Adoption By Homosexuals

   There is no way to pass calmly and fortunately there seems to be no such case in Bulgaria.

   As far as I know it is not legal. The step forward has not yet been made with marriage, what is left for the adoption of a child? Given the culture of the Bulgarians, the life of LGBTI people in Bulgaria as a whole is difficult, the good thing is that we are working on the issue of positive change. In a few decades, things may be as they are in developed countries. Let's hope we get rid of our rigid thinking sooner, because it basically pulls us back not only in this regard. Then we wonder why life in our country is not satisfactory and there are more and more miserable and needy people.

   I hope they never allow such a sculpture!

   To numbers 1 and 3 - no matter how much you don't want to, these people exist. And sooner or later they will be able to find their love for each other, to legalize it according to the law and will create a close-knit family, sculpted solely by love. And you will be left only with the hatred and prejudices that fill your hearts, incapable of true love!

   Why didn't he ask how the adopted child's life was going?

   But.2, the fact that you were born is indicative, you were the fruit of a MAN and a WOMAN. Butt (literally) there is no way to have a child with someone like you. Everything else is your psychological deviations.

   №2 What pulls us back, you say that we have miserable and needy people, because the parliament has not accepted gay marriages ????

   It is clear that the topic is a provocation. And yet: no, he can't. If it's up to me, it won't be! If they create their common child (hee hee) or have a child of one who will not be looked after by the other biological parent - to look after him. It's theirs. But to adopt - no! F31

   The figure of a parent of the opposite sex is important for the development of a child, so once they have accepted (chosen, decided) to live as a homo couple, they must also accept that they cannot have and look after children. We are not hetero, we want to be like them. Hypocrisy.

   This is confusing for the child. I hope they never allow it!

   To adopt a child, they must be a family. Since in Bulgaria pedals cannot create families, there is no way to adopt a child, and thank God that there are still decent Bulgarians, so they save the children, but as things go, the patterns become more impudent, it is not known what times will come !?

   From # 2 To 7 - I have written clearly that thinking pulls us back, not only on the issue addressed in the topic, but also does not allow us to go in the right direction in which developed countries have gone, where there are much more little miserable people. I have not said anything about the parliament. I would advise you to understand what someone else is trying to say and try to think. All the other homophobes I want to ask - if your son or daughter admits to being gay, how will you react? Will you deny your child something that does not depend on him or you? Do not rest assured that it is masculine or the girl - feminine, this is not a guarantee of sexuality, I assure you. :)

   I prefer to be in a family of homosexuals and to be loved and not as I was born in my family, for whom I am garbage and miserable!

   Homosexual 12 in the comments there is no one who hates homosexuals, people are only against homosexuals to have too many (more than others) rights. The reality is that all people in Bulgaria have the same rights, we have the right to marry anyone of the opposite sex, we have the right to have a biological child, we have the right if we are married to adopt a child. It is not fair to make special laws specifically for a group of people. If we make laws in defense of gay people, let's make separate laws in defense of the fat, the skinny, the bald, the blue-eyed, the people with natural curls (they are in large groups). you can't blame the people for your choice of who to "sleep with." People don't blame you for choosing who you sleep with. And one more thing about not wanting to have children raised by two same-sex parents is not homophobia. In this regard, the child and his development as an adult are more important than the desire of someone to raise a child, and here homophobia has nothing to do.

   As 13 said, the important thing is that your family loves you and is happy in it. The harm is when the child lives amid constant quarrels and hatred of seemingly perfect traditional families. In other countries, there are examples and studies of children raised by homosexual families and they are not inferior to their peers.

   13 You may prefer many things, but no one can guarantee that your potential homo parents will love you more than your real parents. However, homosexuals are people and have all kinds of characters, just because they are gay does not mean that they are good people. What if he had come across a homosexual family that loved you a little more than you currently had, what?

   Number 13 Just because your parents love you doesn't mean they can't hurt you. Parents who quarrel with each other and raise scandals also love their child. But they still hurt him. Tyrannical parents who obsess over their children's lives also love them, but do not realize that they are harming them. Irresponsible parents do not realize that they are irresponsible and that they are harming their child. Homosexuals may adore children, but that doesn't mean they will make them happy. Yes, they can give them love, money, attention, etc., but at what cost. What will a child who grew up with two mothers or two fathers have an idea of ​​the world instead of a mother and father? It is no coincidence that some things are forbidden.

   We are not homophobes, on the contrary. It is just very difficult to raise a child in such an environment, you need to work with a psychologist, intensive communication with the child, a special approach, that it is not necessary to imitate the parents and that it is normal to like the opposite sex. Most hetero couples can't do it, I highly doubt homo couples can. If you want so much, take a pet, but a child - not right.

   As long as they want to be a family, the homosexuals in question can settle abroad and get married there. If they want a child, take it there. It is not legal here.

   Is number 2 not a patch for those who finance their prides with money from abroad? As mentioned above, you both want equal rights and special treatment ... This is hypocrisy everywhere. I have no problem inheriting the opposite and so on, but marriage as an institution has suffered enough, and with their active participation. Not to mention the most sacred thing of the Bulgarian - the child ... They are now the children of mixed marriages are in a terrible environment at school, let alone if dads 1 and 2 of parental blossom. This child's life will be a nightmare ...

   I completely agree with number 21! Equal rights presuppose equal obligations before the law, equal responsibilities. And the so-called "different" have long enjoyed more privileges than ordinary people. They have complete freedom of speech and can say whatever they want, but we must be careful what we say so as not to offend them. So our freedom is limited in favor of theirs. This applies not only to the opposite, but also to minorities. They really do not want equal rights, they want extra rights at the expense of our human rights, and we must "step on our toes and measure our stories" so as not to infringe on their dignity. Well, of course it's not right. Look at the countries where these homosexual desires are legalized. I can't call them stable or fair, because there are a lot of victims among heterosexual people, for example. If we could be completely equal, we would not consider ourselves different and we would not need some "special rights" for "special people". I've heard that in some US states, mothers with babies are not allowed to breastfeed in public because it depressed homosexual men that they couldn't get pregnant. Amy, I'm sorry that human nature is like that, and only a woman can get pregnant and give birth naturally. Sorry for our heterosexual "ostentation" that normal women want their children to eat and that this depresses you. Otherwise there is no problem to make gay parades, etc. Complete shock! I hope people return to the old family traditions ... it is forbidden for mothers with babies to breastfeed in public because it depressed homosexual men that they could not conceive. Amy, I'm sorry that human nature is like that, and only a woman can get pregnant and give birth naturally. Sorry for our heterosexual "ostentation" that normal women want their children to eat and that this depresses you. Otherwise there is no problem to make gay parades, etc. Complete shock! I hope people return to the old family traditions ... it is forbidden for mothers with babies to breastfeed in public because it depressed homosexual men that they could not conceive. Amy, I'm sorry that human nature is like that, and only a woman can get pregnant and give birth naturally. Sorry for our heterosexual "ostentation" that normal women want their children to eat and that this depresses you. Otherwise there is no problem to make gay parades, etc. Complete shock! I hope people return to the old family traditions ... Otherwise there is no problem to make gay parades, etc. Complete shock! I hope people return to the old family traditions ... Otherwise there is no problem to make gay parades, etc. Complete shock! I hope people return to the old family traditions ...

   To number 2, 12 I sincerely apologize for what I will write. From what you have said, there is only one true thing - that limited thinking pulls us back. Yes, that's true, but who is really limited? I wish you could think about what people are writing here. You ask, "Would we give up our child if he was gay?" Relevant question, BUT! You don't think it depends on him or his parents, do you? Well, you're wrong. The truth is, no one is born the other way around unless your parents have been mentally disabled in some way. Otherwise, in order to be gay, you became one later. It is most often due to some deep trauma in childhood, which must have been caused by the parents. So it depends a lot on the mother and father whether their son will become gay or their daughter a lesbian. If the mother is tyrannical, the son can become the opposite. If a father is mean and tyrannical towards his daughter, she can hate men and become a lesbian. However, sexuality is related not only to human biology, but also to the human psyche. Now think about the results if homosexual couples start adopting children! If a child grows up in an unhealthy environment, it affects his way of thinking and his sexuality for the future. And this applies not only to same-sex marriages, but to any kind of unhealthy environment. Unfortunately, they are quite species. Keep in mind that no one is born the other way around, but becomes so, either because of their sick parents or because of the sick society in which we live. When you're exposed to gay propaganda everywhere, you can't grow normally. That is why same-sex marriage and homosexual adoption are banned. Because people know what causes this. The countries you mention number 2, where gay marriage is legal, have only advanced economically and financially. But socially and ethically, they are pure parody. I apologize for the things I write and I hope the administrators publish my comment. But this is the truth. Think about it, why when you like someone of the same sex, you are called "reverse"? Well, because what you do is incompatible with biological human nature, which is adapted so that we can have children with a person of the opposite sex. At least in a natural way. The number of counterparts in the world, and the people who defend them, are the product of this stupid propaganda that counterparts are not so different from heterosexuals. I wonder only one thing. Since we are not different, then why are some homo, and the others hetero? Why are there different definitions at all? And how can we be equal, when in a certain way we do not want to be equal? I know I look like a homophobe and my words sound like prejudice, but they are actually facts. You will probably think that I am insulting the opposite. I'm not insulting them, I'm telling the truth. I'm not saying that they are bad people or that I hate them, but I think that these are still confused people who can confuse other people's consciousness. That's why I wouldn't want them allowed to adopt. In your opinion, number 2, how will the world change for the better if same-sex marriages become legal? I think that just the opposite will become more and the state will produce more and more traumatized and confused children. And something I've always wondered about. Many opposite say that they are born that way and that they cannot fight with themselves. At the same time, everyone is trumpeting that people have a choice of what to be. Let me ask you, what choice are you talking about if you were "born that way"? Doesn't the fact that you were "born that way" automatically mean a lack of choice? Or, if you "have a choice," then you are not "born that way," but you have chosen it, dear people. It is logical. For the third time, I apologize for sounding like a homophobe, but I am of the opinion that the opposite should not adopt children. Let them be like that, let them make love with whomever they want, but at least not to embrace the unfortified psyche of the children (more than is permissible). P.P. Having said that, I'm not saying that heterosexuals are necessarily better, smarter, or bigger than the other way around. But some things need to be legitimized. automatically means no choice? Or, if you "have a choice," then you are not "born that way," but you have chosen it, dear people. It is logical. For the third time, I apologize for sounding like a homophobe, but I am of the opinion that the opposite should not adopt children. Let them be like that, let them make love with whomever they want, but at least not to embrace the unfortified psyche of the children (more than is permissible). P.P. Having said that, I'm not saying that heterosexuals are necessarily better, smarter, or bigger than the other way around. But some things need to be legitimized. automatically means no choice? Or, if you "have a choice," then you are not "born that way," but you have chosen it, dear people. It is logical. For the third time, I apologize for sounding like a homophobe, but I am of the opinion that the opposite should not adopt children. Let them be like that, let them make love with whomever they want, but at least not to embrace the unfortified psyche of the children (more than is permissible). P.P. Having said that, I'm not saying that heterosexuals are necessarily better, smarter, or bigger than the other way around. But some things need to be legitimized. but at least not to embrace the weakened psyche of children (more than is permissible). P.P. Having said that, I'm not saying that heterosexuals are necessarily better, smarter, or bigger than the other way around. But some things need to be legitimized. but at least not to embrace the weakened psyche of children (more than is permissible). P.P. Having said that, I'm not saying that heterosexuals are necessarily better, smarter, or bigger than the other way around. But some things need to be legitimized.

   На мен пък са ми много интересни тези табута и определения - Хомофоб, сексист, и тн. Много хора са платили с живота си правото да казваме каквото мислим - независимо, че някой може да се почувства оскърбен. Значи, ако някой не се справя с работата си е ок да го наречеш какъвто е - некъдърник, но ако той е обратен, изведнъж става хомофобско. Хомосексуализмът не е свързан със секса, а със социалната роля - в древна Гърция и Рим се е практукувал масово, но тези същите мъже са били на първа линия във войните. И за мен е изконно човешко право да кажа, когато не одобрявам нещо или някого. Това е свободата на словото. Свобода на словото под условие е любим трик на политиците, защото така никой не би подтикнал другите към действия по промяна. Свободните думи носят сила. Според мен хората имат право да изказват неодобрението си от това или онова, защото дори и да нямащ право да го кажеш, ще си го мислиш, и това, че заради някой си длъжен да внимаваш какво говориш само ще те изпълва още повече с омраза към този някой.

   It's amazing, obsessed with hatred, what a person can do. I hadn't read so much nonsense in a while. Here I see only some conflicting thoughts, contradicting each other and the absence of any facts. 23 has tried to look scientifically sophisticated, but only to the point - as much nonsense as you want. I sincerely sympathize with you because I see how strongly you believe in your fabrications, which torment you the most. I wish you life to present you with circumstances that will get you out of your self-delusion. I also want you to read more and talk so confidently about the things you are sure of.

   25, I would be very grateful if you could explain to me which one contradicts you in my comment and which one you call "nonsense"? Is it not true for you that only two people of the opposite sex can have a child naturally? If the child is raised by two men or two women, the two parental models of the man and the woman will be missing in his life, and his development will be marked. Yes, this child will learn to tolerate the opposite, but he himself will hardly know what a normal way of life is, etc. You probably think that the opposite are better parents, because they would love the child more than normal people. Whether they love him or not, they remain in short supply as a couple and a family. I do not hate these people, I am sad for them that they are confused and I am very angry that they imperceptibly make the minds of others sick, as happened to you.

   Yes, the fact is that two people of the same sex can not create a child, very cleverly thought to note it. However, the facts are so far. I feel that it is pointless to discuss with you one by one the other untruths and suggestions, the fruit of your rich but strongly distorted imagination. I will only say that it is ignorance to claim that a homo or bisexual person is "confused" and "makes the minds of others sick." These are not diseases that make you sick. But these are things you are not currently able to understand. However, life is very ironic and I would be very happy if you find out even first hand that parents do not have to be sick to have a homo child. Where did you actually read this information from? Again, I would like you to read more and speak so confidently about the things you are sure of. I don't think I should pay such attention to the other comments, you don't deserve it, and what I already said was because of the people who are still looking for themselves. :)

   I will answer your question with the greatest pleasure, number 27. I have not just read these things in psychology textbooks or statistics, which are variable, but I have seen them with my own eyes. I do not know what your personal experience with the opposite is, but I know enough such people. And they all either had a serious problem in the family, or were mentally abused on sexual and all kinds of topics, long before they realized they were "different." Injuries lead to sexual problems, psychologists have proven. The pressure of our sick society confuses us from an early age. We are not born the other way around, but become so later, as I have already said. There is a rumor that this is normal and that we must tolerate them. And do they show understanding towards heterosexuals? No, that's exactly why we "hate" them. Not to mention that these people's idea of ​​the world is quite ... interesting. I have a gay acquaintance who claims that "being heterosexual is definitely a flaw and that femininity in itself is definitely something ugly, so it would be better for one man to be with another man." I think it is unnecessary to explain why this seems wrong to me. Yes, for him, a woman is something ugly, but that does not mean that all men should become the opposite, just because of his misconception. And he often forces her, as if he is the wisest in the world. And he is not the only "French graduate" with such an opinion and such an approach to propagate his theory. It's not just their personal choices, they want everyone to be like them. Give them rights and see how they rob! I also know that not all gays are like that, but there are many examples that prove that our "prejudices" are facts. However, this stereotype was born on the basis of facts. They tried to destroy it a million times, but alas. People feel that there are negative consequences. And where have you seen or read that a child can grow up normally in a homo environment? If you've read it somewhere, I'll give you some advice. Don't believe everything you read! A lot of lies are written and they are given constant publicity in order to be manipulated and deceived that we are smart and to be controlled. This idea began a long time ago in human history, and if we start a discussion about it, we will go to another topic. And the things I say are not just read somewhere, human history proves it. The destruction of family values ​​is one of the methods of controlling society. And gay propaganda helps a lot for that purpose. In answer to your question, this is how our society "gets sick". To be gay it has long been fashionable. By that logic, I'm retro sexual, haha! However, you are right about one thing. Life is ironic. Until a year ago, I thought like you, I didn't see anything wrong with someone being the other way around, I didn't consider it a disease, but life disproved me. It is true that there is a difference between gay and another obscene word, but unfortunately most of them only compromise globally. None of these people, the current reverse, lived in a normal environment. Or even if they had normal families, something else went wrong. It could be a mockery at school, it could be unrequited love, it could be some other kind of trauma. Or it could be hereditary if the parents were still injured. If these people start raising children, the world will not get better. Until a year ago, I thought like you, I didn't see anything wrong with someone being the other way around, I didn't consider it a disease, but life disproved me. It is true that there is a difference between gay and another obscene word, but unfortunately most of them only compromise globally. None of these people, the current reverse, lived in a normal environment. Or even if they had normal families, something else went wrong. It could be a mockery at school, it could be unrequited love, it could be some other kind of trauma. Or it could be hereditary if the parents were still injured. If these people start raising children, the world will not get better. Until a year ago, I thought like you, I didn't see anything wrong with someone being the other way around, I didn't consider it a disease, but life disproved me. It is true that there is a difference between gay and another obscene word, but unfortunately most of them only compromise globally. None of these people, the current reverse, lived in a normal environment. Or even if they had normal families, something else went wrong. It could be a mockery at school, it could be unrequited love, it could be some other kind of trauma. Or it could be hereditary if the parents were still injured. If these people start raising children, the world will not get better. but unfortunately most of them are only compromised globally. None of these people, the current reverse, lived in a normal environment. Or even if they had normal families, something else went wrong. It could be a mockery at school, it could be unrequited love, it could be some other kind of trauma. Or it could be hereditary if the parents were still injured. If these people start raising children, the world will not get better. but unfortunately most of them are only compromised globally. None of these people, the current reverse, lived in a normal environment. Or even if they had normal families, something else went wrong. It could be a mockery at school, it could be unrequited love, it could be some other kind of trauma. Or it could be hereditary if the parents were still injured. If these people start raising children, the world will not get better.

   I will add a lot more, dear 27. Something I repeated several times, but I feel I have to write it again. The "illness" I'm talking about is exactly this constant exposure to the wrong idea that being "gay is normal." You cannot deny the eternal approach of the media to manipulate us. Ok, I understand that they want to make the opposite feel accepted, etc. This is great, but the problem that affects the topic are the additional rights that each opposite claims. As someone had said in previous comments, "In Bulgaria, in reality, everyone has equal rights with others - to marry a person of the opposite sex and have children with him." If they allow the opposite to marry each other and adopt, in reality, heterosexuals will have the same rights, but the benefit will be zero because they are heterosexual. Now you will tell me that gays and lesbians also want to marry people they love. Great, let them love each other, let them be together, but when it comes to marriage, the adoption of children will follow, and from there to greater perversions. Let's think realistically. If a couple of opposite men adopt a girl, how would things turn out? At first, everything will be great. They will buy her dresses, make her hairstyles, manicures, etc. And then when does this girl start turning into a woman? Will she feel comfortable living with two mature men without female support? Who will she talk to about her female problems such as the menstrual cycle, bras, etc.? It would be very traumatic for a young woman to have no one to turn to for these things, or to discuss them with men. Or two lesbians to adopt a boy. Well, how is this boy going to become a man, if there is no male example in your life? A real man, not a woman trying to fulfill that role? Come to think of it with your heads! If homosexuality were so similar to us, it would be difficult for them to be completely like us. No, my problem is not that they are "different", as many homosexuals would think. We have already become "different" heterosexuals. If you look around, you'll see how overwhelmed we are by the silly idea that "the opposite is almost better than ordinary people who used old-fashioned ways to start a family." On television, in forums, in magazines, various shows regularly launch gays and lesbians to raise their ratings and divide people into two camps - one is the "evil homophobe who hates the different" and the other is "broad-minded defenders of the opposite." Even here on share.net, someone had posted the topic that "lesbians were smarter than ordinary women." Even if they are smarter, they cannot fully perform the male functions in a family, so ... The sad thing is that the blame for these problems is entirely ours, because we tolerated and sympathized with them. Liking people of the same sex is not just a "taste" or a preference in bed. This is a kind of distortion, just like it is with rapists and pedophiles. True, it's not as scary or perverted as the last two. It is again more tolerable and does not involve a crime or injury to anyone. But here I will add a difficult and sad truth. That some people develop homosexuality precisely as a result of violence or sexual harassment. That should be enough to make up our minds. No, this is not a figment of my imagination, these are proven facts! Yes, indeed, your parents may be completely normal, but something else can confuse your mind and cause you trauma for life. Injuries that you don't understand how they change. You took these things for granted, you consider me ignorant because I see it as a disease. Congratulations, you are subject to manipulation! The worst thing is that you consider your shortcoming to be good quality. He would probably say the same about me and my "hatred" of this type of people. Now I think of something very ironic. Marius Kurkinski, who is openly the opposite, said in an interview that "he would not adopt a child because he is perversely the opposite of looking after a child." I don't think a comment is needed. you consider me ignorant because I see it as a disease. Congratulations, you are subject to manipulation! The worst thing is that you consider your shortcoming to be good quality. He would probably say the same about me and my "hatred" of this type of people. Now I think of something very ironic. Marius Kurkinski, who is openly the opposite, said in an interview that "he would not adopt a child because he is perversely the opposite of looking after a child." I don't think a comment is needed. you consider me ignorant because I see it as a disease. Congratulations, you are subject to manipulation! The worst thing is that you consider your shortcoming to be good quality. He would probably say the same about me and my "hatred" of this type of people. Now I think of something very ironic. Marius Kurkinski, who is openly the opposite, said in an interview that "he would not adopt a child because he is perversely the opposite of looking after a child." I don't think a comment is needed.

   Like I said, I prefer to be the son of a gay couple of 2 cool PEOPLE, because it's stupid to divide by sex, everyone is either a Man or not. I've read many cases of adopted children from a homosexual and they were normal because in Normal countries you are not ridiculed because you had 2 mothers or 2 fathers, this is normal. As there is no discrimination, there is no problem! The problem comes from those who ridicule and mock, who are at a very low level! The fact that you are raised by 2 people who love each other does not bother you and will not make you homo. Homo are more the children of supposedly "normal hetero" families! That's a fact! And when you are the son of such a family in BG, your life becomes Hell, because what will people say and I don't know what! I have gay friends and no, I'm not like that, but they are cool people and I even forget what they are, it's their job.

   Number 13/30, you prefer it because, according to you, you have lived in an environment where you lacked love. An unhealthy environment always leads to problems.

   You are very interesting to me, all of you who claim that there should be a good model of a man and a woman. How many single parents look after their children. Let's ban them by law, if there are no 2 parents, the state will take their children. Do you realize how absurd it is? And as for who becomes hetero or homo, well, they are just born that way. I am a woman, no matter how much I force myself, I cannot like another woman. It doesn't come from inside me. It is logical for them to be the same, just the same sex attracts them. Simple and clear. As for the children, I think that whoever wants to adopt a child must have this opportunity, if he is a good person and can provide for that child. Be it as an ordinary couple, a single parent, a gay or a gay couple. Don't you think that children will be better off growing up in homes? Moralizers think about it.

   Dear number 28/29, I will not be so vain, because the amount of information is not decisive for its quality. I will say again, however, that your suggestions are not supported by any evidence or fact, but are simply filled with hatred. Your understanding is from several centuries ago, when people did not have the information we have at the moment. Before, people had a different idea of ​​the shape of the Earth, but today, thanks to science, we have a real idea of ​​things. Here are the facts: The World Health Organization (WHO), an official body of the United Nations, removed homosexuality from the International Classification of Diseases on May 17, 1990. Today marks World Homophobia, Biphobia and Transphobia. I do not know what psychology you have read (if you have read at all) and what psychologists your statements (if any) are based on, but they certainly contradict what has been proven. As you advised, so I advise, do not believe everything you read. I stop following the topic because for me it is already exhausted.

   to number 31 - that's where the problem is - YOU prefer to be raised by a homosexual, this is your decision and your vision. How could a child adopted by a gay couple without being asked about his or her desire be considered interested? What if it's big enough to differentiate between gender and social roles? Things do not touch the selfishness of every couple who wants to have a child, but can not, things touch the interest of the child, and this does not only mean finances, support and love for him. This means socialization, education in values ​​and morals, attitude towards others, sex ... Do you understand that all these things will be presented to him through the prism of homoideology? In the tribe of cannibals you do not become vegan ...

   Wait a minute! Just because they're gay doesn't mean they're infertile! Yes, it is asked about adoption in the topic, but you (expectedly ...) have slipped away, so let me land you - if with or without the help of medicine and a third person of the opposite sex is created OWN for one partner child, how exactly someone does not to allow to grow it with your same-sex partner! ?? Well, there's no way, so stop with those rights. ... And privileges! The fact that they could say whatever they wanted, unlike the heterosexual ones, killed the fish!

   It is much better for a child to be adopted by a homosexual couple who have the opportunity to care for him and provide him with a quality education, health care and standard of living than to live in misery and violence in an orphanage or in a large family of social benefits somewhere in the ghettos. Separately, as number 35 aptly points out, gays and lesbians are neither impotent nor infertile, but are fully capable of conceiving and giving birth to their own child if they want one - and they do. From then on, with whom they will raise it is their choice and the state has no reason to interfere.

   №13 You say that you prefer to live with homosexuals only if they love you. They may love you, but they will certainly rip your ass apart and turn you into the same cocksucker as you are. Then you will also be from Yuraina and you will wave the fagot flag!

   I'm 31 To number 32 Of course, it wouldn't be better to grow up in orphanages or live with one parent. I have written several times that growing up in an unhealthy environment always leads to problems. But the opposite is not born that way. I want you to understand. It is difficult to create a stable family or to raise a child alone. I agree. But no matter how many wonderful people there are among the opposite, unfortunately they continue to be a problem for society. They try to get involved, they rely on other people's mercy, but they often abuse it. See how it is in the other countries that you praise me. Dear 33, even if you don't want to, you remain naked. Just because there is a law that "fights homophobia" does not mean that homosexuality is not a disease. Law and ethics have long been in great conflict. I accept the fact that this is no longer considered a disease. But that doesn't mean he isn't. If you were smart, you would understand that laws, unfortunately, don't always rely on morality. At one time, it was legal to kill human beings, and it was even considered a noble cause to remove some of them. Fortunately, it's different now, but that's exactly what should tell you that laws don't always lead to good. We have the same problem in our wonderful time. These innovations of today only seem to be aimed at equality and understanding. In fact, it is quite different. The so-called "fighters for social justice" have no idea what is really good and fair. I'm not saying we have to "kill everyone back," but there has to be a limit when it comes to family. Modern people consider themselves much smarter than us old-fashioned people, but the truth is that you are simply subject to propaganda. I'm sorry, that's my opinion. Who knows, maybe I'm wrong too. But I may be right. All political movements, such as "feminism" or "the fight against homophobia", are hidden behind a "noble" facade, but in fact have the personal benefit of those who promote them. I told you that what I write, I saw with my own eyes. So this is not about what we have read or what laws there are, it is about Life Experience. I wish you to think with your head and make sense of the things you encounter in life, and not to rely only on someone's writings. Unfortunately, the legislative system is no longer in line with morality and in many countries gender is in power. And this is not the only bad result. I hope this does not happen in Bulgaria. My understanding of "several centuries ago" does not refer to simple science, but to an eternal truth. Science cannot give us 100% truths about the world because it only applies to the material world. There are other things that are not ONLY "scientific facts" or pseudo-scientific things that are even dangerous. And this truth is proven in the experience of many people. A truth that many others try to discredit because it does not benefit them. I agree that the opposite can be good and loving people, I agree that they are not necessarily bad or dangerous, but tolerance for them sometimes crosses boundaries. And since you are so well-read and thinking, why don't you answer my question? How would things turn out if opposite men adopted a girl, for example? Don't rely on statistics, they are variable! Don't just rely on books and textbooks, they are sometimes written by hypocrites who deliberately impose wrong ideas. If not, human history would not be filled with so many atrocities and mistakes. You think we are moving towards progress, but in fact we are failing. This has been the case in every period of human history. It is ignorant to me to say that anyone who does not like the opposite is limited or malicious. Have you ever wondered why these people were rejected at all? You will probably say that it is because they are different and no one understands or accepts them because society is limited. Amy is not like that. That is not the reason. Because of these people, many misunderstandings occur and in many countries, they take away the rights of heterosexuals. And don't we have the right to look for them? You have a very interesting approach, dear homosexual, to avoid the essentials in my comment and to come out with the excuse that "this is full of hatred and no facts." You always get this far, when someone disagrees with modern trends. I had heard of some schools in Sweden where children are taught to be gender neutral. I don't know how you would comment on that, you must think it's a great thing. Well then migrate to those countries where everything is legal. They will soon legalize pedophilia. And I stop following the topic, because I am aware that there is no way to change someone's wrong views in one conversation. And that is not the goal. But life knows its job. Hopefully one day we will understand that SOME traditions have not been established by chance. And let's hope we turn our backs on these trends that are hurting us. They will soon legalize pedophilia. And I stop following the topic, because I am aware that there is no way to change someone's wrong views in one conversation. And that is not the goal. But life knows its job. Hopefully one day we will understand that SOME traditions have not been established by chance. And let's hope we turn our backs on these trends that are hurting us. They will soon legalize pedophilia. And I stop following the topic, because I am aware that there is no way to change someone's wrong views in one conversation. And that is not the goal. But life knows its job. Hopefully one day we will understand that SOME traditions have not been established by chance. And let's hope we turn our backs on these trends that are hurting us.

   35, we haven't slipped away. The topic asks "can a homosexual couple adopt a child in Bulgaria?" “. The answer is simple. No, he can't.

   I had already threatened to take part in the subject, but you, Mrs. 39, do not stop with the suggestions and not only - yours is already a low manipulation, provoked only by hatred. I can't understand why this malice is towards some people who are fighting for what they are. Just as you want to express your love freely, dear lady, so we want to (I deeply doubt, however, that you have a person to love at all - such an evil person would find it very difficult to allow love to himself). First, I want to clarify another lie of yours - the WHO is not a law-making body. Then I want to ask: What do you think you are? Science has already said its word. You are telling me about your life experience. I want to tell you that it costs nothing in the face of the FACTS. Looking at the world through the prism of hatred and homophobia is your personal problem, from which it is evident you will not escape. You said you read variable statistics, psychology and psychologists. Now, however, you say that this is not about what we have read. Here is a clear indication of complete untruth in your statements. Be honest with yourself at least! And the "eternal truth", I don't think it will be entrusted to you, has fallen by itself, unread anywhere ... are you actually some kind of psychic or fortune teller? !! Or just a person soaked in hatred? And I answer your question again with facts: The American Psychological Association concludes (adopted in July 2004) that: [...] there is no scientific evidence that the effectiveness of parenting is related to the sexual orientation of parents: for lesbians and gays parents are just as likely to provide a supportive and healthy environment for adolescents, as well as for heterosexuals. [...] Research shows that the adaptability, development and psychological health of children are not related to the sexual orientation of parents and that children of gay and lesbian parents develop as successfully as those of heterosexuals. I do not think that the facts need comment, even from your enlightened and moral consciousness, the opposite (for me) madam. In fact, being different does not make you less enlightened or moral. reverse (for me) ma'am. In fact, being different does not make you less enlightened or moral. reverse (for me) ma'am. In fact, being different does not make you less enlightened or moral.

   Whatever you come together with, you will become. Get together with people who like to suck piss and cum and you will drink it too.

   Up to 41 This time I will answer you briefly. I did not say that the WHO "creates laws", but that not all laws lead to good (in connection with the legalization of same-sex marriage and adoption by reverse). And "law" is not just a legal term, it also means "principle of action" (in connection with the celebration of May 17). P.P. Strange as it may sound, I have already found someone to love.

   Obviously we have a very different idea of ​​the terminology and when it is appropriate to use it, dear 43. Nowhere have I heard such celebrations defined as "laws", be it March 8 or June 1, or as in our case for May 17. And once you have found someone to love, I hope you will be able to look at the world through the eyes of love and try to show at least a little understanding to other people. You yourself would feel better, because living with hostility to life is certainly exhausting.

   to 41 - "The American Psychological Association concludes (adopted in July 2004) that: [...]" - this quote contradicts all your arguments in the same post. The World Health Organization is not a factor, and they cannot be trusted, but one of the hundreds of non-governmental organizations can :) :) In this way you fully supported the arguments of your opponent :) :) Not many years ago, "sciences" developed as eugenics and others. Today they are considered nonsense. For me, from a legal point of view, adoption from a homosexual family is not a problem, but from a social and moral point of view, it is not. In the same way, bombing towns and villages with civilians is militarily acceptable - especially if you are an American, but it is inhumane everywhere.

   Number 46, what pills are you on? :) :) Where did you find the contradiction and with what exactly did I support my opponent's arguments? And for the comparison you made, I will say that it is almost as inadequate as your entire comment. :) :)

   31, Send! ??

   I also promised myself not to write more, but I wanted to add something. Something that is not only related to this topic. Dear number 41, "facts" are things that are proven and verifiable in experience, not just something that is written and announced publicly. I am talking in principle, not just about the things we are discussing here. You are referring to sources who claim that research has been done and that evidence of something definite has been found. Well, have you been involved in this research? Have you seen with your own eyes the evidence for the things in question? Hardly. The only facts are that what you read is written somewhere. But the truth is not only revealed by reading, you have to see some things live and think with your head. But you also have to be impartial about some things, and as you can see, that's hard. Sometimes even impossible. For example, a reverse is willing to accept any information in defense of homosexuality, even if it is not true. :) No, I'm not picky and I'm not angry, I'm talking in principle. It's great that you're well-read, but I'll remind you again, don't believe everything you've read, or everything that seems profitable to believe! Needless to say, how many lies and false information are spread on the Internet and in general. You accept my words as lies. First, it would be more valid to say that they are misconceptions or mistakes. Second, if anyone can write lies, then what prevents your sources from being false? Think about it, the "facts" aren't just in books, textbooks, and the Internet. The facts are in life and experience. what you have read, or everything that seems profitable to you to believe it! Needless to say, how many lies and false information are spread on the Internet and in general. You accept my words as lies. First, it would be more valid to say that they are misconceptions or mistakes. Second, if anyone can write lies, then what prevents your sources from being false? Think about it, the "facts" aren't just in books, textbooks, and the Internet. The facts are in life and experience. what you have read, or everything that seems profitable to you to believe it! Needless to say, how many lies and false information are spread on the Internet and in general. You accept my words as lies. First, it would be more valid to say that they are misconceptions or mistakes. Second, if anyone can write lies, then what prevents your sources from being false? Think about it, the "facts" aren't just in books, textbooks, and the Internet. The facts are in life and experience. textbooks and on the Internet. The facts are in life and experience. textbooks and on the Internet. The facts are in life and experience.

   41 I wonder who is stopping you from expressing your love freely, like other people? What do you mean by "free expression of love" and what tone prevents you from doing so? No matter which association and which organization, what conclusion it has come up with, the most important and first in the world is the law of nature, which does not actually allow same-sex people to have a child, and you want to go against nature and have the right to raise children. from heterosexual. That is, to take away the right of the biological parents, which nature has endowed with the rights to be such, and this right to be given to you by various organizations. It is possible that various organizations believe that certain parents, such as gypsies, are not raising their children properly, however, as we can see, nature seems to have a different opinion and most often endows them with conceiving children. How many gypsies have you seen lined up in front of in vitro centers? It often happens that white educated people line up in front of in vitro centers, and nature endows "Ceca Kompiritsa" with 22 children. There must be a reason! And our rules invented by organizations and associations don't seem to matter to nature, do they?

   Well, I'm a heterosexual woman, but after reading the writings of 50 about nature, I just can't help but give a reference to my speech in another topic, in which I wrote specifically about nature and gypsies ... 

   51 - a very illogical comment.

   Since I see that you have read one point of view, it would be great to read the other. I am sending this article to anyone who is interested.