Circumcised Or Uncircumcised?

   It is more aesthetic, it is more hygienic, it is healthier - for both men and women.

   No! I am a 21 year old girl. and do not like trimmed, look rubbery and artificial. Besides, I've heard that you lost your sensuality constantly whitewashed by rubbing in your pants, and the pleasure of sex was not the same. I like them natural with skin;) they are nicer.

   Circumcised!

   I doubt that girls know which penis is circumcised and which is not. In general, the last thing that will impress a man is the type of his penis. If you don't tell them you're circumcised, they just won't notice. When you say that, they are kind of startled. Otherwise - yes, the vision gets better. His hygiene - too. But there are also bad sides. The chick is not at all what it is for the uncircumcised! Fellatio - too. Just forget about the fun of it! I was circumcised at the age of 40. I had a health problem (not with the bleaching itself). His solution fully justifies the new problems. I don't recommend it to you because of one vanity! Dz,

   The circumcised penis becomes much less sensitive for two reasons: 1 - the skin that is cut, contains the most sensitive cells of the penis, look for a ridged band. A huge part of your pleasure during stimulation comes from this cuticle. 2 - the head dries over time and becomes less sensitive. You decide if it's worth it ... aesthetics is a matter of taste, but in my opinion, the uncircumcised penis looks more arousing and the glans is much more shiny and beautiful. APrince-

   I am not circumcised. But I have a very good friend with whom we share, incl. and intimate things. She told me that she had slept with a circumcised man several times and it was great, especially anal sex. She felt it incredibly in her ass.

   It's much more hygienic, and I think it's a self-sufficient fact that it's better trimmed.

   2 is not a girl. It doesn't look artificial at all, not to mention that the nicer TI natural is hellishly disgusting and unhygienic. Most women, especially those with a little more intelligence, prefer circumcision.

   I am a girl and if I get to the bedroom with a man and see that he is circumcised, I will get dressed and run away. It's a matter of taste, but I personally hate it.

   And I'm for circumcision, you will not reduce the pleasure of sex, at most to endure more. Not to mention hygiene ....

   If a circumcised penis was more hygienic, nature would have "circumcised" us a long time ago, but this has not happened to humans or dogs, cats, bears or camels. But as Einstein said, human stupidity is boundless, and what has been wise to them lately.

   Look now, I made the mistake of keeping it constantly naked, whitewashed, and over time, because my head was constantly rubbing in my underwear, it got rough, my sensitivity dropped, it's true, it's purer, with great excitement I still feel pleasure, but with frequent sexual intercourse pleasure is less and difficult to end sometimes, after nearly 3 years I decided to stop this practice and put the skin back, but some itching began, a feeling of dryness, inflammation had probably occurred due to reduced protective function of the foreskin after treatment with Canesten for fungus the opening of the penis began to irritate me after I finished the two-week treatment in the third week the irritation in the canal disappeared and now I'm fine, but the sensitivity of the member is reduced and now I will have to wait about a year or more to return. So everyone,

   For both women and men, circumcision has great benefits from a hygienic point of view. Removing the foreskin of the penis is like removing the labia minora. For women, the hygienic benefits are even greater. There are no circumcised women who have developed vulvitis, for example, and there is almost no accumulation of smegma. I myself prefer circumcised women, so I circumcised at the age of 18. Before that, ours did not allow me.

   If it were healthier to have this skin without it, don't you think men would be born without it? !!

   It's the author. The only thing stopping me so far is the fear of surgery. Just seeing the scissors makes me black. I watched videos of circumcisions - I just felt sick watching. Otherwise I want to get circumcised and I will do it soon, but I don't know how to overcome the fear. Can anyone who has had the operation share what it feels like?

   16, do you have any idea what a circumcised woman is? You are obviously a Muslim, so you think so. It is the most barbaric in Islam to cut off a woman's clitoris, it is tantamount to cutting a man. The feeling of pleasure from sex is lost, that's why they do it, they want to turn the woman into a bioincubator, they don't want her to experience feelings so that she doesn't stumble on other men. This is a provocative topic, they should not be allowed, they are anti-human, remnants of the Middle Ages. Even in the Muslim world, women are not circumcised, only in some savage tribes it is done!

   There is no feeling - under anesthesia and you do not see what the doctor is doing. But then for a while it's naughty, very naughty ... Do you give up oral sex? Do you ignore the holy chick? Do you think the girls will "land on him like flies on honey"? No, believe me! At least remember the pleasure of them now and I hope you have the courage to admit your mistake in time and do your best to protect others who have decided to succumb to one vanity!

   I'm very curious, where does the guy under number 16 find his favorite, "circumcised" women ?! In our latitudes such do not exist! Yes, in Africa, in some places, this barbaric custom is still practiced, maybe elsewhere, but hygiene is not the purpose of the lesson, sorry dude, you got something wrong, but cruel!

   Author, you have nothing to fear. Your mistake is that you have watched such operations on the net. I was circumcised at 4 because I am a Muslim. I remember it clearly. I was circumcised without anesthesia and almost without sterilization, because it was 1989 and we did such things illegally at home then, because the regime at the time did not allow it. And yet I did not die. And now it's done in a hospital setting in a sterile environment, with better instruments, by better specialists, and I don't really see what you're worried about. The operation is easy and I see the current kids who circumcise them, after a few days they are already leading a normal life. Otherwise, I had discomfort for a few days and it was difficult to urinate, I wore a wide dress so that the clothes would not touch. From the aesthetic ch. item I think there is no doubt that it is better, but in an unerect state. There is not much difference in an erection. Not to mention hygienic. It is healthier. Doctors have told me that there is no reported case of a circumcised person with penile cancer or a woman with uterine cancer who has slept with circumcised men. I can't say about the pleasure, because I'm circumcised at 4 and I don't have a basis for comparison, but I definitely enjoy sex. I don't know if if I had been uncircumcised, it would have been even bigger, but it's big now. Now I know that some people will come to me, but anyway my comment is specifically to you, author, in order to tell from experience (although as far as I understand your question is more to women, but still), not to argue about anything. For me, only hygiene and a lower risk of some diseases are a sufficient advantage. that there is no reported case of a circumcised person with penile cancer or a woman with uterine cancer who has slept with circumcised men. I can't say about the pleasure, because I'm circumcised at 4 and I don't have a basis for comparison, but I definitely enjoy sex. I don't know if if I had been uncircumcised, it would have been even bigger, but it's still big now. Now I know that some people will come to me, but anyway my comment is specifically to you, author, in order to tell from experience (although as far as I understand your question is more to women, but still), not to argue about anything. For me, only hygiene and a lower risk of some diseases are a sufficient advantage. that there is no reported case of a circumcised person with penile cancer or a woman with uterine cancer who has slept with circumcised men. I can't say about the pleasure, because I'm circumcised at 4 and I don't have a basis for comparison, but I definitely enjoy sex. I don't know if if I had been uncircumcised, it would have been even bigger, but it's still big now. Now I know that some people will come to me, but anyway my comment is specifically to you, author, in order to tell from experience (although as far as I understand your question is more to women, but still), not to argue about anything. For me, only hygiene and a lower risk of some diseases are a sufficient advantage. because I'm circumcised at 4 and I don't have a basis for comparison, but I definitely enjoy sex. I don't know if if I had been uncircumcised, it would have been even bigger, but it's still big now. Now I know that some people will come to me, but anyway my comment is specifically to you, author, in order to tell from experience (although as far as I understand your question is more to women, but still), not to argue about anything. For me, only hygiene and a lower risk of some diseases are a sufficient advantage. because I'm circumcised at 4 and I don't have a basis for comparison, but I definitely enjoy sex. I don't know if if I had been uncircumcised, it would have been even bigger, but it's still big now. Now I know that some people will come to me, but anyway my comment is specifically to you, author, in order to tell from experience (although as far as I understand your question is more to women, but still), not to argue about anything. For me, only hygiene and a lower risk of some diseases are a sufficient advantage. not to argue about anything. For me, only hygiene and a lower risk of some diseases are a sufficient advantage. not to argue about anything. For me, only hygiene and a lower risk of some diseases are a sufficient advantage.

   from 16 to 19, this circumcision, which involves removing the clitoris, does not come from Islam, it is from the tribes of Africa. True female circumcision simply removes a small part of the labia, reduces their volume, so to speak, and accordingly accumulates less smegma! It is done while the girl is still young, as it is best to do the male circumcision (while she is a little boy), not like me ... Such circumcised women are much more hygienic than the uncircumcised.

   Since you do not have a physiological problem, there is no point in doing it, the strongest orgasms are experienced when you are not circumcised, this is a sufficient reason not to do it! At 20, there is no problem with the checks and you are circumcised, I wore it bare all the time, which is equivalent to circumcision and I know from experience that the check is made without a problem directly stimulating the head, I do not recommend the author to wear it white because as they said before me there is a risk then after returning the foreskin back from inflammation and irritation until the already roughened head is moistened!

   of 21 I apologize to the author for shifting the topic, but here an interesting dispute arose and with his permission, I will ask my question again on 16/23 - Where do you find these circumcised women, do you ask them if they are, did you announce them? Looking for? I agree that such adjustments are made, but not in childhood (excluding a physiological problem), but when the woman does not like the vision and size of the labia! And she will accumulate smegma if her vagina is passed with an angle grinder, if she is too lazy to wash it! Again, I apologize to the author, and my opinion on his problem is that if he wants to be circumcised. There is no exact answer, which is better and one has its pros and cons, and the other, every man has the right to choose and how he will feel better, good luck!

   For me, I liked sex and oral sex with a circumcised man very much. My tongue did not feel anything unpleasant. On the contrary. I want it again :-)

   24-you speak without knowing ... wearing it naked is not the same as being circumcised, because your foreskin is still available, and it contains a huge amount of cells that play a role in sensitivity and orgasm. If you get circumcised, you lose these cells and nothing will be the same, check the ridged band, stimulate the foreskin and you will see that I am right. http://www.can-fap.net/preview/fundraiser_preview_multipleforegasm.shtml here you can see what an uncircumcised penis is capable of, thanks only to the ridged band. APrince-

   24, don't forget, wait for the boy! There is a lot of difference with chicks! Apparently you don't understand at all what is being cut. A lot of skin is cut off and the frictions are not what they used to be. Yes, it shines at all, but it's different ... I wore it and I noticed before I was circumcised. I have almost nothing in common.

   26, the mouthpiece has no gap. There is nothing unpleasant to feel, to experience. On the contrary - hygiene is generally at a higher level. On the other hand, you spit it out profusely, so you can't feel its dryness. But he ... hardly feels your work. Or at least not the way he feels uncircumcised. For sex. Would you say you would recognize if he was circumcised by penetrating you? Did you make him a chick? And the uncircumcised? If so, you should be clear about the difference. And don't say anything good about the vision in this topic :) After all - how long of all your communication do you watch it (admire it)? Can you imagine it at another time? Exactly this one - the circumcised one. If someone uncircumcised, but with good dimensions has given you great pleasure and another circumcised - not so much, would you prefer the second mainly because of his vision? Tovo, that the circumcised can last longer is also frivolous. I was not circumcised and I drove contentedly. Things have gotten worse over the years. After circumcision, however, I cannot say that I have begun to endure any longer.

   Up to 28 out of 24, on the contrary, it is the same, I wore it naked for three years, the sensitivity decreases and when masturbating I stimulated the head and crown directly and without using the foreskin. By 27, there are no sensitive cells in the foreskin, this is a skin rich in sebaceous glands that lubricate the glans penis and thus make it more sensitive when it is kept open roughened and, accordingly, the pleasure is less. The problem occurs when after a long period of 2, 3 years the head is exposed and when it is covered again with the foreskin, it begins to lubricate it, but as it is roughened begins an irritation and a feeling of dryness and especially in front of the opening of the head and it takes a very long time for it to soften and it is possible for an infection to appear initially. I guess

   Up to 30 out of 27 - with no sensitive cells, why can I reach orgasm just by gently stroking the foreskin? Read in Google about ridged band, as I wrote earlier, there is an awful lot of information on the subject. Watch the video I posted in my previous comment and tell me honestly - can a circumcised penis achieve this? APrince-

   And why is it said uncircumcised I wonder when I think about it? I understand the word circumcision, but it's like you look normal to say that you have two unamputated arms and two unbroken legs. Hey you, the beheaded, why did you get circumcised? It's different to be decapitated, you don't have a hangover, you don't have earwax, you don't spit, you don't mix in your nose, you don't have bad breath in the morning - hygienic work ... Not to mention some bad job like a stroke.

   From 27 to 30, you finish because your head is sensitive by rubbing it through the foreskin! Expose the foreskin and touch it with your hand, you will not feel anything, there are no sensitive cells there!

   from 27 to 30 what is seen in the video is a trick with stopping ejaculation, a little fluid is released and stopped for a moment, then again stimulation is released one or two drops and stopped for a moment, this can be achieved with circumcision penis without any problem, there are thousands of videos showing this.

   Both have their pros and cons ... so it's a good idea to think before you take any action. The sensitivity is not so strong because the head is used to rubbing, but it is actually more hygienic, although I do not see a problem if you wash regularly. In general, I see no reason to go under the knife unnecessarily, but of course the decision is entirely yours. Whatever it is, I wish you success! Ф18

   By 34, do you call it a few drops? I know very well how the technique you described works, but in the video it is not. I don't know about you, but I can only finish with a light touch of the foreskin and I am very pleased to touch it. Other men testify the same, I don't know about you. APrince-

   32, it's complicated (probably for you) ... Some people are said to be smart, others are said to be ignorant. The natural state (without long-term effects) of the brain is ignorant. But when it comes to such no one says "this person is normal", right? Also, how does "this one has appendicitis" sound to you? I personally say that someone has been operated on or has not been operated on for appendicitis. The second for you is the normal condition and it should not be said about anyone that he was not operated on for apadisitis? Are you operated on yourself? If you weren't, wouldn't you appeal for anything in the world? Do you prefer to have unampathetic appendicitis even if you are at risk of peritonitis?

   As a woman, I can say that I do not find a difference in sex with a circumcised man and an uncircumcised man. It's the same. Look, from a male point of view, I can't comment on sensitivity.

   Tell the questioner about the vision - do you like the circumcision much more? Does this even matter to you? How long have you been watching him from his contact? Do you look at "him" at all, at least at a new partner?

   I feel like I'm circumcised. In both places, but especially in the back, it is definitely felt.

   Are you crazy to mutilate ?? This is done only if you suffer from phimosis. The other is commercial propaganda of various private hospitals to squander your money. I had a boyfriend and he was circumcised. Sex with him was TERRIBLE. The glans of his penis was not tender and smooth, but dry and with cracked skin. Not to mention that he had ugly scars, I don't know how they cut him, but it was ugly. The most horrible thing is that he told me that his sexual life was ruined by circumcision. His sensitivity dropped sharply. He didn't feel anything with a condom. And without a condom as we made it, it scraped me terribly with that dry skin. No matter how wet I was, his penis was scraping inside me. Terrible. Not to mention that a circumcised penis seems hellishly unaesthetic to me. Nature has not put anything superfluous in the human body. If it has a foreskin, then it has some important function. And don't worry about hygiene. We live in the 21st century and we all have running water.

   42, you fantasize. Apparently you have never seen (a?) Circumcised, let alone used (a). About hygiene and water ... you have no idea what we're talking about. It's one thing to wash your hands, it's quite another to have a problem with his "hygiene"!

   To number 14, which claims that if it were more hygienic, nature would have created a circumcised Brother for us, why brush your teeth? Nature would create us without teeth ... and the excess hair that stinks when we sweat? As long as you justify yourself with nature and get in order!

   By removing the appendix, you cannot develop appendicitis. It's the same with the foreskin of the penis - removing it makes it much more hygienic and you can't develop diseases. In Islamic countries where they are circumcised, there is virtually no AIDS, for example.

   42 is a man, and unhygienic. As a woman, I wouldn't make a French "hood" no matter how much I wash it, there can always be something left there ... My husband was circumcised as a child precisely because of phimosis, he rinses it literally after every urination anyway. Not only is he not cracked and such nonsense, but I really enjoy playing with him, I have told him hundreds of times that he is very tasty. And Toysam said that if he had not been circumcised for medical reasons, he would have done so as an adult from a hygienic point of view. And because some associate it (justification?) With other religions, etc. to say that he comes from a family who worked in those government services that we hate ... He himself was pressured to study for such a service, although he later "hit the hat" in the ground and decided that he was not. his "profession. You have no excuse!

   45, the reason why there is practically no AIDS in Islamic countries will not please you at all and it is not in circumcision, remember which one it is ... Circumcision does not prevent the transmission of HIV, be educated. Without an appendix, it can be much easier to develop inflammation of the intestines, because it is like a "tonsil" for the intestines. Doing surgery to remove it unnecessarily also carries some, albeit minimal, risk. And the common phenomenon of "inflamed appendix" is due to poor quality food. 44, in fact brushing our teeth would be superfluous if our food was entirely natural. And she can't be like that nowadays. Even if you only eat fruits and vegetables, they are sprayed with poisons, even if they are not, and there is some contamination in the soil from which you cannot isolate yourself. So that, nature will not be to blame for tooth decay and bad breath if they do not brush. About hair - you wrote the reason to remove it, and it is aesthetic, but I do not see what it has to do with the foreskin ... In the end, everyone decides what to do, but seeing what stupid comments there are, I decided to write this ...

   to 49 of 45: I guess you're uncircumcised and that's why you talk like that. I prefer not to associate with the uncircumcised. You have totally different thinking and behavior. In general, the uncircumcised are very bad. That is why the Lord God has made a covenant with the circumcised, because they are much more intelligent.

   In my opinion, circumcision is a great intimate luxury that not all men would allow. Some because of religion, some because of the fear of pain during surgery. The reasons for circumcision in men are different - traditions, hygiene considerations, medical reasons. In Bulgaria, circumcision has always been associated with the expression "cut Turk". But it is actually most common in the United States. 75% of American men have their foreskin removed. One third of the world's men are circumcised, 70% of whom are Muslims. In circumcised people the risk of sexually transmitted diseases is zero. Sexual intercourse is longer, women experience more pleasure. And in those that are not circumcised, smegma collects under the skin, which is a huge nest of microbes, including fungi. Which not infrequently cause diseases such as phimosis and scalp cancer which treatment is very painful and in some cases absolutely impossible with hellish pain and suffering. So I'm for circumcision.

   Another nonsense that the cut ones did not suffer from sexually transmitted diseases. If basic daily hygiene is observed, almost nothing will be collected under the skin. And what is collected is a natural lubricant. You brush your teeth every day, you don't take them out, do you? The animals are constantly licking all over their bodies to maintain hygiene, people don't lick and we have to use water. Would you provide a link with adequate information that Americans are circumcised?

   I cannot determine whether the lies in this subject are the product of trollism or monstrous illiteracy. 1. Lie: In circumcised the risk of sexually transmitted diseases is zero. Rebuttal argument: During the AIDS epidemic in the United States in the late twentieth century, 85% of infected men were circumcised. Rebuttal argument: Sexually transmitted diseases are transmitted equally easily in both the circumcised and the uncircumcised. 2. Lie: There is virtually no AIDS in Islamic countries. Strong argument: AIDS epidemics have been declared in Algeria, Libya, Sudan, Egypt, Irian and Morocco in the last 10 years. Over 80% of those infected have contracted the virus sexually. 3. Lie: A circumcised penis is more hygienic. Rebuttal argument: A circumcised penis is more hygienic only in a population that does not have access to running water and soap. 4. Lying: Circumcised men last longer before ejaculating. Rebuttal argument: There is no serious evidence to support this lie. QED That is, before something can be refuted, it must first be proven. Grandpa Torbalan

   I sincerely laughed with some of the comments, really thanks for that :-) :-) :-) I hope they were written for a humorous purpose, because I hadn't read so much nonsense gathered in one place recently! If we exclude that some medical conditions recommend circumcision, which, however, happens very rarely, circumcision is a primitive vulgarity that cripples men! 1. Sexually transmitted diseases do not depend on whether a man's penis is circumcised or uncircumcised! 2. What makes a circumcised member more hygienic? If you live in the desert, do not have access to soap and water and bathe twice a year, maybe so ... We live in Bulgaria! How often do you bathe? A ridiculous thesis ... How come no woman I've been intimate with for so long has told me that she has any remarks on my hygiene? !! 3. Circumcised men last longer before ejaculating. Well, this is absolute nonsense! I have talked about this topic with several women who have had intimate friends who have been circumcised in the past. None of them told me something like that, on the contrary ... Because of the circumcision, they have an erection problem, due to the roughening of the skin on the head of the penis and they are more difficult to get aroused. These, of course, are the words of my friends, with whom I have not been intimate and cannot make such a basis for comparison. However, my current girlfriend was also intimate with a circumcised man years ago. Tell me that it ended very quickly, there were cases in which even after a few "pushes" it ends ... just for example - I'm uncircumcised, 32 years old, I have sex at least 2-3 times a week, no problem I do three "runs" one after another, as after the first, which, depending on when I last had sex for the last time, lasts between 15 and 35-40 minutes, then I can drive for an hour and up before I finish again. And to summarize - none of the women I've been with so far have had any complaints about my hygiene or my "speed" to finish because I'm uncircumcised! Come with health!

   Whoever has decided to circumcise should be circumcised, but only the gem should not be touched, if possible!

   My answer is a resounding YES! I am a 22 year old girl. I am currently in a relationship with a circumcised man and I like everything much more than before when I was with an uncircumcised man. His penis looks much better than the uncircumcised, it is somehow "nicer", the hygiene is definitely much better than that of the uncircumcised, because the skin retains dirt and odor (even if it is very clean, these two things there are). The pleasure of sex is greater. And what about nature has given us and what are not full of grandmother's nonsense and thoughts from a time - full of nonsense! I currently live in the United States and here most men are circumcised from an aesthetic and hygienic point of view and this is normal. In this way, over time, the woman is protected from various diseases during sexual intercourse, I'm not saying that you are not likely to get any disease,