Children Without Marriage.

We got the Demeck on us, and you don't. I understand you perfectly, because a lot of people today really do not fit for marriage and it is difficult to find the right person, even if you can be a reader. But if you don't believe in marriage, don't get married, I don't understand why you're kind of convincing or criticizing those who want to be stuck and like them. I've been married for 15, and this is the best thing that's ever happened to me, except for the ražadneto of my child. Just because you didn't happen to the right person, or that you're afraid of going down, doesn't mean that no one should get married or that he's stuck. I respect your decision not to marry, but I do not respect such words that someone's or his understanding was old. People have different backgrounds, different understandings, different experiences and different things make them happy and important to them. I'm sure if you find the right person and feel it, you'il forget all those things you wrote. The need to love and be Loved is one of the most foundational human needs. But many people get frustrated by partners and begin to suppress this need. Here's the fact that you think whether you want to or not to marry, says you have that need, but you don't want to be disappointed. Even your tone is as if you were disappointed with the mass of the recently mediated level, maybe your parents did not get along or divorced. And here again we come to the "piling up" of parents. If there was no such need at all, there was no way to pass the Adjeba you want, don't you want a marriage, and you just wouldn't have thought about the subject. So, for example, I don't have the need to go to Mars, and that's why I don't think about it and I don't go to the forums to complain that there's no point in going to Mars, since I'm not going to make it either way or that some of the parents have to go.

Why should I marry when I know I'm getting divorced? If you go with that attitude, you better not make children at all. Work with a specialist, why you have such an attitude.

Why do you have to make children after you split with the mother and make them miserable?

I understand your stupid has totally conquered some, but why do you have to introduce this crap to us. This is about elementary values and morality, no one has ever done anything to me in my head, but I still consider this a great thing. This is an important union, without which a people usually disappears. Accordingly, be calm/calm, it is obvious that many have been beat down by the unvalues of the Western vanishing/dying peoples. Frankly, such gush are completely redundant and I always wonder why they are placed on the site. But talk enough that there is no topic in which married to seek hardly any responsibility from the unmarried why they are not married.

Very chewed theme. If you want to marry, if you don't, don't get married.

If you're sure you're going to divorce true you don't need a marriage. A signature really does not guarantee a good family life. To live with someone without marriage in practice with the same, however. But if you think of separation before you get together, why would you do that? That you have children? You mean to cause all the trouble not only to yourself, your partner, but to them. It's irresponsible and selfish. From what I'm writing, I think you're not ready for us to be together, for children.

Some acquaintances with two children were not married, but a year ago they parted and now the woman sued him for alimony. So maybe the house stays for you, but you won't get away from alimony. Be with someone you love and it won't make any difference whether you're married or not?

That's your personal decision. My brother also has two children, now 2 and 5 years old, without signing a marriage, namely from sobraženi like yours. His girlfriend originally made it for a wedding, but then she made it. And for now, hopefully in the future, they live peacefully together without this formality.

Because if you can't commit to the mother of your children, how can she expect that you can commit to babysitting? Because let's be honest, besides the good moments, there are also obligations to these children (the cash excludes them altogether), as well as difficulties. So back to the question, if you can't commit to an adult who can take care of himself, how can you expect that you can commit yourself to raising children. The decision is ultimately yours, and as you have already said, if you go with the mindset that you will divide, you better not bother. Lola

I've already had 12 G's. I live with my wife in the family with no marriage, and our lives are completely normal. All my acquaintances who have signed up have been struck down and now are being tried as idiots. Marriage is not a guarantee of a happy life, but a guarantee of material advantage. M. 44

Because otherwise, everyone can live with a lot of partners and have children from each of them. It's like you're going to live with a man/woman and live 2-3-5 years. You have kids, but you split up. Then you meet another and so you take 1-2 years in a life together and you have a child. Respectively, everyone can experience with a few partuors and have children from them. But the husband/wife will be only one person, at most two.

I understand older people why they don't approve of me. After all, you've been married for many years, admitting that it's worse, so you can say you've been delusional all your life.

Now, if you don't want to get married, you don't marry. Find a woman with your opinion on the matter and live happily ever after, until a new cohabitation divides you. Know the problem. I just don't understand why you're making your views the most accurate. It became like the vegans-the whole world to admit them and to graze grass. Well, that's not going to happen.

The Braks are obsolete.

You want kids, you don't want a woman. You must be the author of "Woman for Hire" where some guy is looking for a woman to pay her to sleep with her and her even a child. People understand that life is a creation of a family with a person you love and not doing children, because your parents so want.

I'm a child of separated parents, not married. Well, it doesn't hurt any less that your father was a whip. Don't make children if you don't grow them with the other parent!!!!! Marriage has nothing to do with it. People who think about 10-15 years of living together, and then who's where it's better not to create children.

They don't want a marriage that they never really loved. You can't want to be in Ostreŝniâ so hard that you want to everything and everyone, even the fictional God, that you are one and at the same time don't want to marry. You have to remember your children, divide yourself with all the transient women/men (Mothers/fathers) of your children and not give a damn. Otherwise, they and utilities children are growing up, but is this the way? Bratan.

Number 3 Then the author can find another mother, do not think it

Material gain Number 10, and then they look to divorce and take the can to look for the next (s) and to reclothe the white dress... Well, it's marriage

Number 13 and a new woman/man can interrupt a good marriage

Up to 7 Maintenance is 160 to 250, month. The bloody House costs 400 000 euros. I think I'll survive...

That's your opinion, and I accept it, but I think everyone should decide for themselves whether they want to have marriage or not. There are women who from children imagine and dream of this day, if it gives them something they have to experience it.

I prefer the money for one day's celebration to go to my child. Because of one ego to see myself in the wedding dress, etc. Needlessly given money in one day. The wedding is not going to change my feelings for the man next to me.

Why does no one notice that the prepyre of such a character is completely meaningless? Why such dilemmas have not stood at all in front of there and there is no 100. Don't you feel that someone or something masterful, without knowing, is spinning things up and while we here with foaming at the mouth we kill him or is this thing dying of laughter? And it's not just about laughter, it's about the energy of these disputes. It also feeds on the negative energy of tears, the sections, the jealousy, the infidelity, the Moneyand the grief in the eyes of the children? People, let's be conscious, let's get out of the matrix as far as we can, at least a little bit of a try. Even if in part we succeed will still be a big victory for lard, let us stop feeding this octopus. M 42

8, well done by your brother, that he has arranged it, but I would seriously think to give birth to a man who does not perceive me seriously enough if he does not want to be bound to me and formally. In other words, it doesn't sound like a ultimatum, but if the wedding can wait, then the kids can wait. I'm with two hands for when they both have the same opinion that it is a technicality, to coexist and have children and without marriage, but when one was needed and finally was forced to "reconcile"... That doesn't sound very good.

Autolere, you don't have any problems. Live without marriage and that's it. We don't think of us. And if we're getting married, it's our business. Do not impose your opinions on us.

Okay, so wait a minute, so you want kids, but not marriage. You're saying why you want to divorce? Do you ever love a man by yourself or not? What is this reasoning...

27, and all that then complain that you have no money, but you do lavish weddings, usually with the money of your parents pensioners, do you love your children or your future children? ' Cause if you love them, bring them money for their future education, for example. A woman who dreams of her life is "to see herself in a white dress" is an infantile woman. A man thinks otherwise when he has a child or children. Sometimes without marriage, people love each other more. And there's no logic in the assertion that if a man doesn't want a marriage, he doesn't love a man. Don't think shallow!