There are things in a monogamous stable relationship, and in a marriage even more that fleeting relationships will never be able to bring you, like emotions, like sensations, like experiences. I don't know if the subject was written by a man or a woman, but it doesn't matter, it applies to both sexes. Not to mention that relationships build. They contribute to your growth, to your development and to your relationship with others. I am a young woman and I have friends and girlfriends who get married, some are just giving birth, some have children 2-3 years old. So certainly in society among our generation continue to meet and relationships and weddings. It is clear from the above that I am also for building a stable relationship between two people. Not because I'm some puritan, I've had sex without having an affair. I just see that relationships make sense.
Because it's up to the time. Trust me, there's going to be a moment where you want to go home and have someone who just asks you how your day is going, you want the little man to jump on your neck and tell you dad/mom. For these moments lives a man, everything else is transient.
Connections are as dead as computers. People are usually in front of their phone screen, but computers are still applicable, useful and in use. People can easily get sex, naturally, many benefit, but relationships and weddings still exist, are preferred by some and are not taboo. My example is very stupid, but it seems like that, so I won't feel guilty.
Number one, I liked your comment until I read the penultimate sentence. It's not that I blame you, you're free to live your life the way you want. It is simply that nowadays a woman can easily go to bed with a man, even if she herself is not particularly visual, while for a man it is far more difficult, unless he is really beautiful.
I personally would never marry a woman who had one knight stands, friends with advantages and the like. For me, it's a sign of a lack of abstinence. And the fewer long-term partners she had, the better.
In fact, are there any women left?
Personally, I don't like that, and I find it a big harm with these social networks. There is an illusion that on every corner you can find something even better than the previous one and why you should dig deeper, with the next opportunities waiting at the door almost not. But for a relationship to be in, people need to give themselves a chance to get to know each other well to decide if they're for each other. Now with the slightest dislike of something, most people are looking for an alternative, but the other alternative has its drawbacks and you transfer to the next one and how far it will go. It's just that at some point you're going to have a superficial acquaintance with a lot of people, but none of them are really familiar. And you jump from next to the next with the idea that someone will impress you to pay special attention to them, which rarely happens. Somehow the very idea of these social networks that you supposedly have a lot of choice at one point makes you superficial. Well, now if you're looking for something for sex for one night it might be ok, but for a deeper relationship, I don't think it can happen if you're with your mindset - the next please.
That's the way it is when you're young. Now your sea is on your knees, and the sex on one click ;)
If you're not already committed, it's too hard.
You're going to grow up, you're going to find out ;)
It's not true that you can easily find a man/woman, a partner. This is an illusion of the numerous "offering" on the net. The right people for serious contact is even more difficult and sometimes impossible to find today than it was 30 years ago. That you don't even have a place to dance and someone to ask you to dance at a restaurant. Crammed tables and that's in the restaurants. There are no places for real social contacts. And when someone invites you to dance, you feel it right away - like it or not. It's casual, it's got a quick exploratory effect. And not to write for a few weeks, you see, and when you feel his breath, for example, you come to escape with 300.
Where's that easy sex? Women alone, that's true, I guess. For most single men, out-of-touch sex is a myth.
Otherwise, judging by acquaintances and friends, relationships are not dead, just people wait and wait until they decide it's time for a serious relationship. And social media and all this connectivity creates the illusion that there is always someone more relevant, and at the slightest flaw the idea is that with a little more "swis"in Tinder you will find someone else.
I don't think so.
Social media just brings out what we've always been - shallow individuals. Now it's easier to show simply.
Go to number 4
I'm such a woman, I've never been intimate with a man, but I've communicated enough with men to understand them, and... I'm not going to have a family, it's just impossible. I'd rather be alone than be used. You know, even though I haven't had sex with the men I've been socializing with, I feel hurt and abused by them, and i'm disappointed... I probably would have shot myself if I had had sex, but it did not happen to any, because I got to know them for months, I gave them a chance, although in the very first days it was clear to me that they were inappropriate to start a family, not just with me, but in principle. And if you don't think they were obvious players, don't... modest, normal-looking men with good professions, education, etc., in short - with a good social profile, which to me means nothing, of course, because I watch the man "untie"...
The first - showed me that men are excited, especially, by the vision of a woman. The second, third and fourth showed me that men can say, and do anything just to have a woman, be it for entertainment, for variety, for filling loneliness, for stimulus, for a relationship, for sex... , who - when they really believe it won't happen - disappear.
And with the four of us, I have behaved with understanding and, although it has been a long time, I remember everything they shared with me, because yes, men share, and sincerely, though, not unconditionally. It's funny to me why they've been communicating with me for so long, even though I've been completely honest with each of them, seeing them for who they are and not trying to fool me...
Maybe there's nothing strange, just curiosity, a challenge...
I don't want to satisfy anyone's curiosity and be an esperiment to anyone anymore.
10, and what kind of man do you really want? Rob? Someone looking for a surrogate for his mother? You drove men away from yourself. It's natural that they're going to ask you a lot of things, like to fill their loneliness, isn't that what relationships are for? I feel sorry for you. I'm a woman, but I can't understand you.
Ooooooo#10
You're tearing my soul apart. I'm going to just sit down and cry. Poor.
How dare you pay attention to her! Hey, guys, get her in your arms and let's go! She doesn't want attention ok?
So stop it.
Number 10,
You killed the fish... the sink :)
Bravo. It's such an unheated scanner, no man has a chance just. Respect.
Bravo with :)
1 stripperkitty666 answered