They are disgusting to me personally, yes. For others, maybe not.
Number 1, and what's so disgusting about it? And who doesn't have moles, be it a lot or a little? dumb comment ...
From the author: and in my opinion they are not so beautiful, but they also have some charm. Besides, I was born that way, I can't change my essence, I just have to be accepted as I am. I would like other opinions on the discussion.
2, I do not know what, I do not choose what is disgusting to me, I do not do it consciously. Your comment is stupid because no one chooses what is pleasant and what is disgusting. If I had a choice, I would choose not to be disgusted.
Can you consciously choose to like the smell of shit? And do you have to feel guilty that you don't like it? The fact that everyone has moles is not an argument. We all have shit.
Not understanding why you like them, we all have to like us. That you even gave me one.
I don't know why everyone wants everyone else to be like them. I'm sorry, I don't have to be your copy.
Author, I don't know what your problem is, since you have no control over it anyway. Better accept. Otherwise, if you hold, they can be removed very easily and painlessly with a laser in seconds. It costs BGN 30 per mole. By the way, it is also good from a healthy point of view. to remove them.
From n. 2 to 4/1: In fact, I neither like it nor not, just the word "disgusting" came to me a little extreme. By the same logic, if someone likes more light hair, should eyes say to the dark "disgusting" or vice versa.
5, but yes, I'm disgusted, what should I do? Not only do I not like them, I am disgusted. I do not choose it consciously. If you get a cockroach in the soup while eating it, can you consciously choose to just not like it or will it spontaneously become disgusting without having control over it? It's the same with my moles.
From 6
I think someone with a lot of moles was affected. I'm not saying it's bad to have moles, and I didn't mean to hurt anyone. The author asks if we are disgusted and I answer. Sorry if I've affected someone with a lot of moles, but I don't have the self-control to make my mind like something that is otherwise disgusting.
Maybe if I study in a Buddhist monastery one year or another, I will achieve it and make the affected person happy, but for now, I do not intend to go to Tibet.
Unfortunately, we cannot choose what we are. And for me moles are something extremely disgusting and disgusting! I searched the internet for methods to remove, I even tried, but there was no effect, unfortunately, or I did not do it correctly, I do not know... The doctors also have no use with their answer that there was no need to remove. I have to endure the situation and at least expose myself to the sun because I have white skin. You just have to avoid the factors that cause them and that's it.
From 2/5
He didn't really know. I wouldn't have commented at all if I hadn't seen the word "disgusting." It just sounds extreme to me.
9, extreme, not extreme, I'm disgusted, I'm sorry I didn't like the word. I don't see the point in giving me a single opinion. It is foolish to cling to some words and disrespect another's opinion. This speaks of narrow-mindedness.
Up to 10, out of 9 - only on the first comment I put one, then I did not deal. For me, for example, it's disgusting to have fat on your legs, but I didn't go to write in the topics of people who have how disgusting it is.
11, I would have accepted your remark in question if they had not asked me. However, in this case the author asks for an opinion. If it wasn't on the subject and if no one asked me, I wouldn't mention it either.
For example, if I want to know if I'm dumb and ask someone, I prefer if he thinks I'm dumb to tell me "you're dumb." Not to be silent, squeamish or lying. If I haven't asked him to tell me he's dumb, then I won't like it, but if I asked him, then I want to know. I also don't believe that the author should ask with the idea of keeping silent or lying to him.
People who tell the truth after asking them always point the finger. I don't see the point, given that the author has come in to ask, to be silent. If he wanted us to keep quiet, he wouldn't let go of the subject.
I'm a straight person and if they ask me, I tell myself directly what I think. If they don't ask me, I don't say. I prefer not to be a hypocrite - if a person wants to know, I will not help him with silence and hypocrisy.
Lately, I have been holding more and more the opinion that the question here is not to tell him the truth, but to lie to him and calm him down.
Like the one who doesn't take his suit off his ass, even at university, at work and on a first date, and asks if it's silly. Well, it's peasant, and more than 100 people wrote it to him, and he was stubborn that he wouldn't take his suit off his ass. Well, okay, but if you don't want to get off your ass, why did you post the topic? To lie to him that it's gentlemanly to go on a first date in a tracksuit and soothe his guilty conscience?
PS: I suspect you're the one in the suit.
11, what I understand is that you reproach me for not being silent after being asked. Well, as we will be silent, let's just close the forum. The forum does not think it is to be silent, lie or tell the truth only if it gets rid of us.
From 11: Well, well, you said what you think, I said what I think about your comment, I won't argue about any moles anymore, I'm not "the one in the suit", but anyway, it doesn't matter.
14, yes, we both said what we think, the difference is that you blame and I don't. You told me to keep quiet, but I'm not. I said just respect someone else's opinion, not have your own or keep it to yourself. And I'm not arguing, I just don't think it's right to tell someone what to think or say. The latter is the least rude and narrow-minded.
It was good, we understood! Moles are disgusting to you and you always tell the truth. Come on - we won't just read you! Don't you feel you have to apologize to the author? First, you insulted him - no one makes you lie, you could have expressed yourself more tactfully, and second - well, show a little respect - you filled the topic with your comments!
16
Out of 14, just to say that 16 is not my comment.
Me and I have on the face, they are not big or ugly, but I do not care. Obviously, it is not a problem for the people around me. And I fuck girls and women look at me ... If this little man Number 1 bothers him and they are open to him and he hates them, then he hates the people who have them. And this is already a problem. Mental problem. Because moles are part of people. The analogies with disgusting insects in eating is, to put it mildly, human and pathetic.
One hundred percent of these abominations of hatred are written by a complex teenager.
Excess energy is hatred. It is good to transfer to something nice and useful.
19, I have already explained that I do not hate anyone no matter if there are moles and that everyone should be taken. If you don't care, you shouldn't take offense, and I didn't mean that. You offended those with moles a lot. Nobody hates you, I just answered the author's question. One cannot express one's opinion and is immediately accused of hatred and mental problems.
By the way, I never mentioned that I hate people with moles, so I don't know who has mental problems. One who expresses his opinion, or one who assumes about others without knowing them.
Let's face it - aversion to moles does not mean aversion to people who have them, much less hatred. You all accepted this opinion very personally.
Have more self-confidence no matter how many moles you have and who thought what in some anonymous forum. If a word "disgusting" provokes you so much, then moles are your least problem. Your self-confidence is greater.
On the topic - if someone is so much undermined by the self-esteem of these moles, they are removed very easily and quickly. I had one on my chest and I removed it. You get up in minutes, you get up and leave. And now it's even easier with a laser, you don't even need to cut.
And have more confidence. In this way you will respect people's opinion more, without beating your self-confidence and feeling obliged to be influenced by it. And you will be happier.
If you have a problem with the word I used, I will stop using it and keep quiet if necessary, but it will not make you more confident. Do you understand where your problem is at all or are we arguing about the neighborhood for sports?
from 16
You know, number 20, the man with the complexes and the problems is neither the author nor the lady who made a very appropriate remark to you, but you. Be sure to keep the last word yours, not accepting a different opinion, insulting, repeating the same thing a hundred times - this speaks to your problems with self-esteem and your ego. And how did you decide that the author asks only you, and you forbid the others to speak - this site is not your property ?! And so as not to make assumptions, I'll tell you that I have a normal number of moles, they don't bother me, so I didn't guess. If the author has concerns, and obviously has, when he writes here, it is not correct to confirm and overexpose them in such an ugly way. Expressing my indignation at your attitude and behavior, I do not spam - there is one thing called netiquette, it is not bad to ask what it is. And to write three hundred comments, all this - the story of the bear and the bad word do you know it if not - read it.
21,
"If the author has concerns, and obviously has, when he writes here, it is not correct to confirm them"
Aha, I decided that when he asked, he wanted an honest opinion, and he asked so that we could lie to him. Okay.
So moles make me very happy. A man without a mole is not a man. Author, enjoy your moles. With them you become more beautiful. Even go to a surgeon to have more moles glued to make you even more irresistible. Is it that good? Now the author will fly with confidence.
I suspect that even now you will not be satisfied with my answer. It's different to hide from the beginning and let no one know you're a hypocrite. All right, hate the honest, and love the hypocrites. Only lie to yourself. Precisely because I have self-confidence, I want to be told all the shortcomings right in my eyes and take action, rather than living in some illusory confidence in the truth saved.
Apparently my mistake is that I do not understand that there are people who prefer to lie to them, to live with some illusory self-confidence, than to know the truth and fix the problem realistically.
Yes, I have my complexes like everyone else, but at least I don't tell anyone what or how to say. This annoyed me and that's why I started the bike so much. In principle, I do not argue about deafness, but everyone has something that throws him off balance. I am taken off the rails by someone to tell me what to say and how to say it.
Yes, in this case I want the last one to be mine, because I was attacked without asking anyone's opinion, and I want to defend myself. They always bring out the person who defends himself as a psychic, and the fact that someone has attacked him before for no reason is not seen as a bad thing.
Yes, I repeat the same thing 100 times, because they provoke me 100 times and refuse to understand the arguments.
On the contrary, I accept people's opinion and do not want mine to be accepted. What annoyed me was that I was attacked because I told the truth. I should have said it differently. Well, the truth is the truth, no matter how I say it, it will not be any different. I clarified in my first comment that others may not feel sick. Why were you so influenced by my opinion, am I so important to you or do you have your own nasty moles and that hurt you? Given that I'm some kind of forum anonymous, it's the second of May, huh?
I can't stand people interfering in conversations without being invited and leaning on someone and then accusing me of not respecting someone else's opinion. It just makes me totally nervous. Yes, it is my weakness and I overreact, I realize it, but it is not an honor for you to accuse someone of not lying, but of being honest after they asked for his opinion. And as you can see, you continue to answer. But yours is not a problem, and I am the spammer. You are prejudiced.
What a chat you did under the topic of the man with the moles is not true! It is quite normal that one does not like it, another does not like it, and a third does not care. As with freckles, birthmarks, wearing glasses and more. physiological features that no one asks you whether you want them or not.
Some of the biggest sex symbols - Marilyn Monroe, Cindy Crawford, Eva Mendes, Angelina Jolie, Enrique Iglesias have moles on their faces and they have become such a part of their image that you just can't imagine them without them, many people find them for super sexy and a lot of women draw moles with a pencil quite deliberately. And when Iglesias removed his, the fans shocked him and accused him of being more charming with his mole.
I have tiny moles here and there and two larger and more embossed ones, like a small pea. Many times I have thought about removing them, but comparing the risk that lies after their removal, I prefer to wear them until they cause me problems. Because they may never give indications of concern, and at the same time there are more than one or two deaths after removing one nothing and no mole.
32, yes, that's right. Let me just correct you that the mole has not been part of Enrique Iglesias' image for a long time, because I got rid of it a long time ago.
1 just1subsm answered