present and even threaten to shoot on the spot. In response, Tuchkov, who seems afraid, still replies that in his pockets he has a mere trifle and, killing him, the villains-duels will not win much, but the police, to smear, they will have to pay many times more. These are the words, as they say, uttered by the Kornet Naryshkin in response to Tolstoy-American's threat to immediately shoot him at the card table, when Naryshkin accused the American of distorting. Hence, probably, and Alaska, to which Tolstoy, however, was not exiled, but was just dropped off there by the round-the-world expedition Of Krusenstern, when his behavior finally got all the gentlemen of the officers.
69
girloffgrid answered · June 27, 2020
5anjuro: Uh.. How is it? "I was exiled to Kamchatka, Returned aleut - And the hand of the unclean
70
markb125 answered · June 27, 2020
Well, half the movie went nowhere, but by the end somehow completely blown away, and the scene in the carriage is absolutely stupid, I even felt embarrassed to watch it.
71
rubydawn answered · June 27, 2020
key_c: and the scene in the carriage is absolutely stupid, I even felt embarrassed to watch it. The cameraman turned the picture 90 degrees? 😄
72
wendylaserveuse answered · June 27, 2020
key_c: and the scene in the carriage is absolutely stupid, I even felt embarrassed to watch it.
73
sweet_sandi answered · June 27, 2020
Alex! Look at something worthwhile, show? That and the review to read was interesting, and the film peer-reviewed to see.
74
dwp29 answered · June 27, 2020
Dmitri Bolkhovityanov: Alex! Look at something worthwhile, show? That and the review to read was interesting, and the film peer-reviewed to see. I support 😄 Like "Mr. Church" with Eddie Murphy. It's been a long time since I heard anything from him. And the film was very soulful. Especially Britt Robertson's game pleased 😄 At the same time after the taste after "Duelant" to bring down the 😉
75
tiffanytaylor88 answered · June 27, 2020
Dmitri Bolkhovityanov: Alex! Look at something worthwhile, show? That and the review to read was interesting, and the film peer-reviewed to see.
76
dianapt11 answered · June 27, 2020
Dmitri Bolkhovityanov: Alex! Look at something worthwhile, show? That and the review to read was interesting, and the film peer-reviewed to see. I looked at a very funny French shiza. Thursday's review.
77
skypeme2506 answered · June 27, 2020
Dmitri Bolkhovityanov: Alex! Look at something worthwhile, show? That and the review to read was interesting, and the film peer-reviewed to see.
78
princess_g answered · June 27, 2020
Is the film dull? Sad. Did Exler like it? No. "True Detective" dull? Sad. Did Exler like it? Yes. There's a lot of work to be. And anyway, I can't understand Exler's claim about some of the films: "Not at all dynamic." Is "True Detective" dynamic? No. Do Exler like it? And Cohen likes the work. Paradox. By the way, I had to read on the contrary at the COMMUNIST that, they say, the historical exactly was not followed, and made an alternative Petersburg, but to logically look as logical as he could then. It's the right thing to do, I think. "Peter of those times was made in the style of "recently there was a flood, so around the water, half-naked people build something and swim on boats, and the rain pours without ceasing." Well, that was brilliant! There was good exler, well done exler here!
79
chlooewow answered · June 27, 2020
Akim Aslanov: Movie dull? And Cohen likes the work. Paradox. I'd give a hundred of these "Duellants" for any Coen movie! One "Iron Grip" where the action takes place around the same time (admittedly, in very different places) compared to the creation of Gizgirev - a masterpiece of masterpieces. And Marshal Cogburn looks like a professional murderer (which he was) thirty times more than Fedorov in the image of this Kolychev.
80
aviciousman answered · June 27, 2020
Akim Aslanov: Movie dull? And Cohen likes the work. Paradox.
81
basianarusself answered · June 27, 2020
Akim Aslanov: "True Detective" dull? Sad. You don't have to read it any further.
82
jellotrix99 answered · June 27, 2020
Akim Aslanov: "True Detective" dull? Sad.

Frequently Asked Questions

No added frequency questions and answers yet.

Community - Q&A

Ask a question — Sign In
No added questions yet.
Resources