Really smart men are not boring at all, because they, besides the things you have said, have very good emotional and social intelligence.
In the question is not clearly highlighted boredom in conversation from sexual boredom and from sexual attraction. A man may be amusing to talk, but totally unattractive for sex (the classic case of a woman's "chat girlfriend"). Also, it may just not attract a woman sexually, even if she is not monotonous in bed and vice versa-not doing anything who knows what as a technique, interesting situation and place for the act, etc., but because of its primary masculinity to make the woman crazy and not even have a breath to think about what exactly she was doing...
There is something else, the primary males are not family people and the time they spend with their wives is not as much as the "good Guys" – and the longer you are with someone, the more likely you get bored.
I've been trying to pull off, and the result was disastrous. Then I tried to be a bad boy, CAD, but not because it came from inside, but to try a similar strategy and another catastrophe.
At some point I am I'm tired by these roles, that I have lost all kinds of strategies, I have been bad/good, smart/simple, I just wanted to be myself and stop playing roles, even if it cost me loneliness my whole life. When a woman in a situation does not kefi me, I tell her directly, as I think, without complying with how she will accept it. She is irritated for the moment, but I can feel her feeling somehow provoked to prove herself to me. The next moment something in it kefi me, I say and it openly, honestly and unnaturally. Without expecting anything in return, then you usually kefi.
If I'm not in a mood right now, I'm actually trying to smile and be a bit of an affable, if I'm in a good mood, I let loose jokes, etc. If someone does not like me, I have no need to like it, prove it, etc., and before I was influenced by people's opinion and wanted to please everyone, even if I had to play a role.
And it freed me and made a sincere SS sammia me. Now I feel light, free and happy and I am what I am with all my nedostci and I am OK. Children and animals therefore most love them because they are unforced, themselves and do not play any role.
My personal opinion, by my experience, is that things are based not on simple, boring or anything, but in simplicity. I've brought all kinds of men to whom their wives are attached. And beautiful, and not up there, and clever, and dull, and untalkative introverts even.
But what they have in common is they're not forced by my own. For example, there are introverts who are worried about being like that. They do not appear to be attached to them, but I also know such introverts, who nevertheless have charisma, just because they are OK with their introvert. Even women accept them as mysterious.
The smart and the good guys their problem is that they are often good from hypocrisy. IE are good in hopes of getting attention. Often they do not realize it themselves, but behave differently in the prosstvieto of beautiful and ugly women. This on a subconscious level is perceives and considered hypocrisy.
It's better to say some not-so-polite word from time to time, but to be sincere and casual, to be yourself, without trying to fool yourself and others how cool you are, than being hypocritical and playing some unconscious roles.
Just Prvosignalnite men can be anything, they're themselves, they're authentic, and they're OK with that. In the end, there are no perfect people, and those who love even their faults and those who are pretending to be perfect to deceive themselves and others.
Smart people, my boy, never, never boring. Especially your own kind.
Alpha, G. 29, which is only aroused by highly intelligent men
I agree with number four. I like myself and look for smart men, because with them I will never get bored and not only because of the conversations, with such a man can always find an interesting pastime.
With the rest is just a thrill that passes in a week.
Up to 3: Zodiac sign scales, right?
Are the smart ones boring? Is that the question? Did I get that right? So the smart guy is interesting!!!
Ж30
Four, maybe. If you do not know, there are dozens of types of intelligence (logical, emotional, social, creativity, general culture, sports intelligence, enterprising, etc.). In this sense, being clever is quite a stretch and a relative notion. Maybe you're socially intelligent, but you don't have a gram of logical intelligence.
So you're talking about an emotionally/socially smart person. Such a person can not really be boring. But one person can, for example, be a genius mathematician, scientist, engineer, that is, to have a brilliant logical/technical intelligence. Does that make him smart? Yes, definitely. But a logical clever person is not necessarily amusing. Even most times it's the opposite. Mathematicians and programmers, for example, are rarely fun.
6, I'm a marksman, and the zodiac sign is a complete nonsense.
Open, self-esteem and "vulgar" are not boring. The closed, unconfident and disturbing are boring. Smart and stupid there are both types. Don't confuse the concepts.
The smart man does not want a woman who is impressed by the vulgar.
It's not the opposite.
Yes, people who are simple and superficial have greater self-esteem and are more unloved, strange, but fact. But at the same time, they're so funny on the side that you're just throwing up.
Yes, most intelligent people are a little stuck in math assignments, in books, computers, etc.
But.
There are also third people who are intelligent and at the same time are quite sociable and energetic. 2 in 1-unexpectedly good combination. There are people and 3 in 1 and 4 in 1 and 8 in 1.
Not always the truth is black and white, sometimes there is a third option, that the fourth and fifth, and in this case there are 7 billion variants and all the different and unique
HAHASAAAA, Docket me #3 how I #6. My apologies, but it's really crap.
The fire comes from the woman. It should go crazy ~ ~ ~
I'm not a guy who's going to slap me and listen to their stupid. And these "males" often have a great relationship with mom. No thanks. That's what you see, that's what you're looking for.
Another theme filled with typical clichés.
Just another theme released, I guess, from some guy that chicks don't tie. And apparently the supporting comments will be some kind of "consolation".
Unfortunately, it's full of lonely people who, by all means, try to "explain" why they don't. And this is done by placing different labels and common denominators.
As it is here-women do not like intellectuals, but simple and primary males. Women fallen on bad guys...
Can't a man be smart and nice?
Do not forget the appearance, which is a major factor.
Everything is so individual and relative. Some people are simply not compatible due to a number of different reasons.
Instead of trying to find the "solution" of the task who is falling for whom, I advise you to be yourself and not to go into such topics.
G, 26
If it's boring.. So he's just a lettered.
We all have the capacity to learn some kind of matter-be it language/mathematics/physics or whatever. Some for shorter others for a longer period of time.
Sometimes you can perceive yourself as a clever someone who has spent more time/effort on something.
But I believe that intelligent people are curious, they like to watch the details and that's why they are good at communicating.
You can only be good at communication if you know how people react to certain situations, what types of behavior there are and you can judge what a person is interested in.
And that's just not happening.
If you're a dumb, needy woman, you're going to be bored.
I give you my fool-in the truest sense of the word... Be careful what you wish for
15, very clever answer. And I notice that when a man does not get in with women and starts some stupid theories about how his wives fallen I don't know what kind of fools, in Alfie, Betty and Omega and all sorts of nonsense.
What does it mean to be boring and what does it mean to light women? Are women a match to be light? Otherwise, to put a certain group of people under a common denominator is the biggest nonsense that can go through someone's mind! People with all kinds of character and social skills have all kinds of groups where someone can try to group them.
And for the last time, what does smart men mean? ARE those with a MENBE certificate for a certain number of points? Are stupid men a woman? Wealth, success, and knowledge are not tied to the IQ, in any way! The fact that someone's parents have money or companies, or power and their child gets a great post, power and accordingly money, doesn't make it smart. Just because someone's got a thing and that pays a good job doesn't make it smart. Surely there are more clever people on some construction than in offices and under IQ, and in knowledge, and in information and in quick thought and cunning. Cabbies I have met with a sharp mind and a lot of knowledge and such of large positions of companies or government posts with much smaller knowledge, skills, worldview, kindness and at all. There's no way to know all of you to define them. You have no measure to determine who's smart and who's not! I will write what many wise people have been saying for centuries. There are good and bad people. That's it!
I'm the most repulsed by a man being stupid. Maybe the biggest handsome is, but if he can't say anything meaningful, he's straight out. Even if it's one night, I'm still not sleeping with one. I consider myself a woman with a relatively good general culture and expect the same from the partner. The others who are obnoxious are all Alfie, businessmen, yuppies and smarty-pants.
Hi, things are too simple and come down to physics. You like feminine, well-formed women, right? Women like well-formed men with a broadcast. This is the basis of sexual attraction and it is instinctive, not amenable to rationalizations and philosophizing. If you want to be attractive to women go to the gym, train, do diets, develop your body.
There is nothing more anti-sexy than the intellectual superiority of the woman over the man. Or in other words, being blunt and that's obvious, it's not sexy.
For me, smart men are sexy... No matter how attractive a man is, he's not up there... The one that says... To look at him but not open his mouth.
PS I'm not talking about Einstein, but just about a normal smart man, a man you can talk to about a lot of things...
I'm an introvert, I've never had a girlfriend, I have a lot of knowledge, but they don't bring me anything. I'd rather sit on my own in front of a date.
Number 2 and number 3 say roughly everything adequately, which can be said on the subject.
Like 15 she told you without asking:
"Do not forget the look, which is a major factor. "
I'll add and
"Let's not forget the purse, which is a major factor. "
I'il give you some advice. Understand that man is a self-serving selfish creature, and in all his dealings with others he watches one thing – what he can get through them for himself. So any further questions about who "valued the other" will make you ridiculous...
The woman under "smart Man" understands a man who can earn money and knows how to treat her well. Just because you're smart in the sense you understand a lot of physics, for example, you are interested in philosophy. It does not shine. There is no use for this, so there is no way to price it. Fact, it's really easier to appreciate that "you're making her feel good", provoking emotions. These are not "clichés" and "labels", called Psychology, and this elementary...
The male attitude is an absolutely similar situation. How many men would fall for a woman because she's so smart? And men are looking for, to be beautiful, to be of a understood character or... Good to pretend as in most cases... Because that's the benefit they see for themselves.
These problems nowadays who looking for and "cherish in the other" are completely natural because the social formation is changed. What was appreciated back then was mostly relative to the need for survival. Today, at least we think it's a given, we're at the top, and the modern man is already starting to look clearer purely for his personal benefit... Which no longer needs to come from traditions or even practical judgement. Your biggest problem is that you think like "weak sex"--what to do to get me liking someone. With that thinking you won't get far...
Let's summarize here: Women fall for bad boys, then they're crying.
I don't know how sprang that all women liked jerks with inflated muscles and brazen behavior. Well, I don't like, I avoid them, and I can't stand anyone being disrespectful. That's why I left him because he always underestimated me with the kind of words--What do you know, what you're doing smart, and so on. Personally, I like smart, intelligent men who behave in a respectful way with a woman and in general with people. People in sense and tact. And I don't think a smart man is boring. With him I can talk on various topics, and learn different things, not to listen to who drank how many beers, who slept, and how much he bet on Euro football. So stop putting all the women under a common denominator. Yes, there are women who are going to get caught up in these men, but these women themselves don't have many interests outside of how to make their hair and in which house to go tonight. Once a person is reunited with someone, there is a reason for that. You look at yourself and find out why you don't attract any women, and don't find an excuse for not being perfect, but because women prefer jerks, you can't get a woman.
Smart men are for smart women. Glupendirite, and most of all, the fools can't understand that. The decachers are gathering with the deers and so...
Nature has invented it:)
I do not know who to believe: the thousands of women who in life show their behavior on a daily basis, that they prefer an anabolic type with a bad look and a soul and manners, or a few women here who vehemently deny it to be true... It's hard to choose...
Number 3 is closest to the truth in my opinion – the good guys are good because as small as they have been taught by the family environment. Mom's indulgence means mom is well-tuned and not threatening your survival. When you're not mad at mom, Mom's happy and smiling, so she loves you and gives you food. Since mothers are the archetype of all women in the lives of men, these men begin to behave well to all women in order to keep them happy and smiling. Except it doesn't lead to sexual attraction. Moreover, in today's civilization, there is an imperative of oneness-i.e. Culture imposes a man to have a woman, and when deep in the subconscious of the man this woman is mom, then such men are difficult, or even impossible, to take steps towards attracting another woman. This is the Oedipus complex, actually.
No31, my, thank you for the speech and for me!
No32, as it is sung, "Do not believe a woman's wife." Everything that's rattling around here is dust in the eye.
33 because you are all such big "specialists", for this we are mentally the most sick and unstable nation. And with the highest number of suicides and broken marriages, actually...
Number 32-women prefer the athletic type with masculine, sexual radiation with good manners and attitude.
And in my opinion, number 3 said true things, but I just want to say that a lot of women definitely don't feel provoked... to prove ourselves. I'm a woman, and yet in my teenage years, I realized, even at the end of it, that this demonstration makes you plasticine in the ' hands ' of someone, whether a man or a woman, regardless of what type of communication it is.
Usually, women/girls who want to prove themselves to a man do it, either because they have not yet realized, or because they are aiming to get financial support from him, they say more culturally.
They must be boring??? They may be very interesting. I think it's just as simple as that. What are you going to talk to a simple person about? It's a thing. What do you care about a simple person? He has to eat, sleep, and his sex is secured. So, is this an interesting person? What are you going to learn from him? Nothing! A person who nobody the same level is not interested in Intelektualni topics (in most cases it is). If he's going to the movies, I'll watch stupid movies. Exhibitions, museums, concerts....
Smart men are a boring guy for muffins. Those who are interested in clothing and makeup. One of the intelligent women is interested in clothing, makeup, and intellectual themes. Even if the husband is a man of the world, and of the women, not to the truth, if it is intelligent, it will be interested in the need of men to himself. He's going to have to learn something new. A kibbutz would seem dull. An intelligent man can talk about all kinds of topics: from interesting to popular. A simple man can speak for a very, very selfish thing.
This to be a man of your own or nobody NOTHING to do with the level of cleverness. He's this to temperament. -To the architect. There are simple men who are very well-off lovers and simple men who are boring in bed. There are intelligent men with whom Trpka and intelligent nobody.
I'm speaking from personal experience. At the moment, I have no relationship with a man who is extremely intelligent. The truth is that he's got a lot more to do with his cleverness than he does with his appearance (he's attractive, but he's not exactly my type, and there's to me and I don't like it.) And the sense of humor nobody how boring. I learned a lot from him. The cult is 10, and it's 24. a lot. If it wasn't for me, I would have wasted my time with him, and I would have made another one. So, let's say the books and the wine, you're going to be interesting.
To some point the author is right, but only for women who are either themselves primary (non-intellectual), or are intellectual, but are looking for a man to compensate for something. In general, however, smart and successful women prefer smarter and successful women. I'm not saying that physics doesn't matter, but thinking is of greater importance.
There are, however, two types of intelligent men--realized in work and business, men with self-esteem who know what they want.
There are, however, etc. Nerds (Ballurers) who actually have brains, especially gifted in mathematics and science, but have no self-esteem, live in their nursery and spend the whole day in front of the computer. Well, that kind of guy doesn't quote us among the educated intellectuals, among the more ordinary girls.
The woman needs a strong man beside herself, with whom she can create a family for the long term and who she can rely on.
We women also have many tasks and responsibilities, and we cannot be mothers to our children and to our husbands. With brains, you can't compensate for the lack of other qualities. And yes, even I would have preferred every fixed el. Technician in front of someone who's a computer scientist, regardless of income.
I myself am with a man who is both male and has a mind, but I have 2 girlfriends who are highly educated intellectuals and yet are respectively with el. Technician and fitter and are happy. Their men leave enough freedom to go out with girlfriends at various cultural events and to relive their hobbies, do not confuse them and do not harass them, respect their opinion, because they know that their wife is smarter than them, and accordingly she respects their ability to cope with practical things.
G 33
Number 36, and how many percents of these demanding women you write for are both yielding and really have the qualities to deserve such a man? :) One in a hundred, one in two hundred?
8, obviously we have a different understanding of the essence of the notion of intelligence. What you call intelligence and say that it is a lot of species, I call affinity for an occupation, a tendency to acquire a skill. The intelligence, in my opinion, is increased cognitive capacity, i.e. Ability to quickly and in-depth understand the world around you, ability to react appropriately and skill to learn qualitatively. Intelligence can not only run in a certain direction, the "Horse with lids", if it will be the best in its limited field of manifestation, is not intelligent in essence, but a mere appreciative. And I'm not talking about social and emotional characteristics at all. For example, the man I have wanted most is not very pleasant to communicate, in some respects, it is "lame" (from the generally accepted point of view), but it has such a systematic mind and developed intellect that it is not a problem to understand deeply as purely humanitarian spheres as literature and history of culture, as well as dry and mathematical material such as programming and accounting.
Alpha, G. 29
I did not manage to read all the comments, but still, the initial question is put inappropriate/completely wrong... and further reflections in its direction.
Not smart vs CAD/slick, etc. I'd say humbly against the open. A CAD/slick can be very clever and educated but still behave in a way that women like. It has nothing to do with what you graduate, what you do, and whether you behave in a certain way. Well, maybe a percentage of educated people behave in a non-open, but that's not the criterion.
Here I am, for example, to praise myself/When I was a young man, I had both qualities-I am an educated/a lawyer, and I was Hala... Take the strong music from the car, entering with a bang in the pubs, noisy company, speaking at a high tone like everything is your father, watching dirty/Then and I trained seriously/, at all, no inhibitions in opening conversations with women, crush, etc. etc. I've been liked by both muffins and very serious and valuable women who knew me better.
But the truth is, the chicks like the grown-up boys--not because they're vulgar, but just more interesting. Especially if we talk about the younger ones, get in their early 20s. As they grow a little, their value system is changing now.
1 doodle304 answered